Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000
The therapeutic management of new bone formation remains one of the key issues in periodontology and dental implantology. A full understanding of the nature of the bone-forming cells (osteoblasts) and their lineage, the factors that may regulate osteoblast behavior and bone formation locally, and how these different regulatory mechanisms could interact, has been the subject of extensive study for many years, particularly with the aspiration that such an understanding will lead to the development of novel biologically based therapies for the management of bone regeneration, not only in dental applications but also for many other disciplines, such as orthopedic surgery, and maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. The aim of this review was as follows. to describe the nature of the osteoblast phenotype, its lineage and the genetic regulation of osteoblast differentiation and function. to discuss the role of a range of cytokines and growth factors in regulating osteoblast differentiation and function. to review how some of these cytokine pathways may be regulated and interact with each other in the co-ordinated control of osteoblast function. to review, briey, studies that have investigated the pharmacological application of cytokines for therapeutic management of bone formation locally in vivo. Cytokines are soluble, secreted glycoproteins which act as local signaling molecules to control and co-ordinate cellular behavior and function. They function as ligands which bind to cell-surface receptors, triggering a series of intracellular signaling events, ultimately resulting in the modulation of gene expression in their target cells. Growth and differentiation factors are generally considered to be a subset
of cytokines with anabolic physiological and pathophysiological roles in the regulation of tissue growth and healing. Although this terminology is widely used, the distinction between growth factors and cytokines is probably an articial one, particularly given the different complex roles that these molecules may all have on cell and tissue function. However in keeping with convention, here we have used the term growth factors to describe this distinct subgroup of cytokines, and have separately considered the role of cytokines which are particularly associated with inammation on bone cell regulation.
48
the organic matrix of bone and provides the strength, structure and elasticity of the mature bone tissue. The noncollagenous proteins of bone include osteocalcin (bone GLA protein) osteopontin, osteonectin and bone sialoprotein. In addition, the proteoglycans decorin and biglycan are signicant components of the bone organic matrix. Although a full description of the function of the different matrix constituents of bone is beyond the scope of this review, these proteins collectively have calcium-binding activity, which is probably responsible for the exquisite regulation of hydroxyapatite crystal deposition, orientation and specic crystal size seen in the mineralized bone matrix. In addition, it is known that bone sialoprotein and osteopontin contain the ArgGlyAsp (RGD) peptide cell-attachment sequences and can mediate attachment of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts to the bone matrix. Of the noncollagenous proteins of bone, osteocalcin is considered to be the most bone-specic. Expression of osteocalcin in the mature organism is restricted to bone, dentin and cementum. Evidence particularly from mouse knockout models suggest that the bone matrix proteins play an important role in regulating the overall control of bone mass. For example, the osteocalcin knockout mouse exhibits an overall increase in bone mass as its main phenotype (54). The expression of bone-specic genes and proteins are valuable markers for demonstration of bone osteoblast phenotype in vitro, and understanding of the transcriptional regulation of these genes is of fundamental importance in the regulation of osteoblast differentiation and function.
erative capcacity but express many of the proteins associated with the mature osteoblast phenotype, including alkaline phosphatase and osteopontin. The mature osteoblast layer lies immediately adjacent to the bone and is a post-mitotic cell expressing all of the features of the mature phenotype (189). These descriptions give rise to the concept of recruitment of proliferating osteoprogenitor cells from adjacent connective tissues, which undergo further differentiation, resulting in the expression of the mature phenotype. These studies also suggest that mature osteoblasts have an average lifespan of 1 month, after which either they undergo apoptosis, to be replaced by newly differentiated osteoblasts or alternatively about one-third of these cells may be incorporated into deposited bone matrix as osteocytes. The osteocyte is thus the most differentiated cell of the osteoblast lineage and may persist in bone matrix for very lengthy periods of time. Although its functions are not fully understood, there is compelling evidence that the osteocyte has a critical role in the maintenance of bone mass and is the principal bone cell responsible for mechanotransduction. It is well established that maintenance of bone mass relies on regular mechanical stimulation. It is thought that the subtle exing seen in bones in response to any loading causes pulsatile uid ow through osteocyte canaliculi, resulting in signal transduction by osteocytes in order to retain bone mass (24, 128, 228). The precise molecular mechanisms whereby this occurs are unknown. However, mechanical strain and pulsatile uid ow are able to induce signaling molecules, such as nitric oxide, by osteocytes in vitro (127, 194). Interestingly, the recently described bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibitor, sclerostin, has also been localized specically to osteocytes and may contribute to the regulation of overall bone mass (264). Around the periodontal tissues, similar pulse chase 3H-thymidine-labeling experiments demonstrate the continual recruitment of proliferating cells from bone marrow stroma through vascular channels that communicate with the periodontal ligament. These cells appear to preferentially migrate to the osteoblast (and cementoblast) surfaces, consistent with the recruitment of osteoprogenitor cells from stem cells located in the bone marrow stroma through to the periodontal ligament and ultimately undergo osteoblastic differentiation, akin to the kinetics described in other bony tissues (159). Thus, the periodontal ligament is constantly repopulated by relatively undifferentiated mesenchymal cells and is a
49
Hughes et al.
rich source of progenitor cells capable of giving rise to new bone formation (see Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Demonstration of continual recruitment of progenitor cells from bone marrow to the periodontal ligament. Cycling cells were labeled by a bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse on day 0 and followed-up for periods of up to 10 days in Wistar rats. (A) Day 0. A bone marrow space is seen within the bone, communicating directly with the PDL via a vascular channel. Labeled cycling cells (red) are largely restricted to the bone marrow stroma. (B) Day 6. Labeled cells have now migrated into the periodontal tissue spaces and are seen adjacent to vascular channel openings into the ligament. (C) Day 10. Labeled cells are relatively evenly distributed throughout the ligament, tending toward the bony surface. B, bone; T, tooth; PDL, periodontal ligament. Original magnication 100 [King GN, King N, Hughes FJ, unpublished, based on experiments described by McCulloch et al. (159)].
50
reported in primary marrow stromal cells, particularly as osteoblast/chondrocyte/adipocyte stem cells (2, 187, 195). There is much less clear evidence of cells at an advanced stage of differentiation exhibiting true dedifferentiation and redifferentiation along distinct pathways (132). However, studies suggest that this phenomenon may occur in osteoblasts redifferentiating into chondrocytes. In support of the possibility of a differentiated cell subsequently redifferentiating as a distinct phenotype, it has been shown that osteoblastic cells, when transfected with the tissue-specic transcription factor, PPAR-c 2, can be converted to express an adipocytic phenotype (4). In addition to these complexities of the stem cell system, it has proved extremely difcult to identify specic cells of the mesenchymal lineages with labels that specically reect a particular stage in the stem cell/early commitment phases of connective tissue cell lineages. Typically, in stem cell studies using culture methods, in vitro differentiation potentials are elucidated by directly demonstrating differentiation outcomes and ascribing those to cultured cells in retrospect. In addition, at least one antibody (Stro1) has proved extremely useful in identifying the cells in marrow stromal cell cultures with osteogenic potential (225). Stro-1 staining in combination with alkaline phosphatase expression using uorescenceactivated cell sorting has demonstrated the presence of early osteogenic precursor cells in a Stro-1-positive/alkaline phosphatase-negative population of marrow stromal cells (51, 85, 222). During differentiation it has been shown that Stro-1 expression is lost, whilst alkaline phosphatase expression is upregulated (257). Despite these observations and many other attempts, it has still proven difcult and impossible at the present time to dene a marker or markers that would unequivocally identify a single multipotent mesenchymal stem cell in a mixed stromal cell population.
myoblast lineage (260). Similarly, the transcription factor, ppar-c 2, can specify adipocyte differentiation (209), and sox-9 expression is required for chondrocyte differentiation (44). A major breakthrough in the understanding of genetic regulation of osteoblast differentiation was made with the identication of the role of the transcription factor core binding factor 1 (Cbfa-1/Runx-2) (55, 130). Cbfa-1/Runx-2 expression is an absolute requirement for osteoblast differentiation. In cbfa-1 knockout mice there is a normal cartilaginous skeleton seen but a complete absence of bone (and tooth) formation. Cbfa-1/Runx2 is known to interact directly with the osteocalcin promoter to induce its expression (56). However an additional transcription factor, osterix, which is a downstream target for Cbfa-1/Runx-2, has also been shown to be an absolute requirement for normal osteoblast differentiation in knockout mice experiments (170). More recent studies have shown the existence of distinct isoforms of Cbfa-1, which may have subtly different roles during normal tissue formation, including regulation of cartilage expression in addition to bone. The expression of Cbfa-1/Runx-2 occurs quite late in the osteoblast lineage scheme and physiologically probably does not specify osteoblastic commitment events in multipotent stem cell populations. Recently, the role of the transcription factor, TAZ, has been reported, which appears to act by specifying osteoblastic cell fate in bipotent osteoblast/adipocyte stem cells, by activating Cbfa-1/Runx-2 whilst simultaneously repressing the adipocyte transcription factor, ppar-c 2 (95), Experimental overexpression of TAZ in primary mesenchymal stem cells appears to preferentially specify osteoblastic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells. A number of other transcription factors, whilst not being absolute requirements for osteoblast differentiation, are also known to regulate osteoblast differentiation. These include Msx-2, Dlx-5 and the AP-1 family of transcription factors formed by heterodimers of members of fos and jun families. Although a full review of these molecules is beyond the scope of this review, msx-2 appears to act upstream of Cbfa-1/Runx-2 (91) whilst Dlx-5 may be a transcriptional regulator of late stage osteoblast differentiation acting downstream of Cbfa-1/Runx-2.
Summary
In summary, the osteoblast lineage consists of mesenchymal stem cells which exhibit self-renewal and may include both multipotent cells and those of
51
Hughes et al.
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of stages in the osteoblast lineage and some phenotypic features seen at different stages of the lineage. Cbfa-1, transcription factor expression. AIP, alkaline phosphatase; AP-1, activator-protein-1; BSP, bone sialoprotein; OSX, osterix; PTH, parathyroid hormone; PTHrP R, PTH-related protein receptor.
more restricted potentials. Commitment of these cells to the osteoblast lineage is likely to be mediated by the transcription factor TAZ, resulting in committed monopotent osteoprogenitor cells with extensive proliferative capacity. Differentiation of the mature osteoblast is ultimately regulated by transcription factors, including Cbfa-1/Runx-2 and osterix. A diagramatic schema of the osteoblast lineage and its features is shown in Fig. 2.
with distinct properties (98). Interpretation of the large amount of data from these in vitro models can sometimes be difcult owing to the variations seen in different model systems and the fact that cells may show different responses according to the precise stage of target cells through the lineage at different stages of differentiation. For example, as reviewed below, broblast growth factor-2 treatment of osteoprogenitor cells in vitro results in a mitotic response but suppression of the expression of osteoblast differentiation markers, but paradoxically, when applied in vivo, may result in an overall stimulation of bone formation. This can be explained by the suggestion that broblast growth factor-2 results in the expansion of relatively undifferentiated cells, which is seen as a suppression of differentiation in vitro but ultimately results in increased mature osteoblast numbers in vivo. Tissue engineering aims to produce tissues that are both structurally and functionally identical to the original tissues they are replacing, and strategies for growing bone therapeutically are emerging based on the knowledge of the physiological role of different
52
signaling molecules in the bone-forming process. The potential therapeutic application of growth factors in bone tissue engineering is considered further below. Bone formation is directed by the co-ordinated expression of many molecules, including growth factors, BMPs and specic transcription factors, which utilize developmentally derived signals to induce cellular and molecular stimuli to guide cellular commitment and differentiation in the proper spatial and temporal sequence. It is envisaged that future periodontal tissue engineering may involve the use of appropriate gene expression systems for controlled delivery of regenerative growth factors within the appropriate biological scaffold. Growth factors are soluble proteins that act as signaling agents for cells and inuence critical functions, such as cell division, matrix synthesis and tissue differentiation, by receptorligand binding. Results of experimental studies have established that growth factors play many important roles in bone formation and bone repair. Within the periodontal environment, growth factors found in bone, cementum and healing tissues include transforming growth factor-b, basic broblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factors, platelet-derived growth factor and BMPs. Recently, with the advent of recombinant growth factor proteins there has been considerable interest in their use as therapeutic agents in the treatment of bone disorders (including periodontal disease), and as growth factors become available as therapeutic agents, it is essential that we understand their biological characteristics and biological potential for periodontal tissue engineering. During bone formation, a number of candidate growth factors and their respective signaling pathways have been delineated, although there is a paucity of understanding of the complexities in the way that these growth factors interact to regulate bone formation and repair. It seems biologically sensible that there is involvement of multiple bioactive factors in osteoblast development and bone formation, with factors acting in a sequential manner. A number of growth factors, and their downstream molecular targets, have been characterized during osteoblast differentiation. These ndings suggest that at least some of the growth factors reviewed in this article, or their genetic effectors, may be potential therapeutic targets for regenerating bone. Growth factors that are known to affect osteogenic cells include transforming growth factor-b, broblast growth factors, platelet-derived growth factor and insulin-like growth factor.
53
Hughes et al.
from the basic molecular pathway and potential therapeutic perspectives. This has given considerable insight into the genetic cascade leading to bone formation. Among these specic targets are the transcription factors Cbfa1/Runx2 (55), osterix (170) and TAZ (95). Bone morphogenetic proteins can upregulate Cbfa1/Runx2 under certain conditions during osteoblast differentiation; therefore, this is a candidate downstream target of BMPs, although Smad complexes can also directly interact and activate target genes independently of Cbfa1/Runx2 (115). Evidence is also emerging to suggest that some aspects of BMP-2-induced differentiation may be mediated through Wnt/b-catenin signaling, although co-operation between b-catenin and Smads are needed to activate late osteoblast gene expression (13). b-catenin is the classical effector of Wnt protein signaling, suggesting a role for this group of proteins in BMP-2 signal transduction.
54
osteoblastic differentiation (49) and dramatically increases apoptosis when cells are exposed to differentiating conditions (157). Fibroblast growth factors are strongly mitogenic to bone marrow stromal cells and are able to maintain the self-renewal of these cells in culture (135). It seems that short-term treatment with broblast growth factor, followed by its removal from culture, has an overall stimulatory effect on osteoblasts, and these growth factors may have potential as an adjunctive agent to increase bone formation. Their general effects in vitro are consistent with them acting mainly to stimulate proliferation in immature cells (whilst concomitantly inhibiting differentiation), resulting in expansion of the osteoblast progenitor pool.
mone participates in the regulation of skeletal growth and triggers the release of insulin-like growth factor in target cells. The insulin-like growth factors are bound to binding proteins, adding another crucial tier to modulate the activity of insulin-like growth factor. Two insulin-like growth factors have been identied insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin-like growth factor-2 both of which are found in high concentration in serum. In bone, whilst insulin-like growth factor-2 is more abundant, insulin-like growth factor-1 may be more potent, although this might be different both between and within species (208). The regulation of insulin-like growth factor is complex, and the growth hormone mode of action in skeletal cells is largely unknown. Of the major hormones that regulate the skeleton, all have signicant effects on skeletal insulin-like growth factor, as do many growth factors, such as BMP-2 (27), transforming growth factor- (181) and broblast growth factor (70). Insulin-like growth factors increase proliferation and play a major role in stimulating mature osteoblast function. As with other growth factors detailed in this section, the way that osteoblasts respond to insulin-like growth factor signals may well depend on both the differentiation status of the cell and cell type. At the molecular level, insulin-like growth factor-1 upregulates the osteoblast-associated transcription factor, osterix, but not Cbfa1/Runx2. In addition, insulin-like growth factor-1, in combination with BMP-2, acts synergistically on osterix expression (34). Although it is widely accepted that insulin-like growth factors have a dening role in bone remodeling, their actual role is still unclear and needs to be understood within the complex inter-relationships of the components of the insulin-like growth factor system that evidently occur in vivo. Overall, the evidence suggests that the major effects of insulin-like growth factors are to promote the late-stage differentiation and activity of osteoblasts.
Wnt signaling
There is increasing evidence for the role of Wnt signaling in the control of early stages of the osteoblast lineage. Wnts are a group of over 15 related extracellular signaling molecules that show ligand binding with their receptor, frizzled, and co-receptors LRP5/6. Ligand binding sets off a series of intracellular reactions, resulting in stabilization of the protein b-catenin (200). This is then translated to the nucleus, where it acts as a co-factor with other DNA-binding proteins to regulate gene transcription.
55
Hughes et al.
This Wnt/b-catenin signaling pathway is also known as the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. In addition, Wnt ligand binding can regulate gene expression by noncanonical pathways without the involvement of b-catenin. The canonical Wnt signaling pathway has been shown to have important roles in the maintenance of self-renewal of stem cells in epidermal and hematopoietic cells, and there is increasing evidence for its role in the regulation of bone formation (31, 200, 262). First, it has been shown that canonical Wnt signaling can directly promote osteogenesis through actions on the Cbfa-1/Runx-2 gene (72). Second, genetic defects and polymorphisms of the Wnt co-receptor, LRP5, are associated with an osteoporotic phenotype (14, 129). The relationship between Wnt signaling and other growth factormediated osteoblast effects is, to date, confusing, with evidence for Wnt signaling acting through the induction of BMPs, and, conversely, BMPs acting through the induction of Wnt signaling in mesenchymal cells (13, 199, 265). At present there is little or no information about the role of Wnt signaling in local bone formation during wound healing, although it is likely that this signaling pathway may play an important role in the early events of local bone formation.
56
Fig. 3. Simplied schematic diagram showing the main stages of the osteoblast lineage where different growth factors may act. BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; FGF, broblast growth factor;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; Shh, Sonic hedgehog; TGF-b, transforming growth factor-b; Wnts, a group of >15 related extracellular signaling molecules.
neously upregulating genes encoding growth and repair-promoting molecules (193). The in vitro treatment of cementoblasts with EMDs was found to decrease osteocalcin expression and to increase osteopontin expression (249). Overall, the data support the positive effect of EMDs on osteoblast differentiation, although further studies are needed to clarify which molecules in EMDs stimulate osteogenesis and to dene their precise modes of action.
outcome of these cellular responses may be both anabolic and catabolic. This section will provide an insight into the capacity of the major pro-inammatory cytokines to regulate osteoblast differentiation and function. Finally, the coupling of the osteoblast to the regulation of bone resorption will be introduced.
Interleukin-1
Interleukin-1 is a multipotent cytokine comprising two individual peptides, namely IL-1a and IL-1b, which exhibit similar biological activities (52). Both hematopoietic and mesenchymal/osteoblastic cells can produce IL-1 (89). There are two IL-1 receptors, namely type-I and type-II. All cellular responses elicited by IL-1 are known to be mediated through the type-I receptor (227), whereas type-II acts as a nonsignaling decoy receptor for the cytokine (41). Interleukin-1 also has a natural inhibitor, termed IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra). This binds to, but does not activate, IL-1 receptors (88), thus blocking the biological activity of the cytokine (9). The signaling events downsteam of the IL-1 receptor are mediated by IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK), and include the recruitment of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), phosphorylation of MAPKs, and ultimately activation of the transcription factor, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-jB) (12). In the context of bone, IL-1 is known to regulate both resorption (149) and formation (25). However, the outcomes of different studies on the effects of IL-1 on osteoblast function are rather divergent. On the one
Summary
Considerable advances have been made in describing the regulation of osteoblasts by growth factors and in identifying some of the molecular mechanisms involved in these processes. Although the data are at times complex and sometimes contradictory, an overall pattern emerges of a carefully regulated, temporal sequence of co-ordinated growth factor expression, which can be modulated at any stage of the differentiation cycle. A schematic representation of this is shown in Fig. 3.
57
Hughes et al.
hand, both IL-1a and IL-1b have been shown to inhibit osteoblast proliferation and enhance bone formation, as demonstrated by enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity and bone nodule formation (50, 87, 179). On the other hand, depending on the differentiation stage of the cell, prolongation of the culture period and concentration of the cytokines, IL-1a and IL-1b, may stimulate osteoblast proliferation, including DNA and protein synthesis, and inhibit bone formation (25, 57, 202, 241), and inhibit osteocalcin and type I collagen production (231, 232). Interleukin-1 can also stimulate osteoblasts to produce other pro-inammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 (38, 110), IL-7 (261) and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) (259), or other inammatory mediators, such as prostaglandin E2 and nitric oxide (104, 105, 120, 197, 198).
extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 MAPK, as well as the signal transducers and activators of transcription 1 and 3 (STAT-1 and STAT-3) (59, 65). Desensitization of IL-6 signaling is accomplished by endocytosis of the receptorligand complex, a process dependent on gp130. However, attenuation of IL-6-induced STAT-1 and STAT-3 expression, is independent of IL-6/IL-6R, or gp130 endocytosis (247, 248). Apart from the direct effects on osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, it is also possible that the IL-6/sIL-6R complex may indirectly regulate the expression of other factors known to control these cellular events. These include insulin-like growth factors (63, 62), BMPs (269), and a number of other paracrine and endocrine regulators of osteoblasts.
58
responsive regions in the promoter of the respective genes (COL1A1 and COL1A2), indicating that NF-jB mediates the inhibition of collagen transcription (109, 116, 136, 163). Tumor necrosis factor-a also inhibits alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin expression. However, the nature of osteocalcin inhibition is different from that of type I collagen, because this does not require binding of NF-jB to the promoter of the osteocalcin gene (173, 171). Apart from suppressing extracellular matrix production by osteoblasts, TNF-a also inhibits the differentiation of pre-osteoblasts as a result of the suppression of Cbfa1/Runx2 (1, 76) and osterix (171). In addition, TNF-a stimulates IL-6 production by osteoblasts (47, 110, 203) in an NF-jB-dependent mechanism (139). However, recent evidence suggests that other pathways such as p38 MAPK, and protein kinase C may also be involved in this event (138, 167). Tumor necrosis factor-a also induces prostaglandin E2 production by osteoblasts, an event at least partially mediated by nitric oxide (104).
complex, and ultimately nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) c1 (238, 245). The effects of RANKL can be blocked by the soluble nonsignaling decoy receptor, osteoprotegerin (OPG), a member of the TNFR superfamily with high homology to RANK (226). OPG is produced and secreted by osteoblasts and stromal cells, and by binding to RANKL it prevents RANKL/RANK interaction and consequently the downstream events described. RANKL-decient mice lack functional osteoclasts and develop osteopetrosis, whereas OPG-decient mice develop earlyonset osteoporosis, demonstrating the indispensable role of a balanced RANKL/OPG expression in physiological bone remodeling (23, 131). An increased RANKL/OPG expression ratio has been demonstrated in diseases involving inammation-induced bone loss, including periodontitis (148, 243, 246) and rheumatoid arthritis (60). Interleukin-1, IL-6 and TNF-a are all potent inducers of osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. It is postulated that their catabolic effects on bone are mediated, to a great extent, through osteoblasts/stromal cells, and more specically through the regulation of RANKL and OPG expression in these cells (144, 148, 256). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that IL-6/sIL-6R, IL-11, leukemia inhibitory factor and oncostatin M increase RANKL and OPG expression in osteoblasts, in a manner dependent on gp130 and its downstream effector STAT-3 (177, 178, 191). Similarly, both IL-1 and TNFa induce RANKL expression, the former possibly being dependent on activation of STAT-3, whereas the latter is dependent on phosphorylation of p38 (47, 90, 259). OPG expression is also enhanced by these two cytokines (22, 255). Although both RANKL and OPG are upregulated in these systems, the overall outcome is an increased RANKL/OPG expression ratio, resulting in stimulation of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption.
59
Hughes et al.
than NF-jB (53, 143). It is produced by osteoblasts/ stromal cells, to which it acts as a mitogen, and is also known to inhibit osteoclast differentiation (43, 250). This may, in part, account for its capacity to stimulate osteoprotegerin, but not affect RANKL expression in osteoblasts/stromal cells (155). Interferon-c is a lymphokine produced by activated T cells, with a strong potency to inhibit osteoclastogenesis (80, 81, 239), It also inhibits osteoblast proliferation, as well as collagen and noncollagen protein synthesis (82, 172, 229). These effects appear to be dependent on nitric oxide production (103, 152, 153), rather than on prostaglandin E2 synthesis (229).
Summary
In summary, inammatory cytokines may have both anabolic and catabolic effects on osteoblast function, and consequently on bone physiology. However there is relatively little information on how these effects might also interact directly with growth factor pathways, but these interactions are likely to be very important. Studies have shown that both IL-1 and TNF-a may inuence the effects of BMPs on osteoblasts, but the nature of these interactions have not been explored at a mechanistic level (169, 240). Therefore, any tissue engineering approach targeting osteoblasts for bone regeneration must take into consideration the putative cellular responses elicited by cytokines upon them during inammation. This should be a concern, not only in the case of exogenously administered cytokines as a direct treatment strategy. It is highly probable that several other primary molecular agents may induce secondary inammatory responses by the target cells, inuencing, in turn, the cellular dynamics of bone in an autocrine or paracrine manner. This issue is particularly important in the instance of catabolic effects, which may occur either as inhibition of bone formation, or, most reportedly, as enhancement of bone resorption. Tackling efciently the potential sideeffects of these cytokines may help to ensure that the bone-remodeling balance would tend favorably toward bone formation, ultimately resulting clinically in bone regeneration.
in vitro or, on some occasions, from transgenic and null mutant (knockout) mouse models. These methodologies are extremely powerful for dissecting out specic signaling pathways as it is possible to control many of the extrinsic variables, thus facilitating the study of, for example, the role of individual specic molecules and signaling pathways. However, cells in vivo are exposed to a wide range of these signaling pathways simultaneously, and it is the total sum of these interactions which results in the carefully co-ordinated control of osteoblast function that is seen in vivo. Although there are some data on how different pathways may interact during the co-ordinated regulation of bone growth, at the present time it is only possible to provide examples of such interactions, rather than give a complete picture of the complex interactions in cytokine signaling pathways during bone growth. There are a number of mechanisms which can regulate different growth factor pathways. Different signaling pathways can also interact with each other in order to ne tune the nal observed outcome. These mechanisms are listed below. the regulation of growth factor activity by the secretion of soluble antagonists which are often regulated in both autocrine and paracrine fashions. the regulation of receptor expression on specic cells the interaction between intracellular signaling mechanisms in both antagonistic and synergistic ways.
60
described, whose expression is reportedly restricted to ectodermal-derived tissues in regulating epithelialmesenchymal interactions that are mediated by BMPs (142). The important actions that these inhibitors may have are suggested by a number of observations. First, mutations in the SOST gene (which codes for sclerostin) result in the rare bone disease, sclerosteosis, which is characterized by increased bone mass (15). Second, the overexpression of noggin in transgenic mice results in blocking the production of BMP-4-induced heterotopic bone formation (79). Third, evidence suggests that BMP-4-induced expression of noggin and gremlin is dysfunctional in patients with brodysplasia ossicans progressiva, a multilating condition where heterotopic bone forms in subdermal tissues (3). Finally, normal expression of ectodin in mice blocks enamel formation on one surface of the mouse incisor, and mice lacking ectodin have a number of defects in tooth formation, including an altered pattern of cusp formation and the formation of extra teeth (118, 142). Distinct BMP inhibitors may have tissue-specic activities and may also interact with different BMPs. For example, sclerostin expression is largely restricted to bone cells, particularly osteocytes, and may be involved in the osteocyte-mediated regulation of bone mass (264). In general, the expression of BMP antagonists is transcriptionally regulated by BMP signaling, giving rise to a negative feedback loop to regulate BMP signaling (30, 180). In addition, other pathways may regulate the expression of BMPs. In the case of ectodin, broblast growth factor and Shh signaling downregulates its expression, providing a mechanism whereby other growth factor signaling pathways may effectively upregulate BMP responses (142). The insulin-like growth factors are regulated by a series of at least six different binding proteins (insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins). As with other antagonists, insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins bind to the insulin-like growth factors with high afnity and typically may inactivate activity by preventing ligand binding. However, it is known that insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins may also act to mediate or regulate the ligand binding of insulin-like growth factors to their receptors on some occasions (26, 160). Insulin-like growth factors have been shown to differentially regulate insulin-like growth factor-binding protein gene expression (69). Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins may also be regulated by a number of other osteotropic growth factors, including BMPs and transforming growth factor-b (68, 107, 160).
Fibroblast growth factors have complex interactions with a range of proteins and matrix molecules that regulate their function. First, it is known that broblast growth factors are normally matrix bound to heparan sulphate-containing proteoglycans and that heparan sulphate-containing proteoglycan binding is required for normal broblast growth factor ligandreceptor interactions (217). Alternatively spliced broblast growth factor receptor genes can give rise to broblast growth factor soluble receptors, which inactivate broblast growth factor by preventing normal receptorligand binding. Finally, there are additional broblast growth factorbinding proteins that also interact with broblast growth factors to control their function (141). The presence of these complex different levels of regulation together suggest a nely balanced set of mechanisms to control physiological broblast growth factor activity, although the specic functional signicance of broblast growth factor antagonists remains to be determined in bone. Transforming growth factor-b is also regulated closely by its association with binding proteins. Transforming growth factor-b is secreted in an inactive form bound to a specic binding peptide known as latency associated peptide. This latent transforming growth factor-b complex is then normally bound to one of at least four latent transforming growth factor-b-binding proteins (LTBPs) (182, 213). Latent transforming growth factor-b-binding proteins are extracellular matrix proteins found in bone matrix, and may be responsible for the large amounts of latent transforming growth factor-b sequestered in bone matrix. They may act as a delivery and release vehicle for transforming growth factor-b, and active transforming growth factor-b can be released from the complex by the enzymatic action of the plasminogen-activating system (6). In addition, a number of other proteins, including matrix metalloproteinases and thrombospondin, can release active transforming growth factor-b from latency associated peptide. The importance of these proteins is supported by the reports that LTBP-2 null mice die in utero at around stage e3.5; LTBP-3 knockout mice have a range of bone and craniofacial defects associated with a low turnover of bone (46). In contrast to most other growth factors, specic binding proteins have not been described for platelet-derived growth factor. However, platelet-derived growth factor binds to the matrix protein osteonectin (SPARC) and this may promote sequestering of platelet-derived growth factor in bone matrix and other sites (196).
61
Hughes et al.
Overall, it is clear that the production of growth factor-binding proteins is a mechanism whereby the activity of these proteins can be carefully controlled, and represents one level of regulation allowing careful cross-talk between different factors in a carefully co-ordinated way.
briey describe the general ndings of some of these studies. Given the limitations of currently used clinical techniques, it is unsurprising that there is great interest in the possible utility of recombinant growth factors for tissue regeneration therapies. From a theoretical standpoint, the pharmacological application of growth factors results in a local single dose of the factor, which may be present at a concentration thousands of times higher than that normally seen physiologically. The pharmacological effects of the factor may be distinct from its physiological activity, for example because the normal regulatory feedback mechanisms which control that factor are temporarily overwhelmed by such a large dose. It seems quite likely that therapeutic application of any one of a number of growth factors could perturb the normal bone-forming process in a positive way and, indeed, preclinical studies support this idea. For example, based on the knowledge of physiological function, discussed above, BMPs may increase osteoblastic stem cell recruitment and commitment, broblast growth factor may stimulate early progenitor cell number expansion, platelet-derived growth factor may also increase progenitor cell recruitment and proliferation, and insulin-like growth factors might act to increase nal osteoblast differentiation and function. Any one of these actions may result in the desired nal outcome of increased bone formation. With this in mind, it is likely that one of the main critical determinants of success for these treatments is achieving sufcient substantivity for the factor to provide a continual therapeutic dose over a lengthy period of time (122). Although there is little published data on the pharmacokinetics of growth factor delivery, one study demonstrated that delivery of platelet-derived growth factor with insulin-like growth factor-I in a collagen matrix had a half-life of <4 h, with complete loss of activity by 96 h (151). Thus, in order to address this issue a number of different delivery systems have been used for these applications, including collagen matrix (123, 212), cross-linked gelatin pellets (124), calcium phosphate ceramics (112, 174), and polylactic-acid (PLA)-based resorbable polymers (192). In a different approach to provide persisting growth factor delivery, somatic cell gene transfer of platelet-derived growth factor has also been tested in vitro and in animal models (8, 61, 114, 113, 272). This approach might prove particularly successful in providing a sustained active concentration of growth factor to the site being treated. However, at present, serious concerns about the safety of the
62
adenovirus vectors used for gene transfer, and other ethical and practical issues, will need to be overcome before this could be thought of as a viable clinically applicable technique.
growth factors (162, 242). There is also clinical interest in the application of platelet-rich plasma, an autologous preparation obtained from a patients own platelets, which is rich in a number of growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor and trefoil factor family-b, and which has been applied clinically in both periodontal and implant applications (32, 184, 218, 220). However, disappointingly, to date there is very little proper scientic evidence which evaluates the efcacy of this procedure, and well-controlled clinical studies of platelet-rich plasma would be valuable in ascertaining whether this treatment has a similar potential, for example, as the pharmacological use of recombinant growth factors.
Summary
The explosion of knowledge and the understanding of the role of growth factors, their mechanisms of action and molecular signaling pathways, which have been reviewed in this article, suggest the potential for many novel therapeutic targets, not only for applying growth factors but also for the potential use of growth factor inhibitors or agents that target specic parts of the intracellular signaling pathways. There remains an enormous challenge to convert some of the knowledge from basic studies of bone cell physiology to therapeutically useful techniques for the future. We are optimistic that such novel approaches may result in real qualitative improvements in clinical outcomes over currently available techniques.
