Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
BY
September, 2007.
i
CERTIFICATION
__________________________ ______________________
Chief Supervisor Co-Supervisor
Prof. S.U. Remison Prof. R.K.A. Egharevba,
Dept. of Crop Science Dept. of Crop Science
Ambrose Alli University University of Benin
Ekpoma Benin-City
__________________________ __________________________
Prof. D. A. Enobakhare Internal Examiner
Head of Dept. of Crop Science Prof. A. U. Osagie
University of Benin Dept. of Biochemistry
Benin-City University of Benin
Benin City
ii
DEDICATION
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Prof. (Mrs.) R.K.A. Egharevba for their supervision, sincere devotion to academic pursuit
and research, valuable suggestions, constructive criticism and guidance throughout the
course of the investigation. Special thanks to them for the time they have taken out to
thoroughly supervise this work despite their busy schedule. I am also greatly indebted to
University, Benin City, Prof. Eghosa Osagie, Vice Chancellor of Benson Idahosa
University, Benin City, and other management staff for the financial assistance, time and
as he taught me the technique involved in carrying out research and writing of technical
papers. I am highly indebted to Prof. A. U. Osagie for his kind help, useful pieces of
advice and for providing me with useful literature and journals for this study.
Agriculture, University of Benin, Benin City for providing the necessary training, lectures
and arranging the necessary examinations for me in order to acquire the present status. In
the same vain, the secretary to the Department of Crop Science, Mr. S. E. Ikuvbogie is
highly appreciated together with other Departmental office staff including Austin in
Special appreciation goes to Mr. Peter Akhomogbe for helping me to secure the
sites for the trials and management of the field experiment. Special thanks to Imafidon and
Co. for their role in the collection of data. I also appreciate the contribution of the
iv
experimental site owners for allowing me to use their land for these studies. They were
also involved in the routine operations which in no small way ensured the successful
completion of the investigation. I wish to also thank Mr. Odigie, Manager, Edo
Agricultural Development Programme, Edo Central Zone with headquarter at Irrua for
acknowledgement goes to management of both Nigerian Institute for Oil Palm Research
(NIFOR) and Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN), Uhumora Substation for
University of Benin, Benin City, among whom are Prof. J.E. Alika, Prof. M. Olomu, Dr. I.
Ero, Mr. U.A. Osaigbovo, Engr. Enbaifo, Mr. CNC Nwaguola, Dr. P.C. Kalu, Mr. Obanor,
Dr. S. Nwokoro, Mr. Mohammed, Mr. Izekor David Omoruyi, Dr. Ero, Dr. Aremu, Mr.
Obaze, Dr. Oronsaye, Dr. Obi, Dr. W. W. Modugu and others for their special and various
contributions to see the completion of this thesis. I am highly indebted to the scholarly
I also acknowledge the kindness and friendliness of Mr. Victor Segun Ekun of
Biotechnology unit of International Institute for Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan for helping
me out to analyse my research sampled materials with the assistance of Mr. Joseph Ubolie
of Analytical Service of IITA, Ibadan. Special thanks also go to Mr. E. O. Oteri and Mr.
N. O. Erhayimwen of the laboratory unit of the Faculty of Agriculture and Mr. Chris of the
Biochemistry laboratory unit for their generous assistance given me in carrying out the
I do appreciate the help rendered and give thanks to Prof. Aluyi and Dr. J.E.
Oyedeji for their useful advice, encouragement and moral support. My sincere thanks go
v
to my bosom friend, Mr. Patrick Nosakhare Erhahon for his financial support toward the
during my brief stay at Ibadan for my research work and write-up of this thesis.
Idahosa University, among whom are F.E. Bazuaye, Mr. M.O. Alile, Dr. C.O. Emokaro,
Dr. W.A. Molindo, Peter Ekunwe, Dr. S. Orewa, Mrs. Ajayi, Dr. Uko-Aviomoh, Dr.
