PATRIK BERNARD KAPUSCINSKY Office of the Director, Dually Appointed Administrator 15-791 Braidwood Road, Courtenay BC, Canada

V9N 3S1 Robert L. GIBSON, Brian D. JONES and co-workers, JONES & CO. Barrister & Solicitors
Suite 402-17 Church St Nanaimo, BC Canada, V9R 5H5

June 20th 2012

Court File Number: 35900-1 Court Location: Courtenay, British Columbia, Canada

CROWN PROSECUTORS/no contract

_________________________

Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien_________________________________

(This is a verified statement of fact)

Affidavit: I, _____________________________________do swear and know these facts to be true and accurate. Mr. Robert L. Gibson, Mr. Brian D. Jones and other representatives of the Crown and Courts There is no trial concerning this matter as the crown corporation has failed to produce a valid contract between our parties. I do not contract with anyone unless the agreement is lawful. Your

engagement is unlawful and illegal as you have failed to prove consent by failing to provide the contract you claim to have to do business with me in your manner. The Judge mentioned something about section 8,9,10concerning the initial unlawful and illegal search and seizure that began the process of your continued, relentless abuse. These sections may appear to have relevance to certain persons such as Judge Sutton, due to an illegal search and seizure. However, I am a private individual operating under Inherent birth rights, in this common law jurisdiction. Through my comprehension of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I know that Section 32 & 52 are more relevant and superior Sections to administrate. Section 52 and 32 are the sections that I am holding you to. Foundation evidencelets first establish if you have that authority over me without producing a contract between our two parties or without my consent.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the only Charter of Rights entrenched in the Canadian Constitution, came into force on 17 April 1982. According to section 52 of the CONSITUTION ACT, 1982, every law that is inconsistent with the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force and effect. The SUPREME COURT OF CANADA in the Skapinker case of May 1984 declared unanimously that the Charter "is a part of the Constitution of a nation ... part of the fabric of Canadian law ... the supreme law of Canada." 1

Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. Section 32 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states

Application of Charter 32. (1)This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. Exception (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force. And Section 52 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states Primacy of Constitution of Canada 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. Constitution of Canada (2) The Constitution of Canada includes (a) the Canada Act 1982, including this Act; (b) the Acts and orders referred to in the schedule; and (c) any amendment to any Act or order referred to in paragraph (a) or (b).

Quote from Halsbury states Halsburry on Administrative law, 2011. The law is absolutely clear on this subject, there is no authority for administrative courts in this country, and no act can be passed to legitimize them. The unlawful administrative hearings that you have been damaging me through causing me to suffer a tort, numerous times over a claim of which you have failed to provide proof of claim, makes you liable. Your continued choice of damaging a Sovereign private individual through warrants, shackles, handcuffs, abduction, unlawful and illegal detainment, unlawful confinement unlawful Administrative hearings despite numerous communications between us, clearing up the confusion of your mistaken presumption of my standing.

The last court appearance has cost you another $500 000.00 and yet another $500 000.00 for the next so-called Court appearancewhich is some sort of Cesti-que vie trustit is a trust meeting. How about I be the grantor and you or the Judge be the beneficiary. Not much of a trust is it? A trust meeting that does not disclose to all parties that it is a trust meeting is in fact fraud. Sounds like fraud by false representation to me Section 2 of the Fraud Act, 2006. Sounds like fraud by failing to disclose information to me Section 3 of the Fraud Act, 2006. Sounds like fraud by abuse of position Section 4 of the Fraud Act, 2006. And Section 4 (2) states clearly, a person may be regarded as having abused his position, even though his conduct consisted of an omission, other than an act. It has been clearly communicated with the Crown representative Brian D. Jones and all other representatives of that firm, that the medicinal use of cannabis is strictly my business and not the business of the privately owned Crown Corporation out of Inner City London. For any person to support the criminalization of cannabis, when it is clearly known to treat and cure practically every disease and or illness known to mankind is to be in support of genocide. Your actions tell me who you are You will not escape the liability of your actions, no matter what your privately owned corporate superiors may have told you. Your legal training has taught you clearly nothing about actual law, this obvious. You claim to have a higher authority over my affairs than I myselfyou are mistaken. You have also failed to provide proof of claim of your presumed authority over my affairs. Who are you to me what do you want from me and what is your parasitic motivation in this matter..? To cause harm and more damages? A $26 000 000.00 lawsuit is underway due to your behavior and poor choices, an additional $500 000.00 in damages has been billed to the Crown Prosecutors for each of the last two unlawful administrative hearings, dated the 7th and 10th of May 2012. An additional $500 000.00 will be billed for further insistence on yet another unlawful administrative hearing scheduled for the 4th of July, 2012. Any further detainment or detention or confinement will cost the responsible parties each $6 936 936.00 per day.

