2231 S Court, Palo Alto, CA 94301 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.

com/Human_Rights_Alert

Human Rights Alert

Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik DN: cn=Joseph Zernik, o, ou, email=jz12345@ea rthlink.net, c=US Date: 2012.04.15 05:08:33 +03'00'

12-04-14 Alleged deception by then Supreme Court Nominee Sotomayor through concealment of assets _ Dr Richard Cordero
Proposal To a Presidential Candidate or an Organization to Make the Initial Presentation to the media and the public of evidence revealing how President Obama and Then-Judge Sotomayor deceived the public about her concealment of assets, which can lead the media and the authorities to investigate them, and cause even their supporters to abstain from giving him donations, work, and votes, and to ask her to resign

A. The facts to be presented

This proposal is based on showing that the President lied to the public when he vouched for the integrity of his first nominee to the Supreme Court, Then-Judge, Now-Justice Sotomayor: a) He disregarded a series of articles in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico (jur:61/fn.102a)* that suspected Then-Judge Sotomayor of concealing assets of her own(611), which points to tax evasion(fn.102c) and keeping secret their unlawful origin(180b). * http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/2012_E/DrRCordero_jud_unaccountability_reporting.pdf b) The President also disregarded the secret FBI report on the vetting of J. Sotomayor that must have shown how she had withheld from the financial and case documents(65b) that she was required to and did file publicly(fn.102b) with the Senate Judiciary Committee a publicly filed bankruptcy appeal, DeLano(61104a), which she had presided over. That appeal incriminated her in covering up the concealment of assets involved in a bankruptcy fraud scheme(622) that trafficked in vast sums of money(272) and was run by her and circuit peers appointee(28 U.S.C. 152(a); fn.59a), a bankruptcy judge. Exposing their appointee as corrupt or as their agent(49c) raised a conflict of interest that led to their absence of effective oversight(333). The President nevertheless nominated Judge Sotomayor, maintained his nomination of her, and vouched for her to curry favor with advocates of another woman and the first Latina jurist on the Supreme Court. He was courting their support in preparation for his battle to adopt the central piece of his legislative agenda, that is, affordable health care reform, now Obamacare.

Page 2/2 B. The initial public presentation of the available evidence

April 15, 2012

Relying on the evidence of the conditions enabling judicial(21A) and J. Sotomayors (61B) wrongdoing(88a-d) and any other found by an investigative team(fn.229a), a presentation can be made at a press conference(121E) to show that J. Sotomayor has given the appearance of impropriety by concealing assets as a judge, which she must keep doing as a justice to avoid self-incrimination; and that the President covered and keeps covering it up. There need only be shown that she appears to have committed an impropriety. That would suffice to criticize her and call for her to resign, just as Justice Abe Fortas had to on May 14, 1969, though his impropriety was not even a misdemeanor(91d), whereas hers points to crimes, among others, tax evasion and perjury. At the presentation, both the President can be called on to release the FBI report on Then-Judge Sotomayor and she to account for her missing assets(fn.102c). The journalists covering it can be given a well-defined though broadly framed and widely-known incriminating investigative query(xvi) that is likely to lay out the high stakes and enticing potential of investigating them:

What did the President(127) and the justices and judges know about J. Sotomayors concealment of assets and consequent tax evasion(fn.102c) and other judges wrongdoing(64a) and when did they know it?(685)
This can send journalists in quest for a Pulitzer Prize-worthy scoop on a Watergate-like generalized media investigation of wrongdoing(101D) that develops unstoppable momentum.

C. Strategy based on a reasonable expectation of how events will unfold It is to be expected that, to avoid self-incrimination, both the President and Justice Sotomayor will refuse to release the FBI report on her and to account for her missing assets(fn.102c). Their refusal will strengthen the suspicion of their wrongdoing only to be hardened into evidence by the blow after blow of impropriety findings by newssmith journalists searching for J. Sotomayors concealment of both her assets and her peers wrongdoing(iii/endnote.iii). This will generate an embarrassment for the President, who will be locked into his defense of her integrity and his refusal to release the report. It will put him on the defensive, thus distracting him from his campaigning. If any of J. Sotomayors concealed assets are found, the embarrassment will become a scandal and the distraction a constitutional crisis: If this life-tenured justice refuses to resign, will President Obama keep supporting her or be forced to endorse or even call for the impeachment of his own former nominee at the risk of causing her to retaliate, e.g., by agreeing in plea bargaining to testify to his cover-up in exchange for leniency on the tax evasion and perjury charges? This query can be expected to put under intense scrutiny the Presidents second justiceship nominee, Now Justice Kagan(674), and other of his nominees. This expectation arises from the fact that he already nominated for cabinet positions three known tax cheats: Tim Geithner, Tom Daschle, and Nancy Killefer(fn.103). Those Democrats that shepherded J. Sotomayor through the Senate confirmation process will also be scrutinized, such as Sen. Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand(696). Will any of them crack and sing to save his or her own skin? Calls for Congress to hold public hearings on the query will force the President to go into full damage control mode. This will only further impair his campaigning ability and diminish his resources

Page 3/3

April 15, 2012

intake. Moreover, it will deepen the disappointment of those who supported him just as it will turn away Independents and the undecided that may still be considering voting for him.

D. Initial presenter: presidential candidate or personality covered by media

One of the presidential candidates can make the initial presentation(xv) of the evidence of J. Sotomayors and the Presidents wrongdoing. All the candidates have criticized federal judges for being either activist or liberal(iii/ent.i) the President too has preemptively criticized the Supreme Court for its activism if it declares Obamacare unconstitutional. Those are subjective notions that appeal only to those who share that opinion. But the presenter can focus on objective evidence of wrongdoing, which will outrage all people at unaccountable(211) justices and judges who abusively(26e) exempt themselves(23b,c) from the laws that they impose on everybody else. The candidates presentation can initiate the development of his image as the Peoples Champion of Justice, who battles Judges Above the Law to ensure that We the People in government of, by, and for us receive our due: Equal Justice Under Law. That will serve him well when contrasted with a president under media investigation as a conniving liar who showed no respect for the law and ethics when he saddled Americans with a life-tenured tax cheating judge contemptuous of the law of the land and the Constitution under which it is adopted. The initial presenter can also be another personality who can call reputable news organizations to a press conference or make the presentation at an event well-attended by the media(1211) such as the job fair of a journalism school or a university commencement where he or she is the speaker. The resignation of one or more life-tenured justices will be more dramatic than that of 2nd and last term President Nixon due to his wrongdoing in the Watergate scandal. It will earn greater rewards(27) to those most responsible for a cleansing of the presidency and the Judiciary(832,3). To contribute to that outcome Dr. Cordero welcomes invitations to present(151F) the evidence and the strategy to a presidential candidate or an organization that is willing to trigger history!(fn.216a) http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/2012_E/DrRCordero_jud_unaccountability_reporting.pdf Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Judicial Discipline Reform http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org 59 Crescent Street Brooklyn, NY 11208 Tel. (718)827-9521