Presentation Rubric Presentation Component Overview: introduction case or problem and background described Style: use effective verbal

l and nonverbal communication skills (e.g., voice volume, inflection, eye contact, etc.) Unacceptable Acceptable Good Excellent

introduction but no introduction or overview, awkward, sketchy or background or agenda unclear overview and background poor style (long pauses, reading speech, "Umm..." and other mannerisms, poor eye contact, monotone, etc.)

confident and fluent confident introduction; clear introduction; clear overview purpose and overview; relevant & and background, but could be clear background more complete or polished Excellent style involving matching verbal and nonverbal style, good projection with inflection, spontaneous speaking fluent vocabulary and pronunciation without pretention

Either fluent delivery generally good delivery but reading, or awkward and spontaneity but could delivery but spontaneous improve good use of terms but still uses jargon or forces or is awkward with use of terms

use of terms but not Vocabulary: appropriate and little or no attempt to include well related, sporadic, fluent use of terms and concepts terms, concepts, authors misused or mispronounced Rationale: explains reasoning and provides evidence little or no reasoning, explanation, or evidence provided

reasoning and evidence logical reasoning integrated good logical reasoning and presented but not well with authoritative references on evidence, but not integrated organized or poor sources key points graphics present but poor quality (illegible, inconsistent, , etc.) well-designed and attractive well done graphics but too graphics that simplify or much or too little, and not on summarize key ideas; original key points graphics prepared for questions on key areas, and responsive to participant reaction and questions

Graphics: attractive & balanced no graphics (may be layout, legible font appropriate in some cases) Discussion: prepared to facilitate discussion and is receptive to feedback

little or no discussion

discussion but without prepared for discussion clear organization or questions purpose

Reflection: identifies what it little or no reflection would do differently to improve

ask for feedback and clarify request feedback, clarify ask for feedback; some responses; generally responses and link to performance defensiveness nondefensive changes; positive & curious