Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
F U E L P RO C ES S I NG T EC H NOL O G Y X X (2 0 0 7) XX X–XXX
www.elsevier.com/locate/fuproc
Article history: Methane conversion by plasma offers a promising route to produce higher value-added
Received 7 February 2007 products. As plasma reaction is a relatively complex process, kinetic modeling is necessary
Received in revised form to obtain a general pattern of the complex interaction on the basis of chemical reaction and
13 September 2007 products. In this paper, we present a method to obtain the kinetic rate coefficient (k) from
Accepted 17 September 2007 the experimental data. Although plasma reaction was classified as chemically complex
interaction, the reactions showed a certain pattern of the mechanism. In pure methane
Keywords: injection, the decomposition of methane by plasma could initiate coupling reactions and
Plasma produce C2H6, C3H8, and C4H10. Dehydrogenation of C2H6 into C2H4 and then to C2H2 could be
Dielectric barrier discharge clearly seen by the higher value of the reaction rate constant of C2Hn + 2 to C2Hn − 2. Using the
Methane rate constant values (k) obtained by this method, the pathways of the methane conversion
Kinetic reaction by a dielectric barrier discharge can be drawn.
© 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
⁎ Corresponding author. Clean Technology Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul
130-650, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82 10 2296 3748.
E-mail address: indarto_antonius@yahoo.com (A. Indarto)
0378-3820/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.006
Please cite this article as: A. Indarto, et al., Kinetic modeling of plasma methane conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge,
Fuel Process. Technol. (2007), doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.006
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2 F U E L P RO C ES S IN G T EC HN O L O G Y X X (2 0 0 7) XXX –XXX
production. Higher hydrocarbon production via methyl coupling In order to maintain the similarity of the reactor configu-
reactions occurred only with very short time and high tem- ration, e.g. electrodes gap distance, the reactor capacitance
perature reaction [12]. was checked by an RCL meter (Fluke model PM6304) before
Non-oxidative plasma methane conversion (NOPMC) offers a and after experiments. The reactor capacitance was in the
high selectivity towards C2+ products [11,13]. The reason for range of 9.0–10.0 pF at ambient air condition.
focusing on oxygen-free methane conversion is therefore to
maintain the high C2+ selectivity, while simultaneously en- 2.2. Input gas and measurement system
hancing the CH4 conversion and the C2+ yield, respectively. The
optimization of the NOPMC necessitates a detailed knowledge All experiments were carried out by introducing eight different
of the gas-phase reactions that occur and their kinetics. hydrocarbons: CH4, C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, n-C4H10.
In this present work, we develop a kinetic model for plasma CH4 has purity of 99.97% while other gases have purity of above
methane conversion to higher hydrocarbons. By finding the 99.9%. A Gas Chromatography (YoungLin M600D, column: 30 ft of
kinetic rate constant (k), the global pathway of the reactions could Hayesep D) has been used to quantitatively analyze the amount
be drawn easily. The model includes the gas-phase transforma- of products by flame ionization detection (FID) and thermal
tion of molecules that exist in the reactant and the products. conductivity detector (TCD). The FID system was capable to
Based on the comparison between experimental and simulation detect compounds in hundreds of ppm level. Considering the
data, it was found that the proposed kinetics well-accounted for volume expansion and the compression of products, the output
the reaction products of C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, and line was connected to a bubble flow meter to measure the flow
n-C4H10. The constructed model was applicable for the plasma difference of the products before and after reaction.
