4th YEAR LABORATORY - GROUP PRESENTATION EVALUATION

FKE-4722-08

Laboratory: ___________________________________________________________________

Course: _________

Group no.: _________

Title of project/ problem: ________________________________________________________________________ Group members: 3)___________________________________ No. 1. Criteria Presentation Organization Excellent 4 Presentation is clear, can easily be followed. Level is appropriate, speakers are easy to understand. Speakers pace is well planned for audience to understand. Aids prepared in professional manner with main points that stand out. Discuss purpose of work with relevant background information. Design of simulation, programming, experiment and methods used are clearly stated and described. Results and conclusions are clearly stated, thorough discussion on what results mean and implications of results. Provide consistently accurate information. Responds well to questions. Restates and summarizes when needed. 1)___________________________________ 4)___________________________________ Good 3 Presentation is generally clear, a few minor confusing points. Level is generally appropriate, some problems in understanding a speaker. One speakers pacing is too fast/slow, repetitive or skipping important details. Aids contributed but not all material is supported by aids. Proper font size. Some discussion on purpose of work, missing some background information. Design of simulation, programming, experiment and methods used are described with some items missing or insufficiently described. Description of results is generally clear. Some discussion on what results mean and implications of results. No significant errors are made. Generally responsive to questions. Fair 2 Presentation can be followed but with effort. Presentation is too informal or unprepared, information being read, speakers are difficult to understand. More than one speaker is too fast/slow, repetitive or skipping important details. Aids are poorly prepared or used inappropriately. Font size is too small. Some discussion on purpose of work, no background information. Methods used are insufficiently explained with large gaps in information. 2)______________________________________ 5)______________________________________ Poor 1 Presentation is very confusing and not clear at all. Level is inappropriate, Information being read, speakers cant be understood. Presentation is far too long/ short, speakers generally are too fast/slow. No aids are used or very poorly prepared. Little or no information on purpose of work, no background information. Methods used are not explained at all. Score

_______

Style in presenting scientific results Pace

_______

_______

Visual Aids (Power point presentation) 2. Introduction

_______

_______

3.

Summary of methods

_____ x 2 = ______

4.

Discussion of results and conclusions

5.

Response towards audience Total points

Little discussion on what results mean and implications of results. Enough errors are made to be distracting, but some information is accurate. Reluctantly interacts with audience. Responds poorly to questions.

Discussion on results is very difficult to follow. No discussion on meaning of results. Information is so inaccurate that makes the presentation unreliable. Avoids audience interaction. Not responsive to group.

_____x 2 = ______

________

________

Total (20%)

_____ / 2 = ______

Facilitator : __________________________________________________________ Signature: ____________________________

Date : _________________________