Você está na página 1de 35

The 9/11 Minority

Report:
Part 1: An Orgy of Evidence

Part 2: CIA Internet Fakes

Part 3: True Lies of 9/11: Amanda & Atta


The 9/11 Minority Report: Part 1: An Orgy of Evidence

WagNews
SOMETHING VERY FISHY

THURSDAY, MAY 05, 2005

9/11 - The True Pill

I've NEVER seen the like of the current propaganda campaign -now running full steam,
ahead of the C-SPAN 2 broadcast by Prof. David Ray Griffin (The New Pearl Harbor)
-this Saturday, May 7th at 2:30 PM EST.

As Fred Burks raved:


In his 80-minute lecture to a standing room audience of 400 at the University of Wisconsin, Prof. Griffin,
one of the most respected theologians in the US, discusses his extensive research into the 9/11 cover-up.
But it is in Capital Times that we get to see what is really going on:
Americans interpret the events of Sept. 11 in one of four ways, Griffin said:

• A first group accepts the official interpretation that Sept. 11 was a surprise attack by
Islamic terrorists. It is easy for these people "to think of America's so-called War on
Terror as a just war," Griffin said.

• A second group accepts the official line but thinks Sept. 11 has been used
opportunistically by the Bush administration to extend the American empire. People
who hold this view often believe that America's response to Sept. 11, which has led to
hundreds of thousands of deaths, is far worse than the attacks themselves, he said.

• A third group believes the Bush administration knew the attacks were coming and let them happen. It
shows the government as "deliberate and cold-blooded," advancing its imperial designs while
hypocritically portraying itself as promoting a "culture of life," Griffin said.

• A fourth group believes that the government orchestrated the attacks. While no poll shows how
many Americans believe this, polls in Canada and Germany have found as many as 20 percent of those
populations do, Griffin said.
Of course, Group 4 are the really threatening, actual 9/11 skeptics.

They are the ones who can think the sinfully unthinkable. Groups 1-3 believe any old
rubbish(PeakOil, Bird Flu, GannonGate). Clearly, that fourth group are the big
problem for the opinion massagers. The core of their 9/11 strategy has been to try
ensure that groups 1 to 3 are as large as possible -and that group 4 is marginalized as
much as possible.

They have constructed an artificial Bell Curve of internet-based 9/11 opinion


distribution -with Group 4 at the "extreme" end of the curve. They will now proceed to
argue the group 1 to 3 positions for years in the alternative (lol) sections of the mass
media.

Thus replicating their internet tactic on the mass media audience.

They spent 2001 to 2004 getting people in place for this 2005-onwards phase. Along the
way, a key aim was to contaminate Group 4 with enough "extreme" material to damage
the REAL 9/11 skeptics. After all, if Group 4 are extremists, they must look like
extremists.

C-Span is muesli for the left. Muesli is best spoonfed.


Not the red pill or the blue pill. Just the true pill.

'The 9/11 Minority Report'


Why the 9/11 Movement was created
by, and is fostered by the very people
who carried out the attacks...

Audio by Fintan Dunne


May 7, 2005 [mp3]
LISTEN> [56K] [DSL]
POSTED BY BONO
AT 2:55 PM

26 COMMENTS:

Lau-Tzu said...
I watched the Griffin address the other day after downloading it, and it was
quite refreshing to see that some of the hard-core aspects of this "event" are
finally being dealt with in a mainstream forum.

I consider it absolutely remarkable, however, that this relatively modest


attempt to broaden the range of debate on this issue, is being discussed as if it
is the most radical development in exposing the truth since the "event" took
place over three and a half years ago.

9/11 was nothing less than the most outrageously transparent psyop ever
perpetrated in the history of modern man. I was one of the ones who knew that
something was terribly rotten in Denmark even before I watched the first
tower fall on live tv. The fact that so many of the American people (or sheeple
as they are so aptly described in many alternative circles) remain so woefully
in the dark concerning this subject, is a tribute to the highly sophisticated
mass mind-control apparatus known as the "news media."

One feels as if they were just informed that a bit of a crime has just has
occurred, after returning home in the evening to find the wife and children
dead after a demolition crew got the addresses mixed up.

And what to make of that cd cover - "COUP"? It came out shortly before the
"attack". Is this a remarkable example of synchronicity or perhaps mental
telepathy? I have the unsettling suspicion that something far more sinister was
at work. God help us all if I am right.

10:31 PM

Anonymous said...
I hope Fintan you won't be repeating those ideas of photoshoped pictures.
There are too many collaborating video sources showing the exact scenes from
different perspectives for that idea to be valid. In fact claims of post event
photo editing distract actual 9/11 skeptics and destroy creditibility when such
claims are proven false.

Anyway now that the voting charade is over for the major players, phase II of
the WOT is no doubt about to start with avengeance. Lets hope we are much
more responsive and resourceful in exposing the next event which I fear is
almost upon us.

12:43 AM

Anonymous said...
So you are going to hold your cards close to your chest on this one??? I
watched the David Ray Griffin talk on C-SPAN2 last Saturday morning ... how
can I say this delicately ... he was preaching to the choir! His points were valid
and well known to the "movement" but, he required you to purchase his book
for any "real" detail. If he wanted to convince an audience outside of the
college, he needed a full graphic presentation, not just the "trust me", I'm a
fucking certificate-carrying "man of God". The evangelical whack jobs use the
same criteria of proof. I am not discounting the information, just the
presentation.

Now, please make a follow up comment to the current hoopla between Mr.
Jones and the Wing-Dings. I happen to lean on the side of the (gulp) Wing-
Dings on this one. It is reality TV, now isn't it? Even if they are still promoting
"white supremacist" propaganda ... at least they aren't charging folks for their
opinion and making you feel cheated for having to shut them off! Ahh never
mind, I'm getting soft, I return to my original impression ... fuck them and the
911 pamphlet they rode in on!

I'm looking forward to your analysis on Saturday, keep it real, keep it smart,
and keep it free!

Peace

1:47 AM

Spork said...
The reason that the Griffin thing is such a big deal is that it's on TeeVee.
Simple perhaps, but he's reaching the crowd of people who don't use the
internet. I know it can be hard to believe there still are people like that. Mostly
it's the older generation, 60+.