References
1. Abbas S, Zhang YH, Clohisy JC, Abu-Amer Y. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibits pre-osteoblast differentiation through its type-1 receptor. Cytokine 2003: 22: 3341. 2. Ahdjoudj S, Fromigue O, Marie PJ. Plasticity and regulation of human bone marrow stromal osteoprogenitor cells: potential implication in the treatment of age-related bone loss. Histol Histopathol 2004: 19: 151157. 3. Ahn J, Serrano de la Pena L, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. Paresis of a bone morphogenetic protein-antagonist response in a genetic disorder of heterotopic skeletogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003: 85-A: 667674. 4. Allan EH, Ho PW, Umezawa A, Hata J, Makishima F, Gillespie MT, Martin TJ. Differentiation potential of a mouse bone marrow stromal cell line. J Cell Biochem 2003: 90: 158169. 5. Alliston T, Choy L, Ducy P, Karsenty G, Derynck R. TGFbeta-induced repression of CBFA1 by Smad3 decreases cbfa1 and osteocalcin expression and inhibits osteoblast differentiation. Embo J 2001: 20: 22542272. 6. Annes JP, Munger JS, Rifkin DB. Making sense of latent TGFbeta activation. J Cell Sci 2003: 116: 217224.
63
Hughes et al.
7. Antosz ME, Bellows CG, Aubin JE. Effects of transforming growth factor and epidermal growth factor on cell proliferation and the formation of bone nodules in isolated fetal rat calvaria cells. J Cell Physiol 1989: 140: 386395. 8. Anusaksathien O, Webb SA, Jin QM, Giannobile WV. Platelet-derived growth factor gene delivery stimulates ex vivo gingival repair. Tissue Eng 2003: 9: 745756. 9. Arend WP, Welgus HG, Thompson RC, Eisenberg SP. Biological properties of recombinant human monocytederived interleukin 1 receptor antagonist. J Clin Invest 1990: 85: 16941697. 10. Asahina I, Sampath TK, Hauschka PV. Human osteogenic protein-1 induces chondroblastic, osteoblastic, and/or adipocytic differentiation of clonal murine target cells. Exp Cell Res 1996: 222: 3847. 11. Aubin JE. Advances in the osteoblast lineage. Biochem Cell Biol 1998: 76: 899910. 12. Auron PE. The interleukin 1 receptor: ligand interactions and signal transduction. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 1998: 9: 221237. 13. Bain G, Muller T, Wang X, Papkoff J. Activated betacatenin induces osteoblast differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells and participates in BMP2 mediated signal transduction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003: 301: 8491. 14. Baldock PA, Eisman JA. Genetic determinants of bone mass. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2004: 16: 450456. 15. Balemans W, Van Hul W. Identication of the diseasecausing gene in sclerosteosis discovery of a novel bone anabolic target? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2004: 4: 139142. 16. Beck GR, Jr, Zerler B, Moran E. Gene array analysis of osteoblast differentiation. Cell Growth Differ 2001: 12: 6183. 17. Bellido T, Borba VZ, Roberson P, Manolagas SC. Activation of the Janus kinase/STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) signal transduction pathway by interleukin-6-type cytokines promotes osteoblast differentiation. Endocrinology 1997: 138: 36663676. 18. Beresford JN, Bennett JH, Devlin C, Leboy PS, Owen ME. Evidence for an inverse relationship between the differentiation of adipocytic and osteogenic cells in rat marrow stromal cell cultures. J Cell Sci 1992: 102: 341351. 19. Bertolini DR, Nedwin GE, Bringman TS, Smith DD, Mundy GR. Stimulation of bone resorption and inhibition of bone formation in vitro by human tumour necrosis factors. Nature 1986: 319: 516518. 20. Boabaid F, Gibson CW, Kuehl MA, Berry JE, Snead ML, Nociti FH Jr, Katchburian E, Somerman MJ. Leucine-rich amelogenin peptide: a candidate signaling molecule during cementogenesis. J Periodontol 2004: 75: 11261136. 21. Boyce BF, Xing L, Franzoso G, Siebenlist U. Required and nonessential functions of nuclear factor-kappa B in bone cells. Bone 1999: 25: 137139. 22. Brandstrom H, Jonsson KB, Vidal O, Ljunghall S, Ohlsson C, Ljunggren O. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and -beta upregulate the levels of osteoprotegerin mRNA in human osteosarcoma MG-63 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998: 248: 454457. 23. Bucay N, Sarosi I, Dunstan CR, Morony S, Tarpley J, Capparelli C, Scully S, Tan HL, Xu W, Lacey DL, Boyle WJ, Simonet WS. Osteoprotegerin-decient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcication. Genes Dev 1998: 12: 12601268. Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J, Smit TH. Strain-derived canalicular uid ow regulates osteoclast activity in a remodelling osteon a proposal. J Biomech 2003: 36: 14531459. Canalis E. Interleukin-1 has independent effects on deoxyribonucleic acid and collagen synthesis in cultures of rat calvariae. Endocrinology 1986: 118: 7481. Canalis E. Insulin-like growth factors and osteoporosis. Bone 1997: 21: 215216. Canalis E, Gabbitas B. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 increases insulin-like growth factor I and II transcripts and polypeptide levels in bone cell cultures. J Bone Miner Res 1994: 9: 19992005. Canalis E, Raisz LG. Effect of broblast growth factor on cultured fetal rat calvaria. Metabolism 1980: 29: 108114. Canalis E, Centrella M, McCarthy T. Effects of basic broblast growth factor on bone formation in vitro. J Clin Invest 1988: 81: 15721577. Canalis E, Economides AN, Gazzerro E. Bone morphogenetic proteins, their antagonists, and the skeleton. Endocr Rev 2003: 24: 218235. Canalis E, Deregowski V, Pereira RC, Gazzerro E. Signals that determine the fate of osteoblastic cells. J Endocrinol Invest 2005: 28: 37. Carlson NE, Roach RB Jr. Platelet-rich plasma: clinical applications in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2002: 133: 1383 1386. Carpentier I, Beyaert R. TRAF1 is a TNF inducible regulator of NF-kappaB activation. FEBS Lett 1999: 460: 246 250. Celil AB, Campbell PG, Datto M, Wang XF, Hollinger JO, Selvamurugan N, Kwok S, Alliston T, Reiss M, Partridge NC, Hassel S, Schmitt S, Hartung A, Roth M, Nohe A, Petersen N, Ehrlich M, Henis YI, Sebald W, Knaus P, Lee KS, Hong SH, Bae SC, Lai CF, Cheng SL. BMP-2 and insulin-like growth factor-I mediate Osterix (Osx) expression in human mesenchymal stem cells via the MAPK and protein kinase D signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 2005: 280: 3135331359. Centrella M, McCarthy TL, Canalis E. Transforming growth factor beta is a bifunctional regulator of replication and collagen synthesis in osteoblast-enriched cell cultures from fetal rat bone. J Biol Chem 1987: 262: 2869 2874. Centrella M, Horowitz MC, Wozney JM, McCarthy TL. Transforming growth factor-beta gene family members and bone. Endocr Rev 1994: 15: 2739. Cerny R, Slaby I, Hammarstrom L, Wurtz T. A novel gene expressed in rat ameloblasts codes for proteins with cell binding domains. J Bone Miner Res 1996: 11: 883891. Chaudhary LR, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL. Production of various cytokines by normal human osteoblast-like cells in response to interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha: lack of regulation by 17 beta-estradiol. Endocrinology 1992: 130: 25282534. Chen TL, Bates RL, Dudley A, Hammonds R Jr, Amento EP. Bone morphogenetic protein-2b stimulation of growth and osteogenic phenotypes in rat osteoblast-like cells: comparison with TGF-beta 1. J Bone Miner Res 1991: 6: 13871393.
24.
25.
26. 27.
28. 29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
64
58.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66. 67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
65
Hughes et al.
