Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
James E. Rodgers, PhD Member NCRP Report 151 Committee Medical Radiation Physicist Maryland Regional Cancer Care Silver Spring MD e-mail: rodgersj@mrccnet.com
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
ACMP 2006
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
ACMP 2006
Equipment/ modulator
maze
(controlled)
Entrance
J Rodgers
(contrl.) contrl.)
ACMP 2006
d
20o scattered radiation (impt. for 15 MV)
w add 30 cm here
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Primary Barriers Bpri = the barrier transmission factor P =shielding design goal P = Bpri H0 = Bpri Wpri U T/ds2 or, Bpri = Pds2 /(Wpri UT ) If TVL data is available: Bpri = 10-n(TVL) n(TVL) = log10(1/ Bpri ) = # of tenth value layers needed to satisfy the shielding design goal Often TVL1 TVLe , so the barrier thickness is: x = TVL1 + [n(TVL) 1] *TVLe
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
MV 6
Barrier material
18
ACMP 2006
T = 1/20
dA = 5.2 m
Offices
(public =uncontrol ledl) ledl)
dG = 10.9 m
F G
dF = 7.7 m
T=1 T = 1/10
Offices
(public) Equipment/ modulator
T=1
dE = 6.5 m
E
Entrance (controlled)
(controlled)
T=1
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
dH or dH
3 m 1.3 m
Offices (unctrl.) unctrl.)
1.3 m
Important: Barrier width is determined by the beam divergence with gantry angle. Usually the width will match the primary barrier at the wall(s).
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Primary Walls
location type Unctrl. Ctrl. Ctrl. Uctrl. P (mSv/wk) U T ds (m) Bpri 1.05e-4 1.77e-5 1.05e-4 2.36e-6 n 3.98 4.75 3.98 5.62 x (cm)
A C H H
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
ACMP 2006
Location IDR
mSv/h
Rw
mSv/wk
RwT
mSv/wk
P
mSv/wk
Rh
mSv
Limit
mSv
Applicable?
status
A C H H
Yes No No Yes
OK OK OK OK
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Secondary Barriers Leakage Radiation to secondary barriers FDA regulation requires manufacturers of medical electron accelerators to permit leakage at a rate of less than 0.1% of the useful beam at 1 m. That is, 0.1% of the primary beam at 1 m from the x-ray target. Hence, leakage barrier calculations use the equation P = 10-3 BL WL T/dL2 1. Leakage radiation goes in all directions at roughly the same rate 2. Therefore, U is taken as 1 for many situations.
(significant departures from the U=1 approximation may occur)
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Secondary Barriers ---Leakage Radiation Leakage Radiation to secondary barriers Leakage radiation of proportional to the total number of MU the machine produces per week. Thus, the workload for leakage, WL, will be larger than Wpri when IMRT, stereotactic radiosurgery and TBI procedures are being performed. In particular, for (100%) IMRT: WL = C * Wpri Where C is the ratio of average of # MU using IMRT to the average MU without IMRT C varies from 2 to 15 in current technology.
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Secondary Barriers ---Leakage Radiation For our example, we will use C = 4 and assume the accelerator will be used with IMRT for 75% of the patients. Thus, the leakage workload is: WL = 0.75*C*Wpri + 0.25 Wpri = 3.25 x Wpri = 2373 Gy/wk
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
T = 1/20
dA = 5.2 m
Offices
(public =uncontrol ledl) ledl)
dG = 10.9 m
F G
dF = 7.7 m
T=1 T = 1/10
Offices
(public) Equipment/ modulator
T=1
dE = 6.5 m
E
Entrance (controlled)
(controlled)
T=1
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Leakage Radiation to secondary barriers Leakage TVLs Material TVL1/TVLe (cm) Concrete 34/29 Concrete 36/34
MV 6 18
Table B.7
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Shielding Calculation Methods for Medical Scatter radiation arises from two principal sources
the patient and barriers. We deal with patient scatter Q first.
dsec
dsca
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Scattered radiation is normally much less penetrating than primary (especially for megavoltage x-rays). Exceptions to this may occur when 20.
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
T = 1/20
Offices
(public =uncontrol ledl) ledl)
dG = 10.9 m
F G
dF = 7.7 m
T=1 T = 1/10
Offices
(public) Equipment/ modulator
T=1
(controlled)
E
Entrance (controlled)
T=1
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
dI or dI
Offices (unctrl.) unctrl.)
Important: Barrier width is determined by the beam divergence with gantry angle. Usually the width will match the primary barrier at the wall(s).
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
P
mSv/wk
d
m
BL
1.85e-4 1.13e-3 1.77e-3 2.48e-2 9.94e-4 4.56e-3 1.15e-4
n(L)
3.73 2.94 2.75 1.60 3.00 2.34 3.94
tL
cm
B D E F G I I
1 1 1 0.1 1 0.1 1
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
P
mSv/wk
a()
Bsca
1.42e-3 1.76e-3 5.79 e-2 1.91e-1 7.64 e-3 1.24e-2 3.13e-4
n(sca)
tsca
cm
()
Unctrl. Crtl. Ctrl. Ctrl. Unctrl. Ctrl. Unctrl.
1 1 1 0.1 1 0.1 1
ACMP 2006
Combining the results from leakage and scatter calculations for each secondary barrier location:
The rule of thumb is that if the difference between the two thicknesses obtained by the independent (leakage and scatter) calculations is > 1 TVL(of the more penetrating radiation) , then use the larger thickness. If not (> 1 TVL), add 1 HVL (0.30 TVL) to the larger thickness.
This same rule applies whenever barrier thicknesses for two or more contributions are computed independently. For example, low- and hi- beams incident on a primary barrier.
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
tL-tsca
>1TVLe(L)?
old t
new t
x= cos(ang) *t
B D E F G I I
ACMP 2006
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
G
Offices (unctrl.) unctrl.)
D
Console area (controlled)
E
Entrance (contrl.) contrl.)
C J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
ACMP 2006
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
P
mSv/wk
Sv/h B D E F G I I
2.0
Sv/h
0.0
Sv/h Sv 2.0 1.0 6.4 2.0 10.1 3.0 102.6 34 2.0 1.0 114 35 2.1 0.7
J Rodgers
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
ACMP 2006
II.
Contributions at door:
Pri. scattered to maze wall to door (HS) Pt. Scatter to wall to door (HPS) Leakage scattered from maze wall to door (HLS) Leakage transmitted thru maze barrier (HLT) . For high energy beams photon neutrons must be considered. dL dz
G
A0
dr d0 dsec dzz
Equipment/ modulator (controlled)
A1 Az
Entrance
J Rodgers
(controlled)
ACMP 2006
ACMP 2006
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
A0 =(2.6 m)^2 = 6.8 m2 A1 =(2.9 m)x(3m) = 8.7 m2 Az = 9.3 m2 d0 = 4.0 m dr = 5.8 m dsec = 5.5 m dL = 6.2 m dz = 3.9 m dzz = 6.6 m
G
A0
dr d0 dsec dzz
Equipment/ modulator (controlled)
A1 Az
dL dz
Entrance
J Rodgers
(controlled)
ACMP 2006
Example: 6 MV maze door HS = 0.0223 mSv/wk HPS = 0.0051 mSv/wk HLS = 0.0200 mSv/wk HLT = 0.0220 mSv/wk HG = 0.0324 mSv/wk (using f = 0.25) HTot = 2.64 *HG = 0.0856 mSv/wk HTot < P = 0.10 mSv/wk HTot is just below the design goal.
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Example: 6 MV maze door However, to ensure that P is met is is suggested that the door have some lead added to it. Figure 3-6 from McGinleys book gives the amount of Pb needed in the maze door. To lower the DE by 2 HVLs we need about 1 mm of Pb.
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
dTBI
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
The workloads are the principal changes needed to be considered in this situation.
1. If dTBI = 4 m and DTBI = 2 pt/wk *12 Gy/pt = 24 Gy/wk, then then the TBI contribution to the primary workload at 1 m is Wpri(TBI) = 16 x 24 = 384 Gy/wk The leakage radiation contribution at 1 m is WL(TBI) = Wpri(TBI) .
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
3. Combined TBI and conventional workloads are: Directed at location Z (beyond the TBI barrier) is Wpri(Z) = U(conv)*Wpri(conv) + Wpri(TBI) = .2 *730+ 384 = 146 +384 = 530 Gy/wk and the leakage radiation workload for all barriers is: WL = WL(conv) + WL(TBI) = 730 + 384 = 1114 Gy/wk
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
4. We now allow that 40 % of the (conventional) patients are treated using IMRT. Take C = 4 as in prior example. The primary workload directed at Z remains the same (530 Gy/wk) and workloads of 730 Gy/wk*U are directed toward other primary barriers. The leakage radiation workload increases as follows: [WL(conv)+WL(IMRT)] = fIMRT*C*Wpri(conv)+(1- fIMRT) Wpri(conv) = 0.4(4)(730) + 0.6(730) = 2.2*730 = 1606 Gy/wk Thus, the total leakage radiation workload to be applied to all barriers is: WL(total) = WL(TBI) + [ WL(conv)+WL(IMRT)] = 384 + 1606 = 1990 Gy/wk 5. Evaluation of Rh is especially needed due to the long treatment time per fraction.
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
ACMP 2006
More CK Information
Analysis* of Georgetown University Hospital CyberKnife patient plan data yielded the following: 1. U =0.05, is a conservative use factor 2. C = 15 is an average ratio of MU to cGy 3. The average dose delivered per session is 12.5 Gy 4. The average # of treatment sessions (fractions or stages) is 3.2 per lesion. Range: 1-5 Also, 6 treatment sessions per 8 hour day is typical.