Consider that the 9-11 Truth movement has kept moving by slowly adding
members to the choir. Well the choir is getting expanded even more, so it's a
good thing. It's up to the "old hands" out there to maximize this opportunity.
The more the merrier.

2:23 AM

Anonymous said...
I also watched (and taped) the Griffin presentation speech on C-Span last
weekend when it was on in the morning.

Yes it was "mild" for those of us who are already aware of the truth via Internet
sites like this one, but let's remember that MOST people only use the 'net for
mainstream sites like their yahoo email and maybe a sports score or two from
CNN once in a while. Sad to say but the vast majority of people even who ARE
"online" never stray outside of mainstream media INTERNET sources too!

So just imagine the impact on such a typical sheeple person if they're just
flipping around the cable channels and happen upon Griffin's speech -- that's
the difference that having it on TV will make. And it's a big step honestly...
kudos to C-Span for having the cajones to put it on.

4:51 PM

Anonymous said...
Is it 5pm EST yet? Its already the 8th here in Taiwan and I'm curious what
Fintan has to say before the shit hits the fan today. By my caculations today is
going to be more than just another Mother's day.

By the way, everyone really should check out the Alien Invasion episode of
Doctor Who. Notice that time on Big Ben is 2:02 back to front and then in a
later scene it shows 6:11. The exact same time as the clock on the International
Herald Tribune's logo (everyone should really check that logo out too). Just a
coincidence I'm sure and nothing to do with reverse symbolism. That episode
maybe more than just a parody and more like the first episode on the Lone
Gunmen.

6:57 PM

Anonymous said...
Where's that show, Fintan? Can we get some indictments? Does this truth pill
have any side effects? Is it bitter? Will it stir up a frenzy of bickering and in-
fighting? Why can't we all just get along???

10:01 PM

Anonymous said...
Fintan gets to the core of the issue. Everyone should read Philip K. Dick's
books ... he was the author of "The Minority Report". Intricate details are used
to control and confuse the masses ... mistakes are the beacons of truth!

Haven't you figured it out yet? The "911 Commission Report" is the exact same
fucking thing as the "911 Alternate Media Report". Don't let this fact bog you
down, just understanding it is all you need to know.

See, feel, understand and you can be free in your mind ... phase one to total
freedom! Breakfornews.com is the bomb! Wake up, damn it!

2:45 AM

Take the Power Back said...


Why so much talk like give up and go home "your reaction has been planned
..." ?

Because: Resistance is NOT futile!

This is the time that when the real conspirators are most vunerable. The knee
jerk circle the wagons, find someone to lynch and wave the flag, phase is over.
Give up and go home is exactly what we're meant to do. But what if we don't?
Short of living under a rock almost everyone has heard something about the
offical story being a lie and after the endless lies over the Iraq
invasion/occupation many people are right now very receptive to the idea
these guys will do anything for power including staging 911 and killing their
own citizens.

Now is the time to take the best parts of the 911 investigation material and go
mainstream. Collect documentaries, make compilations of the important parts
and burn disks. There are DVD players in almost every living room. Put them
to good use!

3:03 AM

Anonymous said...
Who ever said that resistance is not futile? The minutia is where the truth is
broken. Go ahead and buy, copy and share all the videos out there! Remember
that you are being played ... your emotions are being played ... its a mine/mind
field and like it or not, its just that simple!

All those videos will amount to shit and its that fucking simple if you can't
understand the concept of social scripting. The real information is being given
to you and you are unable to get past the garbage of your "Icons" ... fuck them
all! When you get that ... you will be on the road to real freedom.

We can only hope that those who profit on confusion will rot in hell!

Peace

3:57 AM

Take the Power Back said...


Hey you to relax a little. You underestimate what average person is capable of.

5:28 AM
Take the Power Back
said...
At the end of the day it is all about education. The PR (propaganda) is being
delivered like a slick marketing campaign with various pied pipers ("gate
keepers") employed to direct each demographic. Well that is all well and good
but we're not a passive audience. Present the PR to an audience it was not
intended for and the consequences are completely unpredictable.

The statement "Your reaction is in the script" is false.

Just as it is impossible to predict the weather even a few days into the future,
something as complex as human reaction and intereaction is equally
unknown.

So its time to beat those butterfly wings and create a storm.

3:59 PM

Anonymous
said...
Very interesting show (InsideTrackNews050507a.mp3) Fintan. So tell us, who
are the insiders meant to keep us occupied and who are the real (that would
include you, of course, hahaha) investigators? Of course we know you put
Ruppert in the disinfo category. What about Hopsicker? He's was going on
about Ruppert not so long ago. Is he part of the game plan to keep us all
occupied? Mike Ruppert has laid out for view at least some of his past (at least
what he claims is his past) but I don't know much about Dan Hopsicker other
than he used to actually work for the main stream media. Could that be a clue?
Wouldn't he be a perfect sleeper-cell false-investigator to plant in the
OKcitybombing/9/11 script? What about David Ray Griffin? Is he also a plant?
What about Paul Thompson? Why don't you start a web-page laying out your
evidence for phonies and realies? I'd love to see it!

7:11 PM
Nietzche
said...
Any group, intelligence agency, military or civilian cabal, high level
government figures, or any combination of these four, arrogant enough to pull
off a crime of this magnitude, must have been confident even before they
executed the plan that they would never be exposed.

Remember how Winston Smith was deceived by O'Brien into thinking he was
part of the resistence. It is always wise to question everything, and everybody
when we are dealing with conspiracies of this order. This kind of healthy
scepticism should be applied to all who make any assertions regarding this
topic, including such notables as Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Wing TV, Ruppert,
Griffin,- et al. And don't blindly accept everything that Fintan puts forward
either. It is of the utmost importance that each person think critically about
this case. The movement is only as great as the sum total of it's parts.

7:21 PM

Nietz
che
said...
I am starting to have my doubts about Hopsicker too. His ridicule of anyone
who questions the 19 high-jackers with box cutters story is a little odd. And
isn't he a bit non-chalent in the way he mocks the the so called Venice, Florida
intelligence assets. I don't know about you, but I would be scared shitless if I
knew I was so close to the operational heart of this kind of conspiracy.