reaction using dielectric barrier discharge at atmospheric pres- The products concentration and reactants conversion were
sure (c.a. 1 atm) and ambient temperature (c.a. 25 °C). The formulated as:
presented kinetic model is a part of efforts encompassing the
moles of Cx Hy converted
oxygen-free plasma chemistry for methane conversion. Conversion of Cx Hy ¼ 100 ð1Þ
moles of initial Cx Hy
moles of Cm Hn produced
2. Experimental setup and algorithm Concentration of Cm Hn ¼ 100 ð2aÞ
total moles products
The reactor used in the experiments is a cylindrical pyrex tube In the kinetic model, the possibility of molecular transforma-
(ID of 7.5 mm) with 2 parallel-straight wires (0.2 mm diameter, tion to any possible compounds that exist in the products or
stainless steel) as the inner metal electrode and silver film the reactants was calculated. The reaction rate (dC / dt) of
coated at the outer side of tube as the outer electrode. The single hydrocarbon was measured experimentally by injecting
effective volume and length of the reactor were 8.8 ml and pure compound to the reactor. Then, the product distribution
200 mm, respectively. A high frequency alternating current was calculated and the rate of molecular transformation
(AC) power supply with a maximum voltage of 20 kV was converted to other molecules could be obtained. From the
connected to the electrodes. The supplied power to the reactor experimental analysis, eight hydrocarbons existed in the
was maintained constant at 60 W, measured by a watt meter products and those were (1) CH4, (2) C2H2, (3) C2H4, (4) C2H6,
(Metex model M-3860M). (5) C3H6, (6) C3H8, (7) i-C4H10, and (8) n-C4H10. As we assume
Please cite this article as: A. Indarto, et al., Kinetic modeling of plasma methane conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge,
Fuel Process. Technol. (2007), doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.006
ARTICLE IN PRESS
F U E L P RO C ES S I NG T EC H NOL O G Y X X (2 0 0 7) XX X–XXX 3
that the reaction will occur in a 1st order reaction, the calcu- pressure (∼1 atm) and room temperature (∼25 °C). The flow rate
lation of each compound is as follows: and supplied power were maintained similar at 30 ml/min and
60 W, respectively. These values were obtained from the
dCi Xn Xn
¼ kij Ci þ kji Cj ð3Þ optimization of the previous research [14] in order to avoid large
dt j¼1 j¼1 amount of unknown products and carbon deposition which were
difficult to measure.
where n is the maximum value of i and j for k-set which is
Fragmentation reactions of methane into smaller mole-
8 and kij denotes the reaction rate constant of i molecule that
cules were more favorable than synthesis reactions of higher
converts into a specific j molecule. The assumption was
hydrocarbons at lower input flow rates and higher supplied
chosen to simplify the calculation and make the data
power [11,15,16]. As higher hydrocarbons are more useful and
comparable to each other. The value of kij will be 0 if i = j.
valuable products, increasing flow rates and lowering supplied
2 3
dC1 2 32 3 2 32 3 power can be the way to avoid above problems.
6 dt 7 k11 : : : k18 C1 : : : C8 k11 : : : k81 C1 : : : C1
6 7
6v
4 dC 5
7 ¼ 4 v ⋱ v 54 v ⋱ v 5 þ 4v ⋱ v 54 v ⋱ v 5 Table 1 shows the conversion rate of input gas and the
8 k81 : : : k88 C1 : : : C8 k18 : : : k88 C8 : : : C8 distribution of products after treated by dielectric barrier
dt discharge at flow rate of 30 ml/min and supplied power of
ð4Þ
60 W. Except for the experiments initiated by C2H2 (run 2) and
By solving Eq. (4), the calculation will result a set of kinetic C3H6 (run 5), the total C and H atom balance between the
rate constant (k) which can be arranged as: reactants and products of all plasma process approximately
2 3
0 k12 : : : k18 closed to 100% which means that the molecular transforma-
6 k21 0 ::: k28 7 tion of reactants to the products were almost perfectly
k¼6 7: ð5Þ
4v v ⋱ v 5 identified. Small amounts of carbon deposition on the wall
k81 : : : k87 0 and inner electrode were found but, as the values were
relatively small, those could be neglected in the calculation.
The value of k was obtained by an error minimization
It was a good achievement, since to obtain correct calculation
between model data and experimental data. In this particular
of the kinetics, the C and H balance between reactants and
case, the minimization calculation was done employing
products should be equal. In the case when C2H2 and C3H6
Matlab sub-routine module ‘fminsearch’ after simultaneous
were used as the reactant, the reaction produced a lot of solid
integration of Eq. (4) using ‘ode23s’. The uniqueness of the
carbon and/or soot. We could not confirm whether the solid
result was measured by calculating the mean-squared error of
product was coming from the polymerization of C2H2 and C3H6
each set value of kij obtained from eight different input gases
or agglomeration of monomolecular carbon. However, C2H2
which is expressed as:
and C3H6 are well-known as soot precursor in the pyrolysis or
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi combustion process [17]. In this case, the similar phenomenon
uPP 2
u
t k ki has likely occurred in the plasma process.
s¼ ð6Þ
n1 From Table 1, it can be figured out that when methane was
the reactant, the products were dominated by ethane (C2H6),
P
where n is the maximum size of k-set which is eight, k is the with selectivity of 37.5%, propane (C3H8), 25.6%, and butane
mean value of k-set. (normal- and iso-C4H10), 25.4%. This product composition has
a similarity with the result of Thanyachotpaiboon et al. [18],
who used DBD system and AC power supply similar to ours,
3. Results and discussion with slightly higher selectivity of propane and butane. The
higher value of the selectivity was due to the use of a different
In order to obtain the rate constant k in Eq. (5), eight hydrocarbon method in the selectivity calculation. Thanyachotpaiboon
gases: CH4, C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, and n-C4H10 were et al. was using fractional method instead of carbon balance-
introduced separately to the plasma reactor at atmospheric based calculation that we used.