74. Giannobile WV, Somerman MJ. Growth and amelogeninlike factors in periodontal wound healing. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003: 8: 193204. 75. Giannobile WV, Hernandez RA, Finkelman RD, Ryan S, Kiritsy CP, DAndrea M, Lynch SE. Comparative effects of platelet-derived growth factor-BB and insulin-like growth factor-I, individually and in combination, on periodontal regeneration in Macaca fascicularis. J Periodontal Res 1996: 31: 301312. 76. Gilbert L, He X, Farmer P, Rubin J, Drissi H, van Wijnen AJ, Lian JB, Stein GS, Nanes MS. Expression of the osteoblast differentiation factor RUNX2 (Cbfa1/AML3/Pebp2alpha A) is inhibited by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J Biol Chem 2002: 277: 26952701. 77. Gilbert LC, Rubin J, Nanes MS. The p55 TNF receptor mediates TNF inhibition of osteoblast differentiation independently of apoptosis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005: 288: E1011E1018. 78. Giuliani N, Colla S, Morandi F, Lazzaretti M, Sala R, Bonomini S, Grano M, Colucci S, Svaldi M, Rizzoli V. Myeloma cells block RUNX2/CBFA1 activity in human bone marrow osteoblast progenitors and inhibit osteoblast formation and differentiation. Blood 2005: 106: 24722483. 79. Glaser DL, Economides AN, Wang L, Liu X, Kimble RD, Fandl JP, Wilson JM, Stahl N, Kaplan FS, Shore EM. In vivo somatic cell gene transfer of an engineered Noggin mutein prevents BMP4-induced heterotopic ossication. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003. 23322342. 80. Gowen M, Mundy GR. Actions of recombinant interleukin 1, interleukin 2, and interferon-gamma on bone resorption in vitro. J Immunol 1986: 136: 24782482. 81. Gowen M, Nedwin GE, Mundy GR. Preferential inhibition of cytokine-stimulated bone resorption by recombinant interferon gamma. J Bone Miner Res 1986: 1: 469474. 82. Gowen M, MacDonald BR, Russell RG. Actions of recombinant human gamma-interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha on the proliferation and osteoblastic characteristics of human trabecular bone cells in vitro. Arthritis Rheum 1988: 31: 15001507. 83. Graves DT, Valentin-Opran A, Delgado R, Valente AJ, Mundy G, Piche J. The potential role of platelet-derived growth factor as an autocrine or paracrine factor for human bone cells. Connect Tissue Res 1989: 23: 209 218. 84. Grigoriades AE, Heersche JNM, Aubin JE. Differentiation of muscle, fat, cartilage and bone from progenitor cells present in a bone derived clonal cell population: Effects of dexamethasone. J Cell Biol 1988: 106: 21392151. 85. Gronthos S, Graves SE, Ohta S, Simmons PJ. The STRO-1+ fraction of adult human bone marrow contains the osteogenic precursors. Blood 1994: 84: 41644173. 86. Haase HR, Bartold PM. Enamel matrix derivative induces matrix synthesis by cultured human periodontal broblast cells. J Periodontol 2001: 72: 341348. 87. Hanazawa S, Ohmori Y, Amano S, Hirose K, Miyoshi T, Kumegawa M, Kitano S. Human puried interleukin-1 inhibits DNA synthesis and cell growth of osteoblastic cell line (MC3T3-E1), but enhances alkaline phosphatase activity in the cells. FEBS Letts 1986: 203: 279284. 88. Hannum CH, Wilcox CJ, Arend WP, Joslin FG, Dripps DJ, Heimdal PL, Armes LG, Sommer A, Eisenberg SP, Thompson RC. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist activity of a human interleukin-1 inhibitor. Nature 1990: 343: 336 340. Haynes DR, Atkins GJ, Loric M, Crotti TN, Geary SM, Findlay DM. Bidirectional signaling between stromal and hemopoietic cells regulates interleukin-1 expression during human osteoclast formation. Bone 1999: 25: 269278. Hofbauer LC, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL, Khosla S. Interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factoralpha, but not interleukin-6, stimulate osteoprotegerin ligand gene expression in human osteoblastic cells. Bone 1999: 25: 255259. Hoffmann HM, Catron KM, van Wijnen AJ, McCabe LR, Lian JB, Stein GS, Stein JL. Transcriptional control of the tissue-specic, developmentally regulated osteocalcin gene requires a binding motif for the Msx family of homeodomain proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994: 91: 1288712891. Hogan B. Bone morphogenetic proteins in development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1996: 6: 432438. Holt I, Cooper RG, Denton J, Meager A, Hopkins SJ. Cytokine inter-relationships and their association with disease activity in arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1992: 31: 725733. Holt I, Davie MW, Marshall MJ. Osteoclasts are not the major source of interleukin-6 in mouse parietal bones. Bone 1996: 18: 221226. Hong JH, Hwang ES, McManus MT, Amsterdam A, Tian Y, Kalmukova R, Mueller E, Benjamin T, Spiegelman BM, Sharp PA, Hopkins N, Yaffe MB. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science 2005: 309: 10741078. Hosokawa R, Kikuzaki K, Kimoto T, Matsuura T, Chiba D, Wadamoto M, Sato Y, Maeda M, Sano A, Akagawa Y. Controlled local application of basic broblast growth factor (FGF-2) accelerates the healing of GBR. An experimental study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000: 11: 345353. Howell TH, Fiorellini JP, Paquette DW, Offenbacher S, Giannobile WV, Lynch SE. A phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate a combination of recombinant human plateletderived growth factor-BB and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I in patients with periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1997: 68: 11861193. Hughes FJ, Aubin JE. Culture of cells of the osteoblast lineage. In: Arnett TR, Henderson B, editors. Methods in Bone Biology. London: Chapman Hall, 1998: 149. Hughes FJ, Howells GL. Interleukin-6 inhibits bone formation in vitro. Bone Miner 1993: 21: 2128. Hughes FJ, Mc Culloch CAG. Quantication of chemotactic response of quiescent and proliferating broblasts in Boyden chambers by computer-assisted image analysis. J Histochem Cytochem 1991: 39: 243246. Hughes FJ, Aubin JE, Heersche JNM. Differential chemotactic responses of different populations of fetal rat calvaria cells to platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factorb. Bone Miner 1992: 19: 6373. Hughes FJ, Collyer J, Staneld M, Goodman SA. The effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2, -4 and -6 on differentiation of rat osteoblast cells in vitro. Endocrinology 1995: 136: 26712677. Hughes FJ, Buttery L, Hukkanen M, Polak JM. Regulation of osteoblast activity by nitric oxide. In: Hukkanen M, Polak JM, Hughes SPF, editors. Nitric Oxide in Bone and
89.
90.
91.
92. 93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99. 100.
101.
102.
103.
66
104.
117.
118.
105.
119.
106.
120.
107.
108.
121.
109.
122.
123.
110.
124.
111.
112.
125.
126.
113.
114.
127.
115.
128.
116.
129.
67
Hughes et al.
130. Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, Shimizu Y, Bronson RT, Gao YH, Inada M, Sato M, Okamoto R, Kitamura Y, Yoshiki S, Kishimoto T. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 1997: 89: 755764. 131. Kong YY, Yoshida H, Sarosi I, Tan HL, Timms E, Capparelli C, Morony S, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, Van G, Itie A, Khoo W, Wakeham A, Dunstan CR, Lacey DL, Mak TW, Boyle WJ, Penninger JM. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 1999: 397: 315323. 132. Konieczny SF, Emerson CP Jr. 5-Azacytidine induction of stable mesodermal stem cell lineages from 10T1/2 cells: evidence for regulatory genes controlling determination. Cell 1984: 38: 791800. 133. Kopf M, Baumann H, Freer G, Freudenberg M, Lamers M, Kishimoto T, Zinkernagel R, Bluethmann H, Kohler G. Impaired immune and acute-phase responses in interleukin-6-decient mice. Nature 1994: 368: 339 342. 134. Kotake S, Sato K, Kim KJ, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Nakamura I, Yamaguchi A, Kishimoto T, Suda T, Kashiwazaki S. Interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptors in the synovial uids from rheumatoid arthritis patients are responsible for osteoclast-like cell formation. J Bone Miner Res 1996: 11: 8895. 135. Kotev-Emeth S, Pitaru S, Pri-Chen S, Savion N. Establishment of a rat long-term culture expressing the osteogenic phenotype: dependence on dexamethasone and FGF-2. Connect Tissue Res 2002: 43: 606612. 136. Kouba DJ, Chung KY, Nishiyama T, Vindevoghel L, Kon A, Klement JF, Uitto J, Mauviel A. Nuclear factor-kappa B mediates TNF-alpha inhibitory effect on alpha 2(I) collagen (COL1A2) gene transcription in human dermal broblasts. J Immunol 1999: 162: 42264234. 137. Kratchmarova I, Blagoev B, Haack-Sorensen M, Kassem M, Mann M. Mechanism of divergent growth factor effects in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science 2005: 308: 14721477. 138. Kumar S, Votta BJ, Rieman DJ, Badger AM, Gowen M, Lee JC. IL-1- and TNF-induced bone resorption is mediated by p38 mitogen activated protein kinase. J Cell Physiol 2001: 187: 294303. 139. Kurokouchi K, Kambe F, Yasukawa K, Izumi R, Ishiguro N, Iwata H, Seo H. TNF-alpha increases expression of IL-6 and ICAM-1 genes through activation of NF-kappaB in osteoblast-like ROS17/2.8 cells. J Bone Miner Res 1998: 13: 12901299. 140. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, Elliott R, Colombero A, Elliott G, Scully S, Hsu H, Sullivan J, Hawkins N, Davy E, Capparelli C, Eli A, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Sarosi I, Shalhoub V, Senaldi G, Guo J, Delaney J, Boyle WJ. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 1998: 93: 165176. 141. Lametsch R, Rasmussen JT, Johnsen LB, Purup S, Sejrsen K, Petersen TE, Heegaard CW. Structural characterization of the broblast growth factor-binding protein puried from bovine prepartum mammary gland secretion. J Biol Chem 2000: 275: 1946919474. 142. Laurikkala J, Kassai Y, Pakkasjarvi L, Thesleff I, Itoh N. Identication of a secreted BMP antagonist, ectodin, integrating BMP, FGF, and SHH signals from the tooth enamel knot. Dev Biol 2003: 264: 91105. 143. Lee JK, Kim SH, Lewis EC, Azam T, Reznikov LL, Dinarello CA. Differences in signaling pathways by IL-1beta and IL18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004: 101: 88158820. 144. Lerner UH. New molecules in the tumor necrosis factor ligand and receptor superfamilies with importance for physiological and pathological bone resorption. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004: 15: 6481. 145. Lewis DB, Liggitt HD, Effmann EL, Motley ST, Teitelbaum SL, Jepsen KJ, Goldstein SA, Bonadio J, Carpenter J, Perlmutter RM. Osteoporosis induced in mice by overproduction of interleukin 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993: 90: 1161811622. 146. Li YP, Stashenko P. Proinammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IL-6, but not IL-1, downregulate the osteocalcin gene promoter. J Immunol 1992: 148: 788 794. 147. Littlewood AJ, Aarden LA, Evans DB, Russell RG, Gowen M. Human osteoblast like cells do not respond to interleukin-6. J Bone Miner Res 1991: 6: 141148. 148. Liu D, Xu JK, Figliomeni L, Huang L, Pavlos NJ, Rogers M, Tan A, Price P, Zheng MH. Expression of RANKL and OPG mRNA in periodontal disease: possible involvement in bone destruction. Int J Mol Med 2003: 11: 1721. 149. Lorenzo JA, Sousa SL, Alander C, Raisz LG, Dinarello CA. Comparison of the bone-resorbing activity in the supernatants from phytohemagglutinin-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with that of cytokines through the use of an antiserum to interleukin 1. Endocrinology 1987: 121: 11641170. 150. Lynch SE, Williams RC, Polson AM, Howell TH, Reddy MS, Zappa UE, Antoniades HN. A combination of plateletderived and insulin-like growth factors enhances periodontal regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1989: 16: 545548. 151. Lynch SE, de Castilla GR, Williams RC, Kiritsy CP, Howell TH, Reddy MS, Antoniades HN. The effects of short-term application of a combination of platelet-derived and insulin-like growth factors on periodontal wound healing. J Periodontol 1991: 62: 458467. 152. MacIntyre I, Zaidi M, Alam AS, Datta HK, Moonga BS, Lidbury PS, Hecker M, Vane JR. Osteoclastic inhibition: an action of nitric oxide not mediated by cyclic GMP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991: 88: 29362940. 153. MacPherson H, Noble BS, Ralston SH. Expression and functional role of nitric oxide synthase isoforms in human osteoblast-like cells. Bone 1999: 24: 179185. 154. Maeda S, Hayashi M, Komiya S, Imamura T, Miyazono K. Endogenous TGF-beta signaling suppresses maturation of osteoblastic mesenchymal cells. Embo J 2004: 23: 552563. 155. Makiishi-Shimobayashi C, Tsujimura T, Iwasaki T, Yamada N, Sugihara A, Okamura H, Hayashi S, Terada N. Interleukin-18 upregulates osteoprotegerin expression in stromal/osteoblastic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001: 281: 361366. 156. Manolagas SC. The role of IL-6 type cytokines and their receptors in bone. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998: 840: 194204. 157. Mansukhani A, Bellosta P, Sahni M, Basilico C. Signaling by broblast growth factors (FGF) and broblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2)-activating mutations blocks
68
158. 159.
160. 161.
162.
163.
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
69
Hughes et al.
184. Okuda K, Kawase T, Momose M, Murata M, Saito Y, Suzuki H, Wolff LF, Yoshie H. Platelet-rich plasma contains high levels of platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta and modulates the proliferation of periodontally related cells in vitro. J Periodontol 2003: 74: 849857. 185. Ornitz DM, Marie PJ. FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease. Genes Dev 2002: 16: 14461465. 186. Osyczka AM, Leboy PS. Bone morphogenetic protein regulation of early osteoblast genes in human marrow stromal cells is mediated by extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling. Endocrinology 2005: 146: 34283437. 187. Osyczka AM, Noth U, OConnor J, Caterson EJ, Yoon K, Danielson KG, Tuan RS. Multilineage differentiation of adult human bone marrow progenitor cells transduced with human papilloma virus type 16 E6/E7 genes. Calcif Tissue Int 2002: 71: 447458. 188. Owen M. Uptake of [3H] uridine into precursor pools and RNA in osteogenic cells. J Cell Sci 1967: 2: 3956. 189. Owen M. The origin of bone cells. Int Rev Cytol 1970: 28: 213238. 190. Owen M, Friedenstein AJ. Stromal cells: marrow-derived osteogenic precursors. In: Evered D, Harnett S, editors. Cell and Molecular Biology of Vertebrate Hard Tissues. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1988: 4253. 191. Palmqvist P, Persson E, Conaway HH, Lerner UH. IL-6, leukemia inhibitory factor, and oncostatin M stimulate bone resorption and regulate the expression of receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of NF-kappa B in mouse calvariae. J Immunol 2002: 169: 33533362. 192. Park YJ, Ku Y, Chung CP, Lee SJ. Controlled release of platelet-derived growth factor from porous poly(L-lactide) membranes for guided tissue regeneration. J Control Release 1998: 51: 201211. 193. Parkar MH, Tonetti M. Gene expression proles of periodontal ligament cells treated with enamel matrix proteins in vitro: analysis using cDNA arrays. J Periodontol 2004: 75: 15391546. 194. Pitsillides AA, Rawlinson SC, Suswillo RF, Bourrin S, Zaman G, Lanyon LE. Mechanical strain-induced NO production by bone cells: a possible role in adaptive bone (re)modeling? FASEB J 1995: 9: 16141622. 195. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999: 284: 143 147. 196. Raines EW, Lane TF, Iruela-Arispe ML, Ross R, Sage EH. The extracellular glycoprotein SPARC interacts with platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AB and -BB and inhibits the binding of PDGF to its receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992: 89: 12811285. 197. Raisz LG, Martin TJ. Prostaglandins in bone and mineral metabolism. In: Peck WA, editor. Bone and Mineral Research. Amsterdam: Exerpta Medica, 1984: 286310. 198. Ralston SH, Todd D, Helfrich M, Benjamin N, Grabowski PS. Human osteoblast-like cells produce nitric oxide and express inducible nitric oxide synthase. Endocrinology 1994: 135: 330336. 199. Rawadi G, Vayssiere B, Dunn F, Baron R, Roman-Roman S. BMP-2 controls alkaline phosphatase expression and osteoblast mineralization by a Wnt autocrine loop. J Bone Miner Res 2003: 18: 18421853. 200. Reya T, Clevers H. Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer. Nature 2005: 434: 843850. 201. Reynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME. The era of biologics and reparative medicine: a pivotal clinical trial of plateletderived growth factor for periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 2005: 76: 23302332. 202. Rickard DJ, Gowen M, MacDonald BR. Proliferative responses to estradiol, IL-1 alpha and TGF beta by cells expressing alkaline phosphatase in human osteoblast-like cell cultures. Calcif Tissue Int 1993: 52: 227233. 203. Rifas L, Kenney JS, Marcelli M, Pacici R, Cheng SL, Dawson LL, Avioli LV. Production of interleukin-6 in human osteoblasts and human bone marrow stromal cells: evidence that induction by IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha is not regulated by ovarian steroids. Endocrinology 1995: 136: 40564067. 204. Ripamonti U, Reddi AH. Tissue engineering, morphogenesis, and regeneration of the periodontal tissues by bone morphogenetic proteins. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997: 8: 154163. 205. Ripamonti U, Heliotis M, Rueger DC, Sampath TK. Induction of cementogenesis by recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (hop-1/bmp-7) in the baboon (Papio ursinus). Archs Oral Biol 1996: 41: 121126. 206. Robey PG, Young MF, Flanders KC, Roche NS, Kondaiah P, Reddi AH, Termine JD, Sporn MB, Roberts AB. Osteoblasts synthesize and respond to transforming growth factor-type beta (TGF-beta) in vitro. J Cell Biol 1987: 105: 457463. 207. Rodan SB, Wesolowski G, Thomas KA, Yoon K, Rodan GA. Effects of acidic and basic broblast growth factors on osteoblastic cells. Connect Tissue Res 1989: 20: 283 288. 208. Rosen CJ, Dimai HP, Vereault D, Donahue LR, Beamer WG, Farley J, Linkhart S, Linkhart T, Mohan S, Baylink DJ. Circulating and skeletal insulin-like growth factor-I (IGFI) concentrations in two inbred strains of mice with different bone mineral densities. Bone 1997: 21: 217223. 209. Rosen ED, Sarraf P, Troy AE, Bradwin G, Moore K, Milstone DS, Spiegelman BM, Mortensen RM. PPAR gamma is required for the differentiation of adipose tissue in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell 1999: 4: 611617. 210. Rosenquist JB, Ohlin A, Lerner UH. Cytokine-induced inhibition of bone matrix proteins is not mediated by prostaglandins. Inamm Res 1996: 45: 457463. 211. Rutherford RB, Niekrash CE, Kennedy JE, Charette MF. Platelet-derived and insulin-like growth factors stimulate regeneration of periodontal attachment in monkeys. J Periodontal Res 1992: 27: 285290. 212. Rutherford RB, Ryan ME, Kennedy JE, Tucker MM, Charette MF. Platelet-derived growth factor and dexamethasone combined with a collagen matrix induce regeneration of the periodontium in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol 1993: 20: 537544. 213. Rydziel S, Ladd C, McCarthy TL, Centrella M, Canalis E. Determination and expression of platelet-derived growth factor-AA in bone cell cultures. Endocrinology 1992: 130: 19161922.