Orheruata, Dickson Omorogbe, Mrs. H. Ajayi, Mr. M. Nwanchokor and others who are
too numerous to mention. I also give special thanks to Mr. Dickson I. Imasuen and Mrs.
Special thanks and regards to my wife, Mrs. J.E. Law-Ogbomo for standing by me
(Mr. Ogieva Osa Ogbomo, Mrs. Osazuwa Yusuf, Mr. Adebisi Usuanlele, Mr. Ademola
Usuanlele, Mrs. Oghogho Agbonlaho, Mr. Nad Tunde Kolade etc), aunt (Mrs. H.A.
Usuanlele), my uncle (Engr. S.E. Eriyo), his late wife (Mrs. P. O. Eriyo), my friends (Mr.
Kenneth O. Idahosa and Mr. Bebright Omogiate) . They have been instrumental to my
success and I would not forget to say thanks to them.I do recognize and appreciate all
for helping to develop my personality and most of all for her love.
CONTENTS
vi
Title page ………………………………………………………………………………..i
Certification ……………………………………………………………………………..ii
Dedication…………………………………………………………………………..……iii
Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………....iv
Contents …….…..……………………………………………………………………….vii
Notation …………………………………………………………………………….…..xiv
Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………xv
……….…….32
vii
3.2 Effects of planting density on the performance of yam.………………………..42
3.4 Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on the growth
Chapter Four………………………………..……………………………………….......51
Chapter Five………………………………………………………………………….....129
147
151
viii
LIST OF TABLES
1. Weather data at Evboneka (forest zone)………….………………………...34
3. Soil physical and chemical properties of the experimental sites before cropping
4. Soil physical and chemical properties of the experimental sites after cropping
5. Soil physical and chemical properties of the experimental site before and after
…………………………………………………………………………. …...55
10. Effects of different rates of NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on yield and
ix
content in leaves and tuber of D. rotundata cv “Obiaoturugo” at 16 WAP on
at final harvest……………..………………………………64
“Obiaoturugo”………………………………………………..……………..68
rotundata cv "Obiaturugo…………………………………………………..79
“Obiaoturugo” at 8 WAP…………………………………………………...82
21. Influence of minisett sizes on the relative shoot dry matter (Rsdm) and leaf dry
x
22. Influence of minisett sizes on the growth rate of D. rotundata cv
….…..…..86
“Obiaoturugo”……………………………………………...………………..87
rotundata cv "Obiaoturugo"…………………………………………………89
25. The effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on early
26. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on early
27. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on the
28. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on leaf area
29. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on total dry
30. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on harvest
31. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on some
WAP……………………………………………………………………….101
32. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on yield and
xi
33. Effects of planting density and NPK fertilizer application on N, P and K
106
34. Effects of planting density and NPK fertilizer application on N, P and K content
WAP....................107
35. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on N, P and
WAP….109
36. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on N, P and
WAP....110
37. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on N, P and
….........111
38. Effects of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer application on N, P and K
harvest………………………………………………………………..
…….……..112
39. Economic analysis of the effect of planting density and NPK 15:15:15 fertilizer
………..113
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Map of Edo State, Nigeria showing experimental sites..…………………….….33
………………………………….……………………………………….71
……………………………………………………..…………………....71
at 16 WAP……………………………….…………………………………….....72
at 24 WAP………………………………………………………………... …….72
16 WAP………………………………………………………………………….73
24 WAP……….....................................................................................................
73
xiii
between 16 and 24 WAP………………………………………………………...74
NOTATIONS
BR - Bulking rate.
CGR - Crop growth rate.
g g-1 wk-1 - Change in total dry weight per unit existing weight per unit of
time
g m-2 wk-1 - Change in total dry weight per unit area per unit of time
HI - Harvest index
LAI - Leaf area index.
%LDMC - Percentage leaf dry matter content.
LSD(0.05) - Significant at 5% level of probability.
Macrosett - Ware-yam sett.
NAR - Net assimilation rate.
NPK - Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.
ns - Not significant at 5% level of probability.
P > 0.05 - Not significant at 5% level of probability.
P < 0.5 - Significant at 5% level of probability.
pph - Plants per hectare.
RCB - Randomised complete block.
RGR - Relative growth rate.
RSDM - Relative shoot dry matter.
Stands ha-1- Stands per hectare.
TDW - Total dry weight.
t ha-1 - Tonnes per hectare.
xiv
ABSTRACT
Agronomic evaluation of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata (Poir)) cv
“Obiaoturugo” (“Iyawo”) was carried out in different ecological zones of Edo State to
determine: the optimum level of NPK (N, P2O5 and K2O) 15:15:15 fertilizer application
on yam in the different ecological (forest, forest-savanna transition and derived savanna)
zones of Edo State; nutrient uptake capacity of yam in different ecological zones; the
appropriate planting density for the growth of yams; and the ideal minisett size for rapid
multiplication of yam.
This study involved a series of experiments, which included: (i) Effects of NPK
15:15:15 fertilizer application on the performance of yam. The trial was conducted in 2004
zone) and Ubiaja (derived savanna zone)) and involved five treatments (0, 100, 200, 300
and 400kg of NPK ha-1) which arranged in randomized complete block design in three
replicates. (ii) Effects of planting density on the performance of yam. The trial was
design with five planting densities (10000, 13333, 20000, 17778 and 26667 plants ha-1) in
four replicates. (iii) Influence of minisett sizes on the growth and yield of yam. This trial
was conducted at Evboneka (forest zone) and Irrua (forest-savanna transition) in 2004
using a macrosett (250g) and six minisett sizes (25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50g) in a
xv
randomized complete block design with four blocks. (iv) The effect of planting density and
NPK fertilizer application on the growth and yield of yam. This experiment was conducted
during the 2005 planting season at Evboneka (forest zone) and Irrua (forest-savanna
transition) involving three planting densities (10000, 13333 and 17778 plants ha-1) and
three rates (0, 200 and 300kg) of NPK fertilizer in a 3 x 3 factorial scheme in randomized
Results from the fertilizer trial showed that net assimilation rate, crop growth rate,
dry matter content and leaf area index significantly increased as fertilizer application
increased thereby resulting in higher tuber yield. Tuber yield at Ubiaja was the highest
(18.37t ha-1) followed by Evboneka (15.60t ha-1) and Sabongidda Ora (14.70t ha-1) in
that order. The most profitable yield was obtained at all sites, except Evboneka, with the
application of 300kgha-1 of NPK. With increasing planting density, there were significant
increase in LAI, dry matter accumulation and tuber yield. However, the average yield
stand-1 and multiplication ratio decreased as planting density increased and vice versa.
The highest tuber yield ha-1 was obtained from 26667 (21.93t ha-1), followed by 17778
(19.34t ha-1) and 2000 (18.35t ha-1) pph. Based on economic analysis, the most
profitable yield was produced from 10000 pph (2.38), followed by 17778 (1.89) and
13333 (1.49) pph. Plants grown from the minisetts had a lower yield than the macrosett
plants but had higher multiplication ratio. The recommended use of 40g minisett appeared
to be appropriate for producing seed yam at the forest zone (Evboneka) and 30g setts for
the forest-savanna transition zone (Irrua), since these setts had the highest benefit-cost
ratio in both ecological zones respectively in the production of seed yam. The combined
effects of planting density and fertilizer application revealed that tuber yield was
xvi
were the most abundant nutrients in the leaves and tubers while P was present in low
amount. The nutrient uptake from the soil depended on the nutrient content of the soil and
the planting density. The results indicated that the combination of 10000 pph and
application of 300 kg 15:15:15 fertilizer ha-1 provided the most profitable yields across
xvii