"God" of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is "FEMALE"! This is a (very) serious statement! It may be wrong.

For it to be accepted as not being malicious one, I please you to consider, at least, the essay "Gravitational Theory of Life Reveals the Secret of Cancer (The BODY)". What ideas would to be pursued in this material, related to the above statement: - By the "rational" analysis is accepted a logical approach to the fundamental aim: the survival at any level). Or "common sense" (the instinct of the "whole", from the essay mentioned above). The various theologians, under different motivations, it prevent the "rational" analyzing which can, possibly, answer to some questions. Why? For that this kind of answers would undermine strongly the "teaching" about one God, infinite and, especially, "male". Here are some examples: Bible, Genesis, Chapter 1, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." There is therefore a "beginning" of creation! By default, there are and its previous state. And this state had an opposite nature: we can call it "non creativity". The element which materialize the opposition of the two natures of existence is the state of the expression of the category of "movement": it is manifested in creation, but in the "non creation" it didn't! Which was, in these conditions, the state own of the real nature of God: the NON CREATION (for that it took too, a "forever", isn't it?) Or the CREATION? Even from the Bible (and from other "pagan" religious writings) it result that before of the "beginning" the nature of God was an unmanifested one (a "form", the "word"). Arguing that such a nature can change only by itself (by encompassing an element which not previously existed, the "Movement") is devoid of common sense: is lacking of self consistency both states. In these circumstances God can not be what it claims to be: holy (complete, perfect, It not stick anything and, therefore, no longer can add It something, "I am that I am"). Or: It lacked the "movement" in NON CREATION or she was too much in the CREATION? The question is important: whatever the answer, the "beginning" it limited both of the two possible options: the NON CREATION ends and the CREATION begins in this "point" (thus, God becoming limited). In short: - The "rational" solution is the following: it must be considered two "persons" which, separately, have self consistency (each one exists by himself without any influence of the other part). One of them must to be characterized only by "order", by "form", and the other exclusively by "movement" which, by default, is chaotic. Was generically described the "egg" and "sperm", "yn and yang" etc.. Or, by expanding, the female" and

the "male", that only together, in harmony, can generate the "coordinated movement" (the Universe with his laws, the creation). As such they are "good", at the current level of creation, only together! Separately, are "bad"! Who chose the Jews (who are the precursors of Christianity, the most popular in Romania)? Genesis, Chapter 22, "After these things God tested Abraham and asked him," Abraham!"" Here I am", he said. God said: "Take your son, your only son, whom you love, Isaac, go to the land of Moriah and offer him there burnt on a mountain that I will tell you." Many Christian believers accept, in this case, the alternative of the church: that the God which talk to Abraham is a "good" God who wanted to test his faith. Is it really so? Everyone knows who tempts you to do bad things, no matter under what pretext: "The road to hell ..." "He" (or "She") is "bad"! A "good" God primarily reject "de jure" (by definition) something, anything that is bad. Jesus ever tempted someone to do a bad deed to test his faith? Personally, I don't know such an example. When you testing and forcing someone to bring "death" (non movement) you are a "good" God ? If it ould be so, how the believers see the way that a "bad" God it had be done ? He would have allowed Abraham to kill Isaac" would can said someone. False! Would be left without the "seed" that would be faithful to "him" ("HER"). It is a rare seed: hard to find individuals without preservation instinct, which raises the sword only at its formal order (not to defend him self), knowing that, sooner or later, by sword will die also. They are the instruments of the "DEATH". Through them you can control the phenomenon. The "life" means independent "movement"! It is a spontaneous phenomenon (generated by merging the two principles, "male" and "female", "coordinated motion"). The "DEATH" is the separate action of one of the two parts. Generating the "DEATH" (the "God Almighty") in a controlled manner (according to a strict order: ritual sacrifices, wars, pogroms, etc., strictly organized according to a protocol)) denotes the nature of "female" of God who chose the Jews. How kills a "male" God? By exploding uncontrollable actions based on too much adrenaline, for example. Returning to the question above: if "rational" analyzes , the "common sense" (devoted exclusively to the "LIFE") are prohibited by theologians (perhaps to accept more easily the "life by then"), which could be, then, a criterion by which we can separating "religion" by the mental disease? Because the problem is real: Abraham was considered a founder of religion but a Pentecostal believer, which doing only to follow his suit, and

who killed and chopped her baby, is considered as having mental problems http://penticostalismulazi.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/video-o-mamapenticostala-si-asectionat-bebelusul-in-bucati/