Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Negotiation
Suppose you are engaged in a difficult negotiation. Your counterpart is driving a hard bargain, and you are beginning to feel that you are going to have to settle for less than you would like. What can you do? The answer depends on your BATNA. Negotiation is a consensual process, based on mutual agreement. You do no have to accept any offer unless you choose to. You can always say no. But we negotiate to satisfy some interest, and if we do say no we must find another way to satisfy our interest. In everyday parlance we use the terms option and alternative interchangeably. In the negotiation context, however, it is important to distinguish between options and alternatives. An option is a possible solution to a negotiation. During a negotiation there is often a range of options or possible agreements available to satisfy your interests. But if you and your negotiating counterpart cannot agree on one you may have to look elsewhere for an alternative to get what is important to you. These alternatives exist outside of the negotiation. For example, suppose you are negotiating for a salary increase with your current boss at Myco. You and your boss have a number of options available: she can offer you a big increase, no increase, or an increase of any number of figures in between. She can base the increase on your performance, the cost of living, or tie it to company practices or industry trends. She can offer you various combinations of benefits in lieu of a higher salary. These are all options that can result in a negotiated agreement. If you and your boss cannot reach an agreement, you still have a choice: you can resign. What, then, are your alternatives? How can you satisfy your interests (recognition of your worth, maintaining your standard of living, being treated with fairness and respect, etc.) outside of Myco? You can find a position with another company, change careers, resume your studies, retire early, start your own business, or run away and join the circus. You may not like any of these alternatives, but you do have choices.
August 2006
Some of your alternatives are better than others. When evaluating the options available with your negotiating counterpart you just need to know which alternative is the most attractive.
August 2006
Returning to our example, your boss says she can only increase your salary to $3,700. What is her best alternative if you resign? She may say she can hire a younger person for less than she was paying you. Her BATNA looks good; how can you make it look weaker? You can suggest that it is troublesome and expensive to recruit a replacement, the new hire will take time before he can get up to speed and be productive, he may not work out at all, why take the risk? Now her BATNA doesnt look so good, and she might decide to increase her offer. Or, she might try to diminish your BATNA by suggesting that Other Company are slave drivers, they have a dysfunctional culture, why leave your friends and a good position for a lousy couple of hundred dollars more? There are other ways of making a BATNA seem less attractive than by trying to persuade your counterpart that it is so. Suppose you are negotiating to purchase a house. Your offer of $372,000 is a bit less than the seller would like. What is the sellers BATNA? Perhaps another prospect has expressed a willingness to buy the house for $373,500. What can you do to weaken his BATNA? Put down a cash deposit. The other prospects words may sound sweeter, but they are only words, and money talks. Sellers BATNA suddenly seems less attractive next to your cold, hard cash. Understanding your BATNA is an indispensable part of planning for your negotiation. A strong BATNA ensures that you will not settle for less than you can get elsewhere, and gives you confidence that you can reach a more favorable agreement during a negotiation. By improving your BATNA and undermining your counterparts BATNA, you can expect an even better outcome.
August 2006
ABOUT THE AUTHOR David Goldwich was born and raised in Miami, Florida, USA. He has a BA degree in Political Science with a focus on Political Communication, Organization Theory, and Psychology. He has an MBA with a specialization in Business Management and Organization and also earned a JD degree. David practiced law in the United States for more than ten years, and is also trained as a mediator. He has experience managing a small business as well, serving as CEO of BVS, Inc., an employment screening company, from 1996-98. Recognizing that lawyers perpetuate rather than solve problems, David began lecturing and training in 1995. He has taught at the tertiary level in the USA and in Singapore, teaching in the areas of law, management, organizational behavior, communications skills, and critical and creative thinking. David seeks to apply the 80/20 Rule to training by identifying the few critical tools necessary for the greatest improvement and presenting them in a form that is simple to learn and simple to use. The psychology of learning and the application of NLP technology in all of his material provide delegates with the visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and participatory experiences required for better, faster learning. David's ability, sense of humor, and wealth of experience enable him to deliver breakthrough changes at all levels
Be a part of the IQPC Training Community! Join as a member at our online portal, The Gateway, and youll receive our free E-newsletter every month, with the latest articles, news and insights into Training & Development articles and tips for your organisation!!
Visit The Gateway Homepage or subscribe at www.iqpctraining.com.sg/thegateway