in German Studies, and Economics. NATIONAL e Prussian system in America. T oday we live in a society where it is diIfcult to imagine liIe without a gov- ernment monopoly on education; the gov- ernment heavily regulates charter schools, private schools, and homeschooling to fash- ion the curriculum and benchmarks exactly like public schools. The undermining of alternative education is no accident. Politi- cians have been developing the system since the 18th century with well-documented in- tentions to socialize their constituencies into obedient workers and unquestioning sol- diers. The story begins in the Holy Roman Empire. In the mid 18th century, Holy Roman Empress Maria Theresa sought to expand the authority of the nearly 500-year-old House of Habsburg. Citing a model from The Republic by Plato, Maria Theresa be- lieved she could create a stronger army and achieve total autonomy using manda- tory state-sponsored education. Manda- tory public education had already demon- strated Iavorable results to policy makers: Martin Luther used it to convert Catholics; John Calvin used it to arrest dissenters of Calvinism. Starting out with several mili- tary academies, Maria Theresa created the framework of the system we know today. By 1775, Maria Theresa had codifed a Prussian Model of Education. The system was not widely adopted; however, until the aristocracy capitalized on wartime national- ism to expand the program. Following Napoleons 1806 victory in the War of the Fourth Coalition, Prussian King Friederich Wilhelm II determined their defeat was due to a lack of obedience among Prussian soldiers. He reasoned that the will of the people had to conform to the militaristic aspiration of the nobles. The in- tellectual and military elite resolved to train a new obedient military by enforcing the compulsory education law and using the schools as means to indoctrinate foreign policy goals into the Prussian culture. The implementation of the propaganda machine was quick. The following year, philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte pro- claimed, the state is a necessary instrument in promoting moral and social progress. Fichte reIers to John Locke`s 'children are a blank slate postulation when he proposed: The schools must fashion the person, and fashion him in such a way that he simply cannot will otherwise than what you wish him to will. The nobility eagerly used the intellectuals assertion as an excuse to defend central planning with military force. Under threat of arrest, the Prussian population was expected to forfeit their current educational institutions and utilize those from the state. They also were expected to entirely pay for the new system with federal taxes. The masses were fully integrated by 1819 into a three-tiered model. The aristocratic frst tier included 0.5 oI the population and existed merely as a vehicle to arbitrarily in- vent and meet qualifcations Ior degrees that would justify their sovereignty. The second tier represented 5.5% of the population who would become doctors, lawyers, architects, and engineers. The bottom tier amassed the remaining 94% of Prussians in Volksschu- len, or Peoples Schools. The Volksschule was a mandatory 8-year primary school that subjectively divided up a classical educa- tion into random time-allotted subjects with the curriculum completely controlled by the frst tier. Volksschulen existed to teach harmony, obedience, freedom from stress- ful thinking, and how to follow orders (Jim Keith, 1993). As the vast majority of citi- zens were fed made up history and forced to memorize books glorifying the nobility, politicians worldwide began to take notice oI the system`s eIfcacy. In 1814 Edward Everett became the frst American to receive a degree from Prussia. Hoping to instill the Prussian Model of Edu- cation in America, Everett spent the next 30 years, including his tenure as Massachusetts Governor, staIfng American universities by Aaron Pendola e Disturbing Origins of Modern Education almost exclusively with Prussian scholars. Among the Prussian-educated intellectual elite invited by Everett to raise Americas children was renowned phrenologist and temperance activist, Horace Mann. Having observed frst-hand Prussia`s success in training an empire of obedient soldiers, Mann worked the hardest to imple- ment Volksschulen in America. On the verge of an industrial revolution, Mann believed America could beneft Irom a similarly fashioned generation of obedient factory workers. Mann lobbied for public education vehemently under his famous principle the public shall no longer remain ignorant and, in 1852; the Prussian Volksschule was trans- planted mostly unchanged into Massachu- setts. 80% of Massachusettss residents op- posed Manns reform, requiring him to use the state militia to coerce families into sur- rendering their children (Richman, 1994). Over the next 150 years, Maria The- resas brainchild became a building block of American society. Through public edu- cation, the central planners had the ability to intrude on private lives in innumerable ways. Immigrants were required to adopt English. Catholics were converted to Prot- estantism. Black Americans were not al- lowed to study with white Americans. The system continues to grow today, socializing childrens behavior through non-academic means as well. Politicians now control high- ly personal issues such as sex education, physical ftness, nutrition, and prescription drug administration. Meanwhile, measures of actual school effectiveness demonstrate a downward trend. Literacy in Massachusetts decreased from 98% in 1850 to 91% in the 1980s (Richman, 1993). The bizarre development of our mod- ern school system seems farfetched; a state sponsored propaganda machine does not seem American. Yet, we share these origins with the indoctrination in the fascist dic- tatorships of the 20th century. With every democratically processed expansion of state-sponsored education, the totalitarian authority of the central planners increases accordingly. Americans must reject the ab- sence of choice. The coercive monopoly must be turned over to the marketplace. Educators must have the freedom to edu- cate, and not let their good intentions be ex- ploited by politicians regardless if theyre from the Holy Roman Empire or the United States of America WE D N E S D A Y , F E B R U A R Y 2 9 , 2 0 1 2 1 4