1

Table of Contents
Messages from Cabinet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-20 Keynote Speaker Biographies . . . . . . 21-23 Fundraising, Publicity, Activism . . . . 24-25 Civic Engagement Fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25-26 Midwest JSA Calendar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Debate Feedback Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 JSA Summer School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29-30 Convention Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32-34 Dining Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Skeleton Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2

Messages from Midwest JSA Cabinet

Message from Governor Aadi Tolappa
Midwest Junior State, I cant even begin to explain how excited I am to kick off Fall State 2011. Were back in Madison, and as you could probably tell from looking outside, the city is exciting as ever; as we speak, tens of thousands of Wisconsin citizens gather outside the Capitol building, concerned with the future of their state, and vowing to Be the People. The state of Wisconsin is merely one example of the shifting power paradigm that were witnessing all around us. The world is in flux; with China in a housing bubble, the European Union in panic, and Brazil, India, and several other countries in prosperity, America faces a myriad of monumental decisions. As our economy barely recovers under the looming shadow of a double-dip recession, we must reevaluate our foreign policy and reconsider our role in the global arena. An election is right around the corner; we as citizens must decide where our country should go from here. Midwest Cabinet has tried its hardest to make sure that theres a debate for each of you, so I encourage you to put yourself in the mix at this convention, whether thats giving a great speech, asking the perfect question, or just absorbing what you hear. With engaging debates, enthralling speakers, and an electrifying atmosphere, this Fall State will undoubtedly be unforgettable. What is Americas role in this changing world? You, the Midwest Junior State, will decide. Yours Truly, Aadi Tolappa Midwest JSA Governor

Message from Lieutenant Governor Nesh Patel

Junior Statesmen and Stateswomen, I hope all of you are as excited as I am to be back in Madison for Fall State 2011! For me, Fall State has always represented what JSA truly is, and the potential it holds. Every second of this weekend, all of you are engaging in active citizenship. You will argue our countrys most dire issues and you have the power to answer the hard questions. And you make your voice heard at every step of the way. Therefore, I urge all of you to take a step forward and truly be involved during this convention in as many ways as possible. Ask a question during to the Keynote Speaker, speak with the multiple organizations we have represented here at the Activism Fair, question views and ideas you oppose, but, most importantly, throughout the weekend, be able to question yourself. We all gather here today to not just argue ignorantly, but to learn from others and keep an open mind as we, together, will take on the challenges of the future. Our theme for this years Fall State is the Power Paradigm: Our Role in the Changing World. And if, from this weekend, you are one step closer to knowing your role in our world, no matter what that role maybe, I would call this convention a success. The weekend that lies in front of us all poses a unique opportunity to make your opinions into reality, so make your opinion heard, and watch democracy unfold before your own eyes. Have a fantastic and enjoyable weekend! Neshal Patel Midwest JSA Lieutenant Governor

Message from Convention Coordinator Kimberly Liu

Dear Delegates, I am thrilled to welcome you all to Fall State 2011! Prepare to face challenges that will stimulate your intellect, broaden your mindset, and test your fundamental beliefs. Even more importantly, I urge you to take leaps and bounds out of your comfort zone this weekend and forge new friendships that will truly make your experience here unforgettable. Over this past year, we have had the incredible opportunity to witness history in the making. We have beheld the tremors of both the global economy and a cataclysmic Japanese tsunami, viewed age old dictatorships topple and fall in the Middle East, lived to welcome the birth of the worlds 7 billionth child, and commemorated the end of a decade of grief upon the death of Osama bin Laden. As we sit here in the heart of Madison, revolutionary forces brew around us on the very steps of this building. Pivotal issues like these and many others will be explored throughout the course of this convention. Thus, in accordance with this years theme, I challenge you to take an active role in our changing world and immerse yourself in all that Fall State has to offer. As we gather together today, the message of JSA is resonant in my own heart and, I hope, in yours as well. If you only accept the opportunity, I promise this convention will be an experience like no other. Together we can guarantee that Fall State 2011 will be nothing short of spectacular. Always Yours, Kimberly Liu Midwest JSA Convention Coordinator

The Midwest Junior State of America Fall State 2011

Saturday, November 19
Registration | 8:00 - 9:45 Madison Concourse Hotel Senate A and Senate B Capitol Building Assembly Chamber ` Opening Remarks Governor Aadi Tolappa Lieutenant Governor Nesh Patel Convention Coordinator Kimberly Liu 4

Opening Session | 10:00 - 11:00

Convention Rules Keynote Speaker Block I | 11:05 - 11:50

Lindsey Bowen, Program Director Mark F. Miller, Wisconsin State Senator Capitol Building

Moderating Workshop: All moderators and new JSAers are strongly encouraged to attend. Led by: Karthik Bala, Stanley Yuan Debate Workshop: All speakers and new JSAers are strongly encouraged to attend. Led by: Edeline Chen, Kimberly Liu Council of Chapter Presidents & Teacher Advisor Meeting Mandatory meeting for all Chapter Presidents and Teacher Advisors. Led By: Praneeth Tripuraneni, Gayatri Sanku, Nesh Patel

Room 300 NW

Room 328 NW

Parlor

Debate: Resolved, that the United States promote the idea of evaluating temporary members of the United Nations Security Council for the possibility of permanent voting membership. Many are of the opinion that the current United Nations Security Council is an antique of the World War II era, when its permanent membership was decided. They argue that the dynamics of international power have shifted significantly over the past 66 years since the council was formed, and that something should be done to account for that significant change. As a leading world power, it falls to the responsibility of the United States to take a stance on the future of the Security Council. Many temporary members, which include Germany and India, are just as powerful and influential as the nations on the Security Council and therefore might deserve equal representation. Others argue that expanding the number of permanent voting nations on the Security Council could reduce productivity due to the significance of the veto power, among other negative consequences. The composition of the United Nations Security Council is of great international importance, so it is essential that the United States take a stance on this debate that acts in the best interest of its citizens, and the citizens of the world. Pro: Luke Dawson, Marian Central Catholic Con: Will Donnelly, Naperville North Moderator: Carly Naughton, Neuqua Valley Room 225 NW Debate: Resolved, that Social Security be privatized. With the United States in a terrible fiscal emergency, many are looking for ways to help get the economy back on track and to cut spending. One such government program that is often talked about in regards to spending and the economy is Social Security, and many conservatives want to privatize the program as a means to stabilize Social Security and cut 5

government spending. Supporters of privatization argue that privatization would allow for the payments to be passed on from one generation to the next, spending could be cut, and Chile, with one of the most economically sound countries in the world also has a system similar to privatized Social Security. Others argue that privatization would make Social Security subject to fluctuations in the stock market and bond market, which could adversely affect it, and that spending will not actually be cut because the government will have to fund the private accounts, which would result in more spending. Pro: Varun Chethan, Skyline Con: Matteo Alleman, Naperville North Moderator: Hari Ravi, Neuqua Valley Room 400 NW Thought Talk: Should the U.S. actively support individuals engaged in protest against their governments? Beginning in the spring of 2011 with the string of protests in the Middle East (more commonly known as Arab Spring), there have been in a rise in mass movements, social, political, or humanitarian. There have been changes in head of state in Egypt, the creation of new countries in South Sudan, changes in policies in India, and many more world changing events. The U.S. has been put into a position in which they have to take sides in the conflicts. Some people say that the United States should stand by other heads of state instead of condoning movements such as these. Others say that the U.S. should stand by the values it so proudly proclaims and support protestors in their fights against their states. Moderator: Nic Wolf, Naperville North Room 415 NW Block II | 11:55 - 12:45 Capitol Building

Debate: Resolved, that teacher unions are detrimental to the American education system. Since their establishment, teacher unions have been a forceful contender in the shaping of American education. In fact, Fortune magazine has consistently ranked the National Education Association in the top 15 of its Washington Power list due to its influence in the capitol. In nearly every state, teachers dues are automatically diverted to their unions political funds. These funds are then siphoned to finance campaign distributions, ballot initiatives, and lobbying expenditures, often to combat proposed education reform. Critics of the organizations assert that the activities of teacher unions ultimately detract from the educational system, lowering its quality while increasing its cost. Yet unions are founded upon and perpetuate the principle of social justice. They work tirelessly to give teachers a voice as forceful as that of their role in the lives of Americas youth. Supporters maintain that the improved pay and other benefits that unions achieve incentivize the occupation, encouraging more talent to enter the field while increasing teachers motivation to work. Do unions contribute to the American education system through improvement of teaching conditions or provide teacher benefits at its expense? Pro: Jackie Qiu, Skyline Con: Ben Carlson, Naperville North Moderator: Maya Gianchandani, Skyline Room 415 NW 6

Debate: Resolved, that the United States no longer subsidize petroleum companies, and instead devote those resources to alternative energy grants and hybrid and electric car subsidies. In a time when the Earths petroleum resources are being depleted at a staggering rate and petro-chemical firms are turning significant profits, many call for the US government to pull its many subsidies from the industry and focus instead on the future. By investing that money in the development of alternative energy technology as well as more resource-efficient vehicles, the US could position itself to succeed in an uncertain energy future without further straining an overburdened budget. Others believe that removing these subsidies would be felt by Americans at the gas pump and that doing so would be dangerous in a time of such economic volatility. Whether or not to proceed with moving these subsidies from the vital petroleum industry to an investment for the future of energy in America is a key decision that should be thought over with care. Pro: Rohit Rastogi, Naperville North Con: Lisa Swanson, Naperville Central Moderator: Glen Richardson, IMSA Room 328 NW Debate: Resolved, that the U.S. should respect international desires over national interests as dependence on foreign powers increases. In todays globalized world, America has become increasingly dependent upon other countries for oil, manufacturing, raw materials, and other resources. The federal government borrows massive amounts of money every year, and international trade is quickly becoming the most important aspect of American business. Some experts believe that as America depends more and more upon other countries, we should hold foreign interests in higher priority than domestic issues. Others contend that this is not the case, and that economic interdependence is not a reason to compromise policy at home. Pro: Kevin Zhang, IMSA Con: Karthik Bala, Naperville North Moderator: Pooja Saxena, Neuqua Valley Room 300 NW Debate: Resolved, that America increase quotas on skilled worker visas. The American economy is an advanced economy - it is primarily service based and relies heavily on knowledge industries such as technology and education. Such an economy is fueled by a workforce educated in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). American multinationals have fed their growing demand for STEM educated workers by hiring immigrants by granting them an H1-B visa. The H1-B visa is a skilled worker visa that requires the recipient hold a minimum of a bachelors degree and the visa can only be granted if there are no citizens who can reasonably occupy the job. Under the directive of President Obama, the TARP bill included restrictions on the use of H1-B visas for companies that received TARP money, and these restrictions were again extended with the ARRA bill. Opponents frequently cite the abuse the H1-B system encounters - although workers may be brought in under the premise they are performing skilled labor, many are actually unskilled and processed through the H1-B program to speed their entry into the US. Additionally, only companies can sponsor H1-B visas, making the employees dependent on their employers; some draw parallels 7

between their situation and those of indentured servants. Supporters note that without the visa, the United States would lose its competitive advantage of attracting the worlds smartest
workers to its companies. In addition, supporters note that the H1-B visa allow many foreigners to enter the United States with employment and a stable path to permanent residency, the first steps towards the American Dream.

Pro: Shantanu Jain, IMSA Con: JohnPatrick OHagan, Marian Central Catholic Moderator: Timothe Smith, Naperville North

Room 225 NW

Debate: Resolved, that the United States take a stance against media and social media censorship that countries such as China and North Korea use to limit their citizens access to information. Many believe that Communist Regimes in countries such as North Korea go too far in their policies of media and social media censorship, and that pressure should be applied to achieve freedom of information in these countries. They argue that it behooves the United States to stand with this effort in order to both further its humanitarian objectives and further open up these countries to American businesses. For example, tension between the Chinese government and Google has resulted in the frustrated corporation effectively making its services unavailable to the Chinese mainland, cutting off Google from an internet search consumer base that is growing by 40% every year as well as making information less available to Chinese citizens. Others, however, argue that by taking a stance on this issue the United States would overstep its bounds and potentially interfere with the sovereignty of other nations, not to mention the likely diplomatic consequences. The outcome of these, and other key arguments, will decide whether or not the United States should demand: Mr. Jiabao, tear down this firewall! Pro: Kajol Char, Neuqua Valley Con: Jeremy Still, Vernon Hills Moderator: Caroline Brunson, Springfield Room 400 NW Lunch | 12:50 - 2:05

Block III | 2:10 - 2:55

Capitol Building

Keynote Speaker: Jeff Burkhart, Madison Literacy Network

Assembly Chamber

Block IV | 3:00 - 3:50

Capitol Building

Civic Engagement Fair

North Hearing Room

Thought Talk: Does the country you are born in matter to your success? Immigrants from all over the world come to America, the land of opportunity, in pursuit of a better life. However, as the world becomes increasingly globalized, the traditional view of the Western world holding more economic opportunities is being challenged. In addition, success has a variety of definitions, as few would dispute the success of influential advocates for change such as Mother Teresa or Gandhi. Nonetheless, for those who live in oppressed nations, race and background play a large role in the opportunities that present themselves. Many countries that are engaged in war have corrupt governments that simply cannot provide its citizens with the adequate education and opportunities necessary to succeed. So, does the country you are born in matter to your success? Or does it depend on what type of person you are? Moderator: Adam Burshan, Naperville North Room 300 NW Thought Talk: From what sources does a government derive its power? As the Arab Spring continues to captivate the attention of the world, as governments rise and fall in the blink of an eye, this question seems omnipresent, furtively seeking a resolution amidst the turmoil of the Middle East. While the common perception seems to be that government derives its power from the people, is this really the case? Dictators who ruled with an iron fist for generations have been forced to relinquish their grasp in the face of the very military force they exercised to gain power in the first place. Military rule then gave way to armed rebels, who in turn attribute their power to God. At the very heart of this chaos, where does the power of a government truly lie? Moderator: Lauren Moore, Marian Central Catholic Room 328 NW Debate: Resolved, that the increased polarization of political parties accurately reflects the ideologies of their constituents. In a system where politicians have consistently taken moderate positions or flip-flopped on their own party principles in order to maximize their votes, it seems that parties have become more polarized than ever Republicans use the Democrats policies against them, and vice versa, and leaders adhere closer and closer to strict party lines, widening the once small gap between the two groups. Some say that this ongoing change is simply a reflection of the peoples ideals, as it should be in a democracy, while others claim that radical party leaders are simply demonstrating exaggerated sides of each issue, and that the average American voter is a moderate blend of these influences. Pro: Kyle Glasper, IMSA Con: Eric Price, Naperville North Moderator: Stanley Yuan, IMSA Room 225 NW

Chapter Caucus & Key Distribution |4:35 - 5:05

Madison Concourse Hotel Senate A and Senate B

Block V | 5:10 - 6:00

Madison Concourse Hotel

Debate: Resolved, that America is still the land of opportunity. America has undisputedly been the land of opportunity in its past. Considering the sizeable influx of immigrants during the early nineteenth (and even later during the early twentieth) century and their subsequent assimilation into society, America has surely given opportunities to incoming foreigners. America has always touted social mobility and economic freedom as two of its greatest aspects, both of which are embodied by the idealized, land-of-opportunity America which forever captures admiration. But, has this spirit of economic and social freedom persisted? Many would claim that the America in which we live has neither of these traits, and is in fact becoming less free market and more socially static than it has been in the past. Conversely, Americas continuation of practices like reverse discrimination shows that it is inciting social mobility. Pro: Lucy Mui, Naperville Central Con: James Chen, IMSA Moderator: Nivetha Samy, Skyline University Room C Debate: Resolved, U.S. law enforcement be involved in investigating potential violations of NCAA bylaws by college athletes, coaches, and institutions. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) is the governing body for Division I, II, and III college sports. They have set rules down to protect the amateurism of the athletes. These rules range from prohibiting payments to the players beyond their scholarships to what kind of competitions they can participate in to even whether or not they can have cream cheese on pre-meal bagels (this rule was repealed during summer 2011, but still an interesting rule nonetheless). There are 33 programs that are currently serving a period of probation imposed by the NCAA. Since the NCAA created its rulebook in 1955, 31 college programs have been found guilty of committing at least 5 major violations. In the past 5 years, the NCAA has had to deal with multiple violations by different schools in a short span of time. Because of this, the NCAA has taken a long time to hand out sanctions to the guilty parties and the repercussions of the violations often has to be felt by groups of people who have absolutely nothing to do with the violations or even the team during the time period they committed the violations. A proposed solution is to hire law enforcement agencies to expedite the process of investigating. Opponents of this claim that the government has better things to do than investigate rules violations by college athletes. Others claim that since college sports are such a big money business, government regulation is a necessary measure to ensure that all the rules of the business are followed. Pro: Varun Chethan, Skyline Con: Jack Carbonara, Naperville North Moderator: Stanley Yuan, IMSA Assembly Room 10

Debate: Resolved, that it was in the best interest of the United States to cut off financial aid to Pakistan.
The death of Osama Bin Laden in May of 2011 was a pivotal point in the war on terror. The United States and its allies finally succeeded in killing the 9/11 mastermind and head of Al Qaeda. However, his death resulted in the U.S. looking at its Middle East policy differently, especially in regards to Pakistan. Osama Bin Laden was hiding in Pakistan near a major military academy there. Not only that, but the compound he was residing in was very large and out in the open. After learning of this, many called for the United States to stop sending financial aid to Pakistan. Pakistan, they argued, should have known Osama Bin Laden was hiding in a massive compound near a major military academy, and it seems as if they harbored him. Others argue that Pakistan is playing a major role in fighting terror, and without the financial aid of the U.S., their ability to combat terrorism will be affected, which will only harm the United States and its Allies

Pro: Gayatri Sanku, Naperville Central Con: Praneeth Tripuraneni, Naperville North Moderator: Hari Ravi, Neuqua Valley

University Room D

Debate: Resolved, that the internet is the most important form of infrastructure. As the twenty-first century progresses, the importance of the internet is growing at an unbelievable rate. Its potential and accessibility make it one of the most important innovations of the past few decades, as it has become an information highway upon which hundreds of millions of users connect and communicate. But has this new, exciting form of infrastructure outgrown the importance of actual highways, airports, and even apartment complexes? Railroad conductors would maintain that the internet pales in comparison to the constant, flowing network of resources across the nations rail system, and the same could be asserted by nearly any profession dealing in transportation, housing, or food. Pro: Yasha Mostofi, Naperville North Con: Zach Gold, Naperville North Moderator: Timothe Smith, Naperville North University Room A Thought Talk: How should the government define marriage? Marriage is historically acknowledged as a social institution recognizing the decision between a man and woman to live as husband and wife. In todays society, marriage can also be possible for partners of the same gender. Should a government definition of marriage be based on traditional views or be altered based on societal shifts? Should states still be able to enforce marriage laws differing from those of federally defined marriage? How will the separation of church and state be applied in marriage, which can be considered both a legal and religious institution? Moderator: Casey Doherty, Marian Central Catholic University Room B

Dinner |6:00 - 8:00

11

Block VI | 8:15 - 9:05

Madison Concourse Hotel

Debate: Resolved, that the government financially assist companies that are scientifically and technologically innovative. Two schools of thought persist. One maintains that no, the government should not be involved whatsoever in the affairs of the economy, and it should especially not favor one company over another. The other argument lies in the belief that yes, the government should assist a company that maintains a certain degree of scientific and technological innovation that as of yet is not advantageous in the free market, and so requires financial assistance. Should the government help out the little guy? Some would argue that the responsibility of market success lies entirely in the hands of the company, and not in financial assistance. But would financial assistance stimulate growth in Americas much-neglected fields of science and technology? Would financial assistance be enough to propel weaker, bright-eyed companies beyond the competition of their larger-budgeted, big-business, less-efficient counterparts? Is it ethical? Pro: Lisa Liu, Skyline Con: Naren Akurati, Vernon Hills Moderator: Stanley Yuan, IMSA Assembly Room Debate: Resolved, that higher sales taxes imposed on proscribed goods such as alcohol, tobacco products, and unhealthy foods infringe upon the rights of consumers. Sin taxes sales taxes placed upon goods or services that could be considered harmful to the consumer in the United States are levied by state and federal governments, and have been used as a means of protecting the people since the extra taxation of cigarettes during the Civil War. Sin taxes are ostensibly used to reduce the consumption of these harmful products by making them more expensive, thereby giving the consumer a reason to refrain from purchasing them. However, many argue that these taxes interfere with a citizens individual right to control his or her own body. Still others claim that excessive taxation of certain goods or services leads to black market activity and smuggling within or between jurisdictions. Pro: Carly Naughton, Neuqua Valley Con: Nathan Geldner, IMSA Moderator: Glen Richardson, IMSA University Room A Debate: Resolved, that with the death of Osama Bin Laden, the U.S. should immediately withdraw all military troops from Afghanistan. On September 11, 2001, members of the Al Qaeda terrorist group hijacked four passenger planes and intentionally crashed them into the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon. In retaliation, America initiated a war on terror that culminated on May 2nd, 2011 in the death of the groups leader, Osama bin Laden. After ten long years of war in Afghanistan, a team of United States Navy Seals stormed the mansion where bin Laden was hiding and shot him dead. Now that our initial purpose has been complete, both the majority of Americans and the majority of Afghans support the immediate withdrawal of all troops. Last June, in a 12

televised speech to the nation, President Obama set a timeline for the removal of troops by 2014. However, some feel that this will not enact the immediate change necessary for our country. Pro: Ryan Chiu, IMSA Con: Jack Zinnen, Springfield Moderator: Max Glas, Naperville Central University Room C Debate: Resolved, that because NATO is useless, it should be dissolved. The NATO alliance (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) was an organization founded to formalize relations between the major European and American powers - the traditionally western countries. Since its formation in the mid 20th century, its goal has evolved from "*keeping+ the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down, as stated by the first Secretary General, to enforcing the plans for a no fly zone over Libya. Critics of the organization note that NATO nations constitute 70% of all defense spending, and thus nearly monopolize military power. Supporters note that it allows for fast and organized action because of its codes that require member nations to provide dedicated troops to the organization. Pro: Kyle Glasper, IMSA Con: Will Donnelly, Naperville North Moderator: Adam Burshan, Naperville North University Room B Thought Talk: Hipsters Moderator: Name, School Night Activities I | 9:10 - 10:00 University Room D Madison Concourse Hotel

Debate: Resolved, that America could defeat any single nation without the support of its allies. Many people theorize that the United States has enough military power to single handedly defeat any nation in the world. They believe that the US can achieve its interests without the assistance of the UN, NATO, or any other alliance the US is a part of. Conversely, there are those that believe that the U.S. draws its power from the trust its allies have in its judgment, as well as the alliances that give the US influence in places they would not reach without these alliances. Does the US actually require these alliances to maintain its influence in the world and protect its interests abroad? Or are can they go rogue and do it all on their own? Pro: Kevin Zhang, IMSA Con: Shubham Patel, Vernon Hills Moderator: Timothe Smith, Naperville North University Room A Debate: Resolved, that the U.S. should annex Canada. Since the American Revolution, Americans have looked towards Canada as a possible nation to annex. The War of 1812 shattered this hope, but with the United States as the world's dominant superpower, Canada has once again become a possible nation for 13

annexation. Supporters of annexation argue that should the U.S. take Canada, the United States would gain vast amounts of land, people, and natural resources, including oil. Further, they argue that Canada has an incredibly small military, and the United States should be able to take it with very minimal casualties. Opponents argue that annexing Canada would violate the Treaty of Ghent that ended the War of 1812 and that annexation would make the United States more hated in the world. They also argue that annexation would result in massive riots in Canada that could spill into the United States. Not just any riots, but Canadian hockey riots. Pro: Shaker Samman, Port Huron Con: JohnPatrick OHagan, Marian Central Catholic Moderator: Lauren Moore, Marian Central Catholic University Room B Debate: Resolved, that the lax bro subculture is detrimental to society. Lax bros are bros (two or more males who experience a strong sense of friendship and camaraderie) who play lacrosse. They crush cans of Natty Ice on their rock hard abs, and brochill all day long. Some lax bros attend prep school. Other lax bros take the lax aspect very seriously, training year-round to perfect their games. Lax bros are also known for getting chicks and partying hard. Some believe that these lax bros are degenerates who are bringing society to a new low, while others appreciate their chill demeanor and athletic ability. The lax bros? They just wanna lax, bro. Pro: Kevin Chong, IMSA Con: Aaron Geldner, IMSA Moderator: Anthony Intini, Naperville North University Room C Debate: Resolved, that the Harry Potter series promotes witchcraft among children With the eighth and final Harry Potter installment approaching sales of over one billion dollars since its premier, countless youths have expressed their sorrow over the end of their childhood. The story of the boy wizard who defeated the evil Lord Voldemort has undoubtedly influenced and inspired millions of children, teenagers, and even adults, across the world. However, opponents of the books believe that this influence has gone too far. An unreasonable number of children have woken up on their eleventh birthday, devastated to find that no letter of acceptance from Hogwarts awaited them. Thousands of wands have been sold to young wizard wannabes who wish that they could learn and perform magic themselves. To many parents, the spells, potions, and crystal ball readings in JK Rowlings bestselling selling novels challenge their religious beliefs. Do the Harry Potter series promote unrealistic ideas to the worlds youth? Pro: Roy Fu, Naperville North Con: Neil Bingham, Marian Central Catholic Moderator: Eileen Ennis, Marian Central Catholic University Room D Impromptu Speaking Led By: Karthik Bala, Naperville North Assembly Room

14

Night Activities II |10:00 - 12:00 Dance Quiz Bowl Curfew |12:15

Madison Concourse Hotel Capitol Ballroom Wisconsin Ballroom

Sunday, November 20
Checkout & Breakfast | 8:00 - 10:00 Block VII | 10:15 11:05 Capitol Building

Debate: Resolved, that Americas economy will still be the worlds most important at the end of the 21st century. The rapid rise of the BRIC (Brazil, India, Russia, and China) economies have many economists and historians speculating that relative to the rest of the world, the American economy will decline in relative size and influence. The absolute size of an economy, one side says, determines a countrys influence, as a larger economy is able to interconnect more people across borders with more resources and businesses. They cite the example of small affluent countries, such as Luxemburg. The opposing side states that even if the Chinese and Indian economies were to surpass the United States economy in terms of GDP (output), the United States economys high level of innovation would continue to maintain its influence citing the examples of Japan and South Korea. Pro: Jeffrey Zhao, IMSA Con: Riley Helm, IMSA Moderator: Stanley Yuan, IMSA Room 300 NW Debate: Resolved, that students have the majority of the responsibility in their education. Many, in the American tradition of the self-made man, emphasize the need for individual student responsibility. Students need to take individual ownership for their actions and work hard in their studies. Attempts to shift responsibility from student to the educational system itself result in failures such as programs like No Child Left Behind, wasting the efforts of teachers on students without the drive necessary to achieve and preventing promising students from receiving educational guidance from their already over-burdened teachers. On the other hand, practically all modern nations enforce a compulsory educational system, 15

which takes at its premise that students, regardless of ability or interest, must complete a minimum number of years in schooling. In this sense education is not only for personal enhancement (both intellectually and in employability,) but a national interest. This being the case, can (K-12) educational success be primarily put upon the student who may be present at school only because it is mandatory? Pro: Satya Yerrabolu, IMSA Con: Anthony Intini, Naperville North Moderator: Eileen Ennis, Marian Central Catholic Room 328 NW Debate: Resolved, that a democratically elected leader is responsible for representing the religion of his or her constituents. As we all know, a democratically elected leader is someone who is elected because they have the support of the majority of people in a given election. In many cases, this leader represents a diverse group of constituents. One of the diverse factors is religion. While in a perfect democratic model, religion would not play a role in the election of candidates to office. However, in the humanely possible democratic society, religion inherently plays a role in election based on basic human tendencies to form prejudices. So the question is, does an elected leader have a responsibility to represent the religion his their constituents? Some people argue that one of the basic principles that this country was founded upon, separation of church and state, would prohibit such a representation from happening. Others say that since religion plays such an important role in todays world that we would have to incorporate religion into how we manage the country. Pro: Lisa Swanson, Naperville Central Con: Kendell Byrd, IMSA Moderator: Gayatri Sanku, Naperville Central Room 400 NW Debate: Resolved, that the U.S. has the obligation to promote democracy in the Middle East. The "Arab Spring" in the Middle East has resulted in countless numbers of people dead and the oppression of many others. These revolutions are largely democratic ones, and most seek to overthrow a corrupt ruler. The revolutions have given many people a voice, but the governments in these nations are still powerful and can still crush revolutions and stifle the will of the people. Many argue that the United States, as the most powerful democratic nation in the world, is obliged to promote more democracies in the world. Further, supporters argue that these revolutions could help the United States in the War on Terror and topple rulers who are enemies of the U.S. Opponents argue that the United States has no right to tell a country what government it should have, and that these revolutions open the possibility of Muslim Extremists taking over the country and turning it into a terrorist nation. Pro: Steven Tinetti, Vernon Hills Con: Anushka Mehrotra, Neuqua Valley Moderator: Rishika Ramireddy, Skyline Room 225 NW Thought Talk: Macs vs. PCs Moderator: Adam Burshan, Naperville North 16 Room 415 NW

Block VIII | 11:10 - 12:00

Capitol Building

Resolved, that all American airports undergo Israelification In 2010, the TSA revealed plans to purchase and install at least 500 full body scanners in major airports across the country, each costing approximately $170,000. Currently, only 68 out of the 5,000 public-use airports in the country have these scanners, rendering them ineffective because terrorists can attack flights originating from the airports that do not have scanners installed. Although the United States spends $15 billion each year on airport security, it fails to conduct intelligence and threat analyses based on the monitoring of suspicious behavior. The ineffective American system contrasts with the Israeli method, most prominently used at Tel Avivs Ben Gurion International Airport. The airports security has yet to be breached, despite facing dozens of potential terrorist threats each day in one of the worlds most targeted countries. Their setup consists of a six-step process focused heavily on psychological scrutiny and allows passengers to arrive at their flight in less than twenty-five minutes, as opposed to the three or more hours an American must spend. Should America abolish its TSA scanners and adopt the Israeli method? Pro: Summer Wu, IMSA Con: Nivetha Samy, Skyline Moderator: Lauren Moore, Marian Central Catholic Room 328 NW Debate: Resolved, that the American economic system inherently fosters class conflict. While the poor and working class bear the pain of the recession, the rich and powerful fiercely fight against any proposal that includes a tax raise on the wealthy. Due to the incredibly expensive nature of running electoral campaigns, it is often difficult for blue collar workers to find a political voice. For example, the mid-term elections cost an estimated $4.5 billion, with most of the contributions coming from big corporations and rich contributors. As our economic system is so closely connected to and relies on the political system, many argue that it inherently fosters class conflict. However, America is also known as the land of opportunity because of its history of providing everybody, no matter which class they originate from, the chance to strike it big. Pro: Connor Sundberg, Marian Central Catholic Con: Jungje Choi, Skyline Moderator: Kristiana Yao, Naperville North Room 415 NW Debate: Resolved, that developing countries be exempt from environmental regulations. The deterioration of the environment has grown into a pressing global concern, underscored by rising energy costs and the denial of global warming by certain GOP candidates. Political jibes aside, however, there exists a very real and urgent pressure to tighten environmental regulations and improve their enforcement. Furthermore, the worst infractions often take place in developing, industrializing countries. Activists argue that not only are environmental safeguards crucial in such countries, but they are more in need there than anywhere else in the world. Then there also lies the difficulty of classifying countries in the first place. Nations such as India in China, while they both suffer from heavy pollution and are both developing 17

into world contenders, are still not considered fully developed countries and would be exempt from environmental responsibilities, which has many environmentalists crying foul. Yet from a fiscal and political standpoint, stringent regulations could wreak irrevocable havoc. Going green tends to have a high price tag attached that emerging nations simply cannot afford. Checking the growth of fledgling businesses could cause a serious stagnation of the economy. In the end, is the protection of environment worth it? Pro: Shubham Patel, Vernon Hills Con: Jenny Zavsatsky, Vernon Hills Moderator: Mark Gaughan, Neuqua Valley Room 300 NW Debate: Resolved, that China is not a legitimate threat to Americas global influence. As the worlds fastest growing major economy and Americas largest foreign creditor, many fear the inevitability of Chinas rise and Americas decline. Indeed, Americas foreign policy has done nothing but further entrench these beliefs. Over the past few years, the U.S. has steadily curtailed its military presence in the Pacific and has virtually turned its back on Taiwan. China may also soon surpass the U.S. as the worlds largest GDP. Yet others assert that Chinas purported financial power is in fact two-sided, keeping the country locked within an undervalued dollar-yuan exchange rate and rendering China unable to establish its own sphere of economic influence independent of the U.S. Furthermore, the nation is commensurate to a demographic nightmare and is in need of drastic reforms that it has proven incapable of making. Pro: Karthik Bala, Naperville North Con: Kimberly Liu, Neuqua Valley Moderator: Jon Henricks, IMSA Room 400 NW Thought Talk: Are rights merely privileges given to us by higher authorities? If the right to a fair trial was not afforded to us in the Constitution, would we still have that right? Should torture be forbidden worldwide, just because we are human beings, and the Geneva Convention (half of which the United States did not sign) says so? Do we have the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because we are people, or because the government tells us that we do? If an establishment grants us a right while retaining the authority to take it away, is it really a right? Where does one draw the line between rights and privileges afforded to many? If the government can prevent me from purchasing a gun, do I have the right to bear arms? At what point does an institution have the power to grant rights? Should people be granted something just because they live and breathe on Earth, or in a certain country? Do rights even exist? Moderator: Edeline Chen, Naperville Central Room 225 NW Block IX | 12:05 - 12:55 Capitol Building

Debate: Resolved, that organized religions corrupt individual beliefs. Since the beginning of organized religious establishments, there have been dissenters who refuse to accept the principles laid out for them by theological officials, no matter how 18

convincing the logic or the promised result. Religious institutions offer their constituents an opportunity to come together and practice what they believe with those who believe in the same things, but one question - or some variation of it - has been asked over and over: are theocratic leaders allowing faithful people to join them in their beliefs or telling them what to believe? Some argue that religious organization helps people to form their own faiths and create a sense of moral structure in their lives, while others claim that such establishments lend themselves power and manipulate their constituents out of self-interest. Pro: Chris Norris, IMSA Con: Caroline Brunson, Springfield Moderator: Glen Richardson, IMSA Room 415 NW Resolved, that the Supreme Court decision Snyder vs. Phelps be overturned In March 2006, members of the Westboro Baptist Church rallied at Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyders funeral, chanting antigay slogans and carry signs that read Thank God for dead soldiers. The group holds weekly pickets (schedule is posted on their website www.godhatesfags.com) in front of military funerals in order to attract attention for their anti-homosexual and antigovernment messages, whether or whether not the fallen soldier was gay. Soon after the funeral, Matthews father Albert sued the church for causing him emotional distress and violating his right to grieve privately. Others supported his decision, arguing that soldiers deserve to be honored, and that their funerals are an inappropriate venue for protesting. However, in March 2011, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in favor of the church, explaining that free speech is the foundation of democracy, no matter how blasphemous the message. Nonetheless, should disrespecting soldiers who die for their country constitute an exception? Will lowering the morale of soldiers affect the number that chooses to serve in the future, and as a result affect our national security? Pro: Alexa Maffei, IMSA Con: Nathan Geldner, IMSA Moderator: Pooja Saxena, Neuqua Valley Room 225NW Debate: Resolved, that America has the resources to achieve total global domination. By the end of the 20th Century, the United States of America had asserted itself as the greatest military power in the world, but just how powerful is the USA? Leaving nuclear weapons out of the picture, since using them wouldnt leave all that much to dominate, the United States has something that many other military powers lack, the means to project its power. In modern warfare, the ability to project power can basically be boiled down to the number of aircraft carriers under a nations control. The United States currently controls 12, one of which is in reserve, as compared to 10 controlled by every other nation in the world combined. While the US possesses many advantages such as this one, are they enough to overwhelm the sheer number of soldiers in countries such as China, on the other side of the world? This, and other key questions, will be integral in reaching a conclusion as to whether the United States of America has the resources to achieve total global domination. Pro: Luke Dawson, Marian Central Catholic Con: Misha Bogdanov, Vernon Hills Moderator: Stanley Yuan, IMSA Room 400 NW 19

Debate: Resolved, that the passing grade in public schools be raised to a B. Many students would maintain that earning a low C or D in a class should not qualify them as having passed and learned all of the course material. It is difficult for the average student to fail a class using the current pass/fail criteria, but what if the passing grade was raised to a B? Not only would this make honors classes a legitimate gamble, but it would also create a stronger sieve between academic levels and provide a real impetus for students to put work into school. Among these positive effects, it could be remarked that it would discourage students from taking heavier course-loads and experimenting in subjects at which they do not have a high level of skill. Pro: Hamed Kadiani, Springfield Con: James Chen, IMSA Moderator: Casey Doherty, Marian Central Catholic Room 300 NW Debate: Resolved, that fictitious names and accounts be allowed on Facebook and all other social networking sites. With the advent of the Internet the issue of anonymity has been revitalized in the public mind. The Internet has thrived on open discussion where contributors can freely seek and offer advice on sensitive issues under the protection of anonymitywithout which few would feel comfortable enclosing their personal problems in a public forum. On the other hand, the Internet has empowered bullies to harass their victims with greater effects than ever before through a means that makes it virtually impossible for victims to confront their perpetrators. Many social networking sites have removed the wall between on-line and off-line social life by limiting users to one account which identifies themselves by their real names. Doing so has effectively stopped bullies from disassociating themselves from their real life persona by using a plurality of pseudonyms. Yet Internet entrepreneur Christopher Poole argues, We all have multiple identities. Its not abnormal; its just part of being human...Its not who you share with, its who you share as. Multiple identities allow greater user protection for personal and professional distinctions than the 'lists' and 'circles' offered by Facebook and Google+ respectively, prioritizing privacy when users wish to explore new communities and interests and promoting the individual's ability to choose how they present themselves to the world. Pro: Allex Lubbers, Port Huron Con: Neil Bingham, Marian Central Catholic Moderator: Max Glas, Naperville Central Room 328 NW Closing Session | 1:00 - 1:30 Capitol Building Assembly Chamber Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin State Senator Convention Coordinator Kimberly Liu Director of Debate Edeline Chen Governor Aadi Tolappa 20