CH4 13.8 86.20 0.17 0.45 2.04 0.00 0.93 0.26 0.43 0.95 1.01
C 2H 2 12.0 3.03 81.95 1.45 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.87 1.13
C 2H 4 15.7 2.67 3.31 84.30 0.68 0.38 0.67 0.67 1.84 0.95 0.98
C 2H 6 9.4 0.96 1.27 2.10 90.57 0.16 0.89 0.05 0.85 0.97 0.98
C 3H 6 9.8 0.70 1.60 2.48 0.46 80.16 2.23 0.99 0.57 0.89 1.01
C 3H 8 11.7 2.31 0.47 2.03 0.95 2.54 88.27 0.09 0.00 0.97 0.96
i-C4H10 16.7 2.36 2.35 4.02 1.65 3.19 1.39 83.33 5.94 1.04 1.00
n-C4H10 8.4 1.27 1.08 2.29 1.28 1.36 1.46 2.33 91.63 1.03 0.98
of Cm Hn produced
Note: [1]The calculation of H balance includes the H2 in the output and the selectivity of component follows: selectivity of Cm Hn ¼ n4 moles
moles of CH4 converted .
All data were obtained at a flow rate of 30 ml/min and a supplied power of 60 W.
Please cite this article as: A. Indarto, et al., Kinetic modeling of plasma methane conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge,
Fuel Process. Technol. (2007), doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.006
ARTICLE IN PRESS
4 F U E L P RO C ES S IN G T EC HN O L O G Y X X (2 0 0 7) XXX –XXX
Higher ethane selectivity could be obtained by coupling compared to the original reactant. Instead of above conversion
reaction of methyl radical which also suggested by Zhao et al. reactions, C3H6 could be formed by dehydrogenation of C3H8
[19]. Abundant amounts of methyl radical could combine with (reverse reaction of Eq. (13)) or fragmentation of i-C4H10. This
C2 molecules to form C3 hydrocarbons or with C3 molecules to idea was supported by results of pure C3H8 and i-C4H10 injection.
form C4 hydrocarbons [20]. When C3H8 and i-C4H10 were the reactant, the selectivity of C3H6
In the case of other products, e.g. acetylene and ethylene, reached 44% and 17%, respectively. The proposed reactions
those compounds could be produced due to stepwise dehydro- mechanism follows:
genation reaction of ethane. The tendency of acetylene
C3 H8 →C3 H6 þ H2 ð15Þ
formation from ethylene and ethylene from ethane by dehy-
drogenation reactions was clearly seen from run-4 of Table 1.
iC4 H10 →C3 H6 þ CH4 ð16Þ
When ethane was the reactant, the selectivity for ethylene was
29% which is two times higher compared when acetylene was
used as the reactant. A similar phenomenon also occurred in the iC4 H10 →C3 H6 þ CH2 þ H2 : ð17Þ
case of acetylene formation. The selectivity of acetylene C3H6 produced from Eq. (16) could be suffered from reverse
production reached 27.7% when ethylene was the reactant reaction of n-C4H10 formation
and only the selectivity was 3.2% when methane was the
reactant. An interesting phenomenon occurred when acetylene C3 H6 þ CH4 →nC4 H10 : ð18Þ
was used as the reactant which could be an important part to
In this case, the probability of Eq. (17) is higher than Eq. (16)
describe the kinetic pathways. Acetylene was converted mostly
as high concentration of H2 was found in the product stream.
into methane, 40%, and at the same time, it also produced
Moreover, coupling reaction of :H2 diradical could form C2H4,
ethylene (39%), and n-butane (15%). Those products required
as its selectivity reaches 14%, follows [21]:
hydrogen to react with acetylene.
CH2 þ CH2 →C2 H4 : ð19Þ
C2 H2 þ 3H2 →2CH4 ð7Þ
Taken from all above explanation, the reaction pathways of
C2 H2 þ H2 →C2 H4 ð8Þ methane conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge at flow rate
of 30 ml/min and supplied power of 60 W are shown in Fig. 2.