7:47 PM

An
on
ym
ou
s
sai
d...
Good discussion. My personal experience tells me that all of these crazy war
games are very scripted and yes, right down to the people's responses. An easy
example is the lead up to the current Iraq war. If you paid attention, you can
actually watch the script changes and updates where necessary. These guy
aren't just working one script, they have many and a room full script editors
working overtime. Even with the release of this document,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1593607,00.html ... a large
part of the US people still support the illegal "oil war". To the person who said
that you can't predict human reactions ... they did a pretty good job!

9:09 PM

ca
pt
ai
n
w
ar
dr
ob
e
sa
id.
..
i would like to point your attention to this page i put together

trying to make a little sense out of the


madness that is 'the steering committee'

http://www.warcrimes.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/conspiracy.html

it is a long page which demands you attention and a little reading!!!


thanks for the great heads up Fintan & Kathy
hope you dont mind me using some of your graphics and leads

much love

captain wardrobe

11:22 PM

BG
said...
Wow, I'm not sure why so many are commenting as Anon. I guess it shouldn't
matter, but I would certainly be interested to know if they think it is less that
prudent to expose yourselves, or would your somehow give you away?

Come to think about it, I suppose my initials are tending toward the anon.
category, although I'm hoping Fintan recognizes me. (bgtruth.blogspot.com)

I enjoyed and appreciate several of the comment postings.

Here are my personal opinions (unsolicited, of course) about some of the key
people in the truth movement (this is very off-the-cuff):

FINTAN:

In addition to reading web pages, and listening to broadcasts, Fintan was kind
enough to give me a ring sometime ago and chat for a while. It was a pleasure
and an honor.

I wouldn't say that I esteem Fintan above all others, but I don't for a moment
believe he is secretly behind the "dark side".

SIBEL EDMONDS:
For many of you, Sibel is only a side show, perhaps since you haven't heard her
speak to the major anomalies of the govt./media version of 911. My main
comment would be that she only speaks of what she directly witnessed.
I would strongly ask you to investigate further. She seems clean and the real
deal to me.

Do I believe Dan Ellsberg is a handler for her.... No.

Do I believe Dan Ellsberg is on the up and up. I don't know.

With respect to Ellsberg, when he was on the Meria Heller Show before the
2004 Election, he seemed to reject out of hand Meria's question that it
wouldn't matter whether Kerry or Bush won. He seemed like the true
concerned citizen interested in the rule of law. Was he a pawn during the
Nixon debacle? Probably. Is he a pawn now?

Back to Sibel: Not that my first- person meeting her in June of '04 means
anything, but I did attend the small (tiny) protest in Washington where she
and Ellsberg spoke, and, apropos of nothing in particular, she got a Code Pink
award.

Everything about Ms. Edmonds rings true to me, as her web site name implies:

www.justacitizen.com

DAN HOPSICKER
It may seem like I'm namedropping here, and maybe I am. I guess I'm trying
to establish a smidge of credibility, since I've been been closely following the
whole 911 Truth stuff since 911. When I attended the San Fran 911 Truth Conf.,
Dan was there, and I was able to chat with here briefly. For anyone that would
cast aspersions Dan's way, I would introduce as evidence that during the
conference (near the end), Dan appeared genuinely depressed due the way he
was received, and specifically with regard to Ruppert being a near superstar.
He later wrote a bitter post (can't remember where) along the lines of why
doesn't anybody recognize the important work that I am doing. It was like a
Soap Opera. However, I would strongly argue that this was drama based on
genuinely hurt feelings of a guy who believed in the value of the work that he
has done and was sharing. How do I explain that Dan doesn't touch the
implosion of the WTC buildings (or many of the other areas where it is obvious
that the hijackers where there just as cover)? I don't know. I suppose he's
dense in some ways. However, I don't think he's a scripted player / disinfo
agent. Would a disinfo agent be willing to struggle to publish Barry and the
Boys?

Well, that's enough for now. If I get any response to this post, I'll write more.

11:34 PM

Schopenh
auer said...
Maybe Hopsicker has a point in not addressing the more "fantastic" aspects of
this case. Atta and his cohorts/co-conspirators were (assuming that they are
not still alive) real flesh and blood people, and there must be a trail of evidence
leading from them to at least some element of the plot. Even if they were used
by the real culprits as stooges or patsies, it would be smart to learn everything
we can about them. Just a thought.

7:21 AM

maddog sa
You all sound like dogs chasing their tails. Trust your eyes. Both towers and
building 7 were "pulled" by cave dwelling "terrorists" with nothing but box
cutters. Give me a break PLEASE!!!

2:27 PM

Anonymou
Woof, Woof, douche!

9:52 PM

Anonymou
Did anyone see CNN one or two days after the Towers fell?
Ari Flitcher at the White House was asked by reporters
'Can you tell us about the 60 Israeli's who were arrested today in connection
with the bombing?'
He appeared very annoyed by the question and immediatly closed the meeting
after slamming his book shut.
Same day, later, in in another reporters meeting, in another location, the same
question was asked by reporters to Colin Powel
No answer was given at all.
About three months later it was reported in a UK paper that they had been
deported to Israel.
Were they a football team?
We just wonder who they were.

11:07 AM

Anonymou
Memo by: Tshooter
Nationality: Dutch
Location: Spain
Religion: Humanist
Mail: tshooter_public@yahoo.com

OK, can we get a 'mainstream' team of journalists who care more about truth
than their job or reputation to finally go public with the overwhelming amount
of evidence presented on and offline?

I mean, how much hard evidence do you need? Like the interview with the
firemen stating that '...went like boom-boom-boom-boom, (like) triggered
detonations.' (Commenting on the alleged pulling of the south tower).
Photo evidence of an outward force blasting debris from the stricken towers.
An appearant F-15 crossing through a video of the second plane striking.

The complete lack of remains of flight 77 in the direct vicinity of the crash-site
at the Pentagon.
Not to mention the intact super-lawn. (Got to get me some for my putting
green)

The infrared imaging showing the use of an outside agent like termite charges
(heat well over 3000F) in all three buildings (including nr.7).

No need to go on, this alone should be reason enough for any self-respecting
journalist to take action. Or.. Aren't there any left?
I ask again, step forward. Your Pulitzer is waiting.

I would do it myself, but hey, who the hell am I?

For my work I have been flying back and forth to the states more than twenty
times, and you know what? Until there is an american government in place I
FEEL I CAN TRUST, I am not going back to the U.S. ever again.