70
227.
228.
229.
230.
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
238.
239.
240.
71
Hughes et al.
241. Tanabe N, Ito-Kato E, Suzuki N, Nakayama A, Ogiso B, Maeno M, Ito K. IL-1alpha affects mineralized nodule formation by rat osteoblasts. Life Sci 2004: 75: 23172327. 242. Tatakis DN, Wikesjo UM, Razi SS, Sigurdsson TJ, Lee MB, Nguyen T, Ongpipattanakul B, Hardwick R. Periodontal repair in dogs: effect of transforming growth factor-beta 1 on alveolar bone and cementum regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 2000: 27: 698704. 243. Taubman MA, Kawai T. Involvement of T-lymphocytes in periodontal disease and in direct and indirect induction of bone resorption. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001: 12: 125135. 244. Teitelbaum SL. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 2000: 289: 15041508. 245. Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP. Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat Rev Genet 2003: 4: 638 649. 246. Teng YT, Nguyen H, Gao X, Kong YY, Gorczynski RM, Singh B, Ellen RP, Penninger JM. Functional human T-cell immunity and osteoprotegerin ligand control alveolar bone destruction in periodontal infection. J Clin Invest 2000: 106: R59R67. 247. Thiel S, Dahmen H, Martens A, Muller-Newen G, Schaper F, Heinrich PC, Graeve L. Constitutive internalization and association with adaptor protein-2 of the interleukin-6 signal transducer gp130. FEBS Lett 1998: 441: 231234. 248. Thiel S, Sommer U, Kortylewski M, Haan C, Behrmann I, Heinrich PC, Graeve L. Termination of IL-6-induced STAT activation is independent of receptor internalization but requires de novo protein synthesis. FEBS Lett 2000: 470: 1519. 249. Tokiyasu Y, Takata T, Saygin E, Somerman M. Enamel factors regulate expression of genes associated with cementoblasts. J Periodontol 2000: 71: 18291839. 250. Udagawa N, Horwood NJ, Elliott J, Mackay A, Owens J, Okamura H, Kurimoto M, Chambers TJ, Martin TJ, Gillespie MT. Interleukin-18 (interferon-gamma-inducing factor) is produced by osteoblasts and acts via granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and not via interferon-gamma to inhibit osteoclast formation. J Exp Med 1997: 185: 10051012. 251. Ura K, Morimoto I, Watanabe K, Saito K, Yanagihara N, Eto S. Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 inhibit the differentiation of murine osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Endocr J 2000: 47: 293302. 252. Urist MR. Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 1965: 150: 893899. 253. Urist MR, Strates BS. Bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res 1971: 50: 13921406. 254. Viatour P, Merville MP, Bours V, Chariot A. Phosphorylation of NF-kappaB and IkappaB proteins: implications in cancer and inammation. Trends Biochem Sci 2005: 30: 4352. 255. Vidal ON, Sjogren K, Eriksson BI, Ljunggren O, Ohlsson C. Osteoprotegerin mRNA is increased by interleukin-1 alpha in the human osteosarcoma cell line MG-63 and in human osteoblast-like cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998: 248: 696700. 256. Walsh MC, Choi Y. Biology of the TRANCE axis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2003: 14: 251263. 257. Walsh S, Jefferiss C, Stewart K, Jordan GR, Screen J, Beresford JN. Expression of the developmental markers STRO-1 and alkaline phosphatase in cultures of human marrow stromal cells: regulation by broblast growth factor (FGF)-2 and relationship to the expression of FGF receptors 14. Bone 2000: 27: 185195. Wang EA, Israel DI, Kelly S, Luxenberg DP. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 causes commitment and differentiation in C3H10T1/2 and 3T3 cells. Growth Factors 1993: 9: 5771. Wei S, Kitaura H, Zhou P, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL. IL-1 mediates TNF-induced osteoclastogenesis. J Clin Invest 2005: 115: 282290. Weintraub H. The MyoD family and myogenesis: redundancy, networks and thresholds. Cell 1993: 75: 12411244. Weitzmann MN, Cenci S, Rifas L, Brown C, Pacici R. Interleukin-7 stimulates osteoclast formation by upregulating the T-cell production of soluble osteoclastogenic cytokines. Blood 2000: 96: 18731878. Westendorf JJ, Kahler RA, Schroeder TM. Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and bone diseases. Gene 2004: 341: 1939. Wikesjo UM, Xiropaidis AV, Thomson RC, Cook AD, Selvig KA, Hardwick WR. Periodontal repair in dogs: rhBMP-2 signicantly enhances bone formation under provisions for guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 2003: 30: 705714. Winkler DG, Sutherland MK, Geoghegan JC, Yu C, Hayes T, Skonier JE, Shpektor D, Jonas M, Kovacevich BR, Staehling-Hampton K, Appleby M, Brunkow ME, Latham JA. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. Embo J 2003: 22: 62676276. Winkler DG, Sutherland MS, Ojala E, Turcott E, Geoghegan JC, Shpektor D, Skonier JE, Yu C, Latham JA. Sclerostin inhibition of Wnt-3a-induced C3H10T1/2 cell differentiation is indirect and mediated by bone morphogenetic proteins. J Biol Chem 2005: 280: 24982502. Wozney JM. The bone morphogenetic protein family and osteogenesis. Molecular Reproduction & Development 1992: 32: 160167. Wozney J. Biology and clinical applications of rhBMP-2. In: Lynch S, Genco R, Marx R, editors. Tissue Engineering: Applications in Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1999: 103124. Wozney JM, Rosen V, Celeste AJ, Mitsock LM, Whitters MJ, Kriz RW, Hewick RM, Wang EA. Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. Science 1988: 242: 15281534. Yeh LC, Zavala MC, Lee JC. Osteogenic protein-1 and interleukin-6 with its soluble receptor synergistically stimulate rat osteoblastic cell differentiation. J Cell Physiol 2002: 190: 322331. Yoneda S, Itoh D, Kuroda S, Kondo H, Umezawa A, Ohya K, Ohyama T, Kasugai S. The effects of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on osteoblastic cells in culture and bone regeneration in a rat skull defect. J Periodontal Res 2003: 38: 333342. Yuasa T, Kataoka H, Kinto N, Iwamoto M, EnomotoIwamoto M, Iemura S, Ueno N, Shibata Y, Kurosawa H, Yamaguchi A. Sonic hedgehog is involved in osteoblast differentiation by cooperating with BMP-2. J Cell Physiol 2002: 193: 225232. Zhu Z, Lee CS, Tejeda KM, Giannobile WV. Gene transfer and expression of platelet-derived growth factors modulate periodontal cellular activity. J Dent Res 2001: 80: 892897.
258.
259.
260.
261.
262. 263.
264.
265.
266.
267.
268.
269.
270.
271.
272.
72