2C2 H2 þ 3H2 →iC4 H10 ð9Þ
4. Kinetic model
2C2 H2 þ 3H2 →nC4 H10 : ð10Þ
In order to supply H2, fragmentation of C2H2 as the In order to quantify the rate of the reaction, a kinetic model
intermediate reaction was needed. was built according to the algorithm (Section 2.3). Some
assumptions were used to reduce the complexity of the
C2 H2 →2C þ H2 : ð11Þ
reactions: (i) all the reactions were first order; (ii) the formation
As the total C atom of gaseous products was only 87% of coke and hydrogen was negligible in the model. All
compared to the total C atom of reactant, reaction 11 high calculations were performed using Matlab by exploiting
possibly occurred in plasma zone and responsible for the ‘ode23s’ to solve a set of differential equations in Eq. (4). The
formation of molecular solid carbon formation. The proposed reaction rate constants, k (shown in Eq. (5)) were obtained by
reaction 11 was also supported by hydrogen atom ratio of the least-square calculation of the calculated values and the
products to the reactant which closed to 1 that means there experimental results using ‘fminsearch’ module. The estimat-
was no loss of hydrogen atom in the process. ed reaction rate constants (k) are listed in Table 2. Higher k
Coupling reactions between two C2 compounds could form value means the reactant transformation to certain product is
butane and the long-chain type (n-C4H10) was more favorable easier.
than the iso-type (i-C4H10). It was simply because the adduct From Table 2, the value of the k-set supports our previous
reaction of two C2 moieties occurred without any molecular statements that the decomposition of methane will produce
steric hindrance although later on, it converted to iso-form as C2H6 (k14), C3H8 (k16), and C4 (k17 and k18). Low value of k13
iso-form is thermodynamically more stable than normal-type. (CH4 → C2H4) and k12 (CH4 → C2H2) shows that acetylene and
ethylene were not coming from the direct methane conver-
C2 H4 þ C2 Hx þ ð8−xÞ=2 H2 →nC4 H10 : ð12Þ
sion. Losing two H's and coupling with another triplet :CH2 to
In the case of C3H6 consumption process, the reactions form ethylene or losing three H's and coupling with duplet ·CH
occurred by two main parallel ways: required many steps. There was also a possibility of attack by
C3 H6 þ H2 →C3 H8 ð13Þ
C3 H6 →C2 H4 þ C þ H2 : ð14Þ
Please cite this article as: A. Indarto, et al., Kinetic modeling of plasma methane conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge,
Fuel Process. Technol. (2007), doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.006
ARTICLE IN PRESS
F U E L P RO C ES S I NG T EC H NOL O G Y X X (2 0 0 7) XX X–XXX 5
(1) CH4 0 (0.0) 0.06 (5.3) 0.18 (11.6) 0.5 (6.5) 0.02 (7.5) 0.3 (9.8) 0.13 (10.7) 0.29 (11.1)
(2) C2H2 1.31 (8.1) 0 (0.0) 0.17 (12.0) 0.18 (8.4) 0.31 (38.6) 0.06 (20.7) 0.14 (16.1) 1.47 (9.1)
(3)C2H4 0.08 (8.5) 1.79 (8.6) 0 (0.0) 0.01 (18.9) 0.22 (6.2) 0.02 (15.6) 0.25 (9.1) 1.01 (9.9)
(4) C2H6 0.11 (17.3) 0.3 (6.1) 1.03 (9.2) 0 (0.0) 0.07 (18.0) 0.67 (21.7) 0.15 (4.7) 0.94 (13.7)
(5) C3H6 0.09 (21.8) 0.23 (35.1) 0.33 (7.8) 0.14 (7.0) 0 (0.0) 0.53 (10.9) 0.54 (8.5) 0.53 (7.1)
(6) C3H8 0.06 (13.5) 0.97 (11.3) 0.16 (28.2) 0.49 (8.1) 0.48 (10.8) 0 (0.0) 0.7 (7.9) 0.97 (13.3)
(7) i-C4H10 0.06 (20.6) 0.67 (36.2) 1.28 (7.7) 0.89 (21.7) 1.28 (8.2) 1.45 (8.3) 0 (0.0) 2.45 (8.9)
(8) n-C4H10 0.74 (7.2) 1.07 (21.8) 2.27 (6.4) 0.39 (8.0) 1.05 (18.3) 0.33 (23.8) 1.38 (7.7) 0 (0.0)
−1
Note: The value of kij refers to the value of reaction rate coefficient of molecule i to molecule j. All k values are in mol min ; the standard
deviation values inside the parentheses are in % unit.
