Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Boards and Cords: Discriminating Types of Articial Cranial Deformation in Prehispanic South Central Andean Populations
T. G. OBRIENa* AND A. M. STANLEYb
Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614, USA b Department of Mathematics, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614, USA
a
ABSTRACT
For over a century, a number of ambiguous typologies have been employed to distinctly categorise types of articial cranial deformation. This paper provides a quantitative method, based on multiple dimensions and discriminant function analysis, by which to assign skulls not only into discrete categories: deformed or not, but also by type: annular or tabular. A series of prehispanic, adult, human crania (n=469) from archaeological sites in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and Peru represented by both normal and articially deformed specimens, provide craniometric data for four measurements across the vault: maximum cranial length, breadth and height and the frontal chord. These data are used to develop three indices which in turn are used to compute two discriminant functions. Results are plotted on a territorial map whereby the type of deformity can be determined. When these methods were applied to a comparative cranial sample of nondeformed skulls from South America, 100% of the samples was found to be nondeformed. When these methods were applied to the samples which were subjectively classied a priori by the rst author as nondeformed, 81.3% of the samples were found to be nondeformed. This study demonstrates the value of a more objective and quantitative method by which to classify articial cranial deformation, and thus provides a new approach. Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key words: annular; craniometrics; cultural cranial modication; discriminant function; head moulding; South America; tabular
In physical anthropology, the skull is traditionally the best part of the skeleton by which to determine sex and/or ancestry for either forensic identication purposes or for computing ancient group connections, such as with biodistances. To do this, a plethora of craniometric data is usually collected and subjected to multivariate statistical analysis. However, if a skull shows signs of being intentionally altered, it is often deemed unusable from a strict craniometric perspective (Cocilovo, 1975). Therefore, it is often that such skulls are discarded from analysis. There are two problems with this tacit dismissal of valuable cranial information: rst, interpreting whether or not a cranial vault has been intentionally altered has been and continues to be an extremely qualitative decision; and second, if
* Correspondence to: Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA. 506140513 USA. e-mail: tyler.obrien@uni.edu
the skull is judged to be altered, then it is often classied into a certain style based, once again on ambiguous typological systems; such systems will be described later. The objectives of this paper are to resolve these problems by providing a quantitative approach to determining the metric limitations to whether or not a skull has been articially deformed, and if so, then to discretely categorise its type; at least for this region of the south central Andes from which the samples used herein originate. For this paper, the phrase articial cranial deformation (ACD) is used to denote what others have called cultural cranial modication, head binding, skull moulding or variants thereof (Ellen FitzSimmons & Prost, 1998; Blom, 2005; Torres-Rouff & Yablonsky, 2005; Perez, 2007). Archaeological evidence and ethnohistoric accounts document ACD as a human cultural phenomenon found on almost every continent (Dingwall, 1931). As a biocultural process, it is dened as the product of
Received 15 December 2010 Revised 12 May 2011 Accepted 5 July 2011
Historical background
In the last century, a steadily increasing trend has emerged in the study of ACD from a biological anthropological perspective. Such issues that have been explored include: the effects of deformation on normal patterns of growth and development (Bjrk & Bjrk, 1964; Anton, 1989; Cheverud et al., 1992; Kohn et al., 1993; Konigsberg et al., 1993; Dean, 1995a, 1995b; OLoughlin, 1996; Pomatto et al., 2006); its inuence on cranial trait morphology (Ogura et al., 2006; Rhode & Arriaza, 2006; Del Papa & Perez, 2007; Durband, 2008); the effects on sutural bone development (Ossenberg, 1970; El-Najjar & Dawson, 1977; Gottlieb, 1978; Anton et al., 1992; White, 1996; OLoughlin, 2004; OBrien & Sensor, 2008); using ACD type distribution across time and space to interpret migration, and cross-cultural inuences (Hoshower et al., 1995; Blom et al., 1998; Anton & Weinstein, 1999; zbek, 2001;
Figure 1. Column A: infants. Column B: adults. Column C: adult skull, lateral view. Column D: adult skull, superior view. Row 1: tabular style. Row 2: normal. Row 3: annular style. (Drawing by TGO, modied after Imbelloni, 1938 and Anton, 1989).
