Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1
vs.
2
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
3 et al.,
4 Defendants.
5
RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 06-00244 RMW
6
Plaintiff,
7
vs.
8
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DAUBERT MOTION AND
6211431.1 MOTION TO PRECLUDE NEW OPINIONS;
CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2465 Filed 10/24/2008 Page 3 of 3
9 1. The Manufacturers’ damages experts may not rely at trial on the 2001
10 Amendment No. 1 to the Rambus-Samsung SDR/DDR IC and SDR/DDR Memory Module
11 Patent License Agreement, the 2002 Rambus-Mitsubishi Interim Agreement, the 2004
12 Amendment No. 2 to the Rambus-Elpida Patent License Agreement, the 2005 Infineon
13 Settlement and License Agreement, the 2005 Samsung offers and counteroffers, or any
14 negotiations pertaining to any of the aforementioned agreements in support of their opinions
15 regarding a reasonable royalty.
16 2. W. Christopher Bakewell is precluded from testifying at trial that the
17 appropriate royalty rate for Rambus’s technology is 0.75%.
18
19 IT IS SO ORDERED
20
21
DATED:_______________________, 2008 By:____________________________
22 Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DAUBERT MOTION AND
6211431.1 -1- MOTION TO PRECLUDE NEW OPINIONS;
CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW