Statistics assignment Section 6.

8 Number 8 The data shows independent samples, therefore we use paired-t: By Minitab: Step 1: Hypothesis H : 1 = 2 H1 : 1 < 2 Step 2: Test statistic Two-Sample T-Test and CI: Boeing 747, Boeing 777 (Assuming equal variances)
Two-sample T for Boeing 747 vs Boeing 777 Boeing 747 Boeing 777 N 4 4 Mean 3.840 4.4600 StDev 0.130 0.0883 SE Mean 0.065 0.044

Difference = mu (Boeing 747) - mu (Boeing 777) Estimate for difference: -0.6200 95% lower bound for difference: -0.7726 T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = -7.90 Both use Pooled StDev = 0.1111

P-Value = 1.000

DF = 6

Conclusion: Yes we can conclude that the mean deflection is greater for the Boeing 777. Since the p-value > 0.05 we do not reject H0. We have clear evidence that the mean deflection for Boeing 747 is not less than the mean deflection for Boeing 777.

10 (a) Dependent Samples Step 1: Hypothesis H: 1 = 2 H1: 1 >2 Step 2: Test statistic Paired T-Test and CI: Before, After
Paired T for Before - After Before After Difference N 8 8 8 Mean 279.13 199.75 79.38 StDev 15.32 13.53 13.38 SE Mean 5.42 4.78 4.73

95% lower bound for mean difference: 70.41 T-Test of mean difference = 0 (vs > 0): T-Value = 16.77

P-Value = 0.000

Conclusion: No we cannot. Since the p-value < (0.05), we reject H0. We do not have sufficient evidence to prove that the mean cholesterol after treatment is less than the mean before the treatment.

10 (b) Dependent Samples Step 1: Hypothesis H: D = 75 H1: D > 75 Paired T-Test and CI: Before, After
Paired T for Before - After Before After Difference N 8 8 8 Mean 279.13 199.75 79.38 StDev 15.32 13.53 13.38 SE Mean 5.42 4.78 4.73

95% lower bound for mean difference: 70.41 T-Test of mean difference = 75 (vs > 75): T-Value = 0.92

P-Value = 0.193

Conclusion: No we cannot. Since the p-value > (0.05), we do not reject H0. We have sufficient evidence to prove that the reduction in the mean cholesterol after treatment is greater than 75mg/dL.

Section 6.6 Number 4 Step1: Hypothesis H: 1 = 2 H1: 1 >2

Test and CI for Two Proportions

Sample 1 2 X 48 44 N 60 60 Sample p 0.800000 0.733333

Difference = p (1) - p (2) Estimate for difference: 0.0666667 95% lower bound for difference: -0.0599542 Test for difference = 0 (vs > 0): Z = 0.87 Fisher's exact test: P-Value = 0.259

P-Value = 0.193

Conclusion: No we cannot. Since the p-value > (0.05), we do not reject H0. We have sufficient evidence to prove that the model with one hidden layer is not greater than the model with two hidden layers.

Section 6.7 Number 4 a) Hypothesis: H: 1 < 2 H1: 1 >2

Two-Sample T-Test and CI

Sample 1 2 N 14 40 Mean 47.79 47.15 StDev 2.19 2.65 SE Mean 0.59 0.42

Difference = mu (1) - mu (2) Estimate for difference: 0.640 95% lower bound for difference: -0.682 T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 0.81 Both use Pooled StDev = 2.5428

P-Value = 0.211

DF = 52

Conclusion: No we cannot. Since the p-value > (0.05), we do not reject H0. We have sufficient evidence to prove that the mean time when using Tagman system is less than when using video system. This is because the sample size differs, therefore the mean time between them differs too.

(b) Hypothesis: H: 1 < 2 H1: 1 >2 Two-Sample T-Test and CI

Sample 1 2 N 12 24 Mean 69.33 58.50 StDev 6.26 5.59 SE Mean 1.8 1.1

Difference = mu (1) - mu (2) Estimate for difference: 10.83 95% lower bound for difference: 7.35 T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 5.27 Both use Pooled StDev = 5.8152

P-Value = 0.000

DF = 34

Conclusion: Yes we can. Since the p-value < (0.05), we reject H0. We have sufficient evidence to prove that the mean time when using Tagman system is more than when using video system. This is because the sample sizes differ, therefore the mean time between them differs too.

(c) Two-Sample T-Test and CI

Sample 1 2 N 17 29 Mean 109.7 84.5 StDev 17.0 13.5 SE Mean 4.1 2.5

Difference = mu (1) - mu (2) Estimate for difference: 25.19 95% lower bound for difference: 17.55 T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 5.54 Both use Pooled StDev = 14.8825

P-Value = 0.000

DF = 44

Conclusion: Yes we can. Since the p-value < (0.05), we reject H0. We have sufficient evidence to prove that the mean time when using Tagman system is more than when using video system. This is because the sample sizes differ, therefore the mean time between them differs too.