other species before completing the radical coupling reaction. produce ·CH3, :CH2, or ·CH. The existence of C1 radical
Acetylene and ethylene were formed by stepwise dehydro- hydrocarbons could help to increase the selectivity of C2, C3,
genations of ethane. The dehydrogenation reactions of C2H6, and C4 compounds by coupling reactions. Unfortunately, as
occurred in the plasma reaction, could be detected by k43 this method is just counting the tendency of the reaction
(C2H6 → C2H4), 1.03 min− 1, then k32 (C2H4 → C2H2), 1.79 min− 1. pathway, the presence of intermediate species could not be
The trend of the result was similar to that of Jeong et al. [22] confirmed scientifically.
which was also suggested by Kozlov et al. [23] that pathways of By taking only the important and significant k values, we
C2 dehydrogenation reactions will follow: can draw a global reaction pattern diagram of methane
conversion (presented in Fig. 2). It shows that C2H4 has an
CH4 YC2 H6 Y C2 H4 YC2 H2 : important role as a branching agent to diversify the reaction
mechanism. This idea is supported by the data because C2H4
The above stepwise dehydrogenation reaction was also
was easier to produce than other C2 compounds from the
identified in the thermal coupling of methane [24].
cracking of higher hydrocarbons (C3 and C4). To form C2H6, the
Interestingly, n-butane hydrocarbon could be formed
reactions should be terminated by recombination reaction
from any hydrocarbons species, confirmed by higher value
with H2. On the other hand, C2H2 formation required further
of kx8, N0.5 min− 1, except for methane. This result could
dehydrogenation reaction to remove two hydrogen atoms.
answer the high yield production of C4 compounds that
Instead of dehydration reaction into C2H2, coupling reaction of
usually produced in DBD using AC power supply. This result
C2H4 could form n-C4H10 (Eq.(12)) or react with CH2 radical to
confirmed the previous research that the addition of higher
form C3H6.
hydrocarbons, e.g. ethane, on plasma methane conversion
In order to check the correctness of the model, a binary
would increase the selectivity of butane [18]. Later on,
mixture of methane and acetylene was injected to the reactor
intermolecular transformation of n-butane to i-butane
at the total flow rate of 30 ml/min and supplied power of 60 W.
occurred as i-butane is thermodynamically more stable
As shown in Fig. 3, the model calculation was found to be in
than n-butane, showed by k87 (1.38 min− 1). In a parallel
good agreement with the experimental data. It also means
way, homolytic dissociation of n-butane to C2 hydrocarbons
that the proposed values of reaction rate constant, k, as well as
(acetylene and ethylene) is confirmed by k82 (1.07 min− 1) and
the model can rationalize the plasma mechanism of methane
k83 (2.27 min− 1) or into propene by k85 (1.05 min− 1). Usually,
and/or hydrocarbon conversion.
decomposition of higher hydrocarbon to lower hydrocarbons
results higher reaction rate constant k (around 0.5–2 min− 1)
compared to the formation of higher hydrocarbons from the
lower ones. It was acceptable since the dissociation reaction,
e.g. decomposition of one butane molecule, will produce
double C2 molecules or even more if it decomposed to C1
molecules.
Instead of coming from the intermolecular transforma-
tion of n-butane, the formation of i-butane could be formed
from C3 compounds, k58 = 0.54 min− 1 and k68 = 0.7 min− 1.
Although i-butane will be consumed in further reaction mostly
to n-butane, by k78 = 2.54 min− 1, we have to consider the
conversion comparison between n-butane and i-butane. The
conversion rate of i-butane is 10% lower than that of n-butane,
which means that i-butane is more stable than n-butane.
The reverse reaction to produce methane was mostly
coming from acetylene, confirmed by k21 (1.31 min− 1) which
is higher than for other reactants. From this data, we are also Fig. 3 – The comparison between experimental and model
able to determine that the decomposition of higher hydro- simulation results of binary mixture methane + acetylene at
carbons will not produce CH4 as the product but instead will the flow rate of 30 ml/min and supplied power of 60 W.
Please cite this article as: A. Indarto, et al., Kinetic modeling of plasma methane conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge,
Fuel Process. Technol. (2007), doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.006
ARTICLE IN PRESS
6 F U E L P RO C ES S IN G T EC HN O L O G Y X X (2 0 0 7) XXX –XXX
Please cite this article as: A. Indarto, et al., Kinetic modeling of plasma methane conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge,
Fuel Process. Technol. (2007), doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.006