Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Abstract
This article is dedicated to my dear family, my parents: Hung Hoang Manh, Chuan Nguyen Thi and my brother: Dung Hoang Manh. Without their tremendous encouragement and support, this article could not have been published.
Problem 1
x; y
@ A a j j C @ C PA C @ RA
x
I will try to present the problem in an algebraic way. However, the exists a solution using geometry that we should hopefully gure it out soon. Let &
Solution 1.
a b
a CP aR
x y
Thus, the function becomes Using AM-GM inequality of the form Therefore, we obtain
g a; b
@ A a j C Tj C
a b
C C ! j pP j
b
jj
t
The function of 2 variables becomes the function of only one variable t. This is the exact idea we are looking for in minimizing or maximizing the expression of 2 or more variables. We temporarily called this method "Reducing variables". Now, we consider 3 cases
H
< t
F t
H
t
F t
!T
F t
I !T @ A a T pP a T I C pP I T @ A a T C pP a T C I pP p I @ A a T C pP a I C pP T ! Q P
t t t t t t > t t t
Therefore, it is clear that the minimum occurs i t a T or a C b a T. We combine with the use of AM-GM inequality above to conclude that g@a; bA attains the minimum at a a b a Q or x a y a Q.
1
(11626.Cezar Lupu, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA). Let x1 ; x2 and x3 be positive numbers such that x1 C x2 C x3 a x1 x2 x3 . Treating indices modulo 3, prove that
Problem 2
3 1
p
x
CI I CI
3 1
I I Cq k CI @ k C IA@
3 2 1
x
k+1
Q C IA P C IA
Solution 2.
3 1
p
x
3 1
x
I I Cq CI k @ k C IA@
3 2 1
x
k+1
Let
V b b b b b b b b b ` b b b b b b b b b X
aI aI aI
x1
x2
x3
Thus, it implies that ab C bc C ca a I. Note that a2 C I a a2 C ab C bc C ca a @a C bA@a C cA. We transform the left hand side inequality into
cyc
or Let
p @ C A@ C A cyc @ C A@ C A C cyc @ C A @ C A@ C A
a a ab a b a c a b a c a b a b a c
cyc
a b
@ C A @ C A@ C A
c a b a c
cyc
@ C AC
b c c
ab
cyc
@ C A@ C A
a c b c
V b b b b ` b b b b X
a p C
c a abc x
a p C
b a
a pC
a b
@ C C A
x y z
C C CP
y
C C C C C
y
xy
yz
zx
vr a @ C C A @ C C C P A a @ C C A @ C C ACQ @ C C A
x y z
abc
abc x
Also, by doing exactly the same way, the right hand side looks like
r a @ C C C C C A a @ C C A C P@ C C A@ C C A C @ C C A a @ C C A@ C C A C @ C C A
x
xy
yz
zx
2 2 2
xy
yz
zx
xy
yz
zx
xy
yz
zx
P @ C C A
abc x y z
@ C C A
xy yz zx
vr a P a P
abc
2
abc
cyc
CP
b
yz
cyc
cyc
@ C ACP
c
bc
cyc
@ C A@ C A
a c a b
r a C C @ A a @ A CP
xy yz zx
xy
x yz
cyc
cyc
a
It is enough to show that
2
cyc
abc a
cyc
@ A @ C A@ C A C P
ab
cyc
a bc b
@ C A @ C A@ C A
c a c a b
@ C A CR
b c
cyc
a bc
@ A @ C A@ C A
2
a c a b
cyc
@ A C Q@ A C P
ab
abc
cyc
a bc b
@ C A @ C A@ C A
c a c a b
cyc
@CA
b c b
cyc
@ A C Q@ A
ab
abc
cyc
a bc
@ A @ C A@ C A P
2
a c a
cyc
a bc b
@ C A @ C A@ C A
c a c a b
P e a
bc
cyc
@ C A@ C A
a c a b
cyc
a b
@ C A @ C A@ C A
c a c a b a b
There are several ways to show the boxed inequality above. The rst way is to use sum of square method as shown
cyc
@ @ C A P A @ C A@ C A
a b c bc a c
a a a
h
cyc cyc
@ A @ C A@ C A C @ A @ C A@ C A
ab bc a c a b cb ab a c b c
b a
cyc
p C @ A2 p p
b a a
p p @ Ap C C C
c a c a b b
c
C C
b
I Cq I k CI @ k C IA@
3 2 1
x
k+1
Q C IA P
a b b c c a
cyc
@ C AC
b c
ab
cyc
Q @ C A@ C A P @ C A@ C A@ C A
a c b c
P P
ab
However, this inequality is true using the AM-GM mentioned above, that is
cyc
cyc
@ C A@ C A
a c b c c b c
cyc
@ C ACT
b c c a
abc
ab
@ C A@ C A
a
cyc cyc
ab
@P C C A
b
a
3
@ C ACT
b c
abc
Problem 3 (J218. Mathematical Reection). Prove that in any triangle with sides of lenghts a; b; c, circumradius R, and inradius r, the following inequality holds:
C C C C C
ab bc ca b c b c a c a
IC
R r
Proposed by Cezar Lupu, University of Pittsburgh, USA, and Virgil Nicula, Bucharest, Romania
Solution 3.