(1989) and subsequently adopted for ACD documentation and recording by Buikstra and Ubelaker (1994). Imbelloni (1923; 192425) sought to interpret the ranges of cranial deformity that were articially induced by utilising geometric and trigonometric techniques. The methods that he utilised were never widely accepted, most likely because his work was published in museum annals or as research reports. But he eventually created a simple and useful typology for describing South American skulls (Imbelloni, 1938; see also Dembo & Imbelloni, 1938) (see Figure 1). For his rst type he renames the highland or Aymara style (Hrdlika, 1922, 1923) as the annular form, characterised by bandages, belts or cords wrapped around the infants head. The deforming apparatus would pass across the individuals forehead transversely, run above the ears and be bound at or around the lower back of the head. The result of this deformation technique would produce a skull shape that was obliquely conical when viewed in prole. For his second type, Imbelloni names the utilisation of boards or hard at surfaces bound to the childs head as the tabular form. The deforming apparatus was typically a thin, at board placed across the forehead and tied laterally to another board placed across the back of the head. The stronger forces of deformation would produce a nearly box-like vault shape, that is, high and short). Imbelloni supports a more geometric approach in craniomorphologicla assessment of ACD when he states that: (translated by TGO from original: Imbelloni, 1923:32): . . . an exact or mathematical morphology should be employed to reduce the synthetic expression of the skull to a group of geometric formulas, that represent the most signicant analytical relationships between points, lines and planes; relationships that in dening geometric notation appear in the form of arcs, angles and chords. This observation by Imbelloni is applied within this paper; such that, in normal (nondeformed) skulls, the length of the frontal, parietal or occipital chords vary between and within populations. However, when compared with individuals exhibiting signs of ACD, such as annular or tabular, the chord lengths and vault shape, in general, are more greatly altered (Anton, 1989). For example, in an annular deformed skull, the posterior parietals extend superiorly and posteriorly, and the bones of the frontal, occipital and cranial base are lengthened (Anton, 1989; Kohn et al., 1993). In a tabular deformed skull, the postero-lateral parietals (the bosses) are often widened laterally becoming somewhat
Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. (2011)
Methods
For a cranium to be included in this study, it needed to be an adult and generally complete. The minimal signs used to assess whether a skull was of adult status included the following: full eruption and use of third molar(s), moderate signs of attrition patterns and cranial suture obliteration (Lovejoy, 1985; Meindl & Lovejoy, 1985; Masset, 1989; Buikstra & Ubelaker, 1994; OBrien & Sensor, 2008). Of course, advanced signs of these factors guaranteed adult status. Furthermore, the following cranial landmarks were required
Table 1. Demographics of the OBrien dataset Type of deformation Region Argentina Bolivia Chile Peru Total Annular 5 56 2 14 77 None 39 203 4 34 280 Tabular 48 42 1 21 112 N 92 301 7 69 469
Materials
Three collections of crania are combined and examined for this study. The rst is from the Museo Arqueolgico de San Simon in Cochabamba, Bolivia (OBrien & Sanzetenea, 2002; OBrien, 2003). The second is from the Museo de La Plata in La Plata, Argentina. Finally, the third is from the Museo Etnogrco de Juan Ambrosetti in Buenos Aires, Argentina. All crania in the three collections originate from prehispanic, archaeological sites in: Argentina (n=92), Bolivia (n=301), Chile (n=7) and Peru (n=69). The crania vary in their temporal provenience but date roughly to the Middle Horizon (AD ~5001000) for the south central Andean region. The data from the three combined collections is be referred to as the OBrien dataset (n=469).
Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
F, H L
L F H F, H
Results
B L B
L F H F, H
L F H
Figure 2. Four measurements recorded for this study. Row A: tabular skull. Row B: normal skull. Row C: annular skull. Left side is lateral view and right side is superior view. Maximum cranial height (H), Maximum cranial length (L), Frontal chord (F) and Maximum cranial breadth (B).
cranial breadth (BN) which in turn should be less than the tabular cranial breadth (BT). Therefore, for Cranial Breadth, we have the relationship BA <BN <BT. We now look at cranial length (see Figure 2). The conical shape of the annular skulls tends upwards at an angle from the Frankfort horizontal. Thus, we expect the cranial length of annular to skulls to be larger than normal skulls but not signicantly larger. The shape of the boxy tabular skulls leads us to expect that the cranial length should be smaller for tabular skulls than for normal skulls. We computed the means of the cranial lengths for each of our data sets (see Table 2). Using a t-statistic with a p-value of 0.05, we concluded that in general, the tabular cranial length (LT) is less than the normal cranial length (LN) which should be similar or slightly smaller than the annular cranial length (LA). Therefore, for Cranial Length, we have the relationship LT <LN %LA. Now, consider cranial height (see Figure 2). The position for the bregma in annular skulls often falls roughly behind the placement of the external auditory meatus (or porion). This causes the cranial height of the conical annular skulls to be larger than that of normal skulls. The boxy tabular skulls should also tend to have a larger cranial height than normal skulls because of the raised vault. We computed the means of the cranial heights for each of our data sets (see Table 2). Using a t-statistic with a p-value of 0.05, we are able to conclude that in general, the normal cranial height (HN) is less than the tabular cranial height (HT) which in turn should be similar to the annular cranial height (HA). Therefore, for Cranial Height, we have the relationship HN <HT %HA. Finally, we consider the frontal chord (see Figure 2). In tabular skulls, the higher cranial vault leads us to expect a larger frontal chord for tabular skulls than for normal skulls. Furthermore, the position for bregma in annular skulls also leads us to expect the frontal chord to be considerably larger in annular skulls than in normal skulls. Therefore, we expect the frontal chord of annular skulls to be larger than that of tabular skulls as well. We computed the means for frontal chords for our data
Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
sets (see Table 2). Using a t-statistic with a p-value of 0.05, we are able to conclude that in general, the normal frontal chord (FN) is less than the tabular frontal chord (FT) which in turn should be less than the annular frontal chord (FA). Therefore, for Frontal Chord, we have the relationship FN <FT <FA. We now use this information to dene indices that differentiate between the two types of deformations and normal skulls. We dene the annular index as B/H, the tabular index as H/L and the normal index as F/L and their respective means in Table 3. Following each indexs description and verication, we show how these indices discriminate between the types of deformation and normal skulls.
skulls that were inaccurately classied by OBrien. This attests to the inaccuracy of a visual and qualitative form of ACD type classication system. OBriens methods of interpretation are based on the conicted and ambiguous typological systems that currently exist (see OBrien & Sensor, 2004). Therefore, it is not surprising that classications would differ. We suspect that many of the studies that have been conducted on skull deformation may produce similar results of inaccuracy. Thus, we offer a more objective classication system.
Table 5. The p-values for univariate and multivariate normality of the annular, tabular and normal indices p-values for univariate normality Data collection OBrien Howells Deformation type Annular Tabular Normal B/H annular index 0.112 0.939 0.645 F/L normal index 0.798 0.582 0.682 H/L tabular index 0.250 0.914 0.840
When computed, these functions give the greatest separation of our data. To compute these functions, the data used were OBriens for annular and tabular skulls and Howells for the normal skulls. A territorial map was constructed to help with future classications. Thus, given a skulls four measurements (i.e., L, H, B and F), each index can be computed, their values placed into the functions, and a skulls location plotted on the territorial map (see Figure 3). The skull is classied as determined by the zone, or region, into which it falls on the map (i.e., the annular, tabular or normal zone). The territorial map also displays the severity of the
