WHAT MOST NON-SWINGING CHRISTIANS ARE SAYING: By Wisevirgin Sayings from most christians that you hear regarding

swinging.... "I am a born again Christian but am unsure of entering into this lifestyle becau se of the religious rammifications. I struggle with it internally but would appr eciate any input on the subject you can offer." "Is it right? Is it wrong?" If you attend a church regurally, most from the army of "churchies" will tell yo u that it is adultery and it is wrong. Why? Because the church turns a blind eye and decides to NOT preach and teach about s exuality, swinging and polyamory! Why? Because sexuality is the greatest forum to enhance, heighten and exhault one's s elf-confidence. When multitudes of self-confidence take place within a community , then true power over guilt and control is released! Since religion is used as a form of control, and built upon man's doctorine rather than God-ordained doct rine, church members and family will certainly have a field day with you if disc overed that you are a swinger! And, IF you are found out (these things have a wa y of getting out), be prepared for the consiquences to be singled-out from those in your controlling Congregation! Churchies will launch at you, when discovered, as this is a very hot button to p ush as a topic and you are more than likely to be judged right off as a sinner w ith pointed fingers toward you! Why? Because they like to preach that the bible says that it is wrong to even look at another women with lustful eyes. Even though the bible does not say you will ac tually burn in hell for simple desire towards another women, but there is the co ntext of actually doing all you can to actually get ('lust after') a married wom en away from her married husband. It is always best to do your own research and READ the bible to see what it really says about sex. You do not have to give up church to be a swinger. "Lusting" after another woman, such as wanting another swinging partner's lover a NOT a sin! Why? Because the context of committing adultry "in your heart" to "lust after her" (M atthew 5:27-31) is in the context of wanting a "MARRIED" woman already taken. Ma tthew 5:31 says, "It has been said, 'Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.'" Be sure to clearly understand, as well, that the mor e detailed specifics of Matthew 5:27-31 is about the context of NON-CONTROL! If a single or married male is seeking a woman already possessed/taken by the act o f repeat copulation from her male lover, AND, you proceed to do WHATEVER it take s to get her from him (WITHOUT her lover's permission or behind his back), then, IT IS ADULTERY even if you lusted for her "in your heart!"

If you have permission from a married male to have his wife sexually is it still sin? NO! But if you recopulate in her (barebacked creampie) and send her home to cont inual sexual unions with her husband, then perhaps this what the bible is saying is in fact "adultery" when it was permitted by all involved in a swinging funct ion/act! Why? Perhaps it is NOT an abomination if the women (historectomy) or male (vascectomy ) has their tubes tied or fixed! Generally are most open and encourage multiple swinging partners/lovers when they get medically fixed. Usually if married and i n the child rearing/furtile stage before menopause, swinging couples wont unless pushed for copulation by bareback. Deut 24:4 says, "Her former husband who sent her away is not able to turn back t o take her to be to him for a wife, after that she hath become defiled [by anoth er's copulation]; for an abomination it [is] before Yahova, and thou dost not ca use the land to sin which Yahova thy God is giving to thee an inheritance." Do you fill her up with seed your too and send her home to her husband to recopu late? If so, there are scriptures against going back and forth in copulations (r ules for the women, but not the men). Reason being, it confusses the DNA and wea kens her DNA for future generations. But since she is not generating a child aga in, you should be ok because the context says "abomination to the land" indicati ng perhaps uglier babies for the future country. Do countries that have the most beautiful women in the world, is that because their women were stoned for adult ery during the generations according to the Word? Widows, having been sexually intimate (consistant bareback copulation) with thei r own husbands, are under command to marry (1 cor 7:8,9; 1 tim 5:14). Is it ok f or the to have another male lover? Sure! As long as the second swinging male isn 't playing behind his back, AND is either pulling out (masturbation by intercour se), has his tubes tied (vasctecomy) or is wearing a condom/rubber! If your regu lar female wife (by regular copulation - "one flesh") is swinging behind your ba ck, both her new male lover AND your wife is committing adultery, even if it is lust "from the heart." Jer. 3:3:1 Saying, "Lo, one sendeth away his wife, And she hath gone from him, A nd she hath been to another man, Doth he turn back unto her again? Is not that l and greatly defiled?" Most Churchies will totally disagree with swinging of at least threesomes of tho se of two males and one female (MFM or MMF)! Why? Because of the church view of the below bible verse. Leviticus 18:22 says, "If a man lies with a man as one lies a women, both of the m committed an abomination!" Leviticus 20:13 goes further to say, "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." The main context here is they keywords 'as a woman' and that implies that the ma le shouldn't copulate into his male lover, and should pull out.

Paul was against any male on male action, but the verse from the original Hebrew is all about the copulation should not mix, thus why a woman is stoned for adul tery as again she intermixed semon (seeds) from both males. Eunichs, in the bible, were just for being servants as well as SEXUAL servants! Eunichs had total sexual liberty and gave sexual functions of pleasing the Queen while the King was away on business as well as MMF or MFM's or moresomes. Why? Because a eunich's testicals (balls) were cut off and NO DNA (semen/blood) was m ixed, copulation yes, but no seed (semen/blood/DNA) was causing an abomination. Also see: Deut 23:13 (excrement); Deut 24:1 (indecency/adultery); Lev 18:6-11,17 -21 (relatives of close family DNA not to mix/seen naked); Ex 20:26 & Ex 28:42 ( bare naked flesh not to touch holy altar); Gen 9:22-23 (nakedness of Father); Ge n 42:9 ("undefended parts"/gentitals). Another scripture the Churchies bash swingers with is the "abomination" for the Sin(s) of Sodom in Ezekiel 16:49-50 which says, "Behold, this was the iniquity o f thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in he r and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and need y." You see, it wasn't fire from Heaven because of sexual acts of men with men, if you remember, there were male angels being so attractive, that the male human s were contemplating "ANAL RAPE" over them! It was NOT the mere act of "male li es with male"; but the mere "PRIDE" and "ARRROGANCE" of mixing seed 'BETWEEN' tw o entirely different species! Have you ever seen an ape actually try to rape a m onkey for sex?! Apes are aggressive, but not so proud as to actually and sexuall y rape a lesser monkey vessel for sex!!