and c.
IT 2 a @ C C A@ C A@ C A@ C A
A a b c a b c b c a c a b
cyc
a
C
b
ab
P I C @ C A@ C A@ C A
abc c a b c b a c a b
By multiplying both sides by the postive term @a C b cA@b C c aA@c C a bA, we need to show that
cyc
ab a
@ C A@ C A @ C A@ C A@ C A C P
c b b c a a b c b c a c a b
abc
cyc
ab a
@ C A@ C A a
c b b c a bc
ab
@ A2
a b
cyc
cyc
ab a
@ C AC
b
cyc
ab a
@ A
b
We now turn our attention to the popular method "Sum of Square" that I shall demonstrate below. We have the following identities
3 C 3 @ C A a @ A2 @ C A p p 2 @ C A P 2 a 2 @ p A2
a b ab a a b a b a b a b c bc a b c
cyc
@ p A CP
b c
cyc
bc b
@A !
c
cyc
@ C A@ A
a b a b
or or or
cyc
@ p A
b c
CP
c
p p
bc a
@ C p A @ C A@ C p A ! H
b c
p
c
cyc
@ p A
b
p p p p @ C A2 @ A2 ! H
b c b c
cyc
@ p A
b
@ A2 ! H
b c
Problem 4
a; b; c; d d
I C I C I C I !H
a b b c d b b c c d d a
Prove that
@I A C @I A C @I A C @I A ! H
Solution 4.
Proposed by Gabriel Dospinescu, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France We rewrite the condition as follows
a
ICICICI! C C C
a c c b b c d a d b b c c d d
d b
The good news is that we can write the nal outcome in a nicer way
a
@I A C @I A C @I A C @I A ! H
a b c d ab bc cd da b d a c
is equivalent to
a
or
C C C ! C C C a @ C A@ C A
a
Now, the following trick comes to eect (just if you can see how). We will complete the proof if we can show that
a
I C I !I C C
c b d a
ac
C C C
c
bd
I I C C C
c b d
!ICICICI
a b c d
ac a
C C C C C C C @ C AC @ C AC @ C AC @ C A! P C C a P a C @ CA @ CA
c
ac b
bd a
bd b
ac
bd
ac
ac
ac a
ac a
ac b
The last inequality is true so our proof is completed. Problem 5 (S220.Mathematical Reection). Let a; b; c be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that
r
3
a
C C C ! P C P @C A @ CA C C @ A C @ A !H @ CA @C A
c
bd a
bd a
ac b
p C C I @ @ C A C @ C A C @ C AA ! C C P
b
ab a
bc b
ca c
ab
bc
ca
Solution 5.
cyc
Proposed by Mircea Lascu and Marius Stanean, Zalau, Romania power from both sides and write them as Sum of Square, we obtain the
3
b
V @ A C S@ A @ A @ A ! H
ab a
Notice that the following inequality, regarded as one of the best estimations in the modern approach to higher order of the variables
@ A@ A@ A a
a b
cyc
@ C A P @ C C A P
b
abc a
cyc
a c
3 3
CP
cyc
abc
ab a
@ C A T@ A
b abc
Comment
The solution looks short but it did take me ages to do calculation on the draft paper. The moral lesson is that although these computations may seem rather tedious and lengthy, it does not matter anymore because you are doing Mathematics! Now, if we set one variable to be zero, we have the following nice inequality for 2 varables Let H < x; y; z <
Problem 6.
ab a
ab
ab
Solution 6.
xyz
A @I I A C @I I A C @I I A
z y x z y x z x
We may consider individual term of the above expression to have a better view
@I A@I A a I C I
x z z x
and
z
x z
@I A a I
xyz y xz
xy y
or
cyc
I C I C
cyc
x
z
!T
cyc
I C I !T
x z z
cyc
However, this is simply AM-GM for 2 or (6?) positive numbers. The proof is completed.
Problem 7.
C C C C C
b b b b c c c c c c a a
a
a
<
I IT
c a c c
Solution 7.
C C a @ A@ A@ A C C C @ C A@ C A@ C A
b b b b b b c c a a b b c a a b b c c a < a b b c c a
ITj@ A@ A@ Aj @ C A@ C A@ C A Without loss of generality, we may assume that a mxf g. Moreover, using the triangle inequality j j
a a; b; c a b
< c
IT j j @ C A@ C A@ C A
bc b c < a b b c c a
We assume further that b ! c in order to break the absolute value sign. Thus, the inequality is equivalent to
IT @ A @ C A@ C A@ C A
bc b c < a b b c c a
At this stage, it is enough to use AM-GM for 2 numbers to nish o the problem as follows
V @P A@ A P @ C A
b c b c b b c
P @ C A @ C A@ C A
b b c < a b a c
Nevertheless, this inequality is true due to the above assumptions. Hence, we nish the proof here. and let m be an integer greater than 2. Dene Pk @xA a x a x b ; k ; ; ; m: expressions P1 @xA; Pm @xA do not have any real roots, then all the remaining polynomials also don't have real roots.
2
Problem 8
Solution 8.
We have
a a a a
ak bk
a1 b1
a1 a
C @ IA C @ IA R H H mR m
k k b1 < b
d1
d2
<
b1
@ C @ IA A
a1 m d1 d1
<
R @ C @ IA A
b1 m d2 d2 k ; ;:::;m
@ C @ IA A
a1 k
<
R@ C @ IA A V P fI P
b1 k k
or
C P @ IA C @ IA @ IA@P C @ IA R A P R C @ IA
a1
a1 d1 k a1 d1
2 2 d1
d2
< <
2 d1
a1 d1
d2
d1
<
P P
It is enough to show that This is true since m ! k.
Problem 9
b1 m
a1 d1
d2
<
R C R@ IA R R I R @ IA I
b1 k d2 b1 b1 k
2 a1 2 a1 2
b1 k
a1
d1
d2 <
R @ IA I
b1 a1
d1
R @ IA I
a1
d1 <
R @ IA I
b1 k a1
d1
(Number theory). Let a; b be two positive integers. Show that if divisible by 3 then A must have at least one perfect square divisor.
Solution 9.
Since A is written in a product form and 3 is a prime, we have PHIIa C PHIPb is divisible by 3 or @PHIPa C PHIIbA is divisible by 3. Wlog, suppose that 3 is a factor PHIIa C PHIPb, we would like to show that @PHIPa C PHIIbA is also a multiple of 3. However, this job is done easily with a little help of modulo. It all boils down to ja bj is divisible by 3 and thus, we complete the proof here.
Problem 10
Solution 10.
Firstly, we need to show that 4 divides n and then using this to show that 3 also divides n.
If 2 does not divide n then m is divisible by 3. Thus, 2 divides n and as a consequence, m a S2k1 C Q2k1 C I where n a Pk1 . We continue the problem in this fashion that if k1 a Pk2 C I then m is divisible by 5. Therefore, k1 a Pk2 . Now, n a Rk2 . If k2 a Qk3 I then m is divisible by 7. We are done for now.
