Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • Will The Supreme Court Grant CERTIORARI On This Case That Shows Unarguable Corruption in The Massachusetts Federal Court System?

    Enviado por

    tired_of_corruption
    146 visualizações1 página
    Petitioner seeks this Court’s review of void judgments achieved through fraud, and a treble default judgment against all Defendants in this action based on the provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U. S. C. §1961 et seq. Certiorari review in this case is warranted because in the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and in the US District Court of Massachusetts officers of the court and public servants have put a Disabled American through an abusive process of pretense litigation that this Petitioner alleges has been nothing less than deliberate planned obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. 18 U.S.C.§ 3771 Crime Victims’ Rights (a)(1)Petitioner has the right to be reasonably protected from the accused.

    Título original

    Will the Supreme Court Grant CERTIORARI on this case that shows unarguable corruption in the Massachusetts Federal Court System?

    Direitos autorais

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formatos disponíveis

    PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    Petitioner seeks this Court’s review of void judgments achieved through fraud, and a treble default judgment against all Defendants in this action based on the provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U. S. C. §1961 et seq. Certiorari review in this case is warranted because in the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and in the US District Court of Massachusetts officers of the court and public servants have put a Disabled American through an abusive process of pretense litigation that this Petitioner alleges has been nothing less than deliberate planned obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. 18 U.S.C.§ 3771 Crime Victims’ Rights (a)(1)Petitioner has the right to be reasonably protected from the accused.

    Direitos autorais:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    146 visualizações1 página

    Will The Supreme Court Grant CERTIORARI On This Case That Shows Unarguable Corruption in The Massachusetts Federal Court System?

    Enviado por

    tired_of_corruption
    Petitioner seeks this Court’s review of void judgments achieved through fraud, and a treble default judgment against all Defendants in this action based on the provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U. S. C. §1961 et seq. Certiorari review in this case is warranted because in the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and in the US District Court of Massachusetts officers of the court and public servants have put a Disabled American through an abusive process of pretense litigation that this Petitioner alleges has been nothing less than deliberate planned obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. 18 U.S.C.§ 3771 Crime Victims’ Rights (a)(1)Petitioner has the right to be reasonably protected from the accused.

    Direitos autorais:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 1

    No.

    11-1180 Title:

    Docketed: Lower Ct: Case Nos.: Decision Date: ~~~Date~~~ Mar 26 2012

    Laura J. McGarry, Petitioner v. Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod, Inc., et al. March 28, 2012 United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (11-1668, 11-2292) December 27, 2011 ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 27, 2012)

    ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Attorneys for Petitioner: Laura J. McGarry

    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1717 Sheridan Road Apt. A-50 Bremerton, WA 98310

    ~~Phone~~~

    Party name: Laura J. McGarry

    QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the court of appeals render void, not voidable, but void Judgments by failing to acknowledge Petitioners motion for Judicial Notice of an Extraordinary Writ and verified docketing statement under the provisions of Title 18 U.S.C. 3771 Crime Victims Rights Act of 2004 (CVRA) and FRCP 60? Does the lower courts pro bono plan described in general court order (09-04) which excludes pro se plaintiffs who assert employment related claims against current or former employers single out an entire class of litigants, promote retaliation and ensure high priced employment law attorneys and their clients unrepresented opposition? Is the tax payer supporting oppression and tyranny when public servants working for our federal judiciary decide who is entitled to justice and then devise a concerted effort to ensure no legitimate court process or Article III oversight and is the resulting pretense litigation which invalidates multiple Acts of Congress as well as OUR Rights Provided by the Constitution of the United States leaving a majority of the unfortunate select victims beaten down without recourse because they lack the resources or skill to break the barrier of corruption?

    Você também pode gostar