Você está na página 1de 5

Molecular Brain Research 135 (2005) 285 – 289

www.elsevier.com/locate/molbrainres

Short communication

Valproic acid, but not lamotrigine, suppresses seizure-induced


c-fos and c-Jun mRNA expression
Patricia Szota,b,*, Sylvia S. Whitea, Danny D. Shenc, Gail D. Andersonc
a
Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System,
1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
b
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
c
Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

Accepted 18 November 2004


Available online 5 January 2005

Abstract

Seizure-induced activity has been shown to increase the expression of immediate early genes (IEGs) c-fos and c-Jun in the CNS. Anti-
epileptic drugs (AEDs) can suppress the induction of a seizure, but it is unknown if AEDs affect the expression of seizure-induced IEGs. We
found that valproic acid (VPA), but not lamotrigine (LTG), was capable of suppressing seizure-induced c-fos and c-Jun mRNA expression in
rats despite a similar anticonvulsant effect. LTG in some regions of the CNS enhanced seizure-induced IEG expression. These studies
indicate that the older AED (VPA), as compared to the newer AED (LTG), can suppress seizure-induced IEG expression. The consequence of
this suppression of IEGs following a generalized seizure may be viewed either as a neuroprotective or detrimental effect upon the brain.
Published by Elsevier B.V.

Theme: Neurotransmitters, modulators, transporters and receptors


Topic: Signal transduction: gene expression

Keywords: Valproic acid; Lamotrigine; c-fos; c-Jun; Flurothyl; Bipolar disorder; Seizure

Numerous studies have used the expression of the seizure-induced c-fos and c-Jun mRNA expression, IEG
immediate early genes (IEGs) c-fos and c-Jun as indirect mRNA expression was measured after flurothyl-induced
markers of central nervous system (CNS) neuronal activa- generalized CT seizure in rats treated acutely with either
tion, particularly in response to acute seizure. Following a valproic acid (VPA) or lamotrigine (LTG). VPA is one of
generalized clonic–tonic (CT) seizure induced by a con- the older AEDs used clinically, while LTG is one of the
vulsant agent such as flurothyl, there is a significant increase new generation of AEDs. In addition, both of these agents
in the mRNA expression of c-fos and c-Jun mRNA in are used to treat bipolar disorders [4,21]. VPA is an al-
specific regions of the CNS [17,23,24,28,29]. Anti-epileptic ternative to lithium in treating acute mania, whereas LTG
drug (AED) therapy is commonly used to prevent or is indicated for the treatment of bipolar depression.
reduce the number of seizures in epileptic patients. How- Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (200 g) were purchased
ever, if a seizure occurs when AEDs have been admi- from Bantam and Kingman (Seattle, WA), and housed in
nistered, it is unknown if AEDs will affect the expression of standard cages in a controlled environment with a 12-h
seizure-induced IEGs. To determine if AEDs can modulate light/dark cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum.
The animals were given a 7-day acclimating period to the
facility before treatments were started. All animal proce-
* Corresponding author. Mental Illness Research Education and
Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 dures were in accordance with Animal Care Committee at
South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA. Fax: +1 206 768 5456. the VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, and
E-mail address: szot@u.washington.edu (P. Szot). NIH guidelines.
0169-328X/$ - see front matter. Published by Elsevier B.V.
doi:10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.11.011
286 P. Szot et al. / Molecular Brain Research 135 (2005) 285–289

Saline (n = 10), valproic acid 250 mg/kg, ip (VPA; n = across animals according to the atlas of Paxins and Watson
10; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), or lamotrigine 10 mg/kg, ip [20]. Background optical density was subtracted from each
(LTG; n = 10; generous donation from Glaxo Smith Kline) image value for each region. c-Fos mRNA expression was
were administered by intraperitoneal injection twice a day measured in the cortex (CTX), septum (SEP), caudate
for 3 days (approximately 10 h apart). Doses for VPA and (CAU), hippocampus [CA1, CA2, CA3, and dentate gyrus
LTG were chosen based on studies examining the effective- (DG)], amygdala (AM), and locus caeruleus (LC). c-Jun
ness of these agents to suppress seizure activity and in mRNA expression was more limited and analysis was
animal studies for bipolar disorder. On the fourth day, 1 h measured in the DG, AM, and bed nucleus of the stria
after the first injection of either saline, VPA, or LTG, terminalis (BNST). Each mean F SEM reported here for
susceptibility to flurothyl-induced seizures was measured as each region in the CNS is the average of six optical density
previously described [24,29] in six of the ten animals from measurements (after background subtraction) for each
each group. The latency to the first myoclonic jerk (MJ) and animal. Statistical comparison of c-fos or c-Jun expression
generalized CT seizure was recorded for each animal in the was made using Student’s unpaired t test with Bonferroni
three treatment groups. Because flurothyl results in a correction for mRNA expression.
progressive increase of seizure activity with exposure, both Short-term administration of either VPA or LTG signifi-
of these seizure phenotypes can be observed and latency cantly lengthened the latency to generalized CT seizures
recorded for each animal; however, the final seizure that was produced by flurothyl as compared to control-treated
observed in animals was a generalized CT seizure. These animals, although only VPA significantly lengthened the
animals were sacrificed 1 h after the observance of the latency to MJ as compared to control-treated animals
generalized CT seizure, and brains were removed and frozen (Fig. 1). Seizure severity as determined by seizure pheno-
on dry ice. Previous work has shown 1 h to be the peak time type (i.e., progression to tonic extension) or mortality was
for c-fos mRNA expression following a generalized CT not different between treatment groups.
seizure [22,24,28,29]. The remaining four of the ten animals Administration of VPA or LTG alone, with no seizure,
from each group were not exposed to flurothyl and are did not affect either c-fos or c-Jun mRNA expression as
considered the non-seizure controls. These animals were compared to saline-treated animals with no seizure. Because
sacrificed 2 h after injection of either saline, VPA, or LTG to there was no difference in IEG expression in the non-seizure
match the time of sacrifice of the seizure animals. Statistical animals, the optical density values from the three treatment
comparison of latencies was made using Student’s unpaired groups with no seizure were combined and shown in
t test with Bonferroni correction for latencies and v 2 test for Figs. 2 and 3 as bno seizureQ. As previously shown [24,29],
seizure latencies. a single generalized CT seizure induced by flurothyl in
Brains were cut on a cryostat at 20 Am and alternate saline-treated animals significantly elevates c-fos mRNA
sections were collected onto two sets of slides. Individual expression in many regions of the CNS, including the CTX,
sets of sections were used for c-fos and c-Jun mRNA. hippocampal CA1, CA3, and DG, AM, SEP, and LC as
Tissue preparation was conducted as previously described compared to non-seizure saline-treated animals.
[28]. The c-fos and c-Jun oligonucleotide probes were 51- VPA treatment significantly reduced seizure-induced c-
and 45-base sequences, respectively, and complementary to fos mRNA expression in the CTX, hippocampal CA1,
nucleotides 270–319 for c-fos mRNA [17] or to the last CA3, and DG, SEP, AM, and LC as compared to saline-
15 amino acids for the c-Jun mRNA [1]. The oligonucleo- treated animals with a generalized CT seizure (Fig. 2).
tide probes were 3V-end-labeled with [33P]-dATP (Perkin- The expression of c-fos mRNA in VPA-treated seizure
Elmer, Boston, MA) using terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl animals was similar to no seizure animals in all but the
transferase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and then purified on
a G25 spin column (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). The
c-fos hybridization buffer contained 0.5  106 cpm/50 Al
and the c-Jun hybridization buffer contained 0.65  106
cpm/50 Al. Hyperfilm h-Max (Amersham) was exposed to
slides containing tissue hybridized with either c-fos or c-Jun
[33P] oligonucleotide—24 h for both c-fos and c-Jun. To
quantitate c-fos and c-Jun mRNA expression in specific
regions of the CNS, all sections were processed, hybridized,
and washed in the same session; and each sheet of
Hyperfilm contained sections from the three treatment
groups. Optical densities were measured from films using
Fig. 1. Flurothyl seizure thresholds in rats treated short term with saline,
MicroComputer Imaging Device (Imaging Research,
VPA, or LTG. Histograms on the left represent the latency to MJ for each
Ontario, Canada). Separate optical density measurements treatment group and the histograms to the right represent the latency to CT
were made of the left and right hemispheres over 3 seizure for each treatment group. *Represents statistical ( P b 0.05)
successive sections, which were anatomically matched difference to the saline-treated group.
P. Szot et al. / Molecular Brain Research 135 (2005) 285–289 287

Fig. 2. c-Fos mRNA expression in saline-, VPA-, and LTG-treated rats following flurothyl-induced seizure. (A) Quantitation of c-fos mRNA expression
measured in the cortex (CTX), locus caeruleus (LC), amygdala (AM), septum (SEP), caudate (CAU), and hippocampal CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG).
Autoradiographic images of c-fos mRNA expression at the level of the septum (B–D) or hippocampus/amygdala (E–G) in saline (B and E)-, VPA (C and F)-, or
LTG (D and G)-treated animals following a seizure. *Represents statistical ( P b 0.05) difference compared to saline-treated animals with a seizure. yRepresents
statistical ( P b 0.05) difference compared to no seizure group.

CTX. Therefore, the administration of VPA suppressed significantly elevated seizure-induced c-Jun expression in
the generalized CT seizure-induced expression of the IEG the BNST and AM as compared to saline-treated animals with
c-fos in most regions of the CNS. generalized CT seizure. As with c-fos expression, VPA, but
LTG-treated animals with a generalized CT seizure had not LTG, suppressed generalized CT seizure-induced c-Jun
c-fos mRNA expression similar to saline-treated animals expression, especially in the DG.
with a generalized CT seizure in the CTX, hippocampal These data indicate that VPA was able to prevent the
CA1, CA3, and DG, and LC (Fig. 2). However, in the AM, generalized CT induction of c-fos and c-Jun mRNA
SEP- and CAU LTG-treated animals with a generalized CT expression in all regions of the CNS studied. For most
seizure had significantly more c-fos mRNA expression than regions, seizure-induced IEG expression in VPA-treated
control-treated animals with a generalized CT seizure animals (except cortex for c-fos) was identical to animals
(Fig. 2), indicating that LTG either had no effect or with no seizure. In contrast, LTG had no effect on
enhanced seizure-induced c-fos expression. generalized CT-induced seizure c-fos or c-Jun mRNA
c-Jun mRNA expression following a flurothyl-induced expression in most regions and even increased expression
seizure was limited to fewer regions in the CNS than c-fos of these IEGs in other CNS regions.
mRNA expression. c-Jun mRNA expression in saline-treated These results reflect only one dose (versus dose
animals following a seizure was significantly elevated only in response) and one convulsant agent. It is possible that this
the hippocampal DG and amygdala (AM) as compared to no suppressant response of VPA may not be seen with other
seizure animals (Fig. 3). The elevation in c-Jun mRNA convulsant agents, or that LTG may have a suppressant
expression in the hippocampal DG induced by a generalized effect if other doses were used. A single dose of VPA alone
CT seizure was suppressed by VPA but not LTG (Fig. 3). LTG (no seizure) will increase c-Fos immunohistochemistry in
288 P. Szot et al. / Molecular Brain Research 135 (2005) 285–289

Fig. 3. c-Jun mRNA expression in saline-, VPA-, and LTG-treated rats following flurothyl-induced seizure. (A) Quantitation of c-Jun mRNA expression
measured in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), and amygdala (AM). Autoradiographic images of c-Jun mRNA
expression at the level of the hippocampus/amygdala (B–D) in saline (B)-, VPA (C)-, or LTG (D)-treated animals following a seizure. *Represents statistical
( P b 0.05) difference compared to saline-treated animals with a seizure. yRepresents statistical ( P b 0.05) difference compared to no seizure group.

the rat hippocampus, but chronic administration has no factors may prevent cell death. Several studies have shown
effect [3]. This supports the data generated in this study that blocking the expression of these IEGs results in a
where 3-day administration of VPA alone had no effect on neuroprotective effect [14,32]. Lithium has also been shown
IEG mRNA expression. Against noxious thermal stimula- to exert a neuroprotective effect through its ability to
tion, VPA as well as carbamazepine and phenytoin reduced modulate second messenger systems [11,15,18,34]. On the
the amount of c-Fos immunohistochemistry in the spinal other hand, it has been shown that VPA and other older AEDs
cord dorsal horn [30]. However, with a generalized CT such as phenytoin and phenobarbital, but not the newer AED
seizure, only VPA suppressed IEG expression; but both topiramate, result in neurodegeneration in the developing
AEDs were equally effective at extending the latency to brain with a similar treatment regimen of twice a day injection
generalized CT seizure. There is a difference between VPA for 3 days [2,5]. In addition, there are data to suggest that a
and LTG concerning the latency to MJ, but this could not reduction in IEG expression may be associated with neuro-
account for the difference in seizure-induced IEG expres- degeneration [9,10]. It is possible that the inability of the
sion because the final seizure phenotype that was observed brain to respond normally to a stimulus (i.e., increased IEG
in the three treatment groups was a generalized CT seizure expression) may be detrimental, while an AED that allows a
which typically increases IEG expression [17,23,24,28,29]. normal response to a stimulus to occur will have less of
It is unclear why VPA, but not LTG, blocked seizure- disruptive effect upon the CNS. It remains to be determined if
induced IEG expression. Both AEDs affect multiple ion VPA is the only AED that suppresses seizure-induced IEG.
channels and neurotransmitter systems including the exci-
tatory amino acid, glutamate [7,16,19,21]. Expression of
these IEGs following a seizure has been attributed, in part, Acknowledgments
to increased release of glutamate [12,13,25–27,31,33]. If an
anti-glutaminergic effect was the main reason for the This work was supported by the University of Wash-
suppression of seizure-induced IEG expression, then this ington Pediatric Epilepsy Research Center (G.D.A.),
would suggest that VPA affects the glutaminergic system Department of Veterans Affair Puget Sound Health Care
differently than LTG. The ability of VPA to suppress System (P.S.), and National Alliance for Research in
seizure-induced IEG expression may be due to the similarity Schizophrenia and Depression (P.S.).
of VPA to lithium in treating bipolar disorder [21]; i.e., the
ability attributed to these agents to modulate second
messenger systems such as G-protein-coupled cyclic AMP
References
and polyphosphoinositol pathways [15,34].
Since c-fos and c-Jun, as transcription factors, are [1] P. Angel, T. Smeal, J. Meek, M. Karin, Jun and c-Jun contain multiple
involved in the pathways for apoptosis and necrosis regions that participate in transcriptional activation in an interdependent
[6,8,14,32,35], suppressing expression of these transcription manner, New Biol. 1 (1989) 35 – 43.
P. Szot et al. / Molecular Brain Research 135 (2005) 285–289 289

[2] P. Bittigau, M. Sifringer, K. Genz, E. Reith, S. Pospischil, S. valproate on concentrations of brain amino acids, Eur. Neuro-
Govindarajalu, M. Dzietko, S. Pesditschek, I. Mai, K. Dikranian, psychopharmacol. 13 (2003) 220 – 227.
J.W. Olney, C. Ikonomidou, Antiepileptic drugs and apoptotic [20] G. Paxinos, C. Watson, The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates,
neurodegeneration in the developing brain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99 second ed. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1986.
(2002) 15089 – 15094. [21] R.M. Post, T.A. Ketter, K. Denicoff, P.J. Pazzaglia, G.S. Leverich,
[3] B. Chen, J.F. Wang, B.C. Hill, L.T. Young, Lithium and valproate L.B. Marangell, A.M. Callahan, M.S. George, M.A. Frye, The place
differentially regulate brain regional expression of phosphorylated of anticonvulsant therapy in bipolar disorder illness, Psychopharma-
CREB and c-fos, Mol. Brain Res. 70 (1999) 45 – 53. cology 128 (1996) 115 – 129.
[4] I.N. Ferrier, Lamotrigine and Gabapentin. Alternatives in the treat- [22] D.W. Saffen, A.J. Cole, P.F. Worley, B.A. Christy, K. Ryder, J.M.
ment of bipolar disorder, Neuropsychobiology 38 (1998) 192 – 197. Baraban, Convulsant-induced increase in transcription factor messenger
[5] C. Glier, M. Dzietko, P. Bittigau, B. Jarosz, E. Korobowicz, C. RNAs in rat brain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85 (1988) 7795 – 7799.
Ikonomidou, Therapeutic doses of topiramate are not toxic to the [23] S.M. Sagar, F.R. Sharp, T. Curran, Expression of c-fos protein in
developing rat brain, Exp. Neurol. 187 (2004) 403 – 409. brain: Metabolic mapping at the cellular level, Science 240 (1988)
[6] A.M. Gorman, M.P. Scott, P.C. Rumsby, C. Meredith, R. Griffiths, 1328 – 1331.
Excitatory amino acid-induced cytotoxicity in primary cultures of [24] T.W. Storey, J.M. Rho, S.S. White, R. Sankar, P. Szot, Age-dependent
mouse cerebellar granule cells correlates with elevated, sustained c-fos differences in flurothyl-induced c-fos and c-Jun mRNA expression in
protooncogene expression, Neurosci. Lett. 191 (1995) 116 – 120. the mouse brain, Dev. Neurosci. 24 (2002) 294 – 299.
[7] N.A. Gray, J. Du, C.S. Falke, P. Yuan, H.K. Manji, Lithium regulates [25] R. Szakacs, R. Weiczner, A. Mihaly, B. Krisztin-Peva, Z. Zador, E.
total and synaptic expression of the AMPA glutamate receptor GluR2 Zador, Non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists moderate
in vitro and in vivo, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1003 (2003) 402 – 404. seizure-induced c-fos expression in the rat cerebral cortex, Brain
[8] R. Griffiths, C. Malcolm, L. Ritchie, A. Frandsen, A. Schousboe, M. Res. Bull. 59 (2003) 485 – 493.
Scott, P. Rumsby, C. Meredith, Association of c-fos mRNA [26] A.M. Szekely, M.L. Barbaccia, H. Alho, E. Costa, In primary cultures
expression and excitatotoxicity in primary cultures of mouse neo- of cerebellar granule cells the activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate-
cortical and cerebellar neurons, J. Neurosci. Res. 48 (1997) 533 – 542. sensitive glutamate receptors induces c-fos mRNA expression, Mol.
[9] T. Herdegen, P. Skene, M. Bahr, The c-Jun transcription factor- Pharmacol. 35 (1989) 401 – 408.
bipotential mediator of neuronal death, survival and regeneration, [27] A.M. Szekely, E.M. Costa, D.R. Grayson, Transcriptional program
Trends Neurosci. 20 (1997) 227 – 231. coordination by N-methyl-d-aspartate-sensitive glutamate receptor
[10] W. Jin, J. Zhang, D. Lou, C. Chavkin, M. Xu, c-Fos-deficient mouse stimulation in primary cultures of cerebellar neurons, Mol. Pharmacol.
hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons exhibit both enhanced basal 38 (1990) 624 – 633.
and kainic acid-induced excitability, Neurosci. Lett. 331 (2002) [28] P. Szot, S.S. White, R.C. Veith, Effect of pentylenetetrazol on the
151 – 154. expression of tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA and norepinephrine and
[11] E. Jorda, E. Verdaguer, A. Morano, A. Jimenez, A. Canudas, A. dopamine transporter mRNA, Mol. Brain Res. 44 (1997) 46 – 54.
Camins, M. Pallas, Lithium prevents colchicines-induced apoptosis in [29] P. Szot, S.S. White, E.B. McCarthy, A. Turella, S.X. Rejniak, P.A.
rat cerebellar granule neurons, Bipolar Disord. 6 (2004) 144 – 149. Schwartzkroin, Behavioral and metabolic features of repetitive
[12] L.S. Lerea, J.O. McNamara, Ionotropic glutamate receptor subtypes seizures in immature and mature rats, Epilepsy Res. 46 (2001)
activate c-fos transcription by distinct calcium-requiring intracellular 191 – 203.
signaling pathways, Neuron 10 (1993) 31 – 41. [30] T.R. Tolle, J.M. Castro-Lopes, J. Schadrack, G. Evan, W. Zieglgans-
[13] L.S. Lerea, L.S. Butler, J.O. McNamara, NMDA and non-NMDA berger, Anticonvulsants suppress c-Fos protein expression in spinal
receptor mediated increase of c-fos mRNA in dentate gyrus neurons cord neurons following noxious thermal stimulation, Exp. Neurol. 132
involves calcium influx via different routes, J. Neurosci. 12 (1992) (1995) 271 – 278.
2973 – 2981. [31] F.M. Vaccarino, M.D. Hayward, E.J. Nestler, R.S. Duman, J.F.
[14] X.C. Lu, F.C. Tortella, H.S. Ved, G.E. Garcia, J.R. Dave, Neuro- Tallman, Differential induction of immediate early genes by excitatory
protective role of c-fos antisense oligonucleotide: in vitro and in vivo amino acid receptor types in primary cultures of cortical and striatal
studies, NeuroReport 8 (1997) 2925 – 2929. neurons, Mol. Brain Res. 12 (1992) 233 – 241.
[15] H.K. Manji, R.H. Lenox, Signaling: cellular insights into the [32] D.D. Yang, C.Y. Kuan, A.J. Whitmarsh, M. Rincon, T.S. Zheng, R.J.
pathophysiology of bipolar disorder, Biol. Psychiatry 48 (2000) Davis, P. Rakic, R.A. Flavell, Absence of excitotoxicity-induced
518 – 530. apoptosis in the hippocampus of mice lacking t20022002he Jnk3
[16] B. Meldrum, M. Leach, The mechanisms of action of lamotrigine, gene, Nature 389 (1997) 865 – 870.
Rev. Contemp. Pharmacother. 5 (1994) 107 – 115. [33] S. Yasuda, N. Ishida, A. Higashiyama, S. Morinobu, N. Kato,
[17] J.I. Morgan, D.R. Cohen, J.L. Hempstead, T. Curran, Mapping Characterization of audiogenic-like seizures in naive rats evoked by
patterns of c-fos expression in the central nervous system after seizure, activation of AMPA and NMDA receptors in the inferior colliculus,
Science 237 (1987) 192 – 197. Exp. Neurol. 164 (2000) 396 – 406.
[18] S. Nonaka, C.J. Hough, D.-M. Chuang, Chronic lithium treatment [34] L.T. Young, Postreceptor pathways for signal transduction in
robustly protects neurons in the central nervous system against depression and bipolar disorder, J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 26 (2001)
excitotoxicity by inhibiting N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-mediated S17 – S22 (Suppl.).
calcium influx, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95 (1998) 2642 – 2647. [35] J. Zhang, D. Zhang, J.S. McQuade, M. Behbehani, J.Z. Tsien, M. Xu,
[19] T. O’Donnell, S. Rotzinger, M. Ulrich, C.C. Hanstock, T.T. c-Fos regulates neuronal excitability and survival, Nat. Genet. 30
Nakashima, P.H. Silverstone, Effects of chronic lithium and sodium (2002) 416 – 420.

Você também pode gostar