Problem 11
a; b; c
mxf
Solution 11.
a; b; c
g!I
Valentin Vornicu
Let
V b b b b ` b b b b X
x
a I
a
a I
b
a I
c
WLOG, suppose that a a mxfa; b; cg. This implies that x ! y ! z . Suppose further that x < H. Thus, From the given condition, we have
x
H
y z
> x
! !
y
C C CQ a a I a
xyz
@ C IA@ C IA@ C IA C P
xy yz x y x y z
I I I C C
zx
I I I W C C !
x y z x y
This gives or
@ C C A ! W
x y z a
C C CT H
b c
x; y
! H , Prove that :
x y
2 2
@ C PA ! @ C A@ IA.
x
xy
Solution 12.
P
xy
Let
a C
x
and
xy
!R D !P
P S
. WLOG, we may x
@ P PA ! @ IA
S
S P
or
P
@ IA P 2 @ C IA ! H
P S P P P S P P S P
f S
@ Aa
P
p @ IA P 2 @ C IA for ! P
P P
P >
R C P @I A ! P C P
P
This is left as an exercise for readers who are interested in completing the solution.
Problem 13.
2
b
C C C C C C C C
c
b b
b b
C Q C C C
a
Magazine Gazeta Matematica B,11,year 1995,author:Ion Bursuc Renement For a; b; c > H , prove that
cyc
Solution 13.
a
C C T min @ A @ A @ A Q@ C C A C @ C A@ C A@ C A@ C C A C C
b
abc
For the renement one, we might expand everything out, therefore, we need to show that (with the assumption that @a bA2 a minf@a bA2 ; @b cA2 ; @c aA2 g)
cyc
a
@ C ACT @ A
b
abc a
cyc
a b
@ C A
4
c
or
T @ A
abc a b
ab a
@ A@ C A
b
cyc
ab a
@ A @ C A!@ A
b
4
2
cyc
ab a
@ C A !T @ A
b abc a b
x; y; z
P C P C P C @ Cp C A C @ Cp C A C @ Cp C A !I
2
xy y
zx
xz
2 z
xy
2 x
yz
Solution 14.
Firstly, we have the following estimation using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for 3 positive real numbers
y
C Cp
z x
p
xz
@ C C A@P C A
x y z z y x
P C P C @ C p C A ! @ C C A@P C A
2
xy
xy
xz
2 z
or or
@P C A C @P C A C @P C A ! C C CP CP CP
x y y y z z z x y z z x x y x y
P@ C C A
x y z
y
CP C CP C CP
x y z z z x x x y z z z x x
y
! P@ C C A
x y z
This is single-handedly the result from Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Let a, b be real numbers such that sin3 a
a
CP C CP C CP !I
y
The following problems appear in the Mathematical Reection Magazine Issue 2 2012.
Problem 15.
3
a b
This is equivalent to
Problem 16
Given that a3 C b3 a P. We need to show that a C b Notice that a C b ! H. Let This transformation leads to S 2 ! RP . We have
P
aH
P.
&
S P
a C a
a ab
or S 3
V aA
a Q P
S
10
Case 2 Case 3
aI aP
(Seninor high school for gifted students entrance exam 2012-2013, Ha Noi).
V ` X
a c a
! CI C !
b b a b b
Proof.
Quite neatly, Q can be rewritten as follows
Q
a @
f a; b; c
I Aa CI C CI C CI I
a b c a b
Step 1
f a; b; c
A! @
f c
b; b; c
A
f a; b; c
A @
f c
b; b; c
A a C I C I C a @ C IA@ C IA !H
a c b a c b a b c a c b
Step 2 Note 1.
f c
b; b; c
S A ! IP
!I ! CI
x a b
Q
x x c c
We now deal with a function with only 2 variables, it is more compact to write that function in the following form
f c
b; b; c
A A a @ A a @ @ C IA@ @C C PA C IA IA@
g x; c c c x x c x x c c
for c ! Q andx ! I
Step 3
g c; x
@ A ! @ IA
g c;
The computation is a bit lengthy, however, the result is surprisingly elegant. We have
g x; c
11
Hence, min Q a
Problem 18
(Mathlinks.ro).
S IP i a I a P and a Q.
a ;b c
c c
c c
c c
c c
p C I ! P I I P
a b a b
p C C ! P I P P
a b b a b b a b
I I P C C aP CPC C P I C a P C C P r I !P IP P p ! P I P
a b b a b a b b b a b
12