Statement of truth
I have asked you numerous times to provide proof of contract and to produce the original charge. You have failed to provide proof of contract You have refused to produce the original charge

You have failed to provide any facts. You have no injury, therefore no crime, no corpus delecti. You have failed to clarify who exactly you represent Are you not a representative of a foreign Nation..? You have no jurisdiction over a private individual I have Lawful Excuse through uncontested Claim of Rightand uncontested sworn affidavits. I have agreement with you through uncontested sworn affidavit of truth I have facts I have multiple receipts of proof of registered mail and process server Youve generated a civil suit for $26 000 000.00, due to insistence on continuing to damage me. I have a few commercial liens on the way thanks to your insistence on ignoring law and your agreement of claims making them facts in the process
Maxims: All men and women know that the foundation of law and commerce exists in the telling of truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Truth as a valid statement of reality is sovereign in commerce. An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. An unrebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgment in commerce. Guaranteed-All men shall have remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy does not exist, or has been subverted, then one may create a remedy for themselves and endow it with credibility by expressing it in their affidavit. (Ignorance of law might be an excuse, but it is not a valid reason for the commission of a crime when the law is easily and readily available to anyone making a reasonable effort to study the law.) All corporate government is based on Commercial Affidavits, Commercial Contracts, and Commercial Liens and Commercial Distresses, hence, governments cannot exercise the power to expunge commercial processes. The legitimate Political Power of a corporate entity is absolutely dependent upon its possession of Commercial Bonds against Public Hazard, because no Bond means no responsibility, it means no power of Official signature, means no real corporate political power, means no privilege to operate statutes as the corporate vehicle. 4

The Corporate Legal Power is secondary to Commercial Guarantors. Case law is not a responsible substitute for a Bond. Municipal corporations which include cities, towns, regions and national government have no commercial reality without bonding of the entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its effects (the execution of its ruling). In commerce, it is a felony for the Officer of a Political/Public Office to not receive and report a Claim to its Bonding Company, and it is a felony for the agent of a Bonding Company to not pay the Claim. If a Bonding Company does not get a malfeasant public official prosecuted for criminal malpractice within 60 (sixty) days, then it must pay the full face value of a defaulted Lien process (at 90 days). Except for a Jury, it is also a fatal offence for any person, even for a Judge, to impair or to expunge, without a Counter-Affidavit, any Affidavit or any commercial process based upon an Affidavit. Judicial non-jury commercial judgments and orders originate from a limited liability entity called a municipal corporation; hence it must be reinforced with a Commercial Affidavit and a Commercial Liability Bond. A foreclosure on a summary judgment (non jury) without a commercial bond is a violation of commercial law. Governments cannot make unbounded rulings or statutes which control commerce, free enterprise citizens, or sole-proprietorships, without suspending commerce by a general declaration of martial law. It is a tax fraud to use Courts to settle disputes/controversy which can be settled peacefully outside of or without the court. An official (officer of the court, policeman, etc.) must demonstrate that he/she is individually bonded to use a summary process. An official who impairs, debauches voids or abridges an obligation of contract or the effect of a commercial lien without proper cause, becomes a lien debtor and his/her property becomes fortified as the pledge to secure the lien. Pound breach (breach of impoundment) and rescue is a felony. It is against the law for a Judge to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminish a commercial Lien. Only the Lien claimant or a Jury can dissolve a commercial lien. Notice to agent is notice to principle; notice to principle is notice to agent. PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENTS All officials are required by federal, state and municipal law to provide the name, address and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding company and the policy number of the bond, and if required, a copy of the policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance. Failure to provide this information

constitutes corporate and limited liability insurance fraud (15 USC) and is prim-a-facie evidence and grounds to impose a lien upon the official personally to secure their public oath and service of office,

Discharge the fraudulently derived charge that you claim to have with me through false presumption of mutually consensual contract. Drop your fraudulent matter from the record Send me your bond particulars Robert L. GIBSON , Brian D. JONES, Marsha DOWN, Timothy MORGAN,
Jill VIVIAN and A. MACDONALD and a copy of your specific job performance. I am giving you ten days to do so. Parties: Patrik Kapuscinsky/Lien Claimant c/o Notary Acceptor Charles E. Allen 480 Tenth Street, Courtenay BC V9N 3S1 Constable MOUSSAEU/Lien Debtor Campbell River RCMP Detachment 275 S Dogwood ST, Campbell River, BC Canada V9W 8C8 Robert L. GIBSON, Brian D. JONES and co-workers/Lien Debtor JONES & CO. Barrister & Solicitors Suite 402-17 Church St Nanaimo, BC Canada, V9R 5H5 Minister of Justice and Attorney General Shirley BOND /Lien Debtor Honorably acting as: ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX 9044 Stn Prov Govt, Victoria, BC Canada, V8W 9E2 Robyn CRISANTI, The LAW SOCIETY of BC/Lien Debtor MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 845 Cambie Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6B 4Z9 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA/Lien Debtor Deputy Attorney General David Loukidelis or replacement Deputy PO Box 9290 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9J7 and 1001 Douglas St, Victoria BC, V8W 2C5 Caroline Nevin THE CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION BC Branch/ Lien Debtor Executive Director 10th Floor, 845 Cambie Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6B 5T3 the Minister of Public Safety & Solicitor General of BC