Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
3.1 INTRODUCTION (1) The proper selection of the placement angle of the different layers of fiber is a key feature in the design of composite structures. (2) In fiber composites, the stiffness of the individual plies depend on the angles of fiber placement with respect to the loads. (3) The material developed in this chapter (has direct application to the case in which ) the final composite form has distinct layers, such as (a) the layers of prepreg
3.2 DEFORMATION DUE TO EXTENSION AND BENDING (1) STRESS AND STRAIN RELATIONSHIP (a) The Kirchhoff-Love hypothesis: (for plate theory) If the laminate is thin, a line originally straight and perpendicular to the middle surface of the laminate is assumed to remain straight and perpendicular to the middle surface when the laminate is extended and bent.
xz = yz = 0
That is, =0 z (b) Displacement The displacement in the x, y and z dir. Are called u, v, w
laminate or a filament-wound structure. respectively. u, v, w are assumed to be described by continuous functions of x, y, and z. Assumption of thin-plate (and beam) analysis: The plate displaces in the z-dir. only because of the bending motion, and that no variation of w through the thickness takes place.
x =
(u +
u dx ) u u x = dx x
xy
u dy v dx u v y + x = + = dy y x dx
uc = u0 zc
where is the slope of the laminate middle surface in the x-dir., that is =
w0 x
u(x, y, z) = u0 (x, y) z
(3.1)
=>
xy
u x v = y v u = + x y
(3.2)
(3.1)(3.2)
u 0 x x v0 y = + y xy u 0 v 0 + x y
2w 2 x 2 w z 2 y 2w 2 xy
k x k y k xy
2w0 2 x 2w0 = 2 y 2w 0 2 xy
(3.6)
K th layer
=>
u 0 2w z x x 2 v0 2w = z y y 2 = v0 u 0 2w + 2z y x xy
(3.3)
x x y = Q y Eqn(3.4) Eqn(2.28) xy xy
[]
xy
0 x x 0 y = y + 0 xy xy
0 { } = { }+ z{k }
u 0 x v0 = y u 0 v0 + y x
k x z k y k xy
x Q11 y = Q12 Q xy k 16
(3.4)
x 0 k 0 x y + z k y 0 k k xy xy
The stress variation thr. the laminate thickness is not necessary linear, for the Qij can be different for each layer of the laminate; even though the strain variation is linear. Typical strain and stress variations:
(3.5)
the stress integrated over the thickness of the laminate, and is thus the applied force per unit width.
(2)
h 2 h 2
x dz
N N N
(4)
x y xy
Moment resultant
integrated product of stress and the distance to the center line, over the thickness, and is the applied moment per unit width.
k =1
x h k 1 y xy
hk
dz
(3.9)
(3)
h 2 h 2
x zdz
M x x h M y = 2h y zdz 2 M xy xy
(3.8)
N x x h N y = 2h y dz 2 N xy xy
(3.7)
x M x N hk M y = h y zdz k =1 k 1 xy M xy
where the positions of the limits for each ply are illustrated in Fig.3.3
x x y = Q y xy xy
[]
(2.28)
[]
(2.29)
k =1
k =1
x 0 0 hk Q k y dz hk 1 0 xy
k =1
k x hk 1 Q k k y k xy
hk
(3.11) and
M M M
y = xy
x hk
k =1
x hk hk 1 Q k y zdz = xy
k =1
x 0 0 hk Q k y zdz hk 1 0 xy
k =1
kx 2 h k 1 Q k k y z dz k xy
(3.12)
(3)
Discussion of A, B, D
(3.16)
Concept: (a)
B12 B22 B26
D12 D22 D26
The presence of the Bij implies coupling between bending and extension of a laminate.
(b)
An extensional force results in not only extensional deformations, but twisting and/or bending of the laminate.
(c)
Such a laminate cannot be subjected to moment without at the same time suffering extension of the middle surface.
(3.16)
(4)
A, BD for symmetric laminates The B matrix vanishes for symmetric laminates (see Eqn.(3.18)) From Eqn.(3.16):
Aij =
(Q
k =1 N
ij
) k ( h k h k 1 ) L L ( 3 . 17 )
2 2
h hk 1 L L ( 3 . 18 ) B ij = ( Q ij ) k k 2 k =1 where 3 3 N h hk 1 L L ( 3 . 19 ) D ij = ( Q ij ) k k 3 k =1
{N } = [A]{ 0 }
N x A11 , or N y = A12 A N xy 16
(3.20)
(3.21)
(5)
3.5 LAMINATE CODE (1) A laminate consisting of a series of layers, can be specified by the angles and number of plies in the ply group.
