## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Reading: Sections 5A-5C (only cover major ideas) Suggested Text Problems (Skoog 6th ed): Ch. 5: 7, 8, 10, 11 Overview of our coverage of this chapter (A) (B) (C) What is meant by Signal, Noise and their ratio? Where does noise come from? What can we do to reduce noise or enhance S/N ?

A: Signal, Noise and the S/N ratio S = signal N = noise “Signal” carries the analyte information “Noise” Unwanted signal that hurts the accuracy and precision and detection limits of the signal we care about So we use a signal-to-noise ratio expression to convey this ratio or as a ‘figure of merit’: For a dc signal:

**S mean x 1 = = = N std dev of mean s RSD
**

Std dev can be estimated at a 99% confidence level by measuring the difference between the max and min of the signal and dividing by 5. In general: when

S N

becomes less than 2-3, it becomes difficult to get useful

information from the signal.

Page 1 of 10

2 × 10 A N B: Source of Noise in Instrumental Analysis Two main types of noise effect chemical analyses: chemical and instrumental noise.1(a). Answer: S x 9 × 10 −16 A S = = = 4.1 ≈ 4 = −16 N s 2.Example: Figure 5-1 (a) signal 0. (1) Chemical Noise Generally uncontrollable and specific to the chemistry of the system of interest (2) Instrumental Noise Each part of an instrument can have noise ramifications – so usually the noise observed in a signal is made up of many different kinds of noise and Page 2 of 10 . (b) theoretical depiction if noise wasn’t Problem: Make a rough estimate of the S/N for the signal shown in Figure 5.9 x 10-15 A – with noise present.

and environmental noise.is hard to predict or calculate.38 x 10-23 J/K. quantum noise) Generated when electrons or other charged particles cross a junction. Even when no current in a system. where rise-time is an instruments response to an abrupt increase in signal or output in seconds If tr = 0. irms = 2IeΔf Where: irms = root mean square of the current fluctuation I = average dc current e= charge on an electron = 1. shot noise. (a) Thermal Noise (or Johnson Noise. ( 1 J = 1 V2sΩ-1) T = temperature in K R = resistance in ohms (Ω) Δf = frequency bandwidth = 1 3t r where tr is the rise-time. flicker noise. thermal noise can be observed.6 Hz.05 s then Δf = 6. such as thermal noise. white noise.60 x 10-19 C Δf = frequency bandwidth Independent of absolute frequency – sort of a white noise also. “White noise” – independent of absolute frequency (b) Shot Noise (Schottky Noise. νrms = 4kTRΔf where νrms is the root mean square voltage associated with this noise k = (Boltzmann’s constant)= 1. Page 3 of 10 . Nyquist) Results from random motions of electrons or other charge carriers.

Significant as frequency is 100 Hz or lower. Page 4 of 10 . noise increases. Related to # electrons or photons arriving at a surface. so as frequency decreases. (d) Environmental Noise Due to surroundings: Instrument components can act as antennas – pick up environmental signals. and is proportional to the magnitude of the signal.(c) Flicker Noise (or 1/f noise – or ‘pink noise’) Physical origins of this noise are not well understood. Depends on frequency. At small frequencies – high levels of noise Good regions in frequency spectrum: 3-60 Hz and 1 kHz to 500 kHz.

Page 5 of 10 . .C: Signal to Noise Enhancement When higher sensitivities and accuracy is required.Why use modulation? Useful when we have a low frequency sample.How is modulation accomplished? Modulation is accomplished by using a chopper to physically disrupt the signal – results in a signal with a new frequency dependent on speed of chopper (fluctuates between full signal ‘on’ and then full signal blocked ‘off’). and there is low frequency noise as well (such as flicker noise) we can use a process called modulation to reduce noise .What does modulation do? modulation involves taking a low frequency signal and converting it into a high frequency signal . S/N can start to limit our precision.Why would we want to do that? the use of a high pass filter can remove lower frequency noise.or reduce the amplification of the low frequency noise and therefore amplifying the signal (now at higher frequency) and overall increasing S/N ratio. (1) Some Hardware devices for Noise Reduction Adjusting the instrument design: (a) (b) (c) (d) Grounding and Shielding Difference and Instrumentation Amplifiers Analog Filtering Modulation .

The modulation frequency is 400 Hz (400 cycles per second) – can be accomplished with a mechanic chopper. At this “place”. The signal has a maximum at 0-0. Now the signal can be detected or worked with at a frequency of 400 Hz. but we’ve ‘moved’ the signal to a different frequency. 5. 6. while at its new frequency. Right picture (C): Demodulation occurs – taking the signal back to its original frequency.Example: The signal of interest may be a signal of low frequency (Fig 5-6) Left picture (A): On left is original signal. The flicker noise in the region of 10 Hz and lower. So the signal is modulated (a frequency is ‘added’ to it by chopping the signal). Page 6 of 10 . 2.rotating disk. 4. If we just amplified the signal as it is – since it lies in a region where flicker noise is high for amplified signals – the signal and the noise will be amplified – no gain in S/N will be realized.001 Hz (so it’s low in frequency). 1. The signal has a maximum power of ~ “6” (or 6 x 100). The original signal has been amplified. 3. Most of noise hasn’t moved in frequency. The signal amplitude increases from ‘6’ to ‘ 6 x 105 ’. is amplified also.) Middle picture (B): the modulated and amplified signal. and the noise is not nearly so amplified. the signal is amplified by a factor of 105.

ends up not increasing as much. S/N increases ∝ to n where n = # of scans Used widely in NMR and FTIR Page 7 of 10 . constructive and destructively interfering.and then summed point by point “co-addition” and then averaged (divided by number of repeats) o This increases the signal-to-noise ratio by a factor of number of repetitions n where n is the o the signal is positively reinforced.(2) Software methods for Noise Reduction Computer algorithms pull signals from noisy data: (a) Ensemble Averaging o several repetitions of a the signal are taken and stored as arrays. while the noise varies.

but S/N can be improved. .In the figure shown below – every three points are averaged and that average is used to replace them. .This increases the signal-to-noise ratio (also) by a factor of the number of repetitions n where n is .By averaging a group of adjacent points (that are close in time).Assumes the analytical signal of interest varies slowly with respect to the noise on the signal which varies more erratically at a higher frequency.Detail can be lost this way. it is assumed that the differences in the magnitude of these data points will be due mainly to noise deviations.(b) Boxcar averaging . Page 8 of 10 . .

time} see figure ‘a’ below. .(c) Digital Filtering: .Signal is initially collected in the “time domain” {signal vs.This is then multiplied by the frequency response of a digital low-pass filter – this essentially removes signals of frequencies higher than some cut-off.Fourier Transform: one method of digital filtering. . . frequency. Page 9 of 10 .The Fourier transform (a mathematical algorithm process) converts the ‘time domain’ signal into a frequency domain signal – see figure ‘b’ which is a new function of frequency plotted vs.An inverse FT (Fourier transfer) is use to re-generate the signal back into the ‘user-friendly’ time domain. Fourier transform is accomplished as follows: .

Page 10 of 10 .A different yet complimentary figure: Figure 7-41: Time domain vs. frequency domain.

- Noise
- Noise in Comm System
- 12695_NOISE - 1
- Controls Manual
- Manual - SQuad Voice Test Result Description
- Electronic Circuits
- CSE3213_05_AnalogDigitalTransmission_F2010
- Flaw Detection Trials Using Virtual Ultrasonic Testing
- ravi -ans
- cs2
- Edge Detection with Detail Preservation for RVIN Using Adaptive Threshold Filtering Method
- Pressure Transducers
- lDO Noise
- set4
- Subiecte Rezolvate 2010
- Make Your Own Cband Satellite Tv
- 10EC61 Dec13
- Lab2 coaxial
- 10.1.1.96.4020.pdf
- Brochure2010 en l
- Wk3 Modulation Basic
- Unit 1
- 460_project3
- Digital Noise
- Cutting Parameter Optimization for Minimizing Machining Distortion of Thin
- Tekever drone português espionagem industrial 5.pdf
- Md i 2mikd Za Dem Fsk
- interspeech05.pdf
- sensors-08-02642
- ab-075

- tmp8887.tmp
- tmpC510
- Impulsive Noise Removal from Speech Signals using Rank Order Mean
- Comparative Analysis of Adaptive Recursive Filters For Noise Reduction in C-Arm Fluoroscopic X-Ray Images
- tmpB60B
- tmp719B.tmp
- tmp9198.tmp
- A Novel Approach for Underwater Image Enhancement
- tmpB290.tmp
- Principle Component based Image De-Noising using Local Pixel Grouping
- tmpD56A
- tmpC8D2.tmp
- tmpFA0C.tmp
- Tool Wear Analysis of USM for Composite Material using Taguchi Technique
- tmpFC57
- Optimization of Process Parameters of Wire-Cut Electric Discharge Machine Using Tungsten Die Tool Steel Using Taguchi Method
- tmpE1D
- Improving the Performance of FDM Machine Objects by using Optimization Techniques
- tmp4FBD.tmp
- tmpA2E7
- Tmp 2330
- Apollo Experience Report Voice Communications Techniques and Performance
- Evaluation of Optimal Parameters for Machining Of SS 410 With EDM Using Grey Relational Analysis
- Energy Efficiency of MIMO-IFBC for Green Wireless Systems
- tmpEDF3.tmp
- Pruning of Blind Decoding Results for Long Term Evolution
- Parametric Optimization on MIG Welded EN8 Material Joints by using Taguchi Method
- Sensor Beer
- Parametric Optimization of Process Parameter for Roller Burnishing Process
- Unified S-Band Telecommunications Techniques for Apollo Volume II Mathematical Models and Analysis

- Applied Electronics
- Applied Electronics
- Design and Analysisi of Widw Swing Folded-Cascode OTA
- Housing Works, Inc. v. Bernard Kerik, Commissioner of the New York City Police Department and the City of New York, 283 F.3d 471, 2d Cir. (2002)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee6326.501 06f taught by Jin Liu (jinliu)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.002.09s taught by Gil Lee (gslee)
- WWII Radar & Comm Equipment
- Brainwave Controlled Robot
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee6326.001.07s taught by Jin Liu (jinliu)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.004.08s taught by Eric Vogel (exv061000)
- Design Of High Power Amplifier At 3.4 GHz For Satellite Transponder (IRNSS)
- Power Electronics III
- DCT- SLM Technique for Peak-To-Average Power Ratio Reduction in OFCDM System
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ce3311.001.10s taught by Bhaskar Banerjee (bxb073000)
- Design of Low Noise Amplifier at 3.4GHz for Ranging Transponder (IRNSS)
- Docket No. 01-7245 August Term, 2000, 2001 March 7, 2d Cir. (2002)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ce3111.002.09s taught by Gil Lee (gslee)
- Design & Analysis of CMOS Telescopic Operational Transconductance Amplifier (OTA) with its Process Parameters
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee6326.501 05f taught by Jin Liu (jinliu)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.004.09s taught by Gil Lee (gslee)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3311.5u1.09u taught by Arash Loloee (axl018200)
- Comparative Analysis of PAPR Reduction Techniques in OFDM Using Precoding Techniques
- Design of Low Power, High Speed 3-Bit Pipelined ADC
- Gain Analysis of Fiber Raman Amplifier at 870nm band.
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.501.07f taught by Randall Lehmann (rel041000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3311.501.07s taught by Arash Loloee (axl018200)
- Standard Coil Products Co., Inc. v. General Electric Company, 306 F.2d 319, 2d Cir. (1962)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3311.501.10f taught by Bhaskar Banerjee (bxb073000)
- Detrola Radio & Television Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 313 U.S. 259 (1941)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.5u2.08u taught by Balkan Kecicioglu (bxk022000)

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading