Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I. IN GENERAL
CONSTITUTION: the document which serves as the fundamental law of the state. (V. Sinco, Philippine Political Law, 11th ed., p.68-70); that written instrument enacted by direct action of the people by which the fundamental powers of the government are established, limited and defined, and by which those powers are distributed among the several departments for their safe and useful exercise for the benefit of the body politic (Malcolm, Philippine Constitutional Law, p.6) Classification: 1. written (conventional or enacted) v. unwritten (cumulative or evolved). 2. rigid v. flexible
and possessing a government to which a great body of the inhabitants render habitual obedience; a politically organized sovereign community independent of outside control bound by ties of nationhood, legally supreme within its territory, acting through a government functioning under a regime of law. (CIR v. Campos Rueda, 42 SCRA 23). Elements : 1. People inhabitants of the State, the number of which is capable for selfsufficiency and self-defense; of both sexes for perpetuity. Different meanings of the word people: a. People as inhabitants (Sec.1, Art.XIII; Secs.15 -16, Art. II; Sec.2, Art.III); b. People as citizens (Preamble; Secs. 1 and 4, Art. II; Sec.7, Art. III); c. People as electors (Sec.4, Art. VII; Sec.2, Art. XVI; Sec. 25, Art. XVIII). 2. Territory fixed portion of the surface of the earth inhabited by the people of the State; see Art I. 3. Sovereignty supreme and uncontrollable power inherent in a State by which that State is governed; Characteristics: a. permanent b. exclusive c. comprehensive d. absolute e. indivisible f. inalienable g. imprescriptible
The Philippine Constitution is written and rigid. (Art. XVII) The 1987 Constitution took effect on February 2, 1987, the date of the plebiscite for its ratification and not on the date its ratification was proclaimed. (De Leon v. Esguerra, 153 SCRA 602)
Interpretation: a doubtful provision shall be examined in the light of the history of the times and the conditions and circumstances under which the Constitution was framed (Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary, 194 SCRA 317). In case of doubt, the provisions should be considered selfexecuting; mandatory rather directory; and prospective rather than retroactive (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p.3) CONSTITUTIONAL LAW : designates the law embodied in the Constitution and the legal principles growing out of the interpretation and application of its provisions by the courts in specific cases (Sinco, supra, p.67)
Theory of Auto-Limitation : any state may by its consent, express or implied, submit to a restriction of its sovereign rights. There may thus be a curtailment of what otherwise is a power plenary in character. (Reagan v. CIR, G.R. No. L-26379. Dec. 27, 1969).
Imperium :
II. STATE
A community of persons, more or less numerous, permanently occupying a definite portion of territory, independent of external control,
the states authority to govern embraced in the concept of sovereignty; includes passing laws governing a territory, maintaining peace and order over it,
Dominium : capacity of the state to own or acquire property. (Lee Hong Hok v. David, 48 SCRA 372)
Effect of Belligerent Occupation No change in sovereignty. However, political laws, except those of treason, are suspended; municipal laws remain in force unless changed by the belligerent occupant. principle of jus postliminium At the end of the occupation, political laws are automatically revived. (Peralta v. Director of Prisons, 75 Phil. 285)
through which the functions of government are exercised throughout the Philippines, including the various arms which political authority is made effective, whether pertaining to the autonomous regions, the provincial, city or barangay subdivisions or other forms of local government. [Sec. 2(1), E.O. 292 or the Administrative Code of 1987]
Classification: 1. de jure has a rightful title but no power or control, either, because same has been withdrawn from it or because same has not yet actually entered into the exercise thereof.
Effect of Change of Sovereignty The political laws of the former sovereign, whether compatible or not with those of the new sovereign, are automatically abrogated, unless they are expressly re-enacted by affirmative act of the new sovereign. Municipals laws remain in force. (Macariola v. Asuncion, 114 SCRA 77)
2. de facto actually exercises power or control but without legal title (Lawyers League for a Better Philippines v. Aquino, G.R. No. 73748, May 22, 1986). a. De facto proper government that gets possession and control of, or usurps, by force or by the voice of the majority, the rightful legal government and maintains itself against the will of the latter; b. Government of paramount force established and maintained by military forces who invade and occupy a territory of the enemy in the course of war; and c. Independent government established by the inhabitants of the country who rise in insurrection against the parent state (Ko Kim Cham v. Valdez Tan Keh, 75 Phil. 113).
Jurisdiction manifestation of sovereignty a. Territorial authority to have all persons and things within its territorial limits to be completely subject to its control and protection. b. Personal -- authority over its nationals, their persons, property, and acts, whether within or outside its territory. c. Extraterritorial authority over persons, things or acts, outside its territorial limits by reason of their effects to its territory. 4. Government that institution or aggregate of institutions by which an independent society makes and carries out those rules of action which are necessary to enable men to live in a social state or which are imposed upon the people forming that society by those who possess the power or authority of prescribing them. (US v. Dorr, 2 Phil. 332).
Functions: 1. constituent compulsory because constitutive of the very bonds of society; 2. ministrant undertaken to advance general interest of society (Bacani v. NACOCO, 100 Phil. 468); merely optional. Doctrine of Parens Patriae government as guardian of the rights of People (Government of Philippines Islands v. El Monte de Piedad, 35 SCRA 738).
I . POLICE POWER
3. Taking:
a. there is taking when: i. owner is actually deprived or dispossessed of his property; ii. there is practical destruction or a material impairment of value of property; iii. owner is deprived of ordinary use of his property; and iv. owner is deprived of jurisdiction, supervision and control of his property. b. requisites: i. expropriator must enter a private property; ii. entry must be more than a momentary period; iii. entry must be under a warrant or color of authority; iv. property must be devoted to public use or otherwise informally appropriated or injuriously affected; v. utilization of the property must be in such a way as to oust the owner and deprive him of beneficial enjoyment of the property (Republic v. Castelvi, 58 SCRA 336). 4. Public use - has been broadened to include not only uses directly available to the public but also those which redound to their indirect benefit; that only a few would actually benefit from the expropriation of the property foes not necessarily diminish the essence and character of public use (Manosca v. Court of Appeals, 252 SCRA 412). 5. Just compensation - compensation is qualified by the word just to convey that equivalent must be real, substantial, full and fair; the value of the property must be determined either as of the date of the taking of the property or the filing of the complaint, whichever came first.(Eslaban v. vda. De Onorio, G.R. No. 146062, June 28, 2001) Formula: -- fair market value of the property, to which must be added the consequential damages, minus the consequential benefits, but in no case will the consequential benefits exceed the consequential damages Fair market value the price that maybe agreed upon by parties who are willing but are not compelled to enter into a contract of sale. Consequential damages consist of injuries directly caused on the residue of the private property taken by reason of expropriation 6. Due process of law the defendant must be given an opportunity to be heard.
Law of overruling necessity: power promoting public welfare by restraining and regulating the use of liberty and property.
Basis: public necessity and right of State and of public to self-protection and self-preservation. Who may exercise: generally, the legislature but also: 1.the President, 2.Administrative bodies, and 3.Law-making bodies of LGUs Requisites (Limitations):
2.
3.
power of State to forcibly take private property for public use upon payment of just compensation
Basis: necessity of the property for public use. Who may exercise: generally, the legislature but also: 1. the President; 2. Law-making bodies of LGUs; 3. Public Corporations, and; 4. Quasi-public Corporations. Two stages: 1. determination of the authority of the plaintiff to exercise the power and the propriety of its exercise; 2. determination of just compensation. Requisites:
III.
POWER OF TAXATION
power by which State raises revenue to defray necessary expenses of the Government.
j. k. l.
Scope: covers persons, property, or occupation to be taxed within taxing jurisdiction Basis: power emanating from necessity (lifeblood theory) Who may exercise: generally, the legislature but also: Law-making bodies of LGUs (Sec.5, Art. X); and 2. The President, under Sec. 28 (2), Art. VI of the Constitution or as incident of emergency powers that Congress may grant to him under Sec. 23(2), Art. VI. Limitations on the Power of Taxation: 1. Inherent limitations a. Public purpose; b. Non-delegability of power; c. Territoriality or situs of taxation; d. Exemption of government from taxation; e. International comity. 2. Constitutional limitations a. Due process of law; b. Equal protection of law; c. Uniformity, equitability, and progressivity of taxation; d. Non-impairment of contracts; e. Non-imprisonment for non-payment of poll tax; f. Origin of appropriation, revenue, and tariff bills; g. Non-infringement of religious freedom; h. Delegation of legislative authority to the President to fix tariff rates, import and export quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues; i. Tax exemption of properties actually, directly and exclusively used for religious, charitable and educational purposes;
Majority vote of all members of Congress required in case of legislative grant of tax exemptions; Non-impairment of the Supreme Courts jurisdiction in tax cases; Tax exemption of revenues and assets of, including grants, endowments, donations, or contributions to, educational institutions.
1.
person under a valid law must be resolved in favor of that person and against the taxing power. exemption granted to a person must be resolved against the exemption.
Double Taxation additional taxes are laid: 1. on the same subject; 2. by the same taxing jurisdiction; 3. during the same taxing period; and 4. for the same purpose. Despite lack of specific constitutional prohibition, double taxation will not be allowed if the same will result in a violation of the equal protection clause (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p.38). LICENSE FEE 1. as to basis Power of taxation to Police power to raise revenue regulate 2. limitation Rate or amount to be Amount limited to cost collected unlimited of: (a) issuing the provided not license and (b) confiscatory. necessary inspection or police surveillance. 3. object Imposed on persons or Paid for privilege of property. doing something but privilege is revocable. 4. effect of non-payment Business or activity Business becomes does not become illegal. illegal. TAX
POLICE POWER
1. Regulates both liberty and property
EMINENT DOMAIN
Affects only property rights Maybe exercised by private entities Necessity of the public for the use of private property Property is wholesome and is devoted to public use or purpose Compensation is full and fair equivalent of the property taken
TAXATION
Affects only property rights Exercised only by the Government Public necessity
Property is wholesome and is devoted to public use or purpose Compensation is the protection and public improvements instituted by the government for the taxes paid Contracts may not be impaired.
5. Compensation is the
intangible, altruistic feeling that the individual has contributed to the public good 6. Contracts may be impaired.
Requisites
POLICE POWER
EMINENT DOMAIN
TAXATION
1. Lawful subject 2. Lawful means When exercised by a delegate: 3. Express grant by law
1. Public purpose; 2. Uniformity; 3. Either the person or property taxed shall be within the jurisdiction of taxing authority; 4. That in assessment and collection of certain taxes, certain guarantees against injuries to individuals, especially by way of notice and opportunity for hearing shall be provided.
4. Within the territorial limits 6. Due process of law. 5. Must not be contrary to law
III. Contiguous Zone Extends up to 12 nautical miles from the territorial sea. Although not part of the territory, the coastal State may exercise jurisdiction to prevent infringement of customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws. IV. Two hundred Mile Exclusive Economic Zone not a part of the national territory but exclusive economic benefit is reserved for the country. Thus, the coastal state has in the exclusive economic zone: 1. sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non living, if the waters superjacent to the seabed and subsoil, and with regard to other activities for the economic exploitation and exploration of the zone, such as the production of energy from the waters, currents, and winds; 2. jurisdiction with regard to: a. the establishment and use of artificial islands, installations, and structures; b. marine scientific research; c. the protection and preservation of marine environment; 3. other rights and duties provided for in the Convention. (Art. 56 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) V. Territorial Jurisdiction power of the state over persons and thing within its territory. Entities exempt from this control are: 1. Foreign states, head of states, diplomatic representatives, and to certain degree, consuls; 2. Foreign state property, including their embassies, consulates and public vessels engaged in non-commercial activities; 3. Acts of states; 4. Foreign merchant vessels exercising their rights of innocent passage or involuntary entry, such as arrival under distress; 5. Foreign armies passing through or stationed in its territory with its permission; and 6. Such other persons and property, over which the state may, by agreement, waive jurisdiction (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, 1996 ed., p. 18).
Archipelagic Doctrine
integration of a group of islands to the sea and their oneness so that together they can constitute one unit, one country, and one state. An imaginary single baseline is drawn around the islands by joining appropriate points of the outermost islands of the archipelago with straight lines and all islands and waters enclosed within the baseline form part of the territory. Main purpose is to protect the territorial interests of an archipelago. (see last sentence, Art. I). all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its: terrestrial; fluvial; and aerial domain; Kalayaan Isand Group a. historic right; b. effective control and occupation. (P.D. No. 1596)
2.
3.
including its: sea bed; subsoil; insular shelves; and other marine areas.
4.
i)
Waters: around; between; and connecting - the islands of the archipelago, regardless of breadth; and (ii) dimensions -- form part of the internal waters of the Philippines. II. Territorial Sea The belt of the sea located between the coast and internal waters of the coastal state on the one hand, and the high seas on the other, extending up to 12 nautical miles from the low water mark.
8 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Purpose: to prevent concentration of authority in one person or group of persons that might lead to irreparable error or abuse in exercise to the detriment of republican institutions. (Pangasinan Transportation Co. v. Public Service Commission, G.R. No. 47065. June 26, 1940)
Principle of Blending of Powers instance when powers are not confined exclusively within one department but are assigned to or shared by several departments. (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, 2000 ed., p. 42). Principle of check and balances allows one department to resist encroachments upon its prerogatives or to rectify mistakes or excess committed by the other departments.
1. renounces war as an instrument of national policy; 2. incorporation clause adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land; and 3. adheres to the policy of peace, equality, justice, freedom, cooperation, and amity with all nations.
9 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
1. Churches, personages, etc., actually, directly and exclusively used for religious, charitable and educational purposes shall be exempt from taxation [Sec. 28 (3), Art. VI]; 2. Prohibition against appropriation for sectarian purposes, except when, priest etc., is assigned to the armed forces, or to any penal institution or government orphanage or leprosarium [Sec. 29 (2), Art. VI]; 3. Optional religious instruction for public elementary and high school students [Sec. 3 (3), Art. XIV];and 4. Filipino ownership requirement for educational institutions, except those established by religious groups and mission boards [Sec. 4 (2), Art. XIV].
Aspects of Due Process: 1. Substantive due process Requisites: a. the Interest of the public in general, as distinguished from that of a particular class require the intervention of the state; b. means employed are reasonably necessary for accomplishment of purpose and not unduly oppressive.
2.
Publication of laws is part of substantive due process. (Taada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446) Procedural due process Requisites of Civil Procedural due process: a. an impartial court or tribunal clothed with judicial power to hear and determine matters before it; b. jurisdiction properly acquired over person of defending and over property which is subject matter of proceeding; c. opportunity to be heard; d. judgment rendered upon lawful hearing and based on evidence adduced (Banco Espaol Filipino v. Palanca, G.R. No. L11390. March 26, 1918.) Requisites of Criminal due process [Sec. 14 (1), Art. III]: a. accused has been heard in a court of competent jurisdiction; b. accused is proceeded against under the orderly processes of law; c. accused is given notice and opportunity to be heard; and d. judgment rendered within authority of constitutional law (Mejia v. Pamaran, 160 SCRA 457). Requisites of Administrative Due Process: a. right to a hearing, which includes the right to present ones case and support evidence in support thereof; b. tribunal must consider evidence adduced; c. decision must have something to support itself; d. evidence must be substantial; e. decision must be based on evidence adduced, or at least contained in the records and disclosed to the parties; f. independent consideration of evidence, and not rely on the recommendation of a subordinate; and g. the decision must state the facts and the law in such a way that the parties can know the issues involved and the reasons for the decision. (Ang Tibay v. CIR, 69 Phil 635)
Decentralization of Administration delegation of administrative powers to local government unit in order to broaden the base of governmental powers. Decentralization of Powers abdication of political power in the favor of local governments units declared to be autonomous. (Limbonas v. Mangelin, 170 SCRA 786)
Classification of Rights: 1. Political rights granted by law to members of community in relation to their direct or indirect participation in the establishment or administration of the government; 2. Civil rights rights which municipal law will enforce at the instance of private individuals, for the purpose of securing them the enjoyment of their means of happiness; 3. Social and economic rights; and 4. Human rights.
I.
10 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Requisites of Due Process for Students before Imposition of Disciplinary Sanctions: a. must be informed in writing of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; b. right to answer charges against him, with the assistance of counsel, if desired; c. informed of the evidence against him; d. right to adduce evidence in his behalf; e. evidence must be duly considered by the investigating committee or official designated by the school to hear and decide the case.(Ateneo de Manila University v.Capulong, 222 SCRA 644)
believe that an offense has been committed and that the objects sought in connection with the offense are in the place sought to be searched (Burgos v. Chief of Staff, 133 SCRA 800). 2. Determination of probable cause personally by the judge; SEARCH WARRANT
the judge must personally examine in the form of searching questions and answers, in writing and under oath, the complaints and any witnesses he may produce on facts personally known to them. (Sec. 4, Rule 126, Rules of Court)
WARRANT OF ARREST
the judge may rely simply on the fiscals certification as to probable cause, but the same is not conclusive on the judge as the issuance of said warrant calls for the exercise of judicial discretion. (Placer v. Villanueva, 126 SCRA 463).
Right to appeal is not natural right nor part of due process, instead, it is a mere statutory right, but once given, denial constitutes violation of due process.
II.
OF
all persons or things similarly situated must be similarly treated both as to rights conferred and responsibilities imposed.
Requisites of Valid Classification: (Key: SNAG) 1. Such classification rests upon substantial distinctions; 2. It is germane to purpose of the law; 3. It is not confined to existing conditions; 4. It applies equally to all members of the same class. (People v. Vera, G.R. No. 45685. November 16, 1937).
WARRANT OF ARREST
General warrants are proscribed and unconstitutional (Nolasco v. Puno, 139 SCRA 152); However, a John Doe Warrant (a warrant for the apprehension of a person whose true name is unknown) satisfies the constitutional requirement of particularity if there is some descrpitio personae which will enable the officer to identify the accused (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 73)
Commissioner of Immigration and Deportation may issue warrant only for purpose of carrying out a final decision of deportation (CID v. Judge De la Rosa, 197 SCRA 853) or there is sufficient proof of guilt of an alien (Harvey v. Defensor-Santiago, G.R. No. 82544, June 28, 1988). Exclusionary Rule Evidence obtained in violation of Sec. 2, Art. III, shall be
11 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
inadmissible for any purpose in any proceedings (Fruit of a Poisonous Tree Doctrine) (Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383) Warrantless Arrest, When Valid 1. when person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense; 2. when a. an offense has just been committed; and b. he has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and 3. when a person to be arrested is an escapee or detention prisoner. (Sec. 5, Rule 113, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure)
position to have that view are subject to seizure and may be presented as evidence (open to the eye and hand). Elements: a. a prior valid intrusion based on the valid warrantless arrest in which the police are legally present in the pursuit of their official duties; b. the evidence was inadvertently discovered by the police who have the right to be where they are; c. the evidence must be immediately apparent; d. plain view justified mere seizure of evidence without further search. (People v. Bolasa, GR No. 125754, Dec.22, 1999).
An application for or admission to bail shall not bar the accused from challenging the validity of his arrest, provided that he raises them before entering his plea. (Sec. 26, Rule 114, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure)
IV.
OF AND
Warrantless Searches, When Valid: 1. when right has been voluntarily waived (People v. Malasugui, 63 Phil 221); 2. as an incident to a lawful arrest, provided search is contemporaneous to arrest and within permissible area of search (see Sec. 13, Rule 126, Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure); a valid arrest must precede the search; the process cannot be reversed. (People v. Chua Ho San, 308 SCRA 432). 3. searches of vessel and aircraft for violation of fishery, immigration and customs laws (Roldan v. Arca, 65 SCRA 336); 4. searches of automobiles at borders or constructive borders for violation of immigration and smuggling laws (Papa v. Mago, 22 SCRA 857); 5. Inspection of buildings and other premises for the enforcement of fire, sanitary and building regulations; 6. Visual search at checkpoints (Valmonte vs. de Villa, 178 SCRA 211). 7. Conduct of areal target zoning and saturation drive in the exercise of military powers of the President (Guazon v. de Villa, 181 SCRA 623). 8. When there is valid reason to stop-and-frisk (Manalili v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 113447, October 7, 1997). 9. Where prohibited articles are in plain view (Chia v. Actg. Collector of Customs, 177 SCRA 755) Plain View Doctrine objects within the sight of an officer who has the right to be in a
Limitations: 1. by lawful order of the court; 2. public safety or public order requires otherwise, as may be provided by law (Sec. 3, Art. III).
12 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
3. Balancing of interest rule when particular conduct is regulated in interest of public order, and the regulation results in an indirect, conditional, partial abridgment of speech, the duty of the courts is to determine which of the 2 conflicting interests demands the greater protection under the particular circumstances presented (American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 US 282). Assembly and Petition: The right to assemble is not subject to prior restraint and may not be conditioned upon the prior issuance of a permit or authorization from the government authorities. However, the right must be exercised in such a way as will not prejudice the public welfare (De la Cruz v. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos. 126183 &129221, March 25, 1999). If assembly is to be held at a public place, permit for the use of such place, and not for the assembly itself may be validly required. Power of local officials is merely for regulation and not for prohibition. (Primicias v. Fugoso, 80 Phil 71) Permit for public assembly is not necessary if meeting is to be held in: a. a private place; b. the campus of a government-owned or operated educational institution; or c. a freedom park. [B.P. Blg. 880 (The Public Assembly Act of 1985)].
Limitations: 1. police power prevails over contracts. 2. eminent domain may impair obligations of contracts. 3. taxation cannot impair obligation of contracts.
XI. RIGHTS OF AN ACCUSED UNDER CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION (SEC. 12, ART. III)
b. to overcome the inherent pressure of the interrogating atmosphere. c. to show the individual that his interrogators are prepared to recognize his privilege should he choose to invoke it. Carries the correlative obligation on the part of the investigator to explain, and contemplates effective communication which results in the subject understanding what is conveyed (People v. Agustin, 240 SCRA 541).
investigators, the suspect has the final choice as he may reject the counsel chosen for him and ask for another one (People v. Jerez, G.R. No. 114385, January 19, 1998). 6. no force, etc. which vitiates free will shall be used; 7. secret detention prohibited; places, etc., are
8. confessions/admissions
obtained in violation of these rights are inadmissible as evidence. What is sought to be avoided by the rule is the evil of extorting from the very mouth of the person undergoing interrogation for the commission of an offense the very evidence with which to prosecute and thereafter to convict him (People v. Bonola, G.R. No. 116394, June 19, 1997).
When available the rights under Sec.12, Art. III are available when the investigation is no longer a general inquiry unto an unsolved crime but has begun to focus on a particular suspect, the suspect has been taken into police custody, the police carry out a process of interrogation that lends itself to eliciting incriminating statements (People v. Mara, 55 SCAD 418).
Sec. 2 of RA No. 7438 provides that custodial investigation shall include the practice of issuing an invitation to a person who is under investigation in connection with an offense he is suspected to have committed.
What rights may be waived: 1. the right to remain silent; 2. the right to counsel. Waiver must be in writing and in the presence of counsel. What rights cannot be waived: 1. the right to be informed of his right to remain silent and to counsel; 2. the right to counsel when making the waiver of the right to remain silent or to counsel. Rights of Person Suspected and Subsequently Charged:
14 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
c.
not to be subjected to force, violence, threat, or intimidation which vitiates free will; d. to have evidence obtained in violation of these rights inadmissible as evidence. 2. After the case is filed in court a. to refuse to be witness against himself; b. not to have prejudice imputed on him as a result of such refusal; c. to testify on his behalf; d. to cross-examination; e. while testifying, to refuse questions which tend to incriminate him for some crime other than present charge.
If the court imposed a penalty of imprisonment exceeding 6 years but not more than 20 years, the accused shall be denied bail, or his bail previously granted shall be cancelled, upon showing by the prosecution, with notice to the accused, of the following or other similar circumstances: (a) that the accused is a recidivist, quasi-recidivist, or habitual delinquent, or has committed the crime aggravated by the circumstance of reiteration; (b) that the accused is found to have previously escaped from legal confinement, evaded sentence, or has violated the conditions of his bail without valid justification; (c) that the accused committed the offense while on probation, parole, or under conditional pardon; (d) that the circumstances of the accused or his case indicate the probability of flight if released on bail; or (e) that there is undue risk that during the pendency of the appeal, the accused may commit another crime.
Bail security given for the release of a person in custody of law, furnished by him or a bondsman, to guarantee his appearance before any court as required under conditions specified under the rules of court. (see Sec. 1, Rule 114, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure).
Hearing: whether bail is a matter of right or of discretion, reasonable notice of hearing is required to be given the prosecutor, or at least he must be asked for his recommendation, because in fixing the amount of bail, the judge is required to take into account a number of factors (Cortes v. Judge Catral, A.M. No. RTJ-97-1387, September 10, 1997).
Standards for fixing amount of bail: 1. financial ability of accused; 2. nature and circumstances of offense; 3. penalty for offense; 4. character and reputation of accused; 5. age and health of accused; 6. weight of evidence against him; 7. probability of his appearance at trial; 8. forfeiture of other bail; 9. whether he was a fugitive from justice when arrested ; and 10. pendency of other cases where he is on bail. Excessive bail shall not be required. (Sec. 9, Rule 114, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure) WHEN BAIL SHALL BE DENIED (RULE 114, SEC. 7)
No person, regardless of the stage of the criminal prosecution, shall be admitted to bail if: (a.) charged with a capital offense, or an offense punishable by reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment; AND (b.) evidence of guilt is strong.
punishable by reclusion perpetua or higher, a hearing on the motion for bail must be conducted by the judge to determine whether or not the evidence of guilt is strong (Baylon v. Judge Sison, 243 SCRA 284).
15 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
possibly assess the weight of the evidence against the accused before granting the latters application for bail (Buzon v. Judge Velasco, 253 SCRA 601).
Void-for-vagueness rule accused is denied the right to be informed of the charge against him, and to due process as well, where the statute itself is couched in such indefinite language that it is not possible for men of ordinary intelligence to determine therefrom what acts or omissions are punished and, hence shall be avoided (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 131). Right to speedy, impartial and public trial; Speedy free from vexatious, capricious and oppressive delays; Impartial accused entitled to cold neutrality of an impartial judge. Public to prevent possible abuses which may be committed against the accused. Right to meet witness face to face
6.
2.
Every circumstance favoring the innocence of the accused must be taken into account; The proof against him must survive the test of reason; the strongest suspicion must not be permitted to sway judgment. (People v. Austria, 195 SCRA 700)
8.
Equipoise
or Equiponderance of Evidence evidence of both sides are equally balanced. Effect in criminal prosecution: acquittal of accused because it is insufficient to overcome presumption of innocence.
3.
The accused is amply accorded legal assistance extended by a counsel who commits himself to the cause of the defense and acts accordingly; an efficient and truly decisive legal assistance, and not simply a perfunctory representation (People v. Bermas, G.R. No. 120420, April 21, 1999). Right to counsel during the trial is not subject to waiver (Flores v. Ruiz, 90 SCRA 428). 4. Right to be informed of nature and cause of accusation against him;
Writ of habeas corpus writ issued by court directed to a person detaining another, commanding him to produce the body of the prisoner at designated time and place, with the day and cause of his capture and detention, to do, to submit to, and to receive whatever court or judge awarding writ shall consider in his behalf. (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 135).
Habeas corpus lies only where the restraint of a persons liberty has been judicially adjudged to be illegal or unlawful (In Re: Petition for Habeas Corpus of Wilfredo S. Sumulong-Torres, 251 SCRA 709).
16 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
1. as punishment for a crime whereof one has been duly convicted [ Sec. 18(2), Art. III]; 2. service in defense of the state [Sec 4, Art. II]; 3. naval enlistment (Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 US 275); 4. posse comitatus (US v. Pompeya, 31 Phil. 245) 5. return to work order in industries affected with public interest (Kaisahan ng Mangagawa sa Kahoy v. Gotamco Sawmills, G.R. No. L-1573. March 29, 1948); and 6. patria potestas [Art. 211, par.(2), FC]
Transactional Immunity Statute testimony of any person or whose possession of documents or other evidence necessary or convenient to determine the truth in any investigation conducted is immune from criminal prosecution for an offense to which such compelled testimony relates [Sec. 18 (8), Art. XIII]. Use and Fruit Immunity Statute prohibits the use of a witness compelled testimony and its fruits in any manner in connection with the criminal prosecution of the witness (Galman v. Pamaran, 138 SCRA 274).
Prohibited punishment -- mere severity does not constitute cruel or unusual punishment. To violate constitutional guarantee, penalty must be flagrant and plainly oppressive, disproportionate to nature of offense as to shock senses of community.
XVII. NON- DETENTION BY REASON OF POLITICAL BELIEFS OR ASPIRATION [SEC. 18 (1), ART. III]
Coverage: 1. Debt any civil obligation arising from a contract. 2. Poll Tax a specific sum levied upon any person belonging to a certain class without regard to property or occupation (e.g. Community Tax )
A Tax is not a debt since it is an obligation arising from law hence its non-payment maybe validly punished with imprisonment.
17 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
5. 6.
7.
Dismissal of action, when made at instance of the accused, does not put accused in first jeopardy, except: a. when ground for dismissal is insufficiency of evidence; or b. when the proceedings have been unreasonably prolonged as to violate the right of the accused to a speedy trial.
law assuming to regulate civil rights and remedies only, in effect imposes a penalty of deprivation of right for something which when done was lawful; law depriving accused of some lawful protection to which he had been entitled, such a protection of a former conviction or acquittal, or a proclamation of amnesty.
Crimes covered: 1. same offense; or attempt to commit or frustration thereof or for any offense which necessarily includes or is necessarily included in the offense charged in original complaint or information; and 2. when an act is punished by a law and an ordinance, conviction or acquittal under either shall bar another prosecution for the same act.
BILL OF ATTAINDER - legislative act that inflicts punishment without trial; legislative declaration of guilt.
Article IV : CITIZENSHIP
I. CITIZENSHIP membership in a political community which is personal and more or less permanent in character. Modes of acquiring citizenship: 1. By birth a. jus sanguinis; and b. jus soli; 2. By naturalization; 3. By marriage Citizens of the Philippines (Sec. 1, Art. IV): 1. Those who are Filipino citizens at time of adoption of the 1987 Constitution; a. Those who are citizens under the Treaty of Paris; b. Those declared citizens by judicial declaration applying the jus soli principle, before Tio Tiam v. Republic (25 April 1957, G.R. No. L-9602); c. Those who are naturalized in accordance with law (Act 2927); d. Those who are citizens under the 1935 Constitution; e. Those who are citizens under the 1973 Constitution. 2. Those whose fathers or mothers are citizens of the Philippines; 3. Those born before January 17, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippines citizenship upon reaching the age of majority; Time to elect: 3 years after age of majority 4. Those naturalized in accordance with law.
Doctrine of Supervening Event prosecution for another offense if subsequent development changes character of the first indictment under which he may have already been charged or convicted.
Conviction of accused shall NOT bar another prosecution for an offense which necessarily includes the offense originally charged when: 1. graver offense developed due to supervening facts arising from the same act or omission; 2. facts constituting graver offense arose or discovered only after filing of former complaint or information; and 3. plea of guilty to lesser offense was made without the consent of prosecutor or offended party (People v. Judge Villarama, 210 SCRA 246).
XXII. EX POST FACTO LAW AND BILL OF ATTAINDER (SEC. 22 ART. III)
EX POST FACTO LAW
Kinds: 1. law making an act criminal which was not before its passage; 2. law aggravating penalty for crime committed before passage; 3. law inflicting greater or more severe penalty; 4. law altering legal rules of evidence and receive less or different testimony than law required at time of commission, in order to convict accused;
18 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Caram Rule under the 1935 Constitution, those born in the Philippines of foreign parent, who before the adoption of the Constitution had been elected to public office in the Philippines, are considered Filipino citizens.
the entire period of residence prior to hearing of petition. Declaration of Intention must be filed with the Office of the Solicitor General one year before filing of application for naturalization. Exception: a.Those born in the Philippines and received primary and secondary education in a Philippine school; b.Those who have resided in the Philippines for thirty years; c. The widow or children of the applicant who died before his application was granted. Disqualification for Naturalization: 1. opposed to organized government or affiliated with any association or group of persons who uphold and teach doctrines opposing all organized governments; 2. defending or teaching necessity or propriety of violence, personal assault or assassination for the success or predominance of their ideas; 3. polygamists or believers in polygamy; 4. suffering from mental alienation or incurable contagious disease; 5. convicted of crime involving moral turpitude; 6. who during residence in the Philippines have not mingled socially with Filipinos, or not evinced sincere desire to learn and embrace customs, traditions and ideals of Filipinos; 7. citizens or subjects of nations with whom the Philippines is at war, during the period of such war; 8. citizens or subjects of foreign country whose laws do not grant Filipinos right to become naturalized citizens or subjects thereof (no reciprocity). Effects of Naturalization : 1. ON THE WIFE a. vests citizenship on wife who might herself be lawfully naturalized; She need not prove her qualifications but only that she is not disqualified. (Moy Ya Lim Yao v. Comm. of Immigration, 41 SCRA 292). 2. ON THE MINOR CHILDREN a. If born in the Philippines automatically becomes a citizen; b. If born abroad (i). If born before the naturalization of the father (ia) residing in RP at the time of naturalization automatically becomes citizen; (ib) if not residing in RP at the time of naturalization considered citizen only during minority,
Natural Born Citizens (Sec. 2, Art. IV) 1. Citizens of the Philippines from birth without having to perform any act to acquire or perfect their Philippine citizenship; 2. Those born before January 17, 1973 of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority Who Must Be Natural Born Citizens 1. President [Sec.2, Art. VII]; 2. Vice President [Sec.3, Art. VII]; 3. Members of Congress [Sec.3 & 6, Art. VI]; 4. Justices of the Supreme Court and lower collegiate courts [Sec. 7(1), Art. VIII]; 5. Ombudsman and his deputies [Sec.8, Art.XI]; 6. Constitutional Commissions [Secs.1(1) of Arts. IX-B, IX-C, and IX-D]; 7. Members of the governing board of the Central Monetary Authority [Sec.20, Art. XII]; 8. Chairman and members of the Commission of Human Rights [Sec.17(2), Art.XIII].
II. NATURALIZATION
Qualifications for Naturalization: 1. not less than 18 years of age on date of hearing of petition (as amended by RA 6809); 2. resided in the Philippines for not less than 10 years; may be reduced to 5 years, if: a.honorably held office in the Philippines; b. established new industry or introduced a useful invention; c. married to a Filipino woman; d. engaged as teacher in Philippine public or private school not established for exclusive instruction to particular nationality or race, or in any of branches of education or industry for a period of not less than 2 years; and e.born in the Philippines; 3. character: a.good moral character; b.believes in the Constitution; c. conducted himself in an irreproachable conduct during his stay in the Philippines; 4. Own real estate in the Philippines not less than P5,000 in value; or have some lucrative trade, profession or lawful occupation that can support himself and his family; 5. Speak and write English or Filipino and any principal Philippine dialects; (as amended by Sec. 6 Art. XIV); and 6. Enrolled minor children in any public or private school recognized by government where Philippine history, government and civics are taught as part of curriculum, during
19 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
unless begins to reside permanently in the Philippines; (ii) If born outside the Philippines after parents naturalization considered Filipino, provided registered as such before any Philippines consulate within 1 year after attaining majority age and takes oath of allegiance. Grounds for Denaturalization: 1. naturalization certificate obtained fraudulently or illegally; 2. if, within 5 years, he returns to his native country or to some foreign country and establishes residence therein; 3. naturalization obtained through invalid declaration of intention; 4. minor children failed to graduate through the fault of the parents either by neglecting support or by transferring them to another school; and 5. allowing himself to be used as dummy. Effects of Denaturalization: 1. If ground affects intrinsic validity of proceedings, denaturalization shall divest wife and children of their derivative naturalization; 2. If the ground is personal, the wife and children shall retain citizenship.
Exception: 1. persons citizenship is resolved by court or an administrative body as a material issue in the controversy, after a full-blown hearing; 2. with the active participation of the Solicitor General or his representative; 3. finding of his citizenship is affirmed by the Supreme Court.
DUAL ALLEGIANCE
1. Refers to the situation where a person simultaneously owes, by some positive act, loyalty to two or more states. 2. Result of an individuals volition and is prohibited by the Constitution
Doctrine of Indelible Allegiance an individual may be compelled to retain his original nationality notwithstanding that he has already renounced or forfeited it under the laws of the second state whose nationality he has acquired.
Who may exercise (Sec. 1, Art. V) 1. all citizens of the Philippines, not otherwise disqualified by law; 2. at least 18 years of age 3. resided in the Philippines for at least one year; and 4. resided in the place they propose to vote for at least 6 months immediately preceding the election.
II. RESIDENCE
has dual meaning (Sec.1, Art. V): First as a requirement of residence in the Philippines: synonymous with domicile
20 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Second requirement of residence in the place where one intends to vote: can mean domicile or temporary residence Requisites of Acquisition of Domicile by Choice: 1. residence or bodily presence in the new locality; 2. an intention to remain there; and 3. an intention to abandon the old residence. (Gallego v. Verra, 73 Phil. 453)
Indirect Initiative exercise of initiative by the people through a proposition sent to Congress or the local legislative body for action.
Referendum power of the electorate to approve or reject legislation through an election called for that purpose. Classes of Referendum: 1. Referendum on Statutes petition to approve or reject an act or law, or part thereof, passed by Congress; 2. Referendum on Local Laws legal process whereby the registered voters of the local government units may approve, amend or reject any ordinance enacted by the sanggunian. (Sec. 126, RA 7160 or the LGC of 1991)
2.
Initiative power of the people to propose amendments to the Constitution or to propose and enact legislation through an election called for the purpose. Classes of initiative: 1. Initiative on the Constitution petition proposing amendments to the Constitution;
II. COMPOSITION
21 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
1. Senate 24, elected at large by the qualified voters of the Philippines; 2. House of Representatives not more than 250 members consisting of: a. District Representatives elected from legislative districts apportioned among the provinces, cities and the Metropolitan Manila area; b. Party-list Representatives shall constitute 20% of the total number of representatives, elected through a party-list system of registered national, regional and sectoral parties or organizations.
a. declaring the existence of the vacancy; b. calling for a special election to be held within 45 to 90 days from the date of the resolution or certification. the Senator or representative elected shall serve only for the unexpired term.
III. APPORTIONMENT OF LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT [Sec. 5 (3) and (4), Art. VI]
1. Maintain proportional
2.
3.
IV.
representation based on number of inhabitants; Each city with not less than 250 thousand inhabitants, entitled to at least one (1) representative; Each province, irrespective of the number of inhabitants, entitled to at least one (1) representative. Each district must be contiguous, compact and adjacent. Gerrymandering is not allowed; Gerrymandering formation of one legislative district out of separate territories for the purpose of favoring a candidate or a party (Bernas, Reviewer in Philippine Constitution, P. 186) Reapportionment within 3 years following return of every census.
ELECTION
1. Regular second Monday of May, every three years 2. Special (RA 6645) No special election will be called if vacancy occurs: a. at least eighteen (18) months before the next regular election for members of the Senate; b. at least (1) year before the next regular election for Members of Congress. The particular House of Congress where vacancy occurs must pass either a resolution if Congress is in session or the Senate President or the Speaker must sign a certification, if Congress is not in session,
Adjournment Sine Die interval between the session of one Congress and that of another; Congress must stop the clock at midnight of the last day of session in order to validly pass a law.
22 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
1. Sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns and qualification of their respective members.(Sec. 17, Art. VI) 2. Rule-making power (Lazatin v. HRET, 168 SCRA 391)
disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of 2/3 of all its members, suspend (for not more than 60 days) or expel a member. The interpretation of the phrase disorderly behavior is the prerogative of the House concerned and cannot be judicially reviewed. (Alejandrino v. Quezon, 46 Phil 83).
and its decisions may be reviewed by the Supreme Court only upon showing of grave abuse of discretion.
VII. MATTERS MANDATED BY CONSTITUTION TO BE ENTERED INTO THE JOURNAL [SEC. 16 (4), ART. VI]
1. yeas and nays on third and final reading of a bill [Sec. 26(2), Art. VI]; 2. veto message of President [Sec. 27(1), Art.VI]; 3. yeas and nays on repassing a bill vetoed by President [Sec.27(1), Art. VI]; and 4. yeas and nays on any question at the request of 1/5 of members present [Sec.16(4), Art.VI].
Enrolled Bill conclusive upon courts as regards the tenor of the measure passed by Congress and approved by the President (Mabanag v. Lopez Vito, 78 Phil. 1)
X. POWERS OF CONGRESS
Classification of Powers:
Journal Entry vs. Enrolled Bill Enrolled bill prevails (Field v. Clark, 143 US 649), except to matters, which under the Constitution, must be entered into the Journal. (Astorga v. Villegas, 56 SCRA 714)
1. Legislative
a. General plenary power (Sec.1, Art.VI); b. specific power of appropriation, taxation and expropriation; c. legislative investigations; d. question hour.
VIII. CONGRESSIONAL ELECTORAL TRIBUNALS (SET OR HRET) (SEC. 17, ART. VI)
Composition: 1. 3 Supreme Court Justices designated by Chief Justice; and 2. 6 members of the Chamber concerned (Senate or HR) chosen on the basis of proportional representation from political parties and parties registered under the party-list system Senior Justice shall act as Chairman. Power of Electoral Tribunals:
23 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
j. revoke or extend
k.
proclamation of suspension of privilege of writ of habeas corpus or declaration of martial law (to revoke = legislative veto) power with regard to utilization of natural resources [Sec.2, Art. XII];
Power of Appropriation Appropriations Law a statute, the primary and specific purpose of which, is to authorize release of public funds from treasury. Implied Limitations on Appropriation Power: 1. must specify public purpose; 2. sum authorized for release must be determinate, or at least determinable. Constitutional Limitations on Special Appropriations Measures: 1. must specify public purpose for which the sum was intended; 2. must be supported by funds actually available as certified by National Treasurer or to be raised by corresponding revenue proposal included therein. [Sec. 25(4), Art. VI]. Constitutional Rules on General Appropriations Laws (Sec. 25, Art. VI) 1. Congress may not increase appropriations recommended by the President for operations of Government; 2. Form, content and manner of preparation of budget shall be provided by law; 3. No provision or enactment shall be embraced in the bill unless it relates specifically to some particular appropriations therein; 4. Procedure for approving appropriations for Congress shall be the same as that of other departments in order to prevent sub-rosa appropriations by Congress. 5. Prohibition against transfer of appropriations (doctrine of augmentation), however: a. President; b. Senate President; c. Speaker of the House of Representative; d. Chief Justice; and e. Heads of Constitutional Commissions may, by law, be authorized to augment any item in the general appropriations law for their respective offices from savings in other items of their respective appropriations. 6. Prohibitions against appropriations for sectarian benefit; 7. Automatic re-appropriation. Limitations on Power of Legislative Investigation [Sec. 21, Art. VI] 1. must be in aid of legislation; 2. in accordance with duly published rules of procedures; and 3. right of person appearing in, or affected by such inquiry shall be respected.
Limitations on the Powers of Congress: 1. Substantive a. Express: (i) bill of rights [Art. III]; (ii) on appropriations [Sec. 25 and 29 (1) and (2), Art. VI]; (iii) on taxation [Sec. 28 and 29 (3), Art. VI; Sec 4 (3), Art. XIV]; (iv) on constitutional appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court [Sec. 30, Art. VI]; (v) no law granting title of royalty or nobility shall be passed [Sec. 31, Art. VI]; (vi) no specific funds shall be appropriated or paid for use or benefit of any religion, sect, etc., except for priests, etc., assigned to AFP, penal institutions, etc. [Sec.29(2), Art.VI]. b. Implied: (i) prohibition against irrepealable laws; (ii) non-delegation of powers.
2. Procedural
a. only one subject, to be stated in the title of the bill [Sec. 26(1), Art. VI]; and b. 3 readings on separate days; printed copies of the bill in its final form distributed to members 3 days before its passage, except if President certifies to its immediate enactment to meet a public calamity or emergency; upon its last reading , no amendment allowed and the vote thereon taken immediately and the yeas and nays entered into the Journal [Sec. 26(2), Art. VI]; c. appropriation, revenue and tariff bill (RAT Bills) shall originate exclusively from the House of Representatives (Sec. 24, Art. VI) shall originate exclusively from the House the initiative for filing of RAT Bills must come from the House, but it does not prohibit the filing in the Senate a substitute bill in anticipation of its receipt of the bill from the House, so long as the action by the Senate is withheld pending the receipt of the House bill. (Tolentino v. Sec. Of Finance, 235 SCRA 630).
24 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
4. A bill calling a special election for President and Vice-President under Sec. 10, Art. VII becomes law upon third and final reading. Presidential Veto General Rule: If the President disapprove a bill enacted by Congress, he should veto the entire bill. He is not allowed to veto separate items of a bill. Exception: Item-veto in the case of appropriation, revenue, and tariff bills [Sec. 27 (2), Art. VI]. Exceptions to the exception: 1. Doctrine of Inappropriate Provisions a provision that is constitutionally inappropriate for an appropriation bill may be singled out for veto even if it is not an appropriation or revenue item (Gonzales v. Macaraig, Jr., 191 SCRA 452). 2. Executive Impoundment - refusal of the President to spend funds already allocated by Congress for specific purpose. It is the failure to spend or obligate budget authority of any type. (Philconsa v. Enriquez, G.R. No. 113105. August 19, 1994).
2. As to who conducts the investigation entire body committees 3. As to subject matter Matters related to the any matter for the department only purpose of legislation
Doctrine of shifting majority : For each House of Congress to pass a bill, only the votes of the majority of those present in the session, there being a quorum, is required. Quorum majority of each House, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day and may compel the attendance of absent Members in such manner and under such penalties as such House may determine [Sec. 16(2), Art. VI]. The basis for determining the existence of a quorum in the Senate shall be the total number of Senators who are in the country and within the coercive jurisdiction of the Senate (Avelino v. Cuenco, 83 Phil 17).
Bills that must originate from the House of Representatives: 1. Appropriations bill; 2. Revenue and tariff bills; 3. Bill authorizing increase in public debts; 4. Bill of local application; and 5. Private bills [Sec.24, Art. VI]. Procedure for Approval of Bills: 1. Bill is approved by both chambers; 2. President approves and signs it; 3. If the President vetoes the bill, return bill with presidential objections to the house of origin. Veto may be overridden upon vote of 2/3 of all members of the House of origin and other house; 4. Presidential inaction for 30 days from receipt of the bill: bill becomes a law as if the same has been signed by him How a Bill becomes Law: 1. Approved and signed by the President; 2. Presidential veto overriden by 2/3 vote of all members of both Houses; 3. Failure of the President to veto the bill and to return it with his objections to the House where it originated, within 30 days after the date of receipt;
Pocket Veto occurs when (1) the President fails to act on a bill and (2) the reason he does not return the bill to Congress is that Congress is not in session. Not applicable in the Philippines because inaction by the President for 30 days never produces a veto even if Congress is in recess. The President must still act to veto the bill and communicate his veto to Congress without need of returning the vetoed bill with his veto message.
25 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
a Vice President to be held not earlier than 45 days nor later than 60 days from the time of such call.[Sec.10, Art.VII].
OF
THE
2. confirmation by the Commission on Appointments; 3. issuance of commission; and 4. acceptance by appointee. Deemed complete upon acceptance (Lacson vs Romero, 84 Phil 740) Limitations on Appointing Power: 1. appointments made by an acting-President shall remain effective unless revoked within 90 days from assumption of office by elected President [Sec. 14, Art. VII]; and 2. President or acting-President shall not make appointments except temporary ones to executive positions 2 months immediately before next Presidential elections and up to the end of his term. Only when continued vacancy will prejudice public service or endanger public safety [Sec. 15, Art. VII]. 3. The spouse and relatives by consanguinity or affinity within the 4th civil degree of the President shall not, during his tenure be appointed as: a. members of the Constitutional Commissions; b. member of the Office of the Ombudsman; c. Secretaries; d. Undersecretaries; e. Chairman or heads of bureaus or offices, including GOCC and their subsidiaries. [Sec.13,par. 2, Art. VII] 4. The President shall have the power to make appointments during the recess of the Congress, whether voluntary or compulsory, but such appointments shall be effective only until disapproval by the CA or until the next adjournment of the Congress. [Sec. 16 par.2, Art. VII] 3. POWER OF REMOVAL General rule: this power is implied from the power to appoint. Exception: those appointed by him where the Constitution prescribes certain methods for separation from public service.(e.g. impeachment) 4. POWER OF CONTROL Control power of an office to: Alter, Modify, Nullify, or Set aside what a substitute had done in the performance of his duties and to substitute his judgment to that of the former (Mondano v. Silvosa, 97 Phil, 143).
e. appointment solely by the President. (i) those vested by the Constitution on the President alone; (ii) those whose appointments are not otherwise provided for by law; (iii) those whom he may be authorized by law to appoint; (iv) those other officers lower in rank who appointment is vested by law in the President alone. Appointing Procedure for those that need CA Confirmation: 1. nomination by the President;
26 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency or Alter Ego Principle acts of the Secretaries of Executive departments when performed and promulgated in the regular course of business or unless disapproved or reprobated by the Chief Executive, are presumptively the acts of the Chief Executive (Villena v. Secretary of the Interior, 67 Phil 451). 5. MILITARY POWERS (SEC. 18, ART. VIII) a. Commander-in Chief clause To call out the Armed Force to prevent or suppress lawless violence, invasion or rebellion; organize courts martial and create military commissions. b. Suspension of the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus and Declaration of Martial Law (i.) Grounds: invasion or rebellion, when public safety requires it. (ii.) Duration: not more than 60 days, following which it shall be lifted, unless extended by Congress. (iii.) Duty of the President to report to Congress: within 48 hours personally or in writing. (iv.) Authority of Congress to revoke or extend the effectivity of proclamation: by majority vote of all of its members voting jointly. (v.) Authority of the Supreme Court: to inquire into the sufficiency of the factual basis for such action, at the instance of any citizen. Decision must be promulgated 30 days within its filing. (vi.) Proclamation does not affect the right to bail. (vii.) Suspension applies only to persons facing charges of rebellion or offenses inherent in or directly connected with invasion. (viii.) Person arrested must be charged within 3 days; if not, must be released. (ix.) Proclamation does not supersede civilian authority. Effects of Proclamation of Martial Law 1. The President can: a. Legislate; b. order the arrest of people who obstruct the war effort. 2. The following cannot be done: a. suspend the operation of the Constitution.
b. Supplant the functioning of the civil courts and the legislative assemblies; c. Confer jurisdiction upon military courts and agencies over civilians, where civil courts are able to function. Open Court Doctrine civilians cannot be tried by military courts if the civil courts are open and functioning. d. Automatically suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus.[Sec.18, par(4), Art.VII]. Four ways for the proclamation or suspension to be lifted: 1. lifting by the President himself; 2. revocation by Congress; 3. nullification by the Supreme Court; 4. operation of law after 60 days. 6. PARDONING POWER (SEC. 19, ART. VII) discretionary, may not be controlled by the legislature or reversed by the court, unless there is a constitutional violation. Limitations: 1. cannot be granted in cases of impeachment; 2. cannot be granted in violations of election laws without favorable recommendations of the COMELEC; 3. can be granted only after convictions by final judgment (except amnesty); 4. cannot be granted in cases of legislative contempt or civil contempt; 5. cannot absolve convict of civil liability; 6. cannot restore public offices forfeited.
Pardon act of grace which exempts individual on whom it is bestowed from punishment which the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. Pardon Classified: 1. Plenary or partial; and 2. Absolute or conditional. Commutation reduction or mitigation of the penalty. Reprieve postponement of sentence or stay of execution. Parole release from imprisonment, but without full restoration of liberty, as parolee is
27 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Amnesty act of grace, concurred in by the Legislature, usually extended to groups of persons who committed political offenses, which puts into oblivion the offense itself. AMNESTY PARDON
1. Infraction of peace/ common crimes Individuals does not require concurrence of Congress Private act which must be pleaded and proved Looks forward and relieves the pardonee of the consequence of the offense. Can be granted only after conviction.
1. 2. 3. 4.
Political offenses Classes of persons Requires concurrence of Congress Public act to which court may take judicial notice of Looks backward and puts to oblivion the offense itself
2. 3.
4.
5.
5.
6.
6.
12. OTHER POWERS a. call Congress to a special session [Sec. 15, Art. VI]; b. approve or veto bills [Sec. 27, Art. VI]; c. deport aliens (Qua Chee Gan v. The Deportation Board, G.R. No. L-10280. September 30, 1963); d. consent to deputization of government personnel by COMELEC [Sec.2 (4), Art. IX-C]; e. to discipline such deputies [Sec. 2 (8), Art. IX-C]; f. general supervision over local government units and autonomous regional governments (Art. X); general supervision mere overseeing of a subordinate to make sure that they do their duties under the law but does not include the power to overrule their acts, if these acts are within their discretion. g. by delegation from Congress, exercise emergency [Sec. 23 (2), Art. VI] and tariff powers [Sec. 28 (2), Art. VI]. Conditions for the Exercise of the President of Emergency Powers: 1. there must be a war or national emergency; 2. there must be a law authorizing President to exercise emergency powers; 3. exercise must be for a limited period; 4. must be subject to restrictions that Congress may provide; and 5. exercise must be necessary and proper to carry out a declared national policy [Sec.23 (2), Art.VI].
7. BORROWING POWER (SEC. 20, ART. VII) the President may contract or guarantee foreign loans on behalf of the Republic with the concurrence of the Monetary Board, subject to such limitations as may be provided by law. Monetary Board shall submit to Congress report on loans within 30 days from end of every quarter. 8. DIPLOMATIC POWER (SEC. 21, ART. VII) No treaty or international agreement shall be valid and effective unless concurred in by at least 2/3 of all members of Senate. 9. BUDGETARY POWER (SEC. 22, ART. VII) within 30 days from opening of every regular session, President shall submit to Congress a budget of expenditures and sources of financing, including receipts from existing and proposed revenue measures. 10. INFORMING POWER (SEC. 23, ART. VI) President shall address Congress at the opening of its regular session. President may also appear before it at any other time. 11. RESIDUAL POWER
I. JUDICIAL POWER
duty of courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of government (Sec. 1, par.2, Art. VIII).
Judicial power is vested in: 1. One Supreme Court; and 2. Such lower courts as may be established by law (Sec. 1, Art. VIII).
28 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Jurisdiction - power to hear and decide a case and execute decision thereof. Safeguards that guarantee Independence of Judiciary: 1. SC is a Constitutional body; may not be abolished by law; 2. Members are only removable by impeachment; 3. SC may not be deprived of minimum and appellate jurisdiction; appellate jurisdiction may not be increased without its advice or concurrence; 4. SC has administrative supervision over all inferior courts and personnel; 5. SC has exclusive power to discipline judges/justices of inferior courts; 6. Members of judiciary enjoy security of tenure; 7. Members of judiciary may not be designated to any agency performing quasi-judicial or administrative functions; 8. Salaries of judges may not be reduced; judiciary enjoys fiscal autonomy; 9. SC alone may initiate Rules of Court; 10. SC alone may order temporary detail of judges; and 11. SC can appoint all officials and employees of the Judiciary (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 199-200).
d. Metropolitan, Municipal and Municipal Circuit Trial Court Judges: 1. Citizen of the Philippines; 2. At least 30 years old; 3. Has been engaged for al least 5 years in the practice of law in the Philippines or has held public office in the Philippines requiring admission to the practice of law as an indispensable requisite; 4. a person of proven competence, integrity, probity and independence. Procedure in Appointment: 1. Appointed by President from among a list of at least 3 nominees prepared by Judicial and Bar Council for every vacancy. 2. For lower courts, President shall issue the appointment 90 days from submission of the list. Tenure of Justices and Judges a. Supreme Court hold office until they reach 70 years of age or become incapacitated to discharge their duties [Sec.11, Art.VIII]. May be removed only through impeachment.
Judiciary when it undermines the security of tenure of its members (Sec. 2, Art. VIII).
AND
BAR
Composition: Ex-officio chairman - Supreme Court Chief Justice Ex-officio members - Secretary of Justice - Representative of Congress Regular members - Representative of the IBP; - Professor of Law; - Retired member of SC; and - Representative of private sector Secretary de officio - Clerk of the Supreme Court
29 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Appointment Regular members shall be appointed by the President for a 4 year term with the consent of the Commission on Appointments. Powers and Functions of Judicial and Bar Council 1. Recommend appointees to the judiciary; 2. Recommend appointees to the Office of the Ombudsman and his 5 deputies; 3. May exercise such other functions as may be assigned by Supreme Court. (Sec. 8, Art. VIII)
V. POWER REVIEW
OF
JUDICIAL
Judicial Review the power of the courts to test the validity of executive and legislative acts in light of their conformity with the Constitution. This is not an assertion of superiority by the courts over the other departments, but merely an expression of the
30 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
supremacy of the Constitution (Angara v. Electoral Commission, 63 Phil. 139) Doctrine of Judicial Supremacy 1. Although holding neither purse nor sword and so regarded as the weakest of the three departments of the government, the judiciary is nonetheless vested with the power to annul the acts of either the legislative or the executive or of both when not conformable to the fundamental law. (Association of Small Landowners of the Philippines v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, 175 SCRA 343). 2. When the judiciary allocates constitutional boundaries, it neither asserts superiority nor nullifies an act of the Legislature. It only asserts the solemn and sacred obligation assigned to it by the Constitution to determine conflicting claims of authority under the Constitution and to establish for the parties in an actual controversy the rights which that instrument secures and guarantees to them. (Laurel, Angara v. Electoral Commission, 63 Phil 139)
Therefore, the following must be avoided: political questions; advisory opinions moot and academic issues; no standing. Seven Rules of Avoidance of Constitutional Questions (Brandeis, J.) 1. Friendly, non-adversary proceedings (no vital conflict); 2. Anticipation of a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it (premature case); 3. Formulation of a rule broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is applied; 4. Existence of other grounds upon which the case may be disposed of. (not the very lis mota); 5. Complaint made by one who fails to show injury as to its operations (no standing); 6. Instance of one who has availed himself of its benefit; 7. Possibility of a construction of statute that can avoid the resolution of the constitutional question. Policy of Strict Necessity (Rescue Army Case) the court must refrain from exercising judicial review unless all the requisites for its exercise are fulfilled because: 1. the danger of exercising the function, in view of possible consequences for others stemming also from constitutional roots; 2. comparative finality of those consequences; 3. consideration due to the judgment of the other repositories of constitutional power concerning the scope of their authorities; 4. necessity for each to keep within its own power; 5. inherent limitations of the judicial process its largely negative character, and its limited resources for enforcement; 6. withal in paramount importance of constitutional adjudication. Judicial Power includes: 1. duty of courts to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable; and 2. to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on part of any branch or instrumentality of government [Sec. 1, Art. VIII].
Requisites of Judicial Review: 1. Actual case or controversy a conflict of legal rights, an assertion of opposite legal claims susceptible of judicial determination; 2. Constitutional question must be raised by the proper party one who has sustained or is in imminent danger of sustaining an injury as a result of the act complained of; For a taxpayers suit, 2 requisites: a. public funds are disbursed by a political subdivision or instrumentality; and b. a law is violated or some irregularity is committed, and that the petitioner is directly affected by the alleged ultra vires act (Anti-Graft League of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, 260 SCRA 250) 3. Constitutional question must be raised at the earliest opportunity General Rule: must be raised in the pleadings Exceptions: a. criminal cases at any time at the discretion of the court; b. civil cases at any stage of the proceedings if necessary for the determination of the case itself; c. every case (except where there is estoppel ) at any stage if it involves the jurisdiction of the court 4. Determination of constitutionality of the statute must be necessary to a final determination of the case. (People vs. Vera, 65 Phil. 56).
Grave Abuse of Discretion Amounting to Lack of Jurisdiction capricious and whimsical exercise of judgment. The abuse of discretion must be patent and gross as to
31 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
amount to an evasion of positive duty or a virtual refusal to perform a duty enjoined by law, or to act at all in contemplation of law, as where the power is exercised in an arbitrary and despotic manner by reason of passion or hostility (Intestate Estate of Carmen de Luna v. IAC, 170 SCRA 246). JUSTICIABLE QUESTION POLITICAL QUESTION
Two aspects: questions which, under the Constitution, are to be decided by the people in their sovereign capacity; or regard to which full discretionary authority has been delegated to the legislature or executive branches of government. (Taada v. Cuenco, 100 Phil 1101)
the Solicitor General to decide whether or not his intervention in the action is necessary (Mirasol v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 128448, February 1, 2001) Period for Decision (Sec. 15, Art. VIII) All cases filed after the effectivity of the Constitution must be decided or resolved, from the date of submission, within: a. SC 24 months b. Lower Collegiate Courts - 12 months, unless period is reduced by SC; c. All other lower courts 3 months unless period is reduced by SC In case of delay: A certification to be signed by the Chief Justice or Presiding Justice shall be issued stating the reason for the delay. Court, without prejudice to such responsibilities as may have been incurred in consequence thereof shall decide or resolve the case or matter submitted to it without further delay, despite expiration of mandatory period. Court does not lose jurisdiction over the case, despite the lapse of the mandatory period. Erring judge or justice may be subjected to administrative sanctions for the delay. Effect of Declaration of Unconstitutionality The law is either : 1. void if on its face it does not enjoy any presumption of validity because it is patently offensive to the Constitution. It produces not effect, creates no office and imposes no duty. (Igot v. Comelec, 95 SCRA 392) 2. voidable if on its face it enjoys the presumption of constitutionality. The laws becomes inoperative only upon the judicial declaration of its invalidity; the declaration produces no retroactive effect. (Serrano de Agbayani v. PNB, 38 SCRA 429) Art. 7, NCC is the orthodox view on the matter. Requisites before a Law can be Declared Partially Unconstitutional: 1. the legislature must be willing to retain valid portion (separability clause); 2. the valid portion can stand independently as law.
in
Functions of Judicial Review 1. checking invalidating a law or executive act that is found to be contrary to the Constitution; 2. legitimating upholding the validity of the law that results from a mere dismissal of a case challenging the validity of the law; rule on double negative uses the term not unconstitutional; the court cannot declare a law constitutional because it already enjoys a presumption of constitutionality. 3. symbolic to educate the bench and bar as to the controlling principles and concepts on matters of grave public importance for the guidance of and restraint upon the future. (Salonga v. Cruz Pao, 134 SCRA 438) All courts can exercise Judicial Review The Constitution contemplates that the inferior courts should have jurisdiction in cases involving constitutionality of any treaty or law for Sec. 5 (2), Art. VIII speaks of appellate review of final judgments of inferior courts in cases where such constitutionality happens to be in issue. (J.M. Tuason and Co. v. Court of Appeals, 3 SCRA 696). The Constitution vests the power of judicial review not only in the Supreme Court but also in the RTC. However, in all actions assailing the validity of a statute, treaty, presidential decree, order or proclamation and not just in actions involving declaratory relief and similar remedies, notice to the Solicitor General is mandatory, as required in Sec. 3, Rule 64 of the Rules of Court. The purpose of this mandatory notice is to enable
32 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
1 chairman; 2 commissioners
1. Civil Service Commission (CSC) 2. Commission on Elections (COMELEC) 3. Commission on Audit (COA)
Prohibitions and Inhibitions No member of a Constitutional Commission shall, during his tenure: 1. hold any other office or employment; 2. engage in the practice of any profession 3. engage in the active management and control of any business which in any way may be affected by the functions of his office 4. be financially interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract with, or in any franchise or privilege granted by the Government, any of its subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, including governmentowned and controlled corporations or their subsidiaries. Safeguards that guarantee Independence of Commissions: 1. they are constitutionally created; may not be abolished by statute; 2. each is expressly described as independent; 3. each is conferred certain powers and functions which cannot be reduced by statute; 4. the Chairmen and members cannot be removed except by impeachment; 5. the Chairmen and members are given fairly a long term of office of 7 years; 6. the Chairmen and members may not be reappointed or appointed in an acting capacity (Brillantes v. Yorac, 192 SCRA 358); 7. the salaries of the Chairmen and members are relatively high and may not be decreased during continuance in office; 8. the Commissions enjoy fiscal autonomy; 9. each Commission may promulgate its own procedural rules, provided they do not diminish, increase or modify substantive rights [though subject to disapproval by the SC]; 10. the Chairmen and members are subject to certain disqualifications calculated to strengthen their integrity; 11. the Commissions may appoint their own officials and employees in accordance with Civil Service Law (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p.209)
Qualifications: 1. natural-born citizen; 2. at least 35 years old at the time of appointment; 3. with proven capacity for public administration; and 4. not a candidate in any election immediately preceding the appointment. Term: 7 years without reappointment. Scope of the Civil Service: embraces all branches, subdivisions, instrumentalities and agencies of the Government, including government-owned and controlled corporations with original charters [Sec. 2(1), Art. IX-B] Classes of Service: a. Career service characterized by: 1. entrance based on merit and fitness to be determined by competitive examination or based on highly technical qualifications. 2. Opportunity for advancement; 3. Security of tenure Kinds: (i.) open career positions prior qualification via examination; (ii.) closed career positions e.g., scientific or highly technical; (iii.) career executive service e.g., Undersecretaries, Bureau Directors; (iv.) career officers appointed by President, e.g., foreign service; (v.) positions in AFP, governed by separate merit system; (vi.) personnel of GOCCs with original charter; (vii.) permanent laborers, whether skilled, semi-skilled or unskilled. b. Non-career Service characterized by : 1. entrance on bases other than those of usual tests utilized for career service. 2. Tenure limited to period. Kinds: (i.) elective officials and their personal and confidential staff; (ii.) department heads and officials of cabinet rank, and their personal and confidential staff; (iii.) chairmen and members of commissions and boards with fixed
I. CIVIL COMMISSION
Composition:
SERVICE
33 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
terms of office and their personal and confidential staff; (iv.) contractual personnel or those whose employment in government is in accordance with special contract for specific work; and (v.) emergency and seasonal personnel. Exceptions to requirement of competitive examinations (to determine merit and fitness):
Policy Determining lays down principal or fundamental guidelines or rules. Formulates method of action. Primarily Confidential primarily close intimacy which insures freedom of intercourse without embarrassment of freedom from misgivings or betrayals on confidential matters of state; Or one declared to be so by President upon recommendations of CSC (Salazar v. Mathay, 73 SCRA 275). Highly Technical requires possession of technical skill or training in supreme or superior degree. (de los Santos v. Mallare, 87 Phil 289)
2.
34 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
6. Discussion on the floor of the report; 7. A vote of at least one third of all the members of the House shall be necessary either to affirm a favorable resolution with the Articles of Impeachment of the Committee or override its contrary resolution. Trial and Decision in Impeachment proceedings 1. The Senators take an oath or affirmation. 2. When the President of the Philippines is on trial the Chief Justice of the Supreme court shall preside but shall not vote. 3. A decision of conviction must be concurred in by at least two thirds of all the members of the Senate. Effect of Conviction: 1. Removal from Office; 2. Disqualification to hold any other office under the Republic of the Philippines; 3. Party convicted shall be liable and subject to prosecution, trial and punishment according to law. Limitation: Not more than one impeachment case shall be initiated against the same official within a period of one year
Jurisdiction of the Commission: no law shall be passed exempting any entity of the Government, or any investment of public funds, from the jurisdiction of the Commission on Audit (Sec. 3, Art. IX-D)
III. SANDIGANBAYAN
the anti-graft court shall continue to function and exercise its jurisdiction as now and hereafter may be provided by law.
Initiation of Impeachment Case The House of Representatives shall have the exclusive power to initiate all cases of impeachment Process of Impeachment 1. Verified Complaint filed by any member of the house or any citizen upon resolution of endorsement by any member thereof 2. Included in the order of business within 10 session days. 3. Referred to the proper committee within 3 session days of its inclusion. If the verified complaint is filed by at least one third of all its members, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed. 4. The Committee, after hearing, and by majority vote of all its members, shall submit its report to the House together with the corresponding resolution. 5. Placing on calendar the Committee resolution within 10 days from submission;
Composition: 1 Presiding Justice and 14 Associate Justices with the rank of Justice of the CA. Sits in 5 divisions of 3 members each. Decision and Review unanimous vote of all 3 members shall be required for the pronouncement of judgment by a division. Decision shall be reviewable by the SC on petition for certiorari. Jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan: 1. Original Jurisdiction a. violations of R.A. 3019 (AGCPA) as amended; R.A. 1379; and Chapter II, Sec.2, Title VII, Book II of the Revised Penal Code where one or more of the accused are officials occupying the following positions in the government, whether in a permanent, acting or interim capacity at the time of the commission of the offense: (i.) Officials of the Executive branch with the position of regional director or higher, or with Salary Grade Level
35 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
27 (G27) according to R.A. 6758, specifically including: (a.) Provincial governors, vice-governors; Board members, provincial treasurers, assessors, engineers and other provincial department heads; (b.) City mayors, vicemayors, city councilors; city treasurers, assessors, engineers and other city department heads; (c.) Officials of the diplomatic service from consuls or higher; (d.) PA/PAF colonels; PN captains and all officers of higher rank; (e.) Officers of the PNP while occupying the position of provincial director and those holding the rank of senior superintendent or higher; (f.) City/provincial prosecutors and their assistants, and officials and prosecutors in the Office of the Ombudsman and special prosecutor; and (g.) Presidents, directors, trustees, or managers of GOCCs state universities or educational institutions or foundations; (ii.) Members of Congress and officials thereof with G27 and up; (iii.) Members of the Judiciary without prejudice to the Constitution; (iv.) Chairmen and members of the Constitutional Commissions without prejudice to the Constitution; and (v.) All other national and local officials with G27 or higher; b. Other offenses or felonies whether simple or complexed with other crimes committed by the public officials and employees mentioned in Subsection a in relation to their office; c. Civil and criminal cases filed pursuant to and in connection with E.O. nos. 1, 2, 14 and 14-A issued in 1986.
trial courts whether in the exercise of their own original jurisdiction or of their appellate jurisdiction. (RA 8249)
IV.
THE OMBUDSMAN
The champion of the citizens and protector of the people Tasked to entertain complaints addressed to him against erring public officers and take all necessary actions thereon.
Composition: 1. An Ombudsman to be known as Tanodbayan 2. 1 overall Deputy; and 3. at least 1 Deputy each for Luzon, Vizayas and Mindanao; 4. A separate Deputy for the military establishment may likewise be appointed. Qualifications of the Ombudsman and his deputies: 1. natural born citizen; 2. at least 40 years old; 3. of recognized probity and independence; 4. member of the Philippine Bar; and 5. must not have been candidates for any elective office in the immediately preceding election. Term of Office: 7 years without reappointment. Disqualifications and Inhibitions: During their tenure: 1. shall not hold any other office or employment; 2. shall not engage in the practice of any profession or in the active management or control of any business which in any way may be affected by the functions of his office; 3. shall not be financially interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract with, or in any franchise or privilege granted by the government, or any of its subdivisions, etc.; 4. shall not be qualified to run for any office in the election immediately succeeding their cessation from office.
2. Exclusive Original Jurisdiction over petitions for the issuance of the writs of mandamus, prohibitions, certiorari, habeas corpus, injunction and other ancillary writs and processes in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, Provided, that jurisdiction over these petitions shall be not exclusive of the Supreme Court; and 3. Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction over final judgments, resolutions or orders of regional
Ombudsman Act of 1989) has endowed the Office of the Ombudsman with a wide latitude of investigatory and prosecutory power virtually free from legislative, executive or judicial intervention. The Supreme Court consistently refrains from interfering with the exercise of its powers, and respects the initiative and independence inherent in the Ombudsman who, beholden to no one, acts as the champion of the people and the preserver of the integrity of public service.
36 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
shall
not
be
conduct preliminary investigation and prosecute all criminal cases involving public officers and employees, not only those within the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan but those within the jurisdiction of the regular courts as well. (Uy v. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 105965-70, March 20, 2001). ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH the right of the State to recover properties unlawfully acquired by public officials or employee, from them or from their nominees or transferees, shall not be barred by prescription, laches or estoppel (Sec. 15, Art. XI) but it applies only to civil actions and not to criminal cases. (Presidential Ad Hoc FactFinding Committee on Behest Loans v. Disierto, GR No.130140, October 25, 1999)
Classification of Lands of the Public Domain (Sec. 3, Art. XII) 1. agricultural 2. forest timber; 3. mineral lands; and 4. national parks.
V.
Requirement of Reclassification or Conversion: positive act of government; mere issuance of title not enough (Sunbeam Convenience Food v. Court of Appeals, 181 SCRA 443).
Article XII : NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY I. GOALS OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY (SEC.1, ART. XII)
1. more equitable distribution of wealth; 2. increased wealth for the benefit of the people; and 3. increased productivity.
II.
37 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Exceptions: 1. foreigners who inherit through intestate succession; 2. former natural-born Filipino citizen may be a transferee of private lands subject to limitations provided by law. 3. ownership in condominium units. 4. Parity right agreement, under the 1935 Constitution
Principal Characteristic of Education which State must Promote and Protect: 1. quality education; 2. affordable education [Sec.1, Art.XIV]; 3. education that is relevant to the needs of the people [Sec.2(1), Art.XIV]. Nationalized Educational Activities: 1. ownership, except those established by religious groups and mission boards; 2. control and administration; and 3. student population [Sec.4(2), Art.XIV]. Aspects of Academic Freedom:
Stewardship Doctrine Private property is supposed to be held by the individual only as a trustee for the people in general, who are its real owners.
Distributive Justice the attainment of a more equitable distribution of land which recognizes the right of farmers and regular farm workers who are landless to own the land they till, and a just share of other or seasonal farm workers in the fruits of the land; -- based on the Aristotelian notion of giving each one what is due him on the basis of personal worth and value, and not merely what he has contracted for.
As part of its constitutionally enshrined academic freedom, the University of the Philippines has the prerogative to determine who may teach its students. The Civil Service Commission has no authority to force it to dismiss a member of its faculty even in the guise of enforcing Civil Service Rules.(UP v. Civil Service Commission, GR No.132860, April 3, 2001)
Rights of Labor Guaranteed by the Constitution (Sec. 3, Art. XIII) 1. full protection to labor; 2. promotion of full employment and equality of employment opportunity to all; 3. guarantee of right of workers to selforganization; 4. collective bargaining and negotiations; 5. peaceful concerted activities including the right to strike in accordance with law; 6. right to security of tenure; 7. right to human conditions of work; 8. right to participate in policy and decisionmaking affecting their rights and benefIts.
b. c.
38 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Basis: The state may not be sued without its consent. (Sec. 3, Art. XVI). Test to determine if suit is against State: If the enforcement of the decision rendered against the public officer or agency impleaded will require an affirmative act from State, then, it is a suit against the State (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 20).
A suit is against the state, regardless of who is named as defendant, if it produces adverse consequences on the public treasury, whether in the disbursement of funds or loss of property, the public official proceeded against not being liable in his personal capacity. (Begosa v. Chairman, Phil. Veterans Adm. 32 SCRA 466)
Scope of Consent: Consent to be sued does not include consent to the execution of judgement against it. Such execution will require another waiver, because the power of the court ends when the judgement is rendered, since government funds and properties may not be seized under writs of execution or garnishment, unless such disbursement is covered by the corresponding appropriation as required by law (Republic v. Villasor, 54 SCRA 84). 1. Under Act No. 3083 Ordinary rule for execution will not apply after money judgment against the government, for the consent to be sued is only up to the point of judgment 2. Under a charter May be enforced by a writ of execution because consent is until the satisfaction of the money judgment. Rules Regarding Government Agencies: 1. Incorporated (GOCC) a. if its charter provides that it has the right to sue and be sued, it is an express consent and it is suable.(SSS v. CA, 120 SCRA 707); b. if its charter is silent, inquire into its function based on the purpose for which it was created.(Malong v. PNR, 138 SCRA 63) (i.) propriety if the purpose is to obtain special corporate benefits or earn pecuniary profit, suable; (ii.) governmental if it is in the interest of health, safety and for the advancement of public good and welfare, affecting the public in general, not suable (Balquera v. Alcala, 295 SCRA 366). 2. Unincorporated a. performs governmental functions: not suable without State consent even if performing proprietary function incidentally (Bureau of Printing v. Bureau of Printing Employees Association, 1 SCRA 340). b. performs proprietary functions: suable (Civil Aeronautics Administration v. CA, 167 SCRA 28). Rules Regarding Garnishment or Levy of Government Funds in Government Depository: General Rule: government funds deposited with PNB or authorized depositories cannot be subject to garnishment.
Forms of Consent: 1. Express consent a. general law (i.) Act No. 3083 and CA 327 as amended by Secs. 49-50, PD 1445: money claims arising from contracts first filed with COA before suit may be filed in court; (ii.) Art. 2180, NCC: tort committed by special agent; (iii.) Art. 2189, NCC: LGUs liable for injuries or death caused by defective condition of roads xxx or public works under their control (City of Manila vs Teotico, 22 SCRA 267) (iv.) Sec. 22 (2) of RA 7160 (LGC of 1991): LGUs have power to sue and be sued; (v.) Sec. 24 of LGC, LGUs and their officials are not exempt from liability for death or injury or damage to property. b. special law (Merritt v. Government of the Philippine Islands, 34 Phil., 311). 2. implied consent a. when State commences litigation becomes vulnerable to counterclaim; (Froilan v. Pan Oriental Shipping, GR No. L-6060 Sept. 30, 1950) b. State enters into a business contract (i). Jure Gestonis - by right of economic or business relations, may be sued (US v. Guinto, 182 SCRA 644); (ii). Jure Imperii - by right of sovereign power, in the exercise of sovereign functions. No implied consent (US v. Ruiz, 136 SCRA 487). c When it would be inequitable for the state to claim immunity (Amigable v. Cuenca, 43 SCRA 360)
39 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Exceptions: 1. where law or ordinance has already been enacted appropriating a specific amount to pay a valid governmental obligation. (Municipality of San Miguel, Bulacan v. Fernandez, G.R. No. L-61744. June 25, 1984); 2. funds belonging to government corporations which can sue and be sued that are deposited with a bank (PNB v. Pabalan, 83 SCRA 595). Rules Regarding Payment of Interests by Government in Money Judgments Against It: General Rule: Government cannot be made to pay interests; Exceptions: 1. eminent domain; 2. erroneous collection of taxes; or 3. where government agrees to pay interest pursuant to law.
no amendment in this manner shall be authorized within 5 years following the ratification of this Constitution (February 2, 1987) nor more often than once every 5 years.
RA 6735 (System of Initiative and Referendum) does not authorize a system of initiative to amend the Constitution. The law was deemed sufficient to cover only the systems of initiative on national and local legislation because: 1. Sec. 2 on the Statement of Policies of the Act does not suggest an initiative on the Amendments to the Constitution; 2. Sec. 5 of the Act does not provide for the contents of the provision for initiative on the Constitution; 1. That the Act does not provide a sub-title for initiative on the Constitution simply means that the main thrust of the Act is initiative and referendum on National and Local Laws. (Defensor-Santiago v. Comelec, GR No. 127325, March 17, 1997). PROPOSAL BY CONGRESS
For both Amendments and Revisions
CONCON
For both amendments and Revisions
PROPOSAL BY PEOPLE
For amendments only!
If
Congress, acting as a Constituent Assembly, omits to provide for the implementing details, Congress, acting as a Legislative Assembly this time, can enact the necessary implementing legislation to fill in the gaps.(Imbong v. Ferrer, G.R. No. L-32432. September 11, 1970).
AMENDMENT
REVISION
40 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
2. Ratification Proposed amendment(s) shall be submitted to the people and shall be deemed ratified by majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite, held not earlier than 60 days nor later than 90 days: a. after approval of the proposal by Congress or ConCon, or b. after certification by the COMELEC of sufficiency of petition of the people. Doctrine of Proper Submission plebiscite may be held on the same day as regular election.(Gonzales v. Comelec, 21 SCRA 774) provided the people are sufficiently informed of the amendments to be voted upon, to conscientiously deliberate thereon, to express their will in a genuine manner. unconstitutional. All the amendments must be submitted for ratification at one plebiscite only. The people have to be given a proper frame of reference in arriving at their decision. They have no idea yet of what the rest of the amended constitution would be. (Tolentino v. Comelec, G.R. No. L-34150. October 16, 1971). Questions as to amendments are now subject to Judicial review. (Sanidad v. Comelec, 78 SCRA 332)
OF
A. QUASI-LEGISLATIVE OR RULEMAKING POWER In exercise of delegated legislative power, involving no discretion as to what law shall be, but merely authority to fix details in execution or enforcement of a policy set out in law itself. Kinds: 1. Legislative regulation a. Supplementary or detailed legislation, e.g. Rules and Regulations Implementing the Labor Code; b. Contingent regulation 2. Interpretative legislation, e.g. BIR Circulars Requisites for valid exercise: 1. Issued under authority of law; 2. Within the scope and purview of the law; 3. Promulgated in accordance with the prescribed procedure: a. notice and hearing generally, not required; only when: i. the legislature itself requires it and mandates that the regulation shall be based on certain facts as determined at an appropriate investigation; ii. the regulation is a settlement of a controversy between specific parties; considered as an administrative adjudication (Cruz, Philippine Administrative Law, p.42 - 43); or iii. the administrative rule is in the nature of subordinate legislation designed to implement a law by providing its details (CIR v. Court of Appeals, 261 SCRA 236). b. publication 4. Reasonable Requisites for Validity of Administrative Rules With Penal Sanctions: 1. law itself must declare as punishable the violation of administrative rule or regulation; 2. law should define or fix penalty therefor; and 3. rule/regulation must be published.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Branch of public law that fixes the organization of the government and determines competence of authorities who execute the law and indicates to the individual remedies for the violations of his rights.
41 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
issues involved and reason for decision rendered.(Ang Tibay vs CIR, 69 Phil 635)
Doctrine of Legislative Approval by Reenactment -- the rules and regulations promulgated by the proper administrative agency implementing the law are deemed confirmed and approved by the Legislature when said law was re-enacted by later legislation or through codification. The Legislature is presumed to have full knowledge of the contents of the regulations then at the time of re-enactment. QUASILEGISLATIVE FUNCTIONS
1. consists of issuance of rules and regulations general applicability 1.
Substantial Evidence relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.
QUASIJUDICIAL FUNCTIONS
refers to its end product called order, reward or decision 2. applies to a specific situation 3. present determination of rights, privileges or duties as of previous or present time or occurrence
2.
3. prospective; it envisages the promulgation of a rule or regulation generally applicable in the future
Administrative Determinations Where Notice and Hearing Not Necessary: 1. summary proceedings of distraint and levy upon property of delinquent taxpayer; 2. grant of provisional authority for increase of rates, or to engage in particular line of business; 3. cancellation of passport where no abuse of discretion is committed; 4. summary abatement of nuisance per se which affects safety of persons or property; 5. preventive suspension of officer or employee pending investigation; and 6. grant or revocation of licenses for permits to operate certain businesses affecting public order or morals. Administrative Appeal or Review 1. Where provided by law, appeal from administrative determination may be made to higher or superior administrative officer or body. 2. By virtue of power of control of President, President himself or through Department Head may affirm, modify, alter, or reverse administrative decision of subordinate. 3. Appellate administrative agency may conduct additional hearing in appealed case, if deemed necessary. C. DETERMINATIVE POWERS 1. enabling permit the doing of an act which the law undertakes to regulate; 2. directing order the doing or performance of particular acts to ensure compliance with the law and are often exercised for corrective purposes 3. dispensing to relax the general operation of a law or to exempt from general prohibition, or relieve an individual or a corporation from an affirmative duty; 4. examining -- also called investigatory power; 5. summary power to apply compulsion or force against persons or property to effectuate a legal purpose without judicial warrants to authorize such actions.
B. QUASI-JUDICIAL OR ADJUDICATORY POWER Proceedings partake of nature of judicial proceedings. Administrative body granted authority to promulgate its own rules of procedure. Two necessary conditions: 1. due process; and 2. jurisdiction Includes the following powers: 1. Prescribe rules of procedure 2. Subpoena power 3. Contempt Power Administrative Due Process: 1. right to a hearing; 2. tribunal must consider evidence presented; 3. decision must have something to support itself; 4. evidence must be substantial; 5. decision must be based on evidence adduced at hearing or at least contained in the record and disclosed to parties; 6. board of judges must act on its independent consideration of facts and law of the case, and not simply accept view of subordinate in arriving at a decision; and 7. decision must be rendered in such a manner that parties to controversy can know various
42 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
1. Doctrine of Prior Resort or (Doctrine of Primary Administrative Jurisdiction) where there is competence or jurisdiction vested upon administrative body to act upon a matter, no resort to courts may be made before such administrative body shall have acted upon the matter. 2. Doctrine of Finality of Administrative Action no resort to courts will be allowed unless administrative action has been completed and there is nothing left to be done in administrative structure. 3. Judicial Relief from Threatened Administrative Action courts will not render a decree in advance of administrative action and thereby render such action nugatory. It is not for the court to stop an administrative officer from performing his statutory duty for fear he will perform it wrongly. Effect of Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies: as a general rule, jurisdiction of court not affected but complaint is vulnerable to dismissal. Exceptions to the Doctrine: 1. doctrine of qualified political agency (when the respondent is a department secretary whose acts as an alter ego of the President bears the implied and assumed approval of the latter); except where law expressly provides exhaustion; 2. administrative remedy is fruitless; 3. where there is estoppel on part of administrative agency; 4. issue involved is purely legal; 5. administrative action is patently illegal, amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction; 6. where there is unreasonable delay or official inaction; 7. where there is irreparable injury or threat thereof, unless judicial recourse is immediately made; 8. in land case, subject matter is private land; 9. where law does not make exhaustion a condition precedent to judicial recourse; 10. where observance of the doctrine will result in nullification of claim; 11. where there are special reasons or circumstances demanding immediate court action; and 12. when due process of law is clearly violated.
When made: 1.to determine constitutionality or validity of any treaty, law, ordinance, executive order, or regulation; 2.to determine jurisdiction of any administrative board, commission or officer; 3.to determine any other questions of law; and 4.to determine questions of facts when necessary to determine either: a. constitutional or jurisdictional issue; b. commission of abuse of authority; and c. when administrative fact finding body is unduly restricted by an error of law. Modes of review: 1. Statutory; 2. Non-statutory inherent power of the court to review such proceedings upon questions of jurisdiction and questions of law; 3. Direct proceeding; 4. Collateral attack. General Rule: Findings of facts of Administrative Agencies accorded great weight by the Courts. Exceptions to the Rule: 1. factual findings not supported by evidence; 2. findings are vitiated by fraud, imposition or collusion; 3. procedure which led to factual findings is irregular; 4. palpable errors are committed; and 5. grave abuse of discretion, arbitrariness or capriciousness is manifest.
Brandeis Doctrine of Assimilation of Facts one purports to be finding of fact but is so involved with and dependent upon a question of law as to be in substance and effect a decision on the latter, courts will review the entire case including the latter.
43 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
public.(Fernandez vs Sto Tomas, 234 SCRA 546) Elements of Public Office: 1. created by law or ordinance authorized by law; 2. possess sovereign functions of government to be exercised for public interests; 3. functions defined expressly or impliedly by law; 4. functions exercised by an officer directly under control of law, not under that of a superior officer unless they are functioned conferred by law upon inferior officers, who by law, are under control of a superior; and 5. with permanency or continuity, not temporary or occasional.
b. known or valid appointment or election but officer failed to conform with legal requirements; c. known appointment or election but void because of ineligibility of officer or want of authority of appointing or electing authority or irregularity in appointment or election not known to public; and d. known appointment or election pursuant to unconstitutional law before declaration of unconstitutionality. DE JURE OFFICER
1. 2. rests on the right has lawful or title to the office 1. 2.
DE FACTO OFFICER
on reputation has possession and performs the duties under color of right without being technically qualified in all points of law to act may be ousted in a direct proceeding against him.
3.
3.
Legal Effects of Acts valid insofar as they affect the public Entitlement to Salaries General Rule : rightful incumbent may recover from de facto officer salary received by latter during time of wrongful tenure even though latter is in good faith and under color of title. (Monroy v. CA, 20 SCRA 620) Exception: when there is no de jure public officer, de facto officer entitled to salaries for period when he actually discharged functions.(Civil Liberties Union v. Exec. Sec., 194 SCRA 317)
IV.
1. by appointment; or 2. by election
Requisites: 1. valid existing office; 2. actual physical possession of said office; 3. color of title to office; a. by reputation or acquiescence;
Appointment selection, by authority vested with power, of individual who is to perform functions of a given office. Essentially a discretionary power and must be performed by the officer in which it is vested according to his best lights, the only condition being that the appointee should possess the minimum qualification requirements prescribed by law for the position (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 305)
written
44 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Designation imposition of additional duties, usually by law, on a person already in public office. Classification of Appointments: 1. Permanent extended to person possessing requisite qualification for the position and thus enjoys security of tenure; 2. Temporary acting appointment; 3. Regular made by President while Congress is in session and becomes effective after nomination is confirmed by the Commission on Appointments and continues until the end of term; and Ad-interim a. Recess -- made while Congress is not in session, before confirmation, is immediately effective, and ceases to be valid if disapproved or bypassed by CA upon next adjournment of Congress; b. Midnight made by the President before his term expires, whether or not this is confirmed by the Commission on Appointments.
4. absolute when the term of an incumbent having expired and the latter not having held over, no successor is in being who is legally qualified to assume the office.
4.
OF
PUBLIC
General Rule: not liable for injuries sustained by another as a consequence of official acts done within the scope of his authority, except as otherwise provided by law. A Public Officer shall not be civilly liable for acts done in the performance of his duties Exceptions: 1. statutory liability under the Civil Code (Arts. 27, 32 and 34); 2. When there is a clear showing of bad faith, malice or negligence (Administrative Code of 1987); 3. liability on contracts; and 4. liability on tort .
Nepotism all appointments in the national, provincial, city and municipal governments or in any branch or instrumentality thereof, including GOCC, made in favor of a relative of the (1) appointing or (2) recommending authority or of the (3) chief of the bureau or office or of the (4) persons exercising immediate supervision over him. A relative is one within the 3rd degree either of consanguinity or affinity
Threefold Liability Rule wrongful acts or omissions of public officers may give rise to civil, criminal, and administrative liability. (CAC liability rule) Liability of Ministerial Officers: 1. Nonfeasance neglect or refusal to perform an act which is officers legal obligation to perform; 2. Misfeasance failure to use that degree of care, skill and diligence required in the performance of official duty; and 3. Malfeasance doing, through ignorance, inattention or malice, of an act which he had no legal right to perform. Doctrine of Command Responsibility A superior officer is liable for acts of a subordinate when: 1. he negligently or willfully employs or retains unfit or incompetent subordinates; 2. he negligently or willfully fails to require subordinate to conform to prescribed regulations;
Vacancy when an office is empty and without a legally qualified incumbent appointed or elected to it with a lawful right to exercise its powers and performs its duties. Classifications of vacancy: 1. original when an office is created and no one has been appointed to fill it; 2. constructive when the incumbent has no legal right or claim to continue in office and can be legally replaced by another functionary; 3. accidental when the incumbent having died, resigned, or been removed, there is no one in esse discharging the duties of the office;
45 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
3. he negligently or carelessly oversees business of office as to furnish subordinate an opportunity for default; 4. he directed or authorized or cooperated in the wrong; or 5. law expressly makes him liable.
Under the Revised Admin. Code of 1987, A Superior Officer shall be liable for acts of subordinate officers only if he has actually authorized be written order the specific act or misconduct complained. Subordinate officers are also liable for willful or negligent acts even if he acted under orders if such acts are contrary to law, morals, public policy and good customs Preventive Suspension: a precautionary measure so that an employee who is formally charged of an offense may be separated from the scene of his alleged misfeasance while the same is being investigated (Bautista v. Peralta, 18 SCRA 223) need not be preceded by prior notice and hearing since it is not a penalty but only a preliminary step in an administrative investigation (Lastimosa v. Vasquez, 243 SCRA 497) the period of preventive suspension cannot be deducted from whatever penalty may be imposed upon the erring officer (CSC Resolution No. 90-1066) PENDING INVESTIGATION [Sec.51, E.O.292] 1. not a penalty but
only a means of enabling the disciplinary authority to conduct an unhampered investigation. no compensation due for the period of suspension even if found innocent of the charges.
i. dishonesty; ii. oppression or grave misconduct; iii. neglect in the performance of duty; or iv. if there are reasons to believe that respondent is guilty of the charges which would warrant his removal from the service e. duration the administrative investigation must be terminated within 90 days; otherwise, the respondent shall be automatically reinstated unless the delay in the disposition of the case is due to the fault, negligence or petition of the respondent, in which case the period of delay shall not be counted in computing the period of suspension. A Presidential Appointee: a. can only be investigated and removed from office after due notice and hearing by the President of the Philippines under the principle that the power to remove is inherent in the power to appoint as can be implied from Sec. 5, R.A.2260 (Villaluz v. Zaldivar, 15 SCRA 710). b. the Presidential Commission Against Graft and Corruption (PCAGC) shall have the power to investigate administrative complaints against presidential appointees in the executive department of the government, including GOCCs charged with graft and corruption involving one or a combination of the following criteria: i. presidential appointees with the rank equivalent to or higher than an Assistant Regional Director; ii. amount involved is at least P10M; iii. those which threaten grievous harm or injury to the national interest; and iv. those which may be assigned to it by the President (E.O. No. 151 and 151-A).
2.
2. If exonerated, he
should be reinstated with full pay for the period of suspension.
Rules on Preventive Suspension: 1. Appointive Officials: Not a Presidential Appointee (Secs. 41-42, P.D. 807): a. by whom the proper disciplining authority may preventively suspend; b. against whom any subordinate officer or employee under such authority; c. when pending an investigation; d. grounds if the charge against such officer or employee involves:
2. Elective Officials: (Sec 63, R.A. 7160) a. by whom against whom i. President elective official of a province, a highly urbanized or an independent component city; ii. Governor elective official of a component city or municipality; iii. Mayor elective official of a barangay b. when at any time after the issues are joined; c. grounds: i. reasonable ground to believe that the respondent has committed the act or acts complained of; ii. evidence of culpability is strong; iii. gravity of the offense so warrants;
46 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
d.
iv. continuance in office of the respondent could influence the witnesses or pose a threat to the safety and integrity of the records and other evidence duration: i. single administrative case not to extend beyond 60 days; ii. several administrative cases not more than 90 days within a single year on the same ground or grounds existing and known at the time of the first suspension
Section 24 of the Ombudsman Act (R.A. 6770) expressly provide that the preventive suspension shall continue until the case is terminated by the Office of the Ombudsman but not more than 6 months without pay. The preventive suspension for 6 months without pay is thus according to law (Lastimosa v. Vasquez, 243 SCRA 497) R.A. 3019 makes it mandatory for the Sandiganbayan to suspend, for a maximum period of 90 days unless the case is decided within a shorter period, any public officer against whom a valid information is filed charging violation of: 1. R.A. 3019; 2. Book II, Title 7, Revised Penal Code; or 3. offense involving fraud upon government or public funds or property (Cruz, The Law of Public Officers, pp. 86-87)
Forms of Compensation: a. salary personal compensation to be paid to public officer for his services and it is generally a fixed annual or periodical payment depending on the time and not on the amount of the service he may render; b. per diem allowance for days actually spent in the performance of official duties; c. honorarium something given as not as a matter of obligation, but in appreciation for services rendered; d. fee payment for services rendered or on commission on moneys officially passing through their hands; and e. emoluments profits arising from the office, received as compensation for services or which is annexed to the office as salary, fees, or perquisites. 3. Right to Preference in Promotion Promotion movement from one position to another with increase in duties and responsibilities as authorized by law and usually accompanied by an increase in pay. Next-in-Rank Rule the person next in rank shall be given preference in promotion when the position immediately above his is vacated. But the appointing authority still exercises his discretion and is not bound by this rule. Appointing officer is only required to give special reasons for not appointing officer next in rank if he fills vacancy by promotion in disregard of the next in rank rule. (Pineda vs. Claudio, 28 SCRA 34) Automatic Reversion Rule all appointments involved in chain of promotions must be submitted simultaneously for approval by the Commission, the disapproval of the appointment of a person proposed to a higher position invalidates the promotion of those in the lower positions and automatically restores them to their former positions. 4. Right to vacation leave and sick leave with pay; 5. Right to maternity leave; 6. Right to pension and gratuity; Pension regular allowance paid to an individual or a group of
OF
PUBLIC
47 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
individuals by the government in consideration of services rendered or in recognition of merit, civil or military. Gratuity a donation and an act of pure liberality on the part of the State. 7. Right to retirement pay; 8. Right to reimbursement for incurred in performance of duty; expenses
9. Right to be indemnified against any liability which they may incur in bona fide discharge of duties; and 10. Right to longevity pay.
Limitations on Recall: 1. any elective official may be subject of a recall election only once during his term of office for loss of confidence; and 2. no recall shall take place within one year from date of the officials assumption to office or one year immediately preceding a regular local election. Procedure for Recall (Secs. 70-72, R.A. 7160) 1. Initiation of the Recall Process: a. by a Preparatory Recall Assembly (PRA) composed of: i. Provincial mayors, vice mayors and sanggunian (sg) members of the municipalities and component cities; ii. City punong barangay and (sg) barangay members; iii. Legislative District: iiia. SG Panlalawigan municipal officials in the district; iiib. SG Panglunsod barangay officials in the district; iv. Municipal - punong barangay and (sg) barangay members; majority of the PRA members shall convene in session in a public place; recall of the officials concerned shall be validly initiated through a resolution adopted by a majority of all the PRA members concerned b. by the Registered Voters (RV) in the province, city, municipality or barangay (LGU) concerned - at least 25% of the total number of RV in the LGU concerned during the election in which the local official sought to be recalled was elected;
Retirement: Members of Judiciary : 70 years of age Other government officers and employees : 65 years of age Optional retirement age: after rendition of minimum number of years of service. Accepting Authority for Resignation: 1. to competent authority provided by law;
48 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
written petition filed with the COMELEC in the presence of the representative of the petitioner and a representative of the official sought to be recalled, and in a public place of the LGU; ii. COMELEC shall cause the publication of the petition in a public and conspicuous place for a period of not less than 10 days nor more than 20 days iii. upon lapse of the said period, COMELEC shall announce the acceptance of candidates and shall prepare the list of candidates which shall include the name of the official sought to be recalled 3. Election on Recall COMELEC shall set the date of the election on recall: a. for barangay, city or municipal officials not later than 30 days after the filing of the resolution or petition; b. for provincial officials - not later than 45 days after the filing of the resolution or petition; 4. Effectivity of Recall only upon the election and proclamation of a successor in the person of the candidate receiving the highest number of votes cast during the election on recall. Should the official sought to be recalled receive the highest number of votes, confidence in him is thereby affirmed, and he shall continue in office.
i.
ELECTION LAW
I. SUFFRAGE
1. 2. 3. 4. right to vote in election of officers chosen by people and in the determination of questions submitted to people. It includes: election; plebiscite; initiative; and referendum. Election means by which people choose their officials for a definite and fixed period and to whom they entrust for time being the exercise of powers of government. Kinds: 1. Regular election one provided by law for election of officers either nationwide or in certain subdivisions thereof, after expiration of full term of former members; and
organized group of citizens advocating an ideology or platform, principles and policies for the general conduct of government and which, as the most immediate means of securing their adoption, regularly nominates and supports certain of its leaders and members as candidate in public office. (Bayan Muna v. Comelec, GR No. 147613, June 28, 2001) To acquire juridical personality and to entitle it to rights and privileges granted to political parties, it must be registered with COMELEC.
Groups Disqualified for Registration: 1. religious denominations or sects; 2. those who seek to achieve their goals through violence or unlawful means; 3. those who refuse to uphold and adhere to Constitution; and 4. those supported by foreign governments. Grounds for Cancellation of Registration: 1. accepting financial contributions from foreign governments or their agencies; and 2. failure to obtain at least 10% of votes casts in constituency where party fielded candidates.
Party System a free and open party system shall be allowed to evolve according to free choice of people. no votes cast in favor of political party, organization or coalition shall be
49 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
valid except for those registered under the party-list system provided in the Constitution; political parties registered under party-list system shall be entitled to appoint poll watchers in accordance with law; and part-list representatives shall constitute 20% of total number of representatives in the House. Guidelines for screening party-list participants 1. The political party, sector, organization or coalition must represent the marginalized and underrepresented groups identified in Sec. 5 of RA 7941. Majority of its member-ship should belong to the marginalized and underrepresented; 2. While even major political parties are expressly allowed by RA 7941 and the Constitution, they must comply with the declared statutory policy of Filipino citizens belonging to marginalized and underrepresented sectors to be elected to the House of Representatives. Thus, they must show that they represent the interest of the marginalized and underrepresented. 3. That religious sector may not be represented in the party-list system; except that priests, imam or pastors may be elected should they represent not their religious sect but the indigenous community sector; 4. A party or an organization must not be disqualified under Sec. 6, RA 7941 as follows: a. it is a religious sect or denomination, organization or association organized for religious purposes; b. it advocates violence or unlawful means to seek its goals; c. it is a foreign party or organization; d. it is receiving support from any foreign government, foreign political party, foundation, organization, whether directly or through any of its officers or members or indirectly through third parties for partisan election purposes; e. it violates or fails to comply with laws, rules or regulation relating to elections; f. it declares untruthful statements in its petition; g. it has ceased to exist for at least one (1) year; or h. it fails to participate in the last two (2) preceding elections or fails to obtain at least two per centum (2%) of the votes cast under the party-list system in two (2) preceding elections for the constituency in which it has registered.
5. the party or organization must not be an adjunct of, or a project organized or an entity funded or assisted by, the government. 6. the party, including its nominees must comply with the qualification requirements of section 9, RA 7941 as follows: No person shall be nominated as party-list representative unless he is: (a) natural-born citizen of the Philippines; (b) a registered voter; (c) a resident of the Philippines for a period of not less than one year immediately preceding the day of the election; (d) able to read and write; (e) a bona fide member of the party or organization which he seeks to represent for at least 90 days preceding the day of the election; and (f) at least 25 years of age on the day of the election. In case of a nominee of the youth sector, he must at least be twenty five (25) but not more than thirty (30) years of age on the day of the election. Any youth sectoral representative who attains the age of thirty (30) during his term shall be allowed to continue in office until the expiration of his terms; 7. not only the candidate party or organization must represent marginalized and underrepresented sectors, so also must its nominees; 8. while lacking the a well-defined political constituency, the nominee must likewise be able to contribute to the formation and enactment of appropriate legislation that will benefit the nation as a whole. (Ang Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor Party, v. COMELEC, GR No. 147589, June 26, 2001).
50 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
1. to put election process in mockery or disrepute; 2. to cause confusion among voters by similarity of names of registered candidates; 3. by other circumstances or acts which demonstrate that a candidate has no bona fide intention to run for office for which certificate has been filed, and thus prevent a faithful determination of true will of electorate.
Election Survey The SC held that Sec. 5.4 of the Fair Election Act prohibiting publication of survey results 15 days immediately preceding a national election and 7 days before a local election violates the constitutional rights of speech, expression, and the press because: 1. it imposes a prior restraint on the freedom of expression; 2. It is a direct and total suppression of a category of expression even though such suppression is only for a limited period; and 3. the governmental interest sought to be promoted can be achieved by means other than the suppression of freedom of expression. (Social Weather Station v. Comelec, G.R. No. 147571 May 5, 2001) Substituted and Substitute Candidate In case of valid substitutions after the officials ballots have been printed, the votes cast for the substituted candidates shall be considered as stray votes but shall not invalidate the whole ballot. For this purpose, the official ballots shall provide for spaces where the voters may write the name of the substitute candidates if they are voting for the latter: Provided, however, That if the substitute candidate is of the same family name, this provision shall not apply.(Sec.12)
Prohibited Campaign 1. Public exhibition of movie, cinematograph or documentary portraying the life or biography of a candidate during campaign period; 2. Public exhibition of a movie, cinematograph or documentary portrayed by an actor or media personality who is himself a candidate; 3. Use of airtime for campaign of a media practitioner who is an official of a party or a member of the campaign staff of a candidate or political party; Limitation on Expenses: 1. for candidates: President and Vice President = P10/voter; Other candidates, if with party = P3/voter; Other candidates, if without party = P5/voter. 2. for political parties = P5/voter Statement of Contribution and Expenses
Issues which may be raised in a PreProclamation Controversy: 1. Illegal composition or proceedings of the board of Canvassers; 2. Canvassed election returns are incomplete, contain material defects, appears to be tampered with or falsified; or contain discrepancies in the same returns or in other authentic copies thereof as mentioned in Sec. 233,234,235 and 236 of BP 881;
51 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
3. Election returns were prepared under duress, threat, coercion, or intimidation, or they are obviously manufactured or not authentic; and 4. When substitute of fraudulent returns in controverted polling places were canvassed, the results of which materially affected the standing of the aggrieved candidate/s.
VI.
ELECTION CONTESTS
of which is to expedite settlement of controversies between candidates as to who received majority of legal votes. Purpose to ascertain true will of people and duly elected officer, and this could be achieved by throwing wide open the appeal before the court. Contest any matter involving title or claim of title to an elective office, made before or after proclamation of winner, whether or not contestant is claiming office in dispute. Election, Returns and qualification refers to all matters affecting validity of the contestees title to the position. Election conduct of the polls, including the registration of voters, holding of election campaign, and casting and counting of votes. Returns include the canvass of returns and proclamation of winners, together with questions concerning composition of Board of Canvassers and authenticity of election returns. Qualifications matter which could be raised in a quo warranto proceedings against the proclaimed winner, such as his disloyalty to the Republic or his ineligibility or inadequacy of his certificate of candidacy.
petition for review on Certiorari with SC within 30 days from receipt of decision on ground of grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction or violation of due process; 3. For decisions of Electoral Tribunal petition for review on Certiorari with SC on ground of grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction or violation of due process. Actions Which May Be Filed: 1. Election Protest May be filed by any candidate who has filed a certificate of candidacy and has been voted upon for the same officer; Grounds: a. fraud; b. terrorism; c. irregularities; or d. illegal acts committed before, during, or after casting and counting of votes Time to file: within 10 days from proclamation of results of election. 2. Quo warranto Filed by any registered voter in the constituency Grounds: a. ineligibility; or b. disloyalty to Republic. Time to file: within 10 days from proclamation of results of election. QUO WARRANTO IN ELECTIVE OFFICE
1. determination is eligibility of candidate-elect
Original Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Election Contests 1. President and Vice-President - Supreme Court en banc 2. Senator - Senate Electoral Tribunal 3. Representative - HR Electoral Tribunal 4. Regional/Provincial/City - COMELEC 5. Municipal - RTC 6. Barangay - MTC Appellate Jurisdiction: 1. For decisions of RTC and MTC appeal to COMELEC whose decision shall be final and executory; 2. For decisions of COMELEC
52 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Scope of Application of Local Government Code: Applicable to: 1. all provinces, 2. cities, 3. municipalities, 4. barangays; 5. and other political subdivisions as may be created by law; and 6. to the extent provided in the Local Government Code: a. to officials, b. offices, or c. agencies of the National Government.
5.
Local Autonomy in its constitutional sense, to polarize LGUs from over dependence on central government and do not make LGUs mini-republics or imperium in imperia. Decentralization of Administration central government delegates administrative powers to political subdivisions in order to broaden base of government power and in process make LGUs more responsive and accountable and ensure their fullest development as self-reliant communities and make them effective partners in the pursuit of national development and social progress. Decentralization of Power involves abdication of political power in favor of LGUs declared autonomous.(Limbona v. Mengelin, 170 SCRA 786). Devolution act by which national government confers power and authority upon various LGUs to perform specific functions and responsibilities.[Sec.17(e), par.2, LGC].
6.
Elements of Public Corporation: 1. legal creation or incorporation; 2. corporate name; 3. inhabitants; and 4. territory. Classes of Corporation: 1. Quasi-corporation public corporations created as agencies of State for narrow and limited purposes. 2. Municipal corporation body politic and corporate constituted by incorporation of inhabitants of city or town purposes of local government thereof or as agency of State to assist in civil government of the country. 3. Quasi-public corporation private corporation that renders public service or supplies public wants. PUBLIC CORPORATION
1. established for purposes of administration of civil and local governments
Declaration of Policy: 1. Territorial and subdivisions of State shall enjoy genuine and meaningful local autonomy to enable them to attain fullest development and make them more effective partners in attaining national goals; 2. Ensure accountability of LGUs through institution of effective mechanisms of recall, initiative and referendum; and 3. Require all national agencies and offices to conduct periodic consultations with appropriate LGUs, NGOs and Peoples Organizations and other concerned sector of community before any project or program is implemented in their respective jurisdictions. Rules on Interpretation:
PRIVATE CORPORATION
1. created for private aim, gain or benefit of members
53 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
2. created by will of incorporators with recognizance of State 3. voluntary agreement by and among members
Creation of Municipal Corporations 1. For province, city or municipalty, only by Act of Congress; 2. For barangays, ordinance passed by respective Sanggunian
majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite called for the purpose in the political unit/s directly affected (Sec. 10, R.A. 7160) Based on verifiable indicators of viability and projected capacity to provide services (Sec. 7, R.A. 7160) [Note: see Annex C]
Beginning of Corporate Existence upon election and qualification of its chief executive and majority of members of its Sanggunian, unless some other time is fixed therefor by law or ordinance creating it. Mode of Inquiry to Legal Existence of LGU: Quo warranto which is reserved to State or other direct proceedings Abolition of LGU: When income, population, or land area of LGU has been reduced to less than minimum standards prescribed for its creation. The law or ordinance abolishing LGU shall specify the province, city, municipality or barangay with which LGU sought to be abolished will be incorporated or merged. Division and Merger of LGUs shall comply with same requirements, provided: 1. shall not reduce income, population or land area of LGU concerned to less than the minimum requirements prescribed; 2. income classification of original LGU shall not fall below its current income classification prior to division; 3. Plebiscite be held in LGUs affected. 4. Assets and liabilities of creation shall be equitably distributed between the LGUs affected and new LGU. When municipal district of other territorial divisions is converted or fused into a municipality all property rights vested in original territorial organization shall become vested in government of municipality.
5. Autonomous
for or
V. POWERS OF LGUs
Classification of Powers of Local Government Units 1. Express, implied and inherent; 2. Public or governmental, private or proprietary; 3. Intramural and extramural; and
54 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
4. Mandatory and directory; ministerial and discretionary. Governmental Powers of LGU: 1. General Welfare (Sec. 16, R.A. 7160) statutory grant of police power to LGUs. It is limited to: a. territoriality; b. equal protection clause; c. due process clause; and d. must not be contrary to law. 2. Delivery of basic services and facilities (Sec. 17, of R.A. 7160); 3. Power to generate and apply resources (Sec. 18, of R.A. 7160); 4. Eminent Domain (Sec. 19, of R.A. 7160); Additional Limitations for Exercise by LGU: a. exercise by local chief executive pursuant to an ordinance; b. for public use, purpose or welfare for benefit of poor and landless; c. payment of just compensation; and d. only after valid and definite offer had been made to, and not accepted by owner.(Municipality of Paraaque v. V.M. Realty Corp., 292 SCRA 678) 5. Reclassification of Lands (Sec. 20 of RA 7160) Limited by following percentage of total agricultural land area: a. for HUC and independent component cities: 15%; b. for component cities and 1st to 3rd class municipalities: 10% ; and c. for 4th to 6th class municipalities: 5%. 6. Closure and opening of roads (Sec. 21 of RA 7160) In case of permanent closure: a. adequate provision for public safety must be made; and b. may be properly used or conveyed for any purpose for which other real property may be lawfully used or conveyed; provided no freedom park be permanently closed without provisions or transfer to new site. 7. Local legislative power (Secs. 48-59 of RA 7160) Approval of ordinances: a. local chief executive with his signature on each and every page; b. if local chief executive vetoes the same, may be overridden by 2/3 vote of all sanggunian members; (i) grounds for veto: ordinance is ultra vires or prejudicial to public welfare; (ii) local chief executive may veto particular item/s of appropriation ordinance, adoption of local development plan and public investment plan, or ordinance c.
directing payment of money or creating liability; and (iii) local chief executive may veto an ordinance only once; veto communicated to sanggunian within 15 days for province and 10 days for city or municipality.
power. Corporate Powers of LGU: 1. to have continuous succession in its corporate name; 2. to sue and be sued; 3. to have and use a corporate seal; 4. to acquire and convey real or personal property; 5. power to enter into contracts; Requisites of valid municipal contracts: a. LGU has express, implied, or inherent power to enter into a particular contract; b. Entered into by proper department, board, committee, or agent; c. Must comply with substantive requirements; d. Must comply with formal requirements; and e. In case entered into by local chief executive on behalf of LGU, prior authorization by Sanggunian concerned is needed 6. to exercise such other powers as granted to corporation, subject to limitations provided in Local Government Code of 1991 and other laws.
1.
2. 3. 4.
55 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Doctrine of Implied Municipal Liability a municipality may become obligated upon an implied contract to pay the reasonable value of the benefits accepted or appropriated by it as to which it has the general power to contract (Province of Cebu v. IAC, 147 SCRA 447); the doctrine applies to all cases where money or other property of a party is received under such circumstances that the general law, independent of an express contract, implies an obligation to do justice with respect to the same (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 431)
OF
1. citizen of the Philippines; 2. registered voter of barangay, municipality, city, province, or district wher he intends to be elected; 3. resident therein for at least 1 year preceding election; 4. able to read and write Filipino or local language or dialect; and 5. age: a. 23 years of age Governor, Vice Governor, Board Member, Mayor, Vice Mayor or Member of City Council for HUCs. b. 21 years of age Mayor or Vice Mayor of ICCs, component cities or municipalities; c. 18 years of age members of ICC or component city or municipal council or punong barangay or member of barangay council; d. at least 15 but not 21 years of age candidate for sanggunian kabataan. (Sec. 39, RA 7160) Disqualification of Elective Local Official: 1. sentenced by final judgment for offense involving moral turpitude or punishable by 1 year or more of imprisonment within 2 after service of sentence; 2. those removed from office due to administrative cases; 3. those convicted by final judgment for violating oath of allegiance to the Republic; 4. those with dual citizenship; 5. fugitives from justice in criminal or nonpolitical cases here or abroad; 6. permanent resident in foreign country; and 7. insane or feeble-minded.(Sec.40, RA.7160)
1. Elected at large a. Governor; Vice Governor; b. City or municipal mayor; City or municipal vice-mayor; c. Punong barangay, d. SK chairman, elected by voters of Katipunan ng Kabataan 2. Elected by District a. regular members of Sanggunian b. ex-officio members of Sanggunian (i.) panlalawigan president of leagues of sanggunian members of component cities and municipalities; and president of liga ng mga barangay and pederasyon ng mga sanggunian kabataan (ii.) panlunsod president of liga ng mga barangay and the pederasyon ng mga SB (iii.) bayan president of liga ng mga barangay and the pederasyon ng mga sanggunian kabataan 3. Sectoral representatives women, worker, urban poor, and other sectors allowed by law. Date of Election : Every 3 years on 2nd Monday of May, unless otherwise provided by law. Term of Office ; 3 years starting from noon of June 30 next following the election or such date as may be provided by law, except that of elective barangay officials, for maximum of 3 consecutive terms in same position.
FOR
1. disloyalty to the Republic; 2. culpable violation of the Constitution; 3. dishonesty, oppression, misconduct in office, gross negligence or dereliction of duty; 4. commission of offense involving moral turpitude or offense punishable by at least prision mayor; 5. abuse of authority; 6. unauthorized absence for 15 consecutive working days except sanggunian members; 7. application for, acquisition of , foreign citizenship or residence or status of an immigrant of another country; and 8. such other grounds as may be provided in EC and other laws
local official may be removed from office on the grounds enumerated above by order of the proper court only (Salalima vs Guingona, 257 SCRA 55) 2.
(ii)repeated over a considerable period of time and; (iii)attended by opinio juris or sense of legal obligation c. GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF LAW. Subsidiary
Law that deals with the conduct of States and international organizations, their relations with each other and, in certain circumstances, their relations with persons, natural or juridical (American Third Restatement)
Functions of International Law: 1. promote international peace and security; 2. foster friendly relations among nations and discourage use of force in resolution of difference among them; 3. provide for orderly regulation of conduct of states in their mutual dealings; and 4. ensure international cooperation in pursuit of certain common purposes of economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character. INTERNATIONAL LAW
1. 2. Law of coordination Regulates relation of states and other international persons Derived principally from treaties, international customs and general principles of law Resolved thru state-to-state transactions Collective responsibility bec. it attaches directly to the state and not to its nationals 1. 2.
MUNICIPAL LAW
Law of subordination (issued by political superior) Regulates relations of individuals among themselves or with their own states Consists mainly of statutory enactments, and to lesser extent executive orders and judicial pronouncements Redressed thru local administrative and judicial processes Breach of which entails individual responsibility
Main Divisions: 1. Laws of Peace; 2. Laws of War; 3. Laws of Neutrality. Basis of International Law 1. Law of Nature School based on rules of conduct discoverable by every individual in his own conscience and through application of right reasons.
3.
3.
4.
3. Eclectic
or Groatian School a compromise between the first 2 schools and submits that international law is binding partly because it is good and right and partly because states agreed to be bound by it.
5.
5.
Sources of Public International Law: 1. Primary a. INTERNATIONAL TREATIES CONVENTIONS; (i) law-making treaty (traite-loi); (ii) contract treaty (traite-contract).
AND
Doctrine of incorporation international law are adopted as part of a states municipal law, by a general provision or clause usually in its Constitution. (Sec. 2, Art. II, 1987 Constitution) Doctrine of transformation requires the enactment by the legislative body of such international law principles as are sought to be part of municipal law.
57 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
OF
3.
entity that has rights and responsibilities under international law and having capacity to maintain its rights by bringing international claims, includes: States, independent and dependent; Colonies and dependencies; Mandates and trust territories; The Vatican; The United Nations; Belligerent Communities; International administrative Bodies; and Individuals, to a certain extent. Belligerent Community group of rebels under an organized civil government who have taken up arms against legitimate government. When recognized, considered as a separate state for purposes of conflict and entitled to all rights and subjected to all obligations of a full-pledged belligerent under laws of war. United Nations international organization created at San Francisco Conference held in the US from April 25 to June 26, 1945. UN succeeded the League of Nations and is governed by a charter that came into force on October 24, 1945. Principal Purposes of UN 1. Maintain international peace and security; 2. Develop friendly relations among nations; 3. Achieve international cooperation: and 4. Center for harmonizing actions of nations for attainment of these common goals. Qualifications for Membership: 1. must be state; 2. must be peace loving; 3. must accept obligations of memberstates contained in Charter; and 4. must be able and willing to carry out such obligation. Principal Organs of UN: 1. General Assembly central organ where all members are represented. Classification of functions: deliberative, supervisory, financial, elective, constituent. 2. Security Council organ responsible for maintenance of peace and security,
4. 5.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
6.
undertake preventive and enforcement actions. Economic and Social Council exerts efforts towards higher standards of living, solutions of international economic, social, health and related problems, universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Trusteeship Council organ charged with administration of International Trusteeship System (idle council); International Court of Justice judicial organ of UN; World Court governed by Statute which is annexed to and made part of UN charter; Jurisdiction: decide issues referred to it (consensual). a. interpretation of treaty; b. question of international law; c. existence of fact constituting a breach of international obligation; d. nature or extent of the reparation to be made for the breach of an international obligation. Secretariat chief administrative organ of UN.
State a group of people, living together in a fixed territory, organized for political ends under an independent government and capable of entering into international relations with other states Creation of State: I 1.by peaceful acquisition of Independence (Philippines) ; R 2. by Revolution (USA); U 3. by Unification of several states (Italy); S 4.by Secession (Bangladesh); A 5.by Agreement (Netherlands); and A 6.by Attainment of civilization (Japan). (Key : RUSIA2) Extinction of State: A 1. Overthrow of government resulting in anarchy; E 2.Emigration en masse of its population; A 3. Annexation; M 4. Merger or unification; D 5. Dismemberment; D 6. Dissolution of federal union; and P 7.Partial loss of independence (Key : MA2D2EP)
Principle of State Continuity the state contiues as a juristic being notwithstanding changes in its circumstances provided only
58 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
that such change do not result in the loss of any of its essential elements
III. RECOGNITION
act by which a state acknowledges existence of another state, government or belligerent community and indicates its willingness to deal with the entity as such under rules of international law.
2. The legitimate government recognizing the rebels as belligerents shall observe laws/customs of war in conducting hostilities; 3. Third states recognizing belligerency should maintain neutrality; 4. Recognition is only provisional and only for purposes of hostilities.
Theories: 1. Declaratory merely affirms an existing fact like the possession by the state of the essential elements. Discretionary and political; 2. Constitutive - it is the act of recognition that constitutes the entity into an international person. Compulsory and legal; may be compelled once the elements of a state are established. Objects: 1. State generally held to be irrevocable and imports the recognition of its govt. 2. Government may be withdrawn and does not necessarily signify the existence of a state, as the government may be that of a mere colony. 3. Belligerent community rebels are accorded international personality only in connection with the hostilities they are waging. Kinds: 1. express or implied; and 2. conditional or permanent Effects of Recognition of a State or Government: 1. Diplomatic relations; 2. Right to sue in courts of recognizing state; 3. Right to possession of properties of predecessor on the reorganizing state. 4. All acts of the recognized state or government are validated retroactively, preventing the recognizing state from passing upon their legality in its own courts. Conditions for Recognition of Belligerency: 1. organized civil government; 2. rebels occupy a substantial portion of territory; 3. conflict is serious and outcome is uncertain; 4. rebels are willing to observe the laws of war. absence of one state of insurgency Effects of Recognition of Belligerency: 1. Responsibility for acts of rebels resulting to injury to nationals of recognizing state shall be shifted to rebel government;
Wilson/Tobar Doctrine precludes recognition of government established by revolution, civil war, coup detat or other forms of internal violence until the freely elected representatives of people have organized a constitutional government (Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Tobar and US Pres. Woodrow Wilson) Stimson Doctrine precludes recognition of any government established as result of external aggression (US Sec of State Henry Lewis Stimson) Estrada Doctrine dealing or not dealing with the government established through a political upheaval is not a judgment on the legitimacy of the said government (Mexican Minister Genaro Estrada)
Requisites for recognition de jure: 1. Government is stable and effective; 2. No substantial resistance to its authority; 3. The government must show willingness and ability to discharge its international obligations; 4. The government must enjoy popular consent or approval of the people. absence of one recognition de facto RECOGNITION DE JURE
1. Relatively permanent vests title to properties of government abroad brings about full diplomatic relations
RECOGNITION DE FACTO
1.
2.
Provisional (duration of armed struggle) does NOT vest title to properties of government abroad limited to certain juridical relations
2.
3.
3.
59 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
(i) rivers which may be (a) national; (b) boundary; (c) international (iA) Thalweg Doctrine for boundary rivers, in the absence of an agreement between the riparian states, the boundary line is laid on the middle of the main navigable channel. (iB) Middle of the Bridge Doctrine where there is a bridge over a boundary river, the boundary line is middle or center of the bridge. bays and gulfs strait b. Archipelagic waters ARCHIPELAGO DOCTRINE The waters around, between and connecting the islands of the archipelago regardless of their breadth and dimensions are to be treated as internal waters Two kinds of archipelago: 1. coastal situated close to a mainland and may be considered a part thereof; e.g. Loften Islands, Norway. 2. mid-ocean situated in the ocean at such distance from the coasts of firm land. e.g. Indonesia. c. d. Territorial sea Submarine area
Requisites for Proper Exercise of Right of Self-defense: 1. armed attack; 2. self-defensive action taken by attacked state must be reported immediately to Security Council; and 3. such action shall not in any way affect right of Security Council to take at any time action as it deems necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security.
Sovereignty totality of the powers, legal competence, and privileges arising from customary international law, and not dependent on the consent of another state Independence means freedom from control by other state or group of states and not freedom from the restrictions that are binding on all states forming the family of nations; carries with it by necessary implication the correlative duty of nonintervention
LOSS OF TERRITORY
Dereliction Cession Conquest
3. Accretion
C. RIGHT OF EQUALITY
every state is entitled to same protection and respect as are available to other state under rules of international law.
Bases of Jurisdiction: 1. Territorial principle vests jurisdiction in state where offense was committed (Art. 14, NCC); 2. Nationality principle vest jurisdiction in state of offender (Art. 15, NCC, tax laws); 3. Protective principle vest jurisdiction in state whose national interests is injured or national security compromised (counterfeiting, treason, espionage); 4. Passive personality principle vests jurisdiction in state of offended party.
60 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
5. Universality principle vest jurisdiction in state which has custody of offender of universal crimes (piracy, genocide);
Genocide acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole and in part a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group by: 1. killing members of the group; 2. deliberately inflicting on group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; 3. imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; 4. causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; and 5. forcibly transferring children of the group to another .
1. Pursuit commence from internal water, territorial sea or contiguous zone of pursuing state; 2. Continuous and unabated; 3. Conducted by warship, military aircraft, government ships authorized for the purpose; 4. Ceases as soon as the ship being pursued enters the territorial sea of its own, or of a third, state.
E. RIGHT OF LEGATION
right of state to maintain diplomatic relations with other states Governed by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) Active right of legation send diplomatic representatives Passive right of legation receive diplomatic representatives
Five Air of Freedoms for Scheduled International Services: 1. freedom to fly across foreign territory without landing; 2. freedom to land for non-traffic purposes; 3. freedom to put down traffic originating in state of aircraft; 4. freedom to embark traffic destined for state of aircraft; and 5. freedom to embark traffic destined for, or to put down traffic coming from, third state. Exemptions from Jurisdiction: 1. Doctrine of State Immunity; 2. Act of State Doctrine court of one state will not sit in judgment over acts of government of another state done in its territory. 3. Diplomatic Immunity; 4. Immunity of UN Specialized agencies, other International Organizations, and its Officers; 5. Foreign Merchant vessels exercising the right of innocent passage; 6. Foreign armies passing through or stationed in the territory with the permission of the State; 7. Warships and other public vessels of another State operated for non-commercial purposes. Rules on Jurisdiction Under the VFA 1. if the act is defined as a crime in only one state, said state will have exclusive jurisdiction; 2. if defined as a crime in both states, the Philippines will have primary jurisdiction but the US may request for a waiver so that the US will assume jurisdiction; 3. No waiver may be made however if the act is a violation of the Anti-heinous Crimes Law, Anti Child Abuse Law and the Dangerous Drugs Act. Doctrine of Hot Pursuit Requisites:
Agents of Diplomatic Intercourse: 1. head of state; 2. foreign secretary of minister; or 3. members of diplomatic service. Functions of Diplomatic Missions: 1. representing sending state in receiving state; 2. protecting in receiving state interests of sending state and its nationals; 3. negotiating with government of receiving state; 4. promoting friendly relations between sending and receiving states and developing their economic, cultural and scientific relations; 5. ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in receiving state and reporting thereon to government of sending state; and 6. in some cases, representing friendly governments at their request.
Agreation process in appointment of diplomatic envoy. Where states resort to an informal inquiry (enquiry) as to the acceptability of a particular envoy, to which the receiving state responds with an informal conformity (agrement). Letre de Creance(Letter of Credence) with the name, rank and general character of his mission, and a request for favorable reception and full credence.
Kinds of Consuls 1. consules missi professional or career consuls who are nationals of sending state and are required to devote their full-time to discharge their duties; and 2. consules electi may or not be nationals of sending state and perform consular functions only in addition to their regular callings.
61 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
Ranks: 1. consul-general heads several consular districts, or one exceptionally large consular district; 2. consul takes charge of a small district or town or port; 3. vice-consul assists the consul; and 4. consular agent usually entrusted with the performance of cerain functions by the consul. Privileges and Immunities Accorded to Diplomatic Envoy: P 1. Inviolability of premises and archives; C 2. Right of official communications; L 3. Exemption from local jurisdiction; I 4. Personal inviolability; S 5. Exemption from subpoena; and T 6. Exemption from taxation/custom duties. (Key: PCLIST)
Doctrine of Unequal Treaties treaties which have been imposed in an unequal character, are void. Jus Cogens customary international law that has attained the status of a peremptory norm, accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a rule from which no derogation is permitted and can be modified only by a subsequent norm having the same character. e.g customs outlawing slave trade, genocide, terrorism,etc. Concordat a treaty or agreement between ecclesiastical and civil powers to regulate the relations between the church and the state in those matters which, in some respect are under the jurisdiction of both. Pacta Sunt Servanda Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith. (Art. 26, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties). Rebus Sic Stantibus legal principle which would justify non-performance of treaty obligations where an unforeseen or substantial changes occur which would render one of the parties thereto unable to undertake treaty obligations as stipulated therein. Most Favored Nation Clause pledge made by a contracting party to a treaty to grant to other party treatment not less favorable than that which had been given or may be granted to the most favored among parties.
Exterritoriality exception of persons and property from local jurisdiction on basis of international customs.
V. TREATY
An international agreement concluded between states in written form and governed by international law whether embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments (Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969)
Requisites: C 1. Entered into by parties having treatymaking capacity; A 2. Through their authorized organs or representatives; D 3. Without attendance of duress, fraud, mistake or other vices of consent; S 4. Lawful subject matter and object; and R 5. Ratification in accordance with their respective constitutional processes. (KEY: SCRAD) Effect of Unwritten Treaty 1. has legal force; 2. convention rules on matters governed by international law independently of convention shall apply; 3. convention rules apply to the relations of states as between themselves under international agreement with other subjects as parties. Steps in Treaty-making Process: 1. Negotiation; 2. Signature; 3. Ratification; 4. Exchange of instruments of ratification; and 5. Registration with UN.
Interpretation of Treaties 1. Founding Father Test; 2. Literal or textual; 3. Teleological aims and objects school Termination of Treaty: 1. expiration of term; 2. accomplishment of purpose; 3. impossibility of performance; 4. loss of subject matter; 5. novation; 6. desistance of parties; 7. extinction of one of parties, if treaty is bipartite; 8. occurrence of vital change of circumstance; 9. outbreak of war; and 10. voidance of treaty. KEY: NEW DEVIL (made) VITAL ACCOMPLISHMENT Protocol de cloture an instrument which records the winding up of the proceedings of
62 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
a diplomatic conference and usually includes a reproduction of the texts of treaties, conventions, recommendations and other acts agreed upon and signed by the plenipotentiaries attending the conference. It is not the treaty itself and does not require the concurrence of the Senate. (Taada v. Angara, 272 SCRA 18). TREATY
1. Basic political issues ; changes of national policies 1.
Deportation expulsion of an alien considered undesirable by local state, usually but not necessarily to his own state. Reconduction -- forcible conveying of aliens back to their home state without any formalities
EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT
adjustment of details carrying out established national policies temporary arrangements
2. permanent
international agreements
2.
A. Doctrine of State Responsibility -- state may be held liable for injuries and damages sustained by the alien while in the territory of the state provided: 1. the act or omission constitutes an international delinquency; 2. the act or omission is directly or indirectly imputable to the State; 3. injury to the claimant State indirectly because of damage to its national.
Direct State Responsibility where the international delinquency was committed by superior government officials or organs like the chief of state or the national legislature, liability will attach immediately as their acts may not be effectively prevented or reversed under the constitution or laws of the state.
Indirect State Responsibility where the offense is committed by inferior government official or by private individuals, the state will be held liable only if, by reason of its indifference in preventing or punishing it, it can be considered to have connived in effect in its commission.
International Standard of Justice the standard of the reasonable state that is, as referring to the ordinary norms of official conduct observed in civilized jurisdiction. Calvo Clause provision frequently inserted in contracts where nationals of another state renounce any claim upon his national state for protection. But such waiver can be legally made only by aliens state.
international
conventions provide that stateless individuals are to be treated more or less like the subjects of a foreign state. Reintegration recovery of nationality by individuals who are natural born citizens of a state, but who lost their nationality.
B. Refugees Requisites: 1. Those who are outside the country of his nationality or if stateless, outside the country of his habitual residence; 2. Lacks national protection, and; 3. Fears persecution.
Non-refoulement prohibits a state to return or expel refugee to the territory where he escaped because his life or freedom is threatened. The state is under obligation to
63 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
asylum.
(Refugee
Diplomatic Asylum refuge in diplomatic premises Political Asylum -- refuge in another state for political offense, danger to life, no assurance of due process.
E G M C A J R
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Enquiry Tender of Good offices Mediation Conciliation Arbitration Judicial settlement; and Resort to regional and international organizations. (KEY: JC MARGEN)
C. Extradition surrender of a fugitive by one state to another where he is wanted for prosecution or, if already convicted, for punishment. Surrender is made at request of latter state on basis of extradition treaty. General Principles: 1. Based on consent expressed through treaties 2. SPECIALTY- a fugitive who is extradited may be tried only for the crime specified in the request for extradition and included in the list of offenses in the treaty. 3. NON-LIST TYPE OF TREATY- offenses punishable under the laws of both states by imprisonment of one year or more are included among the extraditable offenses. 4. Any person may be extradited; he need not be a citizen of the requesting State 5. Political or religious offenders are generally not subject to extradition Attentat Clause assassination of head of state or any member of his family is not regarded as political offense for purposes of extradition. Also for the crime of genocide. 6. offense must have been committed within the territory or against the interest of the demanding State 7. double criminality -- act for which the extradition is sought must be punishable in both States
Hostile methods: S 1. Severance of dipomatic relations; I 2. Intervention; R 3. Reprisal; R 4. Retorsion. (KEY: SIR2)
Intervention act by which state interferes with domestic or foreign affairs of another state through the use of force or threat of force. When Intervention is Sanctioned: 1. as an act of self-defense; 2. when decreed by the Security Council as a preventive or enforcement action for the maintenance of international peace and security; 3. when such action is agreed upon in a treaty; or 4. when requested from fellow states or from the United Nations by the parties to a dispute or a state beset by rebellion.
Drago Doctrine intervention not allowed for purpose of making state pay its public debts.
Retorsion retaliation where acts complained of do not constitute legal ground of offense but are rather in nature of unfriendly acts done in pursuance of legitimate state interest but indirectly hurtful to other states. Reprisal unlawful acts taken by one state in retaliation for also unlawful acts of another state, purpose being to bring offending state to terms. Includes: 1. Display of force; 2. Pacific blockade; 3. Occupation of territory; and 4. Suspension of treaties; 5. Embargo detention by state seeking redress of vessels of offending state or its nationals, whether such vessels are found in territory of former or in the highseas.
VIII . DISPUTE
INTERNATIONAL
actual disagreement between states regarding conduct to be taken by one of them for protection or vindication of interest of other. Art. 33 of the UN Charter provides that the parties to any dispute shall first seek a solution through pacific or amicable methods
IX.
WAR
64 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.
armed contention between public forces of states or other belligerent communities implying employment of force between parties for purpose of imposing their respective demands upon each other.
2. governed by laws
of nations
2. 3. 4.
Basic Principles of War: 1. Principle of Military necessity belligerents may employ any amount and kind of force to compel complete submission of enemy with least possible loss of lives, time and money; 2. Principle of Humanity prohibits use of any measure that is not absolutely necessary for purposes of war; and 3. Principle of Chivalry basis of such rules as those that require belligerents to give proper warning before launching a bombardment or prohibit use of perfidy (treachery) in conduct of hostilities. Participants in War: 1. Combatants a. non-privileged; b. privileged. 2. Spies; 3. Mercenaries. Rights of a Prisoner of War: 1. To be treated humanely; 2. Not subject to torture; 3. Allowed to communicate with their families; 4. Receive food, clothing, religious articles, medicine; 5. bare minimum of information; 6. keep personal belongings 7. proper burial; 8. group according to nationality; 9. establishment of an information bureau; 10. repatriation for sick and wounded (1949 Geneva Convention) Termination of War: 1. simple cessation of hostilities; 2. conclusion of a negotiated treaty of peace; and 3. defeat of one of belligerents.
governed by neutralization agreement intended to operate in peace and in war applicable to portion of state
Angary belligerent may upon payment of just compensation, seize, use or destroy, in case of urgent necessity for purposes of offense or defense neutral property found in its territory, in enemy territory or on high seas.
X. NEUTRALITY
condition of state that does not take part, directly or indirectly in war between other states. NEUTRALITY 1. dependent on
attitude of neutral state, which is free to join either of belligerents any time it sees fit
NEUTRALIZATION
1. result of treaty wherein duration and other conditions are agreed upon by neutralized state and other states
65 POLITICAL LAW COMMITTEE: Andy Nachura, Alexander Ragonjan, Maricel Abarentos, Jennifer Balboa, Avito Cahig, Jr., Ma. Cristina Constantino, Ricardo de Guzman, Ethel Degollado, Alder Delloro, Joyce Dio, Christopher Godinez, Andre Jacob, Juanito Lim, Jr., Jonathan Mangundayao, Jeanne Montes, Charo Rejuso, Aimee Sabilala, Jennifer Sobremonte, Gerald Sotto, Jemina Sy, Ryan Sy Lita, Gloriosa Sze, Maria Fe Taal, Joeshias Tambago, Mae Ventura, Elsa Villaflor.