IOM 2011 CASE DATA ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING: GLOBAL FIGURES 1 & TRENDS

February 20122

The data in this document was complied by IOM Headquarters staff, Anvar Serojitdinov, Project Officer, aserojitdinov@iom.intinconjunctionwiththeassistanceofIOMfieldmissions.Allenquiriescanbeaddressedto thegivenemailaddressordirectlytotheappropriateIOMmission. Thisdocumentiscontinuallyupdatedasnewdataarereceivedfrommissionsand/orwheretherearenewyearly updates.
2 1

TABLEofCONTENTS:
1.0Introduction............................................................................................................................................3 1.1Datasources............................................................................................................................................3 1.2Contextanddatacaveats .......................................................................................................................5 . 1.3Global&regionalfindings.......................................................................................................................6 1.4Tables......................................................................................................................................................7 Tableone:Regionaloverview...................................................................................................................8 Figureone:Barchartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byregion ................................................8 . Tabletwo:Africaregion............................................................................................................................9 Tablethree:Central&SouthernAsiaregion..........................................................................................10 Tablefour:EastAsia&Pacificregion.....................................................................................................11 Tablefive:Europeregion........................................................................................................................12 Tablesix:NearEastregion......................................................................................................................13 Tableseven:WesternHemisphereregion .............................................................................................14 . Tableeight:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bygender................................................................15 Figuretwo:Piechartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bygender..............................................15 Tablenine:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bygender .............................................................16 . Tableten:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byage........................................................................18 Figurethree:Piechartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byage.................................................18 Tableeleven:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byage ...............................................................19 . Tabletwelve:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byexploitation.....................................................21 Figurefour:Piechartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byexploitation.....................................21 Tablethirteen:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byexploitation ...............................................22 . Tablefourteen:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bytypeoftrafficking.........................................25 Figurefive:Piechartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bytypeoftrafficking.............................25 Tablefifteen:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bytypeoftrafficking.........................................26 Tablesixteen:Overviewofallcasesassistedin2011,bynationality ....................................................28 . Figuresix:BarchartofTopcountriesoforiginofVoTs,2011................................................................29 Tableseventeen:Overviewofallcasesassistedin2011,bydestinationcountry.................................30 Figureseven:BarchartofTopcountriesofdestinationforVoTs,2011................................................31 1.5TypeofIOMassistanceprovided..........................................................................................................32

1.0Introduction: In order to reply to the request for information for the 2012 Trafficking in Persons Report of the U.S. Department of States Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (J/TIP) IOM has compiled informationonalltraffickingcasesassistedbytheorganizationin2011.Thisisaprocesswhichhasbeen ongoinginthecontextofaJ/TIPfundedprojecttosupporttheIOMhumantraffickingdatabasetool3. 1.1Datasources: ThetablescontainedwithinthisdocumentarebaseduponIOMcasedatawheretheorganizationhas been involved in providing direct assistance to a trafficked person in the context of an IOM counter traffickingproject.SomecasesarealsoassistedthroughotherIOMprojectssuchasAssistedVoluntary Return&Reintegrationprogrammes,resettlementprogrammes,familyreunificationprogrammes,and otherhumanitarianprogrammes. Programmaticdataiscollectedandstoredthroughtwochannels:(1)theIOMMIMOSAbasedHuman traffickingdatabase;(2)andthesistercorevariableapproach. (1) ThroughtheIOMMIMOSA4basedCounterTraffickingModule(CTM)otherwiseknownasthe IOMhumantraffickingdatabase,theIOMMigrantAssistanceDivisioncantodatereportupon numerous variables for all cases encoded into the system from 20002010. This covers approximately 20,000 cases encoded by 72 different missions. For example, singlecase informationcanbeprovidedwhichisdisaggregatedbysex,age,nationality,destinationcountry, typeoftrafficking,detailsoftherecruitmentandexploitationprocessetc. Dataiscollectedwithtwodistincttoolsascreeninginterviewformandanassistanceinterview form.5Screening interviews, undertaken upon first contact with the trafficked person, assess whether an individual was trafficked according to the definition provided in the Palermo Protocol6and also their immediate protection needs. Assistance interviews, undertaken once theindividualhasacceptedIOMassistance,documentthevictimsbackground,recruitmentand transportation, trafficking experience and their assistance and/or re/integration needs, including what service are (and are not) provided. The IOM database encodes data about individualtraffickingvictimsaccordingtothesestandardisedinterviewforms.Thisstandardised dataisfurthersupplementedbyqualitativedatafrominterviewswithtraffickingvictims,which allows for the documentation of details that fall outside of the standardised fields and adds depth to the information collected. Interviews are undertaken by service providers, either an IOMstafforanNGOorGOpartnerwithwhomIOMworksinprovidingdirectassistance.
That is, with the support provided by the United States Department of State (Office to Monitor and Combat TraffickinginPersons),underthetermsofGrantNo.SSGTIP09CR0070.Theopinionsexpressedhereinarethose oftheauthoranddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheUnitedStatesDepartmentofState.
4
3

