Você está na página 1de 5

Issue as opposed to dispense or disperse???

ATTENTION: Ministry of Attorney General

August 16th 2010

Notice of Understanding and Claim of Right of/to Wealth and Prosperity In response to your correspondence on the 30th of July, 2010. When you wish to counter-claim, and/or rebut, dispute or contest the claims made against you you must do so within the reasonable allotted time period for such action. This process must be followed through with within a 10 day period I have allotted you an extra five days grace to respond, there was no response until 30 days later. If you had chosen to dispute these claims, you would have had to respond in the allotted time period under Oath, that these claims are questionable or unlawful, by registering the
claims made herein and or counterclaims and with full disclosure of the living man or woman making the challenge and doing so under full commercial liability to conduct the challenge in a public venue while being video recorded.

Finding anyone who will stand against the lawfulness and legitimacy of my documentation under Oath, is unlikely as that would mean Treason for that individual. I have studied this subject matter explicitly before embarking on solidifying my rights properly and lawfully. I am going by the book of law here. The law of the land, the common law. I pronounce, all that I am doing is legitimate and within the law. What you are doing and supporting is unlawful, which is to say, outside the law. My Notice of Understanding and Intent to Claim as well as my Notice of Dishonor and Claim of the Security of the Person are lawful and legitimate due to your failure to dispute under Oath, in the allotted time period, in a public venue while being video recorded. This lawful documentation must be contested under Oath, it was not. This fact has automatically secured the automatic default judgment securing forever more all rights herein
claimed and established permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any Statute or Act or Regulation against myself the free will sovereign man commonly known as Patrik-Bernard, aka Patrik-Bernard: of the Kapuscinsky family, exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties. I am not filling out an application here for more government intercourse. I am demanding what is lawfully and rightfully mine due to having destroyed my health beyond recognition and nearly died over confirmed medical assistance. Followed by incompetence and negligence on the part of ALL Health Care and Agency involved including the local MLA and MP. I demand that you send me $400 000.00 immediately in the form of certified check, for the amount of $400 000.00 in Canadian dollars, so that I may begin to recuperate from such absurd medical health care as well as incompetent, insubordinate Public Servants, having caused me the loss of all including earning capacity until I can recover from such absurdity.

I demand immediate pay out of the trust, bond, security of the person, surety bond, negotiable instrument, as consent is revoked and denied to commit or contract any further commercial business in the corporate legal entity, All Caps Fiction Person, PATRIK BERNARD KAPUSCINSKY without my/our expressed written and verified consent. The proceeds held within the Cesti Que Trust are to be issued in two ways. Firstly, by surety bond and secondly, the balance by way of cheque(s). I demand a $1,000,000.00 surety bond be sent to the Minister of Transportation and Highways. As I will be exercising my right to travel freely on all roads and highways within the lines of a map called Canada in a few of my passenger vehicles, not yours. The surety bond is to settle any claim of liability in the event of an incident requiring compensation from another living soul. Secondly, the balance is to be made payable to PATRIK BERNARD KAPUSCINSKY, for Patrik-Bernard aka Patrik-Bernard: of the Kapuscinsky family. Any further use of the corporate legal entity, All Caps Fiction Person will initiate/activate my Fee Schedule for trademark infringements as outlined in my Good Faith Public Notice Claim of Right. All rights reserved. Non-Assumpsit.

Disobeying a statute:
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by willfully omitting to do anything that requires to be done, is unless a punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

Section 337 of the criminal code:


Public servant refusing to deliver property-Every one who being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or in right of a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of the employment with the receipt, custody, management or the control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to Imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years, as clearly stated in your statute, under Maritime Admiral Law, for the Duty of Public Servants to protect the people as well as uphold the duty of "issuing" remedy in the form of "issue" of the "security of the person", along with the protection of God-given rights, freedoms, well-being and duties of the people.

These are quotes from My Notice of Dishonor: dated 1rst of July 2010
In the following with grace, I have allowed you ten (10) days from receipt of the Good Faith Public Notice Claim of Right Declaration plus, an additional five (5) days grace, to respond to this action or be in automatic default judgment. You were given the opportunity to dispute via kapper369@yahoo.com by registering the claims made herein and or counterclaims and with full disclosure of the living man or woman making the challenge and doing so under full commercial liability to conduct the challenge in a public venue while being video recorded.