[Q ] = (1)[A] t
Avg
(3.22)
That is for the average stress-strain properties for a laminate. (6) A*B*D*matrix (or called F matrix in this text) (2) (a) In general case from Eqn.(3.16)
0 A B N = k 6,1 B D 6, 6 M 6,1
1
[O2 / 90 / 90 / O2 ]
Laminate is symmetric about the midplane.
[O / 45 / 45 / 90]s
= [0 / 45 / 45 / 90 / 90 / 45 / 45 / 0]
(3.23)
B* D*
(3)
[F ]6,6 (b)
A B B D
A* * B
(3.24) (4)
[0 / 90] = [0 / 90 / 0]
s
Example 3.1 Calculation of A and D matrix for a unidirectional laminate [010 ] AS4/3501-6 carbon epoxy = [0 5 ]s symmetric, [B]=0 Eqn. (3.17) ~ Eqn. (3.19): (a) Aij =
Q 11 = Q 11 = Q 22 = Q 22 = Q 12 = Q 21 Q 16 = 0 Q 26 = 0
1 12 1 12 E 22
E 11
21
21
12 E 22 = 1 12 21
(Q
k =1
ij
) k (hk hk 1 )
Q 66 = Q 66 = G 12
Eqn(2.30):
Q11 = Q11 cos4 + 2(Q12 + 2Q66) sin2 cos2 + Q22 sin4 = Q11 Q12 = (Q11 + Q22 4Q66) sin2 cos2 + Q12(sin4 + cos4 ) = Q12 Q22 = Q11 sin4 + 2(Q12 + 2Q66) sin2 cos2 + Q22 cos4 = Q22 Q16 = (Q11 Q12 2Q66) sin cos3 + (Q12 Q22 + 2Q66) sin3 cos = 0 Q26 = (Q11 Q12 2Q66) sin3 cos + (Q12 Q22 + 2Q66) sin cos3 = 0 Q66 = (Q11 + Q22 2Q12 2Q66) sin2 cos2 + Q66(sin4 + cos4 ) = Q66
Eqn(2.16)
21 E11 1 12 21
1 12 21 0
3 3
E 22
0 0 t G12
3 3
N hk hk 1 h hk 1 = (Qij ) k k 3 3 k =1
= (Qij ) k .
t3 12
21 E11 1 12 21
E 22 1 12 21 0 0 3 t 0 12 G12
E11 1 12 21 12 E 22 [D ] = 1 12 21 0
Its like the EI stiffness of the beam theory for a unit width
beam.
Example 3.2 Calculation of A and D matrices for a bi-directional laminate 20 plies of AS4/3501-6 carbon epoxy [0 5 / 90 5 ] s . The thickness of individual ply is 0.132mm (0.0052in). <Sol.> (a) For the 0 plies
0 1 12 21 E22 12 E22 0 t 00 = 1 12 21 1 12 21 G12 0 0 21 E11 E11 0 1 1 12 21 12 21 t 3 0 E 22 12 E22 0 0 = 12 1 12 21 1 12 21 G12 0 0 E11
0
21 E11 1 12 21
E11 1 12 21 0
[A]90
0 0 t 90 0 G12
21 E11 1 12 21
[A]0
[D]90
E 22 1 12 21 12 E 22 = 1 12 21 0
21 E11 1 12 21
E11 1 12 21 0
0 t3 0 0 90 12 G12
(c)
[D]0
(b)
12 = 0.28, 21 =
12 E 22
E11
= 0.024
(lb-in)
G12 = (6.55GPa)(0.95Msi ) 1 1 = = 1.006 1 12 21 1 0.28 0.024 1 12 21 E 22 1 12 21 E11 = 18.4 1.006 = 18.5 = 1.6 1.006 = 1.61 18.5 0.451 0 5 0.0052 0 0.451 1.61 0 0 0.95 + [ A]900 } = 2 1.61 0.451 0 + 0.451 18.5 0 5 0.0052 0 0.95 0
[A] = 2 {[A]0
Msi-in
h hk 1 Dij = (Qij ) k k 3 k =1
N 3
[ D] =
[A]0
t00
[A]90
t 900
3.6 HYGROTHERMAL BEHAVIOR (1) The stress-strain relations of the individual plies must now include the thermal and moisture effects. From Eqn.(2.34)
x x x T x m y = Q y y T y m xy xy xy T xy m
where
N xth x T + x m N hk {N th } = N yth = h Qk y T + y m dz k =1 k 1 N xyth xy T + xy m
M xth x T + x m N hk {M th } = M yth = h Qk y T + y m zdz k =1 k 1 M xyth xy T + xy m
(3.31)
[]
(3.32)
(3.27)
(2)
If the temperature and moisture terms are independent of the z coordinate in each ply,
[ ]
x T + x m y T + y m (hk hk 1 ) xy T + xy m
(3.33)
(3.28)
and
M xth N M yth = Qk k =1 M xyth
M x x x T x m N hk M Q y T y m zdz = and y hk 1 k y k =1 M xy xy xy T xy m
[ ]
(3.29)
x T + x m 2 h hk 1 2 y T + y m ( k ) 2 xy T + xy m
(3.34)
(3) (integrations):
N A B 0 N th = M B D k M th
If the laminate is nonsymmetric, significant warpage can result from unbalanced thermal stresses.
(3.30)
3.7 SPECIAL LAMINATES 3.7.1 Symmetric Laminates If the laminate is symmetric with respect to the midplane, the B matrix will vanish. Eqn.(3.18)
The vanishing of the B matrix gives an uncoupling of the extensional and bending responses.
h hk 1 Bij = (Qij ) k k 2 k =1
N 2
HW#3
exam.), 2004
hk hk 1 ) 2
2 2
(3.35)
ii. (4)
[B ] = 0, A16 = A26 = 0 D 0, D 0 16 26
(5) The cross-ply laminates
the laminate
1 ( M + F )tQ11 1+ M A12 = tQ12 A11 = 1 1 + MF (1 + MF )tQ11 = A22 = A11 1+ M M +F A16 = A26 = 0 balanced A66 = tQ 66 Bij = 0 symmetry
[( F 1) p + 1]Q11t 3 1 + M A11t 2 = [( F 1) p + 1] 12 M + F 12 [(1 F ) p + F ]Q11t 3 1 + M A11t 2 D12 = = [(1 F ) p + F ] 12 M + F 12 D16 = D26 = 0 cross ply D11 = D66 = Q66t 12
3
D11 = D12 D 22
1 M ( N 3)[ M ( N 1) + 2( N + 1)] where p = (1 + M ) 3 + (4.77) ( N 2 1)(1 + M ) 3 all parameters are shown in book of Jone.
where R = 1 + M +
M=
k = even
t t
aircraft in Fig-3.8 uses coupling between bending and torsion to achieve aeroelastic stability.
iii. Concept: a. A16 , A26 , D16 , D26 are zero for all cross-ply laminates (one of the balanced laminate) b. Only cross-ply laminates with an even number of layers have coupling between bending and extension, since the
Bij are all zero for a cross-ply laminate with an odd number
of layers. c. The relative size of D16 , D26 terms becomes smaller as more plies are added, if the plies at different angles are dispersed rather than being stack together. Assuming D16 = D26 = 0 offers a simplification in analysis, and thus this assumption is after made whether its strictly true or not. d. The couplings cited above that result from A16 , A26 , D16 andD 26 are features of composite structures that have no counterpart in isotropic materials. For example, the forward swept wing design of the x-29
(1)
The stresses within the individual plies can be highly nonuniform, then for very simple loading.
the laminates have equal numbers of plies at 0, 45, -45 and 90 degrees, or at 0, 60 and 60 degrees.
Both of these laminate families display in-plane stiffness that
(2)
A B [F ] B D
(3)
(3.24)
0 N = [F ] M k
(4)
(3.36)
orientation : to add an arbitrary angle to each if the orientation, and then to calculate the A and Qavg matrices, and to observe that the terms do not change. (5)
{ }+ z{k }
0
(3.4)
1 1 2 = [R ][T ] R 12
[ ]
x y xy
= [R][T][R1]( 0 + z{k})
(6)
{}
(3.37)
1 1 2 = [Q] 2 12 12
(3.38)
(1)
The computer programs for this purpose are available on the web for use with this text. a. www.prenhall.com
of the analysis and is the basis for strength design in fiber custom catalog, download library composites. b. ftp site : ftp.prenhall.com dir: pub/esm/mechanical_engineering. s-048/swanson/intro_adv_composite_materials. (2) Or. We can write a program using the mathematical software packages such as Mathcad, MATLAB, Maple, or Mathematica.