This is part of the reason I stopped working for an american company two
years back.

As you can see, I am fairly frustrated and frankly, mad as hell.

Maybe I should apply for a position as field agent for the C.I.A. You know, 'if
you can't beat 'em, join em'?

Nah. I'd probably be FUBAR due to a freak accident in my first year... Heh.

There is something in the air, I can feel it. Be it war or another PsyOp...
Dunno, cannot define it.

Keep the stream alive y'all.

Rupert Murdoch is Australian.


-and that's about the only positive thing I can say about him.

Truth sucks. Gimme Politics, Commercials and Fox.

9:46 PM

Anonymou
My God, my God, they're gonna kill us all. Help us if you can!

11:08 PM

Anonymou
Here are the telltale signs of psy-ops disinfo professionals:

1) Attempt to discredit all the other conspiracy researchers

2) Ignore the actual arguments that are being dismissed and instead use
primarily ad hominim attacks. For example, dismiss "Peak Oil Nuts" without
addressing the actual evidence and providing no counter evidence.

3) Make outrageous accusations with sweeping generalizations, such as, "the


9/11 truth movement was started by those who carried out the crime" - Fintan
Dunn

4) Expose a few obvious lies and conspiracies that everyone can agree with, to
build up credibility, then try to dismiss the most damning and serious parts of
the most horrible conspiracy of 9/11. For example, talk about the 9/11 cover-
up but completely ignore some of the most blatent holes in the 9/11 Official
Story, such as the missing flight 77 at the Pentagon, or the collapse of the 3
towers going down in perfectly obvious controlled-demolition manner, with
hundreds of eyewitnesses who felt and heard the demolition charges going off.

4) Deflect attention to a theory regarding a less serious part of the crime, such
as wasting time with connecting the alleged hijackers with the "international
drug trade", a perfect distraction that keeps people from focusing on the real
criminals - the Bush Administration and/or CIA/FBI/Military elements who's
bizarre cover-up behavior and destruction of evidence puts their finger prints
all over the crime.

By now, it should be obvious to most people that Fintan Dunn fits the above
criteria perfectly. Has anyone researched Fintan Dunn's background? Who is
he really? To me, he is such a blatent disinformation professional, that I
recommend that people not waste their time with Fintan Dunn or
BreakforNews/Wagnews anymore.

Everyone, learn how to be a critical thinker and vet through all the 9/11
conflicting claims and disinfo, because those of us who are truly interested in
finding out the truth are going to be inundated with this crap more and more
as the stench of the Fascist Neo-con's criminal demonic behavior and secret
agenda starts reaching more and more people.

9:20 PM

Tina Louise
Interesting reading, well worth the time for the variety of voices. In my
opinion, the evil are as prone to stupidity and error as the next guy; they will
continue to make mistakes. It is the hoping and waiting for everything to
tumble into place that is hard. But I am certain, that with enough mistakes all
lining up, that the rest of the general public will catch on.

The whole 'critical mass' of understanding and awareness that it feels like we
are on the verge of, is essential. Today's London bombings give added imputus
to the politicians who scream of the need for war to protect peace, laws to
guard justice and security to get a hold of liberty. The 9/11 truths can't come
too soon, but I don't believe it will ever be too late.

I haven't visited this site much, nor commented before, but am glad I have
now.
Namaste
Tina

11:39 PM

POST A COMMENT
<< Home

BREAKING NEWS
Visit My.Breakfornews >

RSS Full text of these

stories and more

in our news portal:

PREVIOUS POSTS

• Researchers Tested AIDS Drugs on Children


• Sign of a Pop: Housing is Everywhere.
• Don't Help Build Prisons, Architect Urges Colleagu...
• Reflections On A Culture of Cruelty
• You Can See The Propaganda Coming....
• 2 GIs Killed, Scores Die at Iraq Police Center
• Vote Fraud Arrests on Eve of UK Election
• Graner testimony endangers England's Abu Ghraib pl...
• Convicted 'Baby Murderer' Framed, says Pathologist...
• Regulated Resistance : Gatekeepers of the So-Calle...

OUR WEB SITES


Audio news, guest interviews,
investigative reports and
uncensored analysis. Hosts:
Fintan Dunne, Kathy McMahon.
The CIA Fakes
9/11 Minority Report PART 2 [Part 1]

Note: We do not contend that everyone associated with these


websites are knowing intelligence operatives. Some have been
professionally manipulated, others merely misled. In any event
these are promoting the psyop agendas and disinformation
themes of the covert controllers. This is also not meant to
be a fully comprehensive listing of all the fake websites.

airamericaradio.com madcowprod.com
albasrah.net meria.net
aljazeera.net monbiot.com
aljazeera.com moveon.org
almartinraw.com mysteriesofthemind.com
americanfreepress.net
angieon911.com narconews.com
antiwar.com newswithviews.com
apfn.org newtopiamagazine.com
arcticbeacon.com nomorefakenews.com

batr.org
bellaciao.org occupationwatch.org
bilderberg.org oilempire.us
blackboxvoting.org onlinejournal.com
bradblog.com peakoil.net
buzzflash.com plaguepuppy.net
prisonplanet.com
propagandamatrix.com
cloakanddagger.ca
coasttocoastam.com questionsquestions.net
conspiracyarchive.com
conspiracyplanet.com
commondreams.org ralphnader.com
cooperativeresearch.org radioliberty.com
rawstory.com
counterpunch.org rbnlive.com
cryptome.org recombinomics.com
rense.com
davidicke.com reopen911.org
deepblacklies.co.uk rigorousintuition.blogspot
democracynow.org riverbend.blogspot
dieoff.com rumormillnews.com

earthfiles.com sanderhicks.com
ellsberg.net savethemales.ca
septembereleventh.org
skolnicksreport.com
fromthewilderness.com standdown.net
stanley2002.org
globalresearch.ca
halfpasthuman.com
team8plus.org
infoclearinghouse.info tomflocco.com
infowars.com thepowerhour.com
inn.globalfreepress.com thetruthseeker.co.uk
internationalanswer.org truefacts.co.uk
truthout.org
tvnewslies.org
jackblood.net
jihadunspun.com
jimmarrs.com unansweredquestions.org
jmccanneyscience.com uruknet.info
johnbuchanan.org
johnkaminski.com vialls.net
judicialwatch.org votetoimpeach.org
justacitizen.com
justicefor911.org
karlschwarz.com wanttoknow.info
konformist.com whatreallyhappened.com
kurtnimmo.com wingtv.net
worldaffairsbrief.com
larouchepub.com
legitgov.com
letsroll911.org xymphora.blogspot
libertyforum.org
libertythink.com 911citizenswatch.org
lovearth.net 911forthetruth.com
911truth.org
911truthradio.com

by Fintan Dunne, Editor,


BreakForNews.com 4th August, 2005
with PsyOpNews.com & WagNews.blogspot.com

For the last three years we have been quietly investigating the
cover-up of the 9/11 attacks. Ours has been a wide-ranging
inquiry which paid special attention to those who claim to be
already exposing the truth.