TheMigrantManagementOperationalSystemApplication(MiMOSA)isaglobaldatabasethatcapturesmigrant

biographicanddemographicinformationrequiredtodeliverandreportIOMoperationalservicessuchasmedical, movement,assistedvoluntaryreturn,culturalorientation,andcountertrafficking. PleaserefertotheIOMDirectAssistanceHandbookforacopyofthescreeningformandadetaileddescriptionof IOMsapproachtoscreeningandassistance.SeeIOM2007.

6 5

See Chapter Two of the IOM Direct Assistance Handbook for more information on how IOM determines traffickingstatus.SeeIOM2007.

IOMs first countertrafficking data collection system was started in 2000 in Kosovo, UNSC resolution1244administeredKosovobyIOMcountertraffickingstaffwhorequiredasystemto collect information about trafficking victims they were assisting as well as returning and referring for assistance in countries of origin. It then expanded from the IOM Pristina (Kosovo/UNSC 1244) mission, initially to surrounding countries of origin to facilitate the provision of return and reintegration assistance provided to trafficking victims7, and then to othercountriesandregionsglobally. Today, the IOM trafficking database aims to consolidate into one database trafficking cases assisted by IOM missions and their partners globally. By mobilising the links between field missions (in origin, transit and destination countries), the database aims to establish a standardised model for data collection and data sharing (allowing for local and cultural adaptation through the inclusion of open fields) while reducing the risk of double counting cases.Thedatabasealsofacilitatesthecrossbordertransferofdatainasecuremanner. Insum,thesystemcancaptureawealthofinformation.Amainbarrierremainsthefragmented use of the tools due to the current nonmandatory nature of MiMOSA for all nonmovement relatedactivities. IOMis workingonchangesthisandthe tool will become mandatoryforall IOMactivitiesinthecourseof2012. FormoreinformationontheIOMdatabasepleasesee: Surtees,R.&Craggs,S.(2010)Beneaththesurface.Methodologicalissuesinresearchanddata collectionwithtraffickedpersons,Geneva:IOM&WashingtonD.C:NEXUS. (2) Recognizing the above limitations, IOM developed a sister core variable approach. This approach is to be used by all nonglobal database missions, with a requirement to share data withHQonaquarterlybasis.Thelistofstandardquestionsandanswershasbeentheoutcome of the translation of core concepts into variables and indicators. The questions, tables and answers have been taken from the IOM standard Screening and Assistance questionnaires. Thisensuresthatdatacollectedonthebasisofeitheroneofthetwosystemscanbecompared and analysed together to provide further insights into trafficking patterns at the regional and globallevel.ItisaminimumsetofdatathatallIOMMissionsarerequiredtocollectandshare withheadquartersatalltimesincasethestandardIOMinterviewformsarenotutilized.There arefouroverachingsections: theprofileofthevictimoftrafficking; thetraffickingprocess; exploitationand; theresponsetothevictim. The process is supported by two accompanying documents guidelines, and an excel data collectiontemplate.

IOM takes a comprehensive approach to the provision of individualised direct assistance to trafficked persons. Thisincludestheprovisionofshelter,healthcare,psychosocialassistance,legalaid,facilitatingvoluntaryreturn process(afterariskassessment)andreintegrationassistance.IOMworkstocountertraffickingandassistvictims incountriesoforigin,transitanddestination.WhileIOMdirectassistanceprojectswerefirsttargetedatfemales trafficked for sexual exploitation, today the organisation provides assistance to men, women and children traffickedforallformsofexploitationaroundtheworld.
7

Baseline data: Data collected through both of these channels can be disaggregated by year, sex, age, nationality,countryofexploitation,typeoftrafficking,sectorofexploitation,andbasicinformationon thetypeofassistanceprovided.Inaddition,thisdatacanbepresentedfromasourceanddestination perspective;andatthelocal,regional,andgloballevel. Duration: The data presented covers the period from January 2011 December 2011 or where otherwisespecified. 1.2Contextanddatacaveats: Data collected directly from trafficked persons, as in the IOM approach, is an important source of information and has proven central in efforts to understand and combat human trafficking. Research and data collection conducted within the assistance framework, such as the IOM approach, can shed light on a range of issues including risks and vulnerability factors, the needs of different groups of trafficking victims (e.g. men, women, children, victim of labour and sex trafficking); the gender dimensions of trafficking; details of the trafficking process and, albeit it to a lesser extent, the perpetrators involved, their modus operandi, the routes used and so on (Surtees & Craggs, 2010). However,itisimportanttounderstandthecontext andnecessarycaveatssurroundingtheIOMcases datahereinpresentedinthisreport: ThedataareonlyreflectiveofIOMassistedcases; Read in isolation, it cannot therefore provide an accurate picture of trafficking in a particular countryorregion; In addition, who comes into assistance is an open question a focus on trafficking for sexual exploitationhas,inpractice,ledtoatendencytoneglectothertypesofvictims(e.g.males)and other forms of trafficking (e.g. labour) which, in turn, has led to a sometimes distorted presentationofthephenomenon,likelytobereflectedintheIOMcasedata.Atthesametime, the heavy focus on international trafficking has, at worse, led to some cases of internal trafficking going unassisted and, at best, caused confusion as to the role of crossborder movementsintrafficking(Surtees&Craggs,2010); A proportion of IOM missions still do not currently share data via the global database or the associatecorevariableapproach.Therefore,datafromthesecountriesismissing.IOMisinthe processofresolvingthis; Unlikedatacollectedinthecontextoftheglobaldatabasewherethecrossbordertransferof data allows for individual case management between destination and source countries, data collected through the core variable approach cannot always be validated against duplicative entries. It is likely that an IOM mission in a destination country will report upon some of the samecasesassistedbyanIOMmissioninasourcecountry,especiallywheretherehasbeena voluntaryreturnmovementprovidedbyIOM.ThereasonforthisisthatbothIOMofficeswillbe involvedinprovidingassistance.Sothecountsofassistancearestillvalid;theymightjustrefer to the same case and thus an individual is counted twice at the regional and global level. For example,acasemightshowasbeingassistedbyIOMHaitiafterbeingtraffickedtoArgentina. ThiscasewillbeincludedinthemissionlevelstatisticsforbothIOMoffices(IOMPortauPrince andIOMBuenosAires).Yetthisdoesnotrefertotwoindividualsbutinsteadtotwocountsof assistance, provided to the same individual. For this reason, the regional and global totals provided relate to individual counts of assistance. The amount of individuals assisted by IOM globallyisslightlylower;IOMiscurrentlyworkingonfinalizingthefigureforthetotalnumberof individuals assisted by IOM globally to complement the number for counts of assistance (recognisingthattheIOMglobaldatabaserelatesto20,000,nonduplicative,individualentries fortraffickingvictims).Atthesametime,itisveryimportanttocontinuetohaveafigureonthe counts of assistance as this is more reflective of funding that is needed for assistance and protectiontovictimsoftrafficking. 5