Keynote Speaker Best Speaker Awards Farwell Address

Keynote Speaker
Mark F. Miller: Democratic Minority Leader, Wisconsin State Senate
Senator Mark F. Miller was born in Boston, Massachusetts and raised in Middleton, Wisconsin. After receiving his Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, he served as a fighter pilot in the Wisconsin Air National Guard, retiring at the rank of Lieutenant Colonel after 30 years in the Guard. Miller then went on to become a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly, representing the 48th district from 1999 through 2005. In 2004 he was elected to the Wisconsin State Senate. He is now serving his second term and is the Senate Democratic Leader. As senator, Miller is a leading advocate in health care reform. He has led the fight to pass a statewide health care plan in Wisconsin and is committed to making health care both affordable and accessible. He is also dedicated to sound environmental policy and conservation efforts. He is the author of legislation that reduce dependence on imported energy, create jobs, and encourage a cleaner environment. In early February of this year, Senator Miller became actively involved in the 2011 Wisconsin budget protests. In a highly publicized demonstration, Miller led Wisconsins 14 Senate Democrats out of the state to deny the quorum necessary to vote on Governor Scott Walkers controversial Budget Repair Bill, which would take away state employees bargaining rights and increase health care costs and contributions to pensions. Although the bill was passed nonetheless this March, Senator Miller captured the attention of the nation, inspiring popular interest in the budget crisis and in the protection of workers rights.

21

Keynote Speaker
Glenn Grothman: Republican Assistant Majority Leader, Wisconsin State Senate
Senator Glenn Grothman was born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and raised in the nearby town of Mequon. He received both his Bachelor of Business Administration degree and Juris Doctor degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. After graduating from law school, Grothman practiced as a tax and real estate attorney for 10 years until his election to the Wisconsin State Assembly in 1993. He served as an assemblyman until 2004, upon which he entered the Wisconsin State Senate. He is now serving his second term as Senator after re-election in 2008 and is the Republican Assistant Majority Leader. Grothman has won many distinctions as a legislator, including the Assembly Tax Cutter of the Year (Milwaukee County Republican Party), Hero Award (Wisconsin Bear Hunters Association), Sanctity of Life Award, (Wisconsin Rights to Life), Guardian of Small Business Award (National Federation of Independent Businesses), Outstanding Legislator Award (Wisconsin Counties Association),Working For Wisconsin Award (Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce), Legislator of the Year (Wisconsin Builders Association, Pro-Life Wisconsin, Independent Business Association, Wisconsin Guild of Midwives, Apartment Association, Wisconsin Curves for Women), and many others. In early spring of this year, Senator Grothman became entangled in the 2011 Wisconsin budget protests. He and other fellow supporters of Governor Walkers Budget Repair Bill were among the Republican senators targeted by protestors. Recall campaigns were also launched against the Democratic senators who left the state to deny the bill a quorum. Although 3 Democrats and 6 Republicans were eventually recalled, the motion against Senator Grothman did not garner enough support and he is again up for re-election in 2012 with a formidable repertoire of accomplishments under his belt.

22

Keynote Speaker

Jeff Burkhart: Executive Director, Literacy Network of Dane County

Jeff Burkhart has worked in adult education and organizational development in the non-profit, healthcare, and educational sectors. His areas of expertise include developing environments for improved organizational learning and learner motivation, transfer of learning techniques, and understanding of communication styles. Jeff has helped improve teamwork in non-profit organizations and has developed curricula for adult basic education and workplace learning programs. He has created and implemented leadership development programs as well as seminars on collaborative work environments to sustain long-term improvement. Jeff has a masters degree in continuing and vocational education from the University of WisconsinMadison, where he focused on participatory education for adult basic learners. Jeff has worked with several organizations serving the basic needs of adult learners. He supervised workplace programs at the Dane County Job Center, created numerous learning programs at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, and coordinated outreach for the BadgerCare Plus program for the State of Wisconsin. Jeff is currently the Executive Director of Literacy Network of Dane County, a non-profit organization serving over a thousand adult learners throughout Dane County. He also serves on the board of Wisconsin Literacy, a statewide coalition of literacy providers, and is a member of the executive team of HealthWatch Wisconsin.

23

Message from the Fundraising Department

Hello and welcome to Fall State! As all chapter leadership knows, fundraising is integral to maintaining an active chapter. Whether it be hosting a mini-con, providing financial assistance to members, or even buying pizza for a meeting, the money has to come from somewhere. Even large chapters such as Naperville North have to deal with this problem, and for smaller chapters, it can be a significant setback in addition to other problems. This year, the Midwest has started a fundraising department to help chapters raise money for activities and conventions. We will be testing out different ideas over the year to alleviate the fundraising problem at conventions. For example, at this convention, we are piloting a program in which chapters can sell items to JSA members to raise money for activities. Other upcoming ideas include a chapter raffle or even a poker tournament with representatives from different chapters. If you have ideas regarding fundraising or you just need assistance with ways to raise funds for your chapter, you can contact me at karthikb27@yahoo.com. I am always available for help. Karthik Bala Director of Fundraising

Message from the Publicity Department

Hello yall, This year for the Midwest Publicity we have a couple of new things for everyone: a newly designed JSA website and a Twitter account! Our new website layout includes upcoming mini-conventions information, a photo gallery, and depicts the Chapter Map for all to use. We have changed the format of the website so it is easier to navigate, and more aesthetically pleasing. Also, since many JSAers are tech-savvy, we have created our Twitter account: MW_JSA. Information about upcoming mini-conventions, regional conventions, current news, and activism projects will be regularly added. In the upcoming months, we are going to create our second Midwest JSA Promotional video! The theme will be along the lines of student activism and why JSA is definitely better than Speech and Debate team. We hope that all of these tools will be useful for Chapter Presidents, and everyone else to better receive information about JSA. Lisa Swanson Director of Publicity

24

Message from the Activism Department

Hello fellow statesmen! This year JSA will focus its activism towards making a difference in Educational standards both here in America and around the world. It is for this reason that we have chosen to do a book drive at Fall State. All the books your chapters have brought in will be going towards the Rotary Club Books for the World program, which sends these books to impoverished schools in South Africa. These children normally do not have access to any reading materials, thus our donations will make a significant impact on their lives. At the Civic Engagement Fair you will see the Literacy Network, which is taking strides to improve adult literacy here in Madison. Lastly, I challenge each and every chapter to make a difference in their own communities, through the Adopt-a-Cause program. I ask that every chapter in the Midwest find a cause or local organization to support for the duration of this year. If we stay committed to making a change, our impact as a state could be incredible. So as Gandhi once famously said, Be the change you wish to see in the world. Good luck Midwest JSA! Nivetha Samy Director of Activism

Civic Engagement Fair

The Progressive: The Progressive is a historically leftwing magazine that was founded in 1909 during the Progressive movement by none other than Robert La Follette himself. The magazine lays its base in standing against militarism, the concentration of power in corporate hands, and the disenfranchisement of ordinary citizens. The Progressive works to make change in regards to social and economic justice, civil rights and liberties, preserving the environment and sustaining freedom of speech. Wisconsin Democracy Campaign: The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign is an organization devoted to reforming the democratic process in modern America. It is a non partisan watchdog group that is focused on tracking money in state politics; fighting corruption, creating government transparency, and creating an overall more honest government which the average citizen can easily participate in. University of Wisconsin at Madison Republicans: The U-W Madison Republicans are a collegiate organization of the Republican Party. They align themselves with the political views of the Republicans, and on campus hold many events to rally fellow conservatives. They have been visited in the past by many electoral candidates, and are an excellent example of collegiate involvement in the political process. 25

Civic Engagement Fair (Continued)

Literacy Network: The Literacy Network is composed of over 400 teachers and volunteers who devote their time to teaching literacy skills to illiterate adults in the Dane county area. All programs are free of charge, as they help these adults who may be in poverty, lack education, have learning disabilities or are immigrants; develop the skills to fully integrate into a literate society. Litnetwork works with over 2000 adults a year, to proactively combate an illiterate society. Rotary Club Books for the World: The program began in 2000 with two Rotarians, one from America and the other from Johannesburg, South Africa. After seeing American schools dispose of textbooks on such a regular basis, and witnessing entire classrooms in South Africa go without reading materials, the Rotarians have taken it upon themselves to take unused books from this country to places where they are more needed. Since then over 1.3 million books have been sent to over 3 different continents and continue to change lives globally. University of Wisconsin Democrats: The University of Wisconsin at Madisons collegiate branch of the Democratic Party. Liberal students on campus have come together to support Democratic values and candidates, and can been seen actively conducting rallies, holding meetings, and voter registration drives. The Democrats were last seen participating in the Recall Walker rally, in which they campaigned for the withdrawal of Governor Walker from Wisconsin State Legislature. Wisconsin Network for Peace and Justice: The Network was established in 1991 by citizens who felt compelled to speak out for a sustainable world free of violence and injustice. WNPJ believes that American society has lost its ethical compass, and thus campaigns for prison reform, social and economic justice, alternatives to militarism, sustainable agriculture, immigrant rights and renewable energy. Since its founding, WNPJ has partnered with over 170 peace, environmental, and human rights agencies. Fair Wisconsin: An organization with a mission to improve the civil rights of Gays and Lesbians throughout the country through electoral involvement and direct legislative democracy. Through movements by Fair Wisconsin they were able to be the first state in the Midwest to protect domestic partnerships. This organization has built strong connections with key political figures in Wisconsin, and works every day to earn equality for everyone regardless of their orientation.

26

Midwest JSA Calendar

November 19-20, 2011 Fall State Convention
Madison Concourse Hotel, Wisconsin State Capitol Madison, WI

January 17, 2012 January 21, 2012

Winter Congress Registration Deadline Neuqua Valley Minicon

Neuqua Valley High School Naperville, IL

February 17-20, 2012

Winter Congress Convention

DoubleTree Crystal City Hotel Washington DC, Arlington VA

April TBD, 2012

Spring State Convention

Location TBD Chicagoland, IL

Midwest Contacts
Title Program Director Governor Lieutenant Governor Chapter Internal Affairs Director Name Lindsey Bowen Aadi Tolappa Nesh Patel Praneeth Tripuraneni Email LBowen@jsa.org ATolappa@jsa.org nesh122@gmail.com praneethtrip@yahoo.com

Important Note: Get approval from your school administration for major conventions 6-8 weeks prior to the event. Your school may require even more advanced notice. Chapter Presidents and Teacher Advisors should work together to clear trips with your schools administration.

27

Debate Feedback Sheets

Name: ________________________ School: _____________________ Quality of Debate (circle one): 1

Poor

2 2

3 3

4 4

5
Average

6 5

10

Outstanding

Difficulty of Debate (circle one): 1

Easy

Medium

Difficult

Comments/Feedback:

Thank you! Name: ________________________ School: _____________________ Please write legibly! Quality of Debate (circle one): 1
Poor

2 2

3 3

4 4

5
Average

6 5

10

Outstanding

Difficulty of Debate (circle one): 1

Easy

Medium

Difficult

Comments/Feedback:

Thank you!
28
Please write legibly!

How does one become a JSA Scholar or a JSA Ambassador?

All across the nation there is a vibrant new spirit of service emerging. The Junior State of America is challenging its members to answer that call to action by taking leadership roles in this movement by becoming a JSA Scholar or JSA Ambassador.

JSA Scholar:
Be a tax-paid member of an official JSA Chapter Attend at least one JSA overnight convention Graduate from one of the JSA Summer Schools or JSA Diplomat Program

Benefits of JSA Scholar Membership include:

Automatic $750 scholarship to the 2012 JSA Summer School at Stanford, Princeton or Georgetown Recognition as a JSA Scholar on the JSA website and at JSA programs. Eligibility for JSA Scholarship Funds for domestic 2012 JSA Summer Schools. One-on-one fundraising coaching from our experienced staff. Become a part of the JSA alumni network. The new friends you make this summer will be a part of your network for decades to come and you'll be connected to JSA alumni who are leaders in a variety of professions.

JSA Ambassador:
Be a tax-paid member of an official JSA Chapter Attend at least 2 conventions during the 2011/2012 academic year Submit Summer School Application by Dec. 31st 2011 Graduate from one of the JSA Summer Schools or JSA Diplomat Program Recruit at least one non-JSA member to attend a 2012 JSA Summer School. (Recruited student must enroll and attend for you to become a JSA Ambassador.)

Benefits of JSA Ambassador Membership include:

Automatic $1,250 scholarship to the 2012 JSA Summer School at Stanford, Princeton or Georgetown Recognition as a JSA Ambassador on the JSA website and at JSA programs. Recruit non JSA members to attend a 2012 Summer School. -One student = a free registration to a 2012-2013 JSA overnight convention. -Two students = 3 free registrations for 2012 2013 JSA overnight conventions. -Three or more students = a full scholarship to JSAs Election 2012 Symposia at either the Republican or Democratic National Conventions. A letter of recommendation from JSA CEO, Jeff Harris, to include in your college applications. Eligibility for JSA Scholarship Funds for domestic 2012 JSA Summer Schools. Lifetime membership in the JSA Alumni Association. With 4,000 plus members the JSAAA gives you access to special alumni events and job opportunities after you graduate from high school. A special JSA Ambassador T-shirt.

Get Started Now!

Visit summer.jsa.org/scholar for more information on the JSA Scholar & JSA Ambassador Program! OR Use your smart phone to scan this qr code and visit automatically.

29

STUDENT APPLICATION FORM

For 2012 Junior Statesmen Summer Programs
To the Applicant A complete application includes: 1. This student application form or online application (www.jsa.org/summer/apply) 2. Two essays, typed and doublespaced (Please see brochure, second to last page, or website for essay instructions). 3. A recommendation from a counselor or social studies or English teacher. 4. An official transcript sent by your school. Im applying to the JUNIOR STATESMEN SUMMER SCHOOL session at: ____ Georgetown ____ Princeton ____ Stanford ____ Beijing, China
(Place a 1 by your first choice campus and a 2 by your second choice. If you apply to a session that is filled or for which you are not qualified, we will try to honor your second choice.)

Name: ______________________________________________________________________________
Please Print First Last

Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________

Street City State Zip

Home Phone: ( ______ ) _____________________ Cell Phone: ( ______) ________________________ Email Address: _____________________________ Parents Email Address: ______________________ Birthday: ____/____/____ Age:___ Male Female Graduation Year: __________

School _________________________________________ School City/State______________________ Email for your teacher recommendation___________________________________________ Georgetown (July 8-July 29) Check class for which you are applying: AP U.S. Government International Relations Constitutional Law Media and Politics Speech and Political Communications Presidency (NEW) Stanford (July 1-July 22) Check class for which you are applying: AP U.S. Government AP Macroeconomics International Relations Constitutional Law Speech and Political Communications Princeton (July 8-July 29) Check one in the first section OR AP U.S. History AP U.S. Government AP Macroeconomics International Relations Speech and Political Communications AP U.S. History (July 1 July 29) JSA Diplomats (June 27-July 22) Beijing, China Check class for which you are applying: Chinese Government and Modern history

China and Stanford applicants, mail to:

Admissions Office Junior Statesmen Summer School 800 South Claremont St, Suite 202 San Mateo, CA 94402 800.334.5353 Fax 650.347.7200

Georgetown and Princeton applicants, mail to: Admissions Office Junior Statesmen Summer School 1411 K Street NW, Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20005 800.317.9338 Fax 202.296.7839

30

Convention Rules
1. All rules for school field trips prevail. Use of illegal drugs or alcohol is not permitted. Students also will be punished if they are in a room where drugs or alcohol are present. The use of tobacco products is not allowed. To ensure these rules are obeyed, the Teacher/Advisor and The Junior Statesmen Foundation must approve the attendance of each delegate. We reserve the right to deny any student the privilege of attending the event. 2. At 7 p.m., students will meet with their Teacher/Advisor for roll call and may not leave the hotel thereafter. At curfew, Teacher/Advisors will check delegates at their rooms. Delegates must remain quietly in their own rooms after curfew. Pizza deliveries and room service deliveries are not permitted after curfew. Delegates also are required to meet with the Teacher/Advisor at other designated times. 3. Delegates MUST attend all conference activities. 4. At no time may young men and women be in each others' rooms. 5. Delegates may not leave the convention hotel without the permission of their Teacher/Advisor. During meal times, with their Teacher/Advisor's permission, delegates may leave the hotel to eat in designated areas. Under no circumstances are delegates to leave the hotel after 8:00 p.m. 6. Delegates must wear their name tags above the waist in a visible location at all times. 7. All students assigned to a room are responsible for any charges made to the room. All students assigned to a room are also responsible for the condition of the room. No outside phone calls can be made from student hotel rooms. Room service and other items may not be charged to a students room. No delegate may change rooms without the permission of The Junior Statesmen staff members at the event. The hotel staff will house four students in each room with two large double beds. 8. No student may drive a car to the convention or ride in a student driven car during the convention. 9. Visitors are not allowed in the convention hotel. Delegates are not allowed to associate with any visitor who is not an official guest of the Junior Statesmen program. 10. Students are expected to dress appropriately. Delegates should respect the rights of other hotel guests and not do anything to damage the reputation of the Junior Statesmen program. Students must not open or throw anything out of windows. Students must stay off balconies. 11. Students should not bring expensive items to the convention. Valuable items must be stored in the hotel safe or with the bellmen. The Junior State/The Junior State Foundation are not responsible for items stored in a luggage storage area. No large radios or portable stereos are allowed. 12. Delegates or delegations that are sent home for conduct problems WILL NOT RECEIVE A REFUND. 13. Delegates and their parents agree that The Junior State may use any photographs or video taken during the convention for promotional purposes. 31

Hotel Map
st

1 Floor Room A Senate Room B Senate Room A

Assembly Room

2 Floor

nd

Wisconsin Ballroom

Capital Ballroom

University Rooms

32

Capitol Building Map

Room Assembly Chamber North Hearing Room Parlor Room 225 NW Room 300 NW Room 328 NW Room 400 NW Room 415 NW

Floor 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4

Wing West North West North-West North-West North-West North-West North-West

The Wisconsin State Capitol Building is laid out in the shape of a compass rose. The chart above indicates the name of each room, the floor it is on, and the wing it is in. Stars indicate the wings in use. The West Wing serves as your entrance and exit point. Avoid the South Entrance. A protest will be taking place there on Saturday.

33

Directions
The Madison Concourse Hotel (A) and the Wisconsin State Capitol Building (B) are marked on the map below with stars. The hotel is located at 1 West Dayton Street. The Capitol Building is located in the middle of Capitol Square. Enter through the West entrance, which is located at the corner of Carroll Street and State Street. On Saturday, a protest will be taking place near the South Entrance (lightning bolt). Be careful crossing streets and navigating the city!

STATE STREET

34

Dining Guide
State Street is the road that leads directly from the West corner of Capitol Square. It has been converted into a pedestrian mall with hundreds of shops and is a major tourist attraction. The dining guide below provides only a small index of the many restaurants that line State Street so feel free to explore on your own!

Fast Food
Subway 462 State St. Taco Bell/KFC 534 State St. Noodles & Company 232 State St. Qdoba Mexican Grill 548 State St. Five Guys 517 State St. Chipotle 658 State St.

American
Buffalo Wild Wings 529 State St. Ginos Restaurant 540 State St. State Bar & Grill 118 State St. Pizza Hut 662 State St. Milios Sandwiches 449 State St. Starbucks Coffee 661 State St.

International
Asian Kitchen 449 State St. Taste of Tibet 430 State St. Frida Mexican Grill 117 State St. Takara 315 State St. Chautara Restaurant 334 State St. Parthenon 316 State St.

35

Skeleton Agenda
Capitol Building
10:00 - 11:00 Block I 11:05 - 11:50 Block II 11:55 - 12:45 12:50 - 2:05 Block III 2:10 - 2:55 Block IV 3:00 - 3:50 Does birthplace affect success? (TT) University Room A Moderating Workshop US should respect international desires Room 300 NW

Saturday Room 328 NW Room 225 Room 400 NW Room 415 NW Opening Session (Assembly Chamber) Debate UN Security Privatizing Social Should US support Workshop Council Security protestors? (TT) US no longer Increase quotas US take a stance Teacher unions subsidize on skilled worker against media are detrimental to petroleum visas censorship education Lunch Keynote Speaker (Assembly Room) Source of Polarization of Civic Engagement Fair government parties reflects (North Hearing Room) power? (TT) constituents

Hotel
4:35 - 5:05 Block V 5:10 - 6:00 6:00 - 8:00 Block VI 8:15 - 9:05 Night Block I 9:10-10:00 Night Block II 10:00 12:00

University Room B University Room C University Room D Assembly Room Chapter Caucus and Key Distribution (Senate A and B) How should It was in the best US law Internet is the America is still the government interest of the US enforcement be most important land of define marriage? to cut financial involved in NCAA infrastructure opportunity (TT) aid to Pakistan violations Dinner Sin taxes violate NATO be US withdrawal Hipsters Government fund consumers rights dissolved from Afghanistan (TT) innovation America could Annexation of Lax bro Harry Potter Impromptu defeat any nation Canada subculture promotes witching Speaking Quiz Bowl Dance (Wisconsin Ballroom) (Capitol Ballroom)

8:00 - 10:00 Capitol Building Block VII 10:15 - 11:05

Room 300 NW US economy most important at end of 21st century Developing countries should be exempt from environmental regulations Passing grade be raised to a B

Block VIII 11:10 - 12:00

Block IX 12:05 - 12:55 1:00 - 1:30

Sunday Checkout & Breakfast Room 328 NW Room 225 Room 400 NW US obligation to Student Democratic promote responsibility in leader should democracy in education represent religion Middle East Are rights merely China not a All American privileges given legitimate threat airports undergo by higher to US global Israelification authorities? influence (TT) Fictitious America has accounts be Snyder vs. Phelps resources to allowed on social be overturned achieve global networking sites domination Closing Session (Assembly Room)

Room 415 NW Macs vs. PCs (TT) American economic system fosters class conflict Organized religions corrupt individual beliefs

36