Table 6. Correlation matrix for the annular, tabular and normal indices Correlation matrix B/H F/L H/L B/H annular index 1.000 0.016 0.308 F/L normal index 0.016 1.000 0.478 H/L tabular index 0.308 0.478 1.000
deformation. For example, if the skull gets plotted in the annular zone but is near the border to the normal zone, it indicates a less moderate degree of deformation. To illustrate how to use these functions and the territorial map, consider the example of skull 1380 from OBriens data set in which the following measurements are applied: B=120, F=110, H=123 and L=173 (see Table 8). Next, the index values are computed: B/H= 0.98, F/L=0.64 and H/L=0.71. But before computing the discriminant function values, consider what outcome could be expected by comparing these index values to the known means for annular, normal and tabular skulls (see Table 9). The standard deviations
Table 8. Measurements and associated indices for example skull #1380 Skull #1380 Cranial measurement (mm) L 173 B 120 H 123 F 110 B/H 0.98 Index values F/L 0.64 H/L 0.71
Table 7. Canonical discriminant function coefcients Function 1 B/H F/L H/L Constant 4.997 29.179 19.551 38.311 2 21.466 28.719 24.521 23.115
Table 9. Means and standard deviations for the annular, tabular and normal indices Means (s.d.) B/H annular index Annular OBrien 0.95 (0.052) Normal Howells 1.07 (0.045) Tabular OBrien 1.10 (0.081) F/L normal index 0.68 (0.028) 0.62 (0.019) 0.69 (0.032) H/L tabular index 0.78 (0.042) 0.74 (0.026) 0.83 (0.045)
Table 10. Predicted membership for deformation type Data group Deformation type as classified by the investigator Annular Normal Tabular Normal Predicted membership by deformation type (number of crania) Annular 83.1% 11.8% 3.6% 0% Normal Tabular 2.6% 15.0% 87.5% 0% (2) (42) (98) (0)
OBrien Howell
(66) 14.3% (11) (33) 73.2% (205) (4) 8.9% (10) (0) 100% (110)
OBriens relatively low percentage for correctly classifying skulls into the right ACD category, we hypothesise that ones visual objectivity may become skewed when working with or seeing so many deformed skulls in a laboratory context; such that one tends to classify many deformed skulls as normal.
References
Allison MJ, Gerszten E, Munizaga J, Santoro C, Focacci G. 1981. La practica de la deformacin craneana entre los pueblos andinos precolombinos. Chungar 7: 238260. Anton SC. 1989. Intentional cranial vault deformation and induced changes of the cranial base and face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 79: 253267. Anton SC, Jaslow CR, Swartz SM. 1992. Sutural complexity in articially deformed human (Homo sapiens) crania. Journal of Morphology 214: 321332. Anton SC, Weinstein KJ. 1999. Articial cranial deformation and fossil Australians revisited. Journal of Human Evolution 36: 195209. Birkby WH. 1966. An evaluation of race and sex identication from cranial measurements. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 24: 2128. Bjrk A, Bjrk L. 1964. Articial deformation and craniofacial asymmetry in ancient Peruvians. Journal of Dental Research 43: 353362. Blom DE. 1999. Tiwanaku Regional Interaction and Social Identity: A Bioarchaeological Approach. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, IL. Blom DE. 2005. Embodying borders: human body modication and diversity in Tiwanaku society. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24: 124. Blom DE, Hallgrimsson B, Keng L, Lozada, MC, Buikstra JE. 1998. Tiwanaku colonization: bioarchaeological implications for migration in the Moquegua Valley, Peru. World Archaeology 30: 238261. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas Archaeological Research Series No. 44; Fayetteville. Cheverud JM, Kohn LAP, Konigsberg LW, Leigh SR. 1992. Effects of fronto-occipital articial cranial vault modication on the cranial base and face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 88: 323345. Clark JL, Dobson SD, Anton SC, Hawks J, Hunley KL, Wolpoff MH. 2007. Identifying articially deformed crania. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 17: 596607. Cocilovo JA. 1975. Estudio de dos factores que inuencian la morfologia craneana en una coleccin andina: el sexo y la Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. (2011)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank David Pereira [Museo Arqueolgico de San Simon in Cochabamba, Bolivia], Hector M. Pucciarelli [Division Antropologia. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo de La Plata (Argentina)], Claudia Aranda, Leandro Luna and Myriam Tarrago [Museo Etnograco J. B. Ambrosetti in Buenos Aires, Argentina], for granting access to the human skeletal
Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.