1.3Global&regionalfindings: Thedatabaseistodayinstalledin72IOMmissionsglobally,albeitwithdifferinglevelsofdatacollected frommissiontomission.AsoftheendofDecember2011,thesystemcontaineddataonapproximately 20,000registeredIOMassistedvictimsinmorethan85sourceandmorethan100destinationcountries. Inaddition,IOMhasbeenabletocombinecorevariabledatafromarevisedtotalof89missions(with information on 91 countries)8, although the number of source and destination countries is above and beyondthisfigureduetotraffickingflowsandassistancepatterns.Only41IOMmissions9wereunable tosharedataordidnotimplementanantitraffickingprojectin2011.10Thedatacombinedrevealsthat IOMhasgloballyprovidedassistancetoindividualtraffickedpersonson5,498occasionsin2011. IOMhasgloballyprovidedassistancetoindividualtraffickedpersonson5,498occasionsin 2011. More than half (62%) of these persons related to adults aged 18 and over, whereas aroundfortypercentofcases(36%)wereminorsandabouttwopercent(2%)unknown.Two thirds(62%)oftheseindividualsarefemale,alittlebitmorethanonethirdaremales(37%), andthesexoftheindividualisunknowninjustonepercentofcases(1%).Individualshave been assisted by IOM after having been trafficked for the purpose of forced labour (53%), sexualexploitation(27%),otherpurposessuchasforcedmarriageandorgantrafficking(7%), begging(5%),combinedsexual&forcelabour(5%),unknownpurposes(3%),andforforced labourandotheraswellasforlowlevelcriminalactivities(0.1%).In2011,individualswere mostly trafficked across borders (64%), internally (31%), and both across borders and internally (1%). The type of trafficking was unknown for four percent (4%) of individuals traffickedin2011.
IOMMissionsin3countriesinEurope(Bosnia&Herzegovina,MacedoniaandSweden)andin2countriesinEast Asia and Pacific (Micronesia and Papua New Guinea) have provided information on why data for 2011 was not available.

InAfrica:Burundi,Cameroon,Chad,Congo,DemocraticRepublicofCongo,Gambia,Guinea,GuineaBissau,Ivory Coast,Liberia,Mauritania,Mozambique,Niger,Rwanda,SierraLeone,SomaliaandSudan;InEastAsia&Pacific: Australia, China, Hong Kong, Micronesia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea and South Korea; In Europe: Armenia,Bosnia&Herzegovina,Croatia,Latvia,Macedonia,Malta,RussianFederation,SloveniaandSweden;In the Near East: Libya and Tunisia; and In the Western Hemisphere: Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela.

NodataonBahamas,Bahrain,Canada,Iran,KuwaitandSaudiArabiawasavailableduetothefactthatIOMdoes nothaveoperationalpresenceinthesecountries.

10

1.4Tables Thefollowingtablesprovideasummaryofmissionlevelcasedataattheregionalandgloballevel. Moredetailedinformationcanbefoundinthedetailedregionalchaptersofthisreport. Tableone:Regionaloverview Tabletwo:Africaregion Tablethree:Central&SouthernAsiaregion Tablefour:EastAsia&Pacificregion Tablefive:Europeregion Tablesix:NearEastregion Tableseven:WesternHemisphereregion Tableeight:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bygender Tablenine:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bygender Tableten:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byage Tableeleven:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byage Tabletwelve:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byexploitation Tablethirteen:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byexploitation Tablefourteen:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bytypeoftrafficking Tablefifteen:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bytypeoftrafficking Tablesixteen:Overviewofallcasesassisted,bynationality Tableseventeen:Overviewofallcasesassisted,bydestinationcountry 7