Failure to register a dispute within Ten (10) days, plus five (5) days grace of the Good Faith Public Notice Claim of Right Declaration, secured the automatic default judgment securing forever more all rights herein claimed and established permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any Statute or Act or Regulation against myself the free will sovereign man commonly known as Patrik-Bernard, aka Patrik-Bernard: of the Kapuscinsky family, exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties. Therefore, you waived your right to a Notice of Protest and consent to, admit to and confess to an immediate automatic default judgment, as outlined in my Good Faith Public Notice Claim of Right Declaration. This means you agree(d) to the remedy I seek in the event that you have wasted the precious lost time that I will never get back! ..

Whereas it is my understanding that according to the Constitution Act of 1982, Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms reads: Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the Supremacy of God and the rule of law and; Whereas it is my understanding that all Rights come from God and are inalienable, which means that they cannot be taken away and; Whereas it is my understanding that those who violate God-given Rights must believe themselves superior to God or they must believe that God does not exist and; Whereas it is my understanding that there are inalienable rights given by God - Life, Liberty and Property and; Whereas it is my understanding that the possession of these basic Rights are all necessary for the Pursuit of Happiness, violation of any one of the three by government is tyranny and; Whereas it is my understanding that attached to an essential part of God-given Rights is the sacred duty to protect and defend those Rights with whatever means necessary, and;

Maxims of Law
There are ten essential maxims or precepts in commercial law found in the bible as follow, 1. WORKMAN IS WORTHY OF HIS HIRE. The first of these is expressed in Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Mat. 10:10; Luke 10:7; II Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: "It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property." 2. The second maxim is "Equality before the law or more precisely, ALL ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW. (God's Law - Moral and Natural Law). Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24: 17-21; Deut. 1; 17, 19:21; Mat. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. "No one is above the law". This is founded on both Natural and Moral law and is binding on everyone. For someone to say, or acts as though, he is "above the law" is insane. This is the major insanity in the world today. Man continues to live, act, believe, and form systems,

organizations, governments, laws and processes which presume to be able to supersede or abrogate Natural or Moral Law. But, under commercial law, Natural and Moral Law are binding on everyone, and no one can escape it. Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of the few. 3. This one is one of the most comforting maxims one could have and your foundation for your peace-of-mind and your security and your capacity to win and triumph -- to get you remedy -- in this business. IN COMMERCE TRUTH IS SOVEREIGN. (Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8) Truth is sovereign -- and the Sovereign tells only the truth. Your word is your bond. If truth were not sovereign in commerce, i.e., all human action and inter-relations, there would be no basis for anything. No basis for law and order, no basis no accountability, there would be no standards, no capacity to resolve anything. It would mean, "anything goes", "each man for himself", and "nothing matters". That's worse than the law of the jungle. Commerce. "To lie is to go against the mind". Oriental proverb: "Of all that is good, sublimity is supreme." 4. TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12). An affidavit is your solemn expression of your truth. In commerce, an affidavit must be accompanied and must underlay and form the foundation for any commercial transaction whatsoever. There can be no valid commercial transaction without someone putting his or her neck on the line and stating, "this is true, correct, complete and not meant to mislead." When you issue an affidavit, it is a two edged sword; it cuts both ways. Someone has to take responsibility for saying that it is a real situation. It can be called a true bill, as they say in the Grand Jury. When you issue an affidavit in commerce you get the power of an affidavit. You also incur the liability, because this has to be a situation where other people might be adversely affected by it. Things change by your affidavit, in which are going to affect people's lives. If what you say in your affidavit is, in fact, not true, then those who are adversely affected can come back at you with justifiable recourse because you lied. You have told a lie as if it were the truth. People depend on your affidavit and then they have lost because you lied. 5. AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS TRUTH IN COMMERCE. (12 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15;) Claims made in your affidavit, if not rebutted, emerge as the truth of the matter. Legal Maxim: "He who does not deny, admits." 6. AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT BECOMES THE JUDGMENT IN COMMERCE. (Heb. 6:16-17;). There is nothing left to resolve. Any proceeding in a court, tribunal, or arbitration forum consists of a contest, or duel, of commercial affidavits wherein the points remaining unrebