Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
this classic spiritual scripture has unoergone many translations
over the centuries. Consequently, the interpretation ol its
original woroing has varieo in each renoition.
the opening
woros are given as the Great Way, or Supreme or Ferlect Way,
in the sense ol ultimate, or transcenoent or Absolute. An
alternate usage lor Way or Tao is Mino ,or Buooha Mino,,
again a relerence to the universal or absolute Fresence which
knows no limitation.
Hsin, in the poem`s title, inoicates ,in one sense ol its usage,
Mino, as a lormless Fresence which is the source ol all being. As
useo in a secono sense, Hsin also relers to an awareness ol this
ubiquitous Fresence, to the extent ol realizing one`s ioentity
with it, thus generating a complete trust in the omnipresent
Mino. In the trust ol this Mino, there is no separation lrom it,
no oissimilarity: Hsin Hsin.
Ming is a treatise, a teaching, in this case, in a versineo
lormat similar to the Dao oe jing or the Sermon on the
Mount. So the title ol the Hsin Hsin Ming has been translateo
variously as ,lor instance, Alnrming the Buooha-Mino, or The
Mino ol Absolute Trust.
Let`s look at the secono stanza, consioer the origin ol the
poem, ano then explore these initial aomonitions in greater
oepth.
*
What Suzuki Roshi saio ol a similar Zen poem, written by the Eighth Chinese
Fatriarch, applies to the Hsin Hsin Ming: When a Buoohist reaos it, it is a
Buoohist text, ano when a Daoist reaos it, it is a Daoist text.
o is the Japanese name lor what was originally calleo C/`oo in China. Ano S/io
)io Mi is the Japanese name lor the Hsin Hsin Ming.
Eoli/toc Jc.i.
!.
When you deviate from it,
You fall into duality.
If you want to comprehend the Tao,
Remain impartial.
1
%
the authorship ol the Hsin
Hsin Ming to Chien-chih Seng Ts`an ,also calleo, by the
Japanese, Kanchi Sosan, or Sosan Zenji,. He is consioereo to
be the thiro successive Chinese patriarch,
*
or oharma heir,
ano the 30th successor in a lineage tracing itsell back to the
Buooha ,who illumineo Inoia in the perioo arouno 0 B.C.,.
Not all Buoohist scholars agree with the attribution ol this
text to Seng Ts`an. Some leel it may have been written alter
o0o A.D., the year when the Thiro Fatriarch oieo.
Fart ol the problem with attributing the Hsin Hsin Ming
to Seng Ts`an is that so little is known about him. When we
set asioe the mythical tales which typically attach to venerable
spiritual ngures, all we can reliably say is that Seng Ts`an was
consioereo, like Buooha, to have been enlighteneo. Ano so,
we can say ol the author ol the Hsin Hsin Ming only that
he ,assuming it was not a she, is pointing to a neeole`s eye
through which he himsell evioently has passeo. Regaroless
ol its authorship, enlightenment teachers throughout the past
centuries have citeo the poem as a touchstone, right up to the
present oay.
*
The Iirst Fatriarch is saio to be Boohioharma, allegeo to have brought the
essence ol Zen precepts to Taoist China circa 20 A.D.