Tableone:Regionaloverview Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Africa South & Central Asia East Asia & pacific Europe Near East Western Hemisphere GLOBAL TOTAL 303 1049 860 1606 696 984 5,498*

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata * Due to the abovementioned issue of doubleentries, these regional and global totals relate to individualoccasionsofassistanceprovidedbyIOMtoindividualtraffickedpersonswhichmayoccur,for example, in places of destination and origin. The amount of individuals assisted by IOM globally is slightly lower; IOM is currently working on finalizing the figure for the total number of individuals assistedbyIOMglobally.

Figureone:Barchartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byregion

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 8

Tabletwo:Africaregion Angola Djibouti Ethiopia Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Nigeria Senegal South Africa Tanzania Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe REGIONAL TOTAL Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 4 17 44 20 2 32 24 35 1 13 47 45 14 5 303 Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

Tablethree:Central&SouthernAsiaregion Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Afghanistan Bangladesh India Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan REGIONAL TOTAL Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 199 15 53 141 202 113 3 7 62 50 204 1,049

10

Tablefour:EastAsia&Pacificregion Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Cambodia Indonesia Japan Laos Malaysia Philippines Thailand Timor Leste Vietnam REGIONAL TOTAL Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 122 83 34 195 38 24 260 2 102 860

11

Tablefive:Europeregion

Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011

Albania Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Kosovo Lithuania Moldova Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Serbia Slovakia Spain Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom Ukraine 36 4 71 142 7 20 26 22 3 2 2 3 69 18 20 2 6 18 4 98 1 33 6 9 1 21 31 26 23 20 35 13 814

REGIONAL TOTAL
Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

1,606

12

Tablesix:NearEastregion Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Egypt Iraq Jordan Lebanon Morocco Syria Yemen REGIONAL TOTAL Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 100 36 10 9 10 18 513 696

13

Tableseven:WesternHemisphereregion Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Argentina Bolivia Chile Colombia Costa Rica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador Guatemala Haiti Mexico Nicaragua Peru The Caribbean region The United States of America REGIONAL TOTAL Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 32 16 1 23 4 49 1 25 58 656 6 18 5 25 65 984

14

Tableeight:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bygender Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Male Female Not known GLOBAL TOTAL Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata Figuretwo:Piechartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bygender

2040 3415 43 5,498

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 15

Tablenine:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bygender AFRICA Male Female TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ASIA Male Female TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 141 162 303

2011 377 672 1049

EAST ASIA & PACIFIC Male Female TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 245 615 860

EUROPE Male Female Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 562 1010 34 1606

NEAR EAST Male Female Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 304 383 9 696

16

WESTERN HEMISPHERE Male Female TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 411 573 984

17

Tableten:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byage Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Under 18 18 and over Not known GLOBAL TOTAL 1987 3404 107 5,498

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata Figurethree:Piechartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byage

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

18

Tableeleven:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byage AFRICA Under 18 18 and over Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ASIA Under 18 18 and over Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata EAST ASIA & PACIFIC Under 18 18 and over TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata EUROPE Under 18 18 and over Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 2011 198 1315 93 1606 2011 356 504 860 2011 209 839 1 1049 2011 147 155 1 303

19

NEAR EAST Under 18 18 and over Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata WESTERN HEMISPHERE Under 18 18 and over Not known TOTAL:

2011 279 408 9 696

2011 798 183 3 984

20

Tabletwelve:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byexploitation Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Sexual exploitation Forced labour Combined sexual & forced labour Begging Other Forced labour & other Low level criminal activities Not known GLOBAL TOTAL Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata Figurefour:Piechartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byexploitation 1507 2906 266 279 379 21 1 139 5,498

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 21

Tablethirteen:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,byexploitation AFRICA Sexual exploitation Forced labour Combined sexual & forced labour Forced labour & Other Begging Other Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ASIA Sexual exploitation Forced labour Combined sexual & forced labour Begging Forced labour & other Other Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 40 124 5 5 20 57 52 303

2011 322 503 129 1 14 29 51 1049

22

EAST ASIA & PACIFIC Sexual exploitation Forced labour Combined sexual & forced labour Begging Other Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 310 439 19 25 64 3 860

EUROPE Sexual exploitation Forced labour Combined sexual & forced labour Begging Low level criminal activities Other Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 635 772 52 36 1 87 23 1606

NEAR EAST Sexual exploitation Forced labour Combined sexual & forced labour Begging Other Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 101 286 7 154 139 9 696

23

WESTERN HEMISPHERE Sexual exploitation Forced labour Combined sexual & forced labour Forced labour & Other Begging Other Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 99 782 54 2 43 3 1 984

24

Tablefourteen:Globaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bytypeoftrafficking Total number of cases assisted: (year) 2011 Internal International Both Not known GLOBAL TOTAL Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata Figurefive:Piechartofglobaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bytypeoftrafficking Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

1708 3531 35 224 5,498

25

Tablefifteen:Regionaloverviewofallcasesassisted,bytypeoftrafficking AFRICA 2011 Internal International Both Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ASIA

83 175 32 13 303

2011 372 632 45 1049

Internal International Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata EAST ASIA & PACIFIC Internal International TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata EUROPE Internal International Both Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2010 4 856 860

2011 180 1266 3 157 1606

26

NEAR EAST Internal International Not known TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata WESTERN HEMISPHERE Internal International TOTAL: Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata

2011 382 305 9 696

2011 687 297 984

27

Tablesixteen:Overviewofallcasesassistedin2011,bynationality
Ukraine Haiti Yemen Laos Uzbekistan Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Afghanistan Belarus Ethiopia Nepal Vietnam Indonesia Moldova Romania Kazakhstan Somalia Bulgaria Nigeria Thailand Philippines Tajikistan India Tanzania Guatemala Hungary

835 709 378 359 292 258 213 179 141 122 116 104 103 100 90 76 74 67 65 64 62 58 53 53 48 48

Turkmenistan Myanmar Turkey Albania Congo El Salvador Colombia Bolivia Azerbaijan Uganda Pakistan Slovakia Serbia Bangladesh Nicaragua Ghana Iraq Kosovo Senegal Brazil Argentina China Russian Federation Zambia Jamaica Sri Lanka

48 42 38 37 35 35 34 32 31 31 29 28 27 26 24 21 19 19 19 18 17 16 16 16 15 15

Mali Czech Republic Dominican Republic Lithuania Mexico Peru Georgia Estonia Honduras Zimbabwe Ecuador Egypt Eritrea Guyana Not known Paraguay Poland Cameroon Iran Kenya Lesotho Liberia Macedonia Rwanda Venezuela Bosnia & Herzegovina

14 13 10 10 9 9 8 5 5 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1

28

Burkina Faso Burundi Chad Dominica Gambia Germany

1 1 1 1 1 1

Greece Latvia Madagascar Malawi Mongolia South Africa

1 1 1 1 1 1

Sudan Swaziland Timor Leste

1 1 1 5498

TOTAL:

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata Figuresix:BarchartofTopcountriesoforiginofVoTs,2011

TOP10countriesoforiginofVictimsofTrafficking assistedbyIOMin2011
Ethiopia Belarus Afghanistan Kyrgyzstan Cambodia Uzbekistan Laos Yemen Haiti Ukraine 0 200 400 600 800 122 141 179 213 258 292 359 378 709 835 1000

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata 29

Tableseventeen:Overviewofallcasesassistedin2011,bydestinationcountry Russian Federation Haiti Yemen Thailand Kazakhstan Not known Afghanistan Indonesia Poland Egypt Turkey United Arab Emirates Germany China India Ukraine Malaysia Nepal United States of America Iraq Netherlands Azerbaijan Argentina Mauritius Tanzania 30 837 658 552 449 265 193 170 148 122 103 101 94 92 87 87 87 82 81 71 65 55 52 51 48 47 Dominican Republic United Kingdom of Great Britain Belarus Syria Uzbekistan Spain Switzerland Uganda Greece Kyrgyzstan Denmark Czech Republic Ghana South Africa Italy Kosovo Guatemala Mali Albania El Salvador Japan Moldova Antigua and Barbuda Cambodia Djibouti Jordan 46 37 36 36 36 35 34 34 32 32 27 25 21 21 20 20 19 19 18 18 18 17 16 16 16 16 Serbia & Montenegro Lebanon Libya Portugal France Bangladesh Nigeria Finland Costa Rica Cyprus Nicaragua Zambia Angola Belgium Ireland Israel Mexico Jamaica Middle East Pakistan Peru Tajikistan Iran Macedonia Morocco Norway 16 15 13 13 11 10 10 8 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 3

Slovak Republic Colombia Ecuador Guyana Kenya Lithuania Montenegro Mozambique Romania Senegal Singapore

3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Timor Leste Belize Bosnia & Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chad Chile Georgia Honduras Kiribati

2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Lesotho Panama Saudi Arabia Slovenia Sweden The Netherlands Trinidad and Tobago Vietnam TOTAL:

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5498

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata Figureseven:BarchartofTopcountriesofdestinationforVoTs,2011*

TOP10countriesofdestinationwhereVictims weretraffickedtoin2011
1000 800 600 400 200 0 837 658 552 449 265 170 148 122 103 101

Source:IOMtraffickingcasedata *Mayincludecasesofinternaltraffickingaswell. 31

1.6TypeofIOMassistanceprovided AssistanceprovidedbyIOMtovictimsoftraffickingmayencompassabroadrangeofactivitiesandwill dependupon:a)theneedsandcircumstancesofthetraffickedpersonand;b)theservicesavailablein the area. Furthermore, reintegration programmes vary from region to region and are linked to the stage of programme development in each country and to funding possibilities (IOM 2007:80). Informationonassistanceprovided,attheindividuallevel,issomewhatincompleteintheprovideddata tables.Keyformsofassistancerelateto:

AssistedVoluntaryreturn:Whereatraffickedpersonvoluntarilyexpressesadesiretoreturntotheir countryoforigin,IOMcanfacilitatethesafeandsecurereturnoftheindividualbyprovidingarisk assessment, travel documents, travel tickets, medical and/or other escorts, along with pre departure,transitandreintegrationsupport. Accommodation:TraffickedpersonsmaybeaccommodatedinanIOMshelterorelsewhereifmore appropriate. Medical Assistance: Victims of trafficking may receive medical care, counselling and psychological care. Education and vocational training: This will depend upon the beneficiaries past education and trainingandhisorherpreferencebutcanincluderetraining,skillsdevelopment,microcreditgrants andsoon. Financial Assistance: Financial assistance may be received to help support the successful reintegration of the trafficked person. The amount will vary from country to country and depends uponthecostoflivingineachcountry. Legal Assistance: This may be for criminal or civil proceedings and where the victim is subject to proceedingsorwhereheorsheseeksredress.Legalassistancemayalsorefertolegaladvice. Jobplacement/apprenticeship:Thevictimoftraffickingmaybeassistedtofindemploymentintheir countryoforigin. Monitoring: This involves case follow up after assistance. This may be via a visit or telephone call, andadditionalsupportcanbeprovidedifneeded ForafulldescriptionpleaserefertotheIOMHandbookfortheDirectAssistanceofVictimsofTrafficking (IOM,2007).

32