Recently

there has been a crisis involving the relationship between a teacher and a student. As a keen follower of the issue, I have decided to write an essay stating a couple of arguments explaining why the students apology should be accepted. I would like to, first, draw your attention to a brief introduction to the issue. At around 20:30, the teacher raised a question regarding a sensitive topic. The student, let us call him Nob, agreed to explain his view, but with a condition of exchanging answers with the teacher. She accepted the proposal. Then the two parties traded their answers. While Nob could see the teachers answer, what the teacher received was a piece of paper containing some meaningless economics recipes and a big LOL word. Having seen this, she went completely mad and hence the crisis broke out. In this situation, it is well understood that the student was wrong. He did express his interest in the question, even proposed to answer but eventually utilised a cheap trick to get away. The trick did not only cause a betrayal feeling in the short-term moment but might also negatively affect the teacher in the long-term. As a student, I wholeheartedly disagree with what the student did but there are a few reasons that could explain his action. Firstly, it is argued that the assumption might not be feasible. The question stated the situation is over and it could caused no harm answering, hence the response should be revealed. However, the student believed that by disclosing the answer, it could revive that matter, or even worse, complicate the already-complicated issue. It is well-known that all men should abide the bro- code; and thus any actions that could potentially damage the relationship between two men should be avoided. In this case, the student considered the situation as one of the potentially damage action had the assumption left out, thus resulting in the collapse of the deal. Secondly, the student expected the teacher to remember an experience undergone by him. It is told that during Nobs elementary years, he had suffered from a similar betrayal by his formal classmate. He believed that the teacher knew this incident; and hence by raising the proposal, Nob actually expected the teacher to know the trick before hand. Unfortunately, the teacher did not recall the history and fell for the trick. Although this reason could not fully explain the students behavior, it indicated that he did think of the possible harm and were fully aware of its consequences. Last but not least, having expressed a regretful manner demonstrated by this essay, Nob clearly wants to give a sincere apology to his lovely teacher. It is not important how the actual answer should be, the crucial thing for Nob is to maintain a close relationship toward his teacher, given that the bro-code is not violated. His wish is simply to have the teacher supervised his Dota assignments (thus he really wants the teacher to visit the library proved in the previous essay). Furthermore, his motivation of staying at home is laid behind the desire to socialise with the teacher. It could be said that the teacher really plays an important role in Nobs life. Nonetheless, he values his brothers and social ethics much more than his own self. For this reason, every of his action should not violate a certain limit. I hope this essay has made Nobs apology fully explained. Additionally, I anticipate his point on the relationship including any potential interests and social constraints is clarified. He wishes the relation could be normalised in the near future and promises such mistake will not be commited again. If his apology is accepted, Nob expected a pleased smile from his adorable teacher. Otherwise, he understands that the teacher might have a skeptical approach to him although that is not at all his desire.