*James Rodgers, CyberKnife Treatment Room Design and Radiation Protection,
Chapter 5, Robotic Radiosurgery, Vol.1, (CyberKnife Society Press, Sunnyvale, CA, (2005)
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
More CK Information
The standard treatment distance (x-ray target to point of deliver in tumor) is 80 cm. Although the CK does not have an isocenter, we use the 80 cm distance as a close approximation for the purpose of shielding calculations. The CK is calibrated (1 cGy/MU) at 80 cm. The IDR is 400 cGy/min at 80 cm. The leakage rate is < 0.1% at 100 cm. The machine has no flattening filter and uses circular cones, ranging in diameter from 0.5 to 6.0 cm.
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
dB = 5.4 m
Office, unctrl. A
CyberKnife
dA= 4.3m
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
The Roof
F(unctrl, e.g. office) or, F(ctrl) dF = 3.7 m 2.4 m 0.925 m
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Shielding Calculations
Primary barrier: P = Bpri Wpri(1m) U T /(diso +0.8 m)2 Wpri(1m) = 0.82 Wpri(0.8 m) = 0.64 (30 TX/wk*12.5 Gy/Tx) = 240 Gy/wk at 1 m and diso = distance(m) from pseudo-isocenter to location Leakage radiation (secondary) barrier: P = BL WL T/(diso)2 WL(1m) = C*Wpri(1m) = 15*240 Gy/wk = 3600 Gy/wk Patient scatter radiation is insignificant.
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Calculation Results
Location T
Ctrl/ Unctrl
n(pri)
n(L)
Combined
Conc. x(cm)
Pb x(cm)
A B F F
1 1 1
1/20
U C U C
4.36 3.49 NA NA
TVL1/TVLe = 29.4 cm/31.9 cm (concrete), 4.8 cm/5.05 cm (Pb) [6.0 cm diameter field at 80 cm]
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Rw*T
Sv/wk
Rhpri Sv
RhL Sv
Combined Rh
Sv
2.1 10.7 NA NA
10.0 50.1 NA NA
0.5 2.5 NA
NA (100.)
||
M = 1.5/0.75
ACMP 2006
V.
The determination of primary and secondary barriers is essentially the same as for low energy. In addition, the photon shielding in those barriers is normally adequate for photoneutrons. Photoneutrons do present additional dose equivalent contributions at the maze door. There are two principal sources of DE at the door: 1. Scattered neutrons (fast to thermal) 2. neutron-capture gamma-rays
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
S0 dJ
J S
d2
Entrance
J Rodgers
where do = 1.41 m is measured from the x-ray target H(do) is the measured total n-DE at do and TVD = 5 m is the recommended tenth value distance S0 and S1 are defined in next Figure Or, Modified-Kersey (Wu and McGinley):
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Sr
d1
A d2
Entrance
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
ACMP 2006
Example :Photoneutron
Data d1 = 5.08 m d2 = 4.5 m S0 = 6.6 m2 S1 = 3.6 m2 Sr = 144 m2 WL (30% IMRT) = 4*500(30%)
Gy/wk + (70%)*500 Gy/wk
maze door
18 MV X-ray machine
Sr
S0 dJ
J S1
d2
Entrance
=950 Gy/wk
J Rodgers
Example-Results 18 MV
Kersey's formula (as modified by McGinley) HK = H(do) (S0/S1) (do/d1)2 10-[d2 / TVD] HK = 21.3E-03 mSv/Gy
here H0 = 1.2 mSv/Gy at d0 = 1.41 m
J = Qn/(4 d12) + 5.4 Qn/(2Sr ) +1.3 Qn /(2Sr ) , [n/(m2Gy)] = 1 for Pb, Qn = 1.2E+12 n/Gy A = 1.259E+10 n /(m2 Gy), HMK= 3.17E-03 mSv/Gy
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006
Example-Results 18 MV
Kerseys formula gives a larger H value than modified Kersey by a factor of 6.7. The MK has a large amount of good recent data to support it. What to do? Take the average! H = 12.3 x10-3 mSv/Gy
The neutron DE per week at the door is estimated as: Hn = WL *H = 11.6 mSv/wk The Capture Gamma contribution at the door: Hcg = WL h , [in Sv/wk at door] h = K A 10-[d2 /TVD] , [ in neutron-Sv / photon-Gy] K = 6.9x10-16 m2 Sv/n TVD = tenth-value distance, 5.4m for 18-25 MV x-rays, h = 1.27E-06 Sv/Gy
ACMP 2006
Example-Results 18 MV
Combining all DE contributions at the maze door, we have HW = Hn + Hcg + HTot where Hn = WL *H = 11.6 mSv/wk Hcg = 1.21 mSv/wk & Htot = photon (x-ray) contribution, guesstimated 0.2 mSv/wk So, the total neutron DE at the door, 12.8 mSv/wk, requires door shielding (Polyethylene and Pb).
J Rodgers
ACMP 2006