From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Weber, Michael Wednesday, April 06, 2011 6:56 PM Zimmerman, Roy ET05 Hoc; ET01 Hoc; OST02 HOC FYI - information from video conference on 4/5/11 that may be of interest to the consortium

I did not know whether you received this in turnover. From: LIA06 Hoc Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:44 PM To: Weber, Michael Cc: LIA08 Hoc; ET01 Hoc; ET05 Hoc; LIA01 Hoc; LIA06 Hoc Subject: RE: information from video conference on 4/5/11 that may be of interest to the consortium Mike, The DOD folks did not indicate in the call that they and DOE had the lead to coordinate technical support for Japan, even though that is what was discussed in the Deputy's meeting yesterday. Cyndi brought it up in the consortium call last night in an attempt to allow DOE to clarify its role as the lead for technical support and the reply was that DOE did not understand it exactly in that manner and was supposed to clarify with their folks and get back to us. DOE did not provide any clarification in the consortium call tonight. It was understood by DOD in the 1600 call that NRC and the embassy are part of the vetting process, but that DOS and NSS were working to put the overall process together. As part of putting the process together, the lead would be solidified. But NSS did not respond, even when I asked specifically, who would lead the process. I believe that asking again at the Deputy's meeting or even at a Principal's meeting, can help formally (hopefully in writing) solidify this assignment. Mark Lombard Liaison Team Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center From: Weber, Michael Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 7:55 PM To: LIA01 Hoc Cc: LIA06 Hoc; LIA08 Hoc; ET01 Hoc; ET05 Hoc Subject: Response - information from video conference on 4/5/11 that may be of interest to the consortium Thanks, Mark. Now I'm confused - I thought that DOE/DOD has the lead to coordinate technical support for Japan. Has this changed? The summarybelow states that the Ambassador, Embassy staff, DOE, DOD, and NRC are leading different, but related components. Please advise. If we need to clarify, we can escalate.

From: LIA01 Hoc To: Al Hochevar <'hochevyAr r@inpo.org'>; Alice Caponiti <Alicecaponiti@hq.doe.gov> (b)(6) t(b)(6) fa Barey, Alan; Blount, Tom; Boger, Bruce; Casto, Chuck; Christensen, Harold; Craig Gaddis (b)(6) DORLCAL Resource; Dorman. Dan- DnrNrrCal Re-sourcp" Emch-..Danielle; ET05 Hoc; HOO Hoc; INPO D 7i-oc; rFOI Kesponse.noc Kesource; Glitter, Joseph,(b)(6)

f;