During this time we have interviewed many people with alternative


views on who were the real perpetrators. All the while, we kept our own
counsel. Much of the time we played it as if we were uncritically buying
the lines being put out on various alternative media.

We have examined a great deal of evidence and methodically traced the methods and
networks used to mislead us all. Now we present the first of our findings.

NO ROGUE GROUP

We published 'Wag The WTC' investigative articles on the


9/11 attacks --just 7 and 14 days after the event. We knew
then, as did many others, that the real planners were not
'Al-Qaida'. That's the easy part. The challenge was to
actually determine -rather than merely guess: who did
carry out the attacks?

In uncovering those perpetrators, we felt that an


investigation of the cover-up would be as much --if not
more-- revealing than our examination of the attacks
themselves.

Our analysis of the cover-up shows it requires, and has used, the official intelligence
resources of more that one state. One of the ways of deflecting investigators from this
grim reality has been to spin the facts to allege that a 'rogue group' within government
carried out the attacks.

But we now state that the depth and multinational scope of the cover-up shows no mere
rogue group was involved. The 9/11 attacks and cover-up have covert governmental
support -deployed through an intelligence framework.

What will be the most startling aspect of our investigation for many people is the vast
scale of governmental control of the 9/11 movement and alternative investigators and
media. From websites to commentators; from analysts to political personages, this has
given the cover-up team unprecedented control of alternative media perceptions.

In short, the government is running not only the 9/11 movement, but also controlling
the 9/11 issue in the alternative media. It was relatively easy to do so, because they have
controlled both mainstream and alternative media and politics increasingly over the last
twenty years. This was just an extension of those operations.
INTERNET POLICE

Here's a quote from a recent article on the UK Guardian: "The Chinese government,
employs an estimated 30,000 internet police, as part of a long-standing policy to
control the web so that it can be used by businesses but not by political opponents."
[Source]

Think the ideology and practice of the USA would be any different? Of course not. Just
well cloaked under a veneer of free expression.

In the US, it's less a case of internet 'police' and more a question of Internet fake
opposition, misdirection websites, front organizations, pseudo-activist groups and a
host of professional blogging and web journalism liars, acting in concert to create an
impenetrable fog.

These people are all over the Internet They are all over the 9/11 issue; all over the
'stolen' election of 2004; behind the psychological operations designed to inspire fear of
earth changes, of global warming, of the Super-State and the so-called New World
Order; all over the landscape of anti-corporate, anti-fascist expression on the Internet.

This army of information controllers is all over the 'free' information you are getting on
the Internet. Time we opened our eyes to see them. It's not just the mainstream which is
controlled. From the moment the Internet became prominent, a vast budget has been
expended to control all the high-trafficked intersections on the information
superhighway.

THE FAKE 'EXPOSING' OF 9/11

Many of these sites/assets were put in place long before 9/11. A key goal was to ensure
that if some truth must come out, it will be a truth designed and controlled by
intelligence agencies --with agency assets in a position to ensure misdirection and
damage limitation.

To this end, an orgy of evidence [See Minority Report Part I] in the form of deliberately
misleading 9/11 'clues', were designed into the 9/11 operation from the start --to give
these assets prearranged talking points with which to fill their column inches and
programming. This has served to confuse and confound.

All this activity rose to a crescendo around the time the Kerry presidential bid hit it's
planned implosion in the 'stolen' election. [The stealing of which was carefully managed
in the controlled alternative media as a psychological operation against the left.]

The hyping of the 9/11 issue up until the 'defeat' of Kerry was designed to max out
activist interest in the issue, then bury it with the aid of general post-Kerry, left-wing
political disillusion -against the backdrop of division in the 9/11 Movement itself.

Also part of a similar confounding exercise were the subsequent 9/11 Movement 'flame
wars', as different assets attacked each other to undermine their collective credibility
and disillusion ordinary grassroots 9/11 truth activists.

THE SMOKESCREEN

A persistent theme of the disinformation spread by these assets is to portray the


machinations of this elite group acting through the CIA/NSA/ETC. as if they originate
from somewhere other than the US security/intelligence apparatus.

Suspicion is directed instead onto the Israelis, the 'City of London', 'International
Bankers', The Rockefellers, The Bildebergers, and most infamously, the ill-defined, so-
called New World Order. Of course, some of these elements are complicit in certain
events, but the aim is to downplay the U.S. establishment's guiding hand and the broad
CFR/corporate support.

Some may be surprised by the range and scope of the misinformation sites we have
detailed, and may even be disconsolate to see the sheer scale of the social and political
control which their virtually unlimited budget can achieve. All we can say is.... deal with
it. We had to. It's better than us all flailing around in ignorance. And it explains why
men and women of good heart have been getting nowhere.

THE MEDIA AS PSYOP

This level of deception has been going on since the 1950's and 1960's at an accelerating
rate. Following the psywar against civilians induced by the nuclear arms race 'crisis,' the
subsequent JFK killing was indeed an assassination, but it was also at heart an
extension of these 1950's nuke-scare psychological operations.

The killing of Kennedy was not necessary for political reasons -but it was a powerful tool
for social control via psychological warfare. Kennedy was killed to deliberately drive the
US population into a grief state which would hamper the development of political
opposition.

This type of PsyOps directed at the civilian population was, and still is the modus
operandi. By now, it has produced a range of operations as varied as AIDS, SARS, 9/11
and the G8/Live8 London bombing.

SUMMARY

Given the number of assets deployed in support of the 9/11 operation, and the
operational requirements of the 9/11 attacks themselves, their origin is now clear. 9/11
was not carried out by some 'rogue group,' nor was it a fully official US Government-
sanctioned operation.

But it was orchestrated by the highest levels of the US Military and military-industrial
complex; on behalf of the national and international politicians, corporates, and
moneyed interests. It had, and still has the full support of the US Military/intelligence
apparatus -who control much of the alternative media and the 9/11 movement.

Stay tuned for more.

Make or View Comments

Audio analysis by Fintan Dunne


Fri 5th August
The CIA, The Left
& Tabloid 9/11
Listen mp3:
DSL Stereo or 56k

Read Part 1:

'An Orgy Of Evidence'


Why the 9/11 Movement was created
and fosteredby the very people
who carried out the attacks...

Laso Listen to mp3: DSL Stereo or 56k


POSTED BY BONO
AT 10:34 PM

2 COMMENTS:

AnderPooll said...
PILLS (Pharmacy Integration of Learning, Leadership and Service)
serves as an umbrella over other organizations in the school.
Buy actos
Buy advair
Buy Bactrim
Buy Bactrim
Buy Biaxin
Buy ultracet
Buy Vicodin
Thanks!

11 :07 P M

seo said...
Web design is a process of conceptualization, planning, modeling, and
execution of electronic media delivery via Internet in the form of Markup
language suitable for interpretation by Web browser and display as Graphical
user interface (GUI). Design Web Format (DWF) is an open, secure file format
developed by Auto desk for the efficient distribution and communication of
rich Web design data to anyone who needs to view, review, or print design files.
Because DWF files are highly compressed, they are smaller and faster to
transmit than Web design files, without the overhead associated with complex
CAD drawings (or the management of external links and dependencies). With
DWF functionality, publishers of Web design data can limit the specific Web
design data and plot styles to only what they want recipients to see and can
publish multi sheet drawing sets from multiple auto cad drawings in a single
DWF file. They can also publish 3D models from most Auto desk Web design
applications. Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the
volume and quality of traffic to a web site from search engines via ;natural;
(;organic; or algorithmic) search results. Usually, the earlier a site is presented
in the search results, or the higher it ;ranks;, the more searchers will visit that
site. SEO can also target different kinds of search, including image search,
local search, and industry-specific vertical search engines.

1 2 :11 P M

POST A COMMENT
<< Home

BREAKING NEWS
Visit My.Breakfornews >

RSS Full text of these

stories and more

in our news portal:


PREVIOUS POSTS

• 'Get Soldiers Out --This is Ridiculous'


• 20 Marines Killed in Iraq Attacks
• The Pied Piper of the London Bombing
• Countdown: The Coming UK Coup
• Police Admit Brazilian did not Jump Turnstile
• Iraqi Journalist's Death Looks Like Assassination
• Video Enhancement Reveals London Bomber
• Ops in Disarray Over London Bombs Probe
• Did Police Lie About Stakeout on Brazilian?
• Cut-outs, Moles, Patsies and Provocateurs

OUR WEB SITES


Audio news, guest interviews,
investigative reports and
uncensored analysis. Hosts:
Fintan Dunne, Kathy McMahon.

TUESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2005

True Lies of 9/11: Amanda & Atta


The 9/11 Minority Report: Part 3
• Part 2: CIA Internet Fakes
• Part 1: An Orgy of Evidence
True Lies: "This mixture of comedy and super-agent spectacle works well at first. But the plot becomes
increasingly ridiculous and overwrought." - Desson Thomson, Washington Post [Source]
by Fintan Dunne & KathyMcMahon,
BreakForNews.com 16th August, 2005

And so it is with great honour that we nominate Ms. Amanda Keller,


reputed long-term girlfriend of 9/11 'mastermind', Mohammed Atta for the
award in the category of 'Best Supporting Actress in a 9/11 Coverup.'

But that's no guarantee she will win this busy category in which she faces a lot of stiff
competition. Especially as her leading man, who plays a reputed terrorist, was written
out of the movie very early on -leaving Amanda to carry the action forward on her own.

If you've been following the story so far [Part 1 & 2], you know that an 'Orgy of Evidence'
was deliberately built into the 9/11 operation, as a smokescreen. This meticuluously
planned evidence has been a fountain of time-consuming false trails, which has also
provided the CIA Internet Fakes with an array of 'talking points', to fill countless hours
of internet radio, articles, blogs and books. It's been a red herring cornucopia.

Among the most legendary of all these 'discoveries' by internet researchers, was the
tracking down of Amanda Keller, by Daniel Hopsicker. In an exclusive to-camera
interview --at an 'undisclosed location'-- she paints a stunning portrait of a cocaine-
sodden Atta; strewing money about; partying and meeting shadowy drug contacts in
Key West.

As Hopsicker comments in an introduction to one set of clips from that interview, it's
just like something out of an episode of Miami Vice.
Which is the very point on which we now question the touting of the Keller story as
some kind of 9/11 motherlode which disproves the official line that Atta was a simple
suicidal fanatic.

DISCONNECT THE BUTTONS


It now seems a long, long time ago, but it was on 4th October, 2001 --in the second of
our investigative articles on the attacks that I wrote something which is just as apt today
as it was then, just 21 days after 9/11:
"Let's stop reacting and stop overreacting. Does the WTC attack feel like a movie? It does? Well of course
it does! It has been specifically written as a movie script. Are you getting the picture? You are witnessing a
cathartic and intense psychological operation. It is designed to alter your perceptions and hence your
politics. It's a classic PsyOp.

It's a made-for-TV movie with all the cliché blockbuster elements. It has mayhem, evil
warlords and subtle hints of a military coup. It has terrorists who wrestle for control of
Flight 93 with Die Hard have-a-go Bruce Willis clones.

This entire sequence of: hijack; first plane; second plane; Pentagon ;WTC collapse; phone
calls from the planes; copy of the Koran; more attempted hijackings; arrests; plucky
passengers; etc., etc., has been scripted by a crew of cynical planners...."

Wag the WTC: The Bockbuster 4th Oct, 2001.

These people are in the business of pushing your emotional buttons. And
they didn't stop pushing them just because the dust had settled over the WTC complex.
The 9/11 PsyOp was planned to extends years after the event itsef. They've been pushing
emotional buttons ever since. That's how they got G.W. Bush re-elected.

The mainstream right media and the left fakes were both pushing everybody's buttons
so hard on the threat of a Bush-orchestrated, pre-election 'terror' attack that we left it to
Kerry's lawyers to cover the bases on simple election theft. And we know how that
worked out.

That Bush would surely steal 2004 exactly as he stole 2000 --in the vote tally-- was a no-
bainer. That's why the Tommy Franks' distraction warning of martial law if terrorists
did attack. They pushed our emotional buttons. It took our eyes off the ball. It worked.

If we are to get anywhere decoding the truth of 9/11, we must learn the lesson and
disconnect our buttons.

THE FINE LINE


The other key point in my 2001 comments was that reference to the 9/11 PsyOp being
like a cliché-ridden B-movie script. In a way, it was a rerun of the infamous terror-
inspiring Orson Wells radio broadcast. It seems farcical that people actually bought
those fake news reports of mayhem following an alien invasion of the U.S.A. --but they
did.
It was a product of its time, no matter how farcical and
laughable that fabricated report now seems in retrospect,
these many years later.

The same can be said of Amanda Keller's performance in the


filmed interview presented by Hopsicker. It was a product of
its time, no matter how farcical and laughable that fabricated
report now seems in retrospect.

Because, like those lurid tales of rampaging Martians, the


Keller interview is by now side-splittingly funny. How she
managed to keep a straight face throughout, is surely tribute
to the iron acting will of a true pro.

But like the greatest comedy, it treads such a fine line that you only catch on to how
exactly funny it is, when someone else laughs or points it out to you. It's the same fine
line trodden by Mel Brooks in his over-the-top comedy 'The Producers' [aka Springtime for
Hitler], starring Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder.

In the pivotal scene of the movie, Brooks shows us a theatre audience --their emotional
buttons fully pushed-- struck dumb by the sight of an onstage, prancing Adolph Hitler
-until someone laughs out loud and turns the doomed stageplay into a hit comedy.

Viewed as a piece of straight acting, Keller's performance seems earnest, even heartfelt.
But, viewed as a hilarious attempt to paint Atta as a B-movie-style 'Miami Vice' villan, it
just gets funnier and funnier the more times you see it. It's a hand-wringing, chain-
smoking comedic performance.

Check it out at madcowprod.com, or view directly here


WinMedia or here Qtime.

Disconnect your emotional buttons. And watch a real pro at


work. And save a copy. They can't leave this online. The truth
has never been this funny.

If you have seen some of the early Keller video clips before,
this later compilation will wow you. Earlier segments
published by Hopsicker featured a restrained performance by
Keller which lent credibility to the material. But in this later compilation, Keller shows
off her subtle comedic star quality.

Actually they can leave it online. It's all part of the tactic I wrote about previously. For
over a year, the credibility of the 9/11 internet 'heroes' has been is being deliberately
notched lower month by month. Carefully undermined to drive 9/11 skeptics away in
disillusion and to lower the image of 'conspiracy theories' with the public.

They pulled the same trick to drive off stolen election campaigners, when Bev Harris'
and a pre-planned implosion on Airamerica's Randi Rhodes Show. Start with good
material to boost credibility and get activists on board, then nosedive to oblivion. A tired
tactic by now, but still reasonably effective. Expecially if people are not aware of the
gameplan.

Which you now are.

THE IN YOUR FACE PATSY


Script Extract. True Lies (1994) :
Harry: [reading phone tap log of wife Helen] Give me the page!
Gib: What?
Harry: This jumps from page 9 to page 11.
Gib: [looks at paper] Must be a typo.
So who is lying and why? What is really going on here beneath the spin, with this Keller
story? According to Hopsicker -nothing at all. He's happy to buy Keller's tale and sell it
on.

Hopsicker says 9/11 was a high-stakes drug war attack, in a Bush v. Bin Ladin battle for
control of the international drug trade. And he says this interpetation of events is totally
consistent with hints from Sibel Edmonds' --based on her time in the FBI translation
unit. But Edmonds could be called the 'Dog-Whistleblower', because due to a court gag
order, her whistleblowing is thus far, well beyond the range of human hearing.

And an opportunistic drug war strike doesn't even come close to explaining a fraction of
the slick 9/11 operation, nor why three steel-framed buildings then fell straight down.
We see many clear signs of a high-powered PsyOp on 9/11. These don't square with a
drug turf war. That dog don't even leave the kennell. Hopsicker's insistence seems
inexplicable.

So let's take view more common among 9/11 skeptics -which sees Atta as a patsy, pre-
positioned to take the blame for 9/11. You babysit such a patsy as if he were a Ming
Vase. In classic patsy theory, his behaviour would be managed to show an image
consistent with his being a fanatical suicide attacker. He would be keeping just high
enough a profile to leave the right impression.

Instead we have reports --from other than just Keller-- of parties, public arguments and
even plotting in public. Not to mention unashamed consumption of alcohol.

Well, perhaps he was under orders to get noticed -and then some. Why?

What possible benefit would offset the severe weakening of the 'Islamic fanatics' cover
story? And why on Earth would Atta be let hang out with a woman whom Hopsicker
hints he is being charitable in describing as a lingerie model. It blows the 'fanatics' cover
out of the water. What is going on here?
TRUE LIES OF 9/11
The early 90's minor-hit Schwartzenneger movie vehicle"True
Lies", featured a spy pretending to be a workaday regular
guy(Arnie); a regular guy pretending to be a spy; and the
woman between them(Jamie Lee Curtis) --who is married to
the real spy but doesn't know it and having an affair with the
fake one --not realizing that either. It also controversially
featured Arab terrorists bent on nuking the USA.

Arnie didn't win any awards. Despite some punchy one-liners,


he only rose a notch above wooden. Jamie was... well, ...Jamie. Which is: good enough
to make it all just watchable.

The movie finds echoes in Atta and Amanda Keller. Mohammed Atta's stern visage is a
new icon of woodenness. The now silent actor left it to Amanda to do all the real acting.
Was Atta her minder? Or was Amanda the spy-minder for Mohammed? Who is fake and
who is for real?

The answer comes from understanding the underlying design of 'Tabloid 9/11' : the
plucky passengers of Flight 93; the Bush speech amid the WTC rubble; the turbanned
Osama. Recall that all this is a movie. It has to be.

The shared cultural ground of the tabloid, celluloid movie world makes 9/11
communicable as a cultural zeitgeist. 9/11 is by necessity a tabloid movie. As tabloid as
the catchphrase 'War on Terror'. 9/11 could only be sold to the masses at the lowest
common denominator of mass psychology. The quintessentially propagandist themes
must be rooted in a cartoonish movie fantasy.

So if that is what the supposedly staid mainstream is like, the conspiracy theories must
be inflated so as to be far, far wilder --least they stand out as sensible. If the conspiracy
theories were to be intellectually superior, the intellectuals --particularly left
intellectuals-- would naturally gravitate to them. A dangerous development for those
who staged it all.

Now you know why Alex Joes is so over the top. He scares off the left. Now you know
why French researchers waded in with the 'Hunt the Boeing' angle. Or why the big focus
on a supposed missile attached to a pod under the plane which struck the second WTC
tower. Sensational claims. The more the merrier.

The best way to avoid substantial questions about the 9/11 events is to overlay the issues
with plenty of additional 'sensationalized' diversionary issues. These sensational
elements were built into the 9/11 operation from the start. Which has allowed the CIA
Internet Fakes to selectively construct their own sensational 9/11 conspiracy theory.

Now you know why Mohammed Atta was found, so sensationally, to be dating a...
stripper! And why Amamda Keller had even further sensational tales to tell about
Mohammed. The lurid tales she recounts are fully consistent with CIA objectives as to
how 9/11 'conspiracy theories' are presented to the world.

We are getting somewhere.

IN SEARCH OF THE REAL MOHAMMED


Early mainstream media reports said that Pakistani intelligence had wired funds to
Mohammed Atta, and he was soon credited as the operational mastermind of the
attacks. So when Daniel Hopsicker's first reports about Atta are published, it seems like
a breakthrough that holes have quickly emerged in one central aspect of the official
story.

The JFK conspiracy theory featured a key patsy, Lee Harvey Oswald --who never lived to
defend himself. History repeats, so they say. And by playing into our expectations, this
can be exploited. It's a technique known as 'framing': the subtle construction of a
context which seems appropriate. And so, the conspiracy theory media have bought into
the idea of Atta as a kind of modern Oswald.

But, what hard evidence connects this drug-linked, flight school circus in Florida to the
actual attacks on the day of 9/11? A passport found in the street? An easily faked CCTV
image? FBI assurances that these were the culpits?

Let's reverse the psychology. Suppose the whole Mohammed Atta, Florida flight schools
story is a prepared package. As you unwrap this package you find items that were placed
there earlier. Are you discovering things? Or are you are being led to find what you half-
expected?

When Atta and the other alleged hijackers turn out to have links to figures connected to
international drug trafficing, is that a breakthrough finding or just more breadcrumbs
leading us further down the Atta/Florida/Drugs trail? Leading us to Al-Qaida and the
Balkans. Leading us to Afghanistan. To the heroin trade.

The biggest crime scene of 9/11 is undoubtedly the World Trade Center. Yet here we are
discussing the finer details of the drug trade thousands of miles away. It's sensational,
but is it relevant? Or is it just our buttons being pushed?

Is this is 'True Lies' twice over? What if Atta and Amanda were an intelligence tag team.
A 9/11 Laurel and Hardy. Foil and counterfoil.

Does that explain their very public rows? Yes. Does that explain Atta's over-the-top
behaviour? Yes. Does that explain Keller's wild tales about Atta? Yes. Does that explain
why Atta ran around Florida playing attack mastermind? Yes. Does that explain why he
is not around any more? Yes. Does that explain why the mainstream fingered him early
on? Yes. Does that explain why he was out of circulation for years? Yes.

And does all that explain why we are down in Florida, thousands of miles from the
major crime scene? Yes, because the whole thing is a diversion. With an outer layer
aimed at the mainstream and an inner layer targetted at the alternative media.

If that's true, it might help explain somethng that happened just after the London
bombings. We know that the real perpetrators of such attacks don't just pin the blame
on a few alleged terrorists. They also like to bolster the 'Muslims-did-it' case with
spurious claims of responsibility and suitable rethoric from Muslims expressing their
admiration for the attack. It helps outrage public opinion and reinforce the war divide.

In such a classic manouver, Muslim stooges are often wheeled out to make the
inflammatory statements.

So, here's our July 21st report about such an interview:


"In an extraordinary interview with CNN, Mohammed Atta's father has praised the London bombings.
During the extremely inflammatory interview --which sounds suspiciously like the work of a professional
provocateur-- Mohammed el-Amir vowed to do anything within his power to encourage more attacks. He
even demanded $5,000 for another interview --which he promised to donate towards carrying out
another terror attack.

"Was all this being hammed-up for the camera? CNN's camera, by the way. Maybe this is a good time to
rethink exactly what role Mohammed Atta and his father are playing in all this?
Which is an interesting development, to say the least.

EPILOG
It's time people asked themselves why a more skeptical view of Florida's flying circus
has not already been articulated by leading conspiracy investigators. Are we supposed to
just take Amanda Keller and Sibel Edmonds at face value?

In our first 9/11 investigative article, published seven days after the
attacks, we asked why the South Tower fell first? Due to the angle at
which the plane came in, the bulk of the jet fuel punched through
the corner of the building and emerged to explode in the giant
fireball we all saw. By comparison, the North Tower was struck
earlier and took a full fuel load directly into the building.

The wrong tower fell first. And that pokes a big hole in the official
explanation about raging internal fires causing the collapse. Funny
how the conspiracy media never picked up on that point.

Issues like that seem more relevant than an uncorroborated tale


about nasty Mohamed Atta killing all of Amanda Keller's kittens. But maybe we are just
not with the plot. If the CIA Fakes network is screaming about stuff, it must be
important, eh?

In the face of the well-organized coverup of 9/11, we are starving for breakthroughs.
That makes us all potential suckers for a few tossed breadcrumbs.
Or so it seems to us, anyway.
But we're a bit wierd like that.

View or Make Comments

POSTED BY BONO
AT 4:06 PM

THURSDAY, AUGUST 04, 2005

The CIA's Internet Fakes


URLs: BreakForNews.com/TheCIAInternetFakes.htm
Wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/08/cias-internet-fakes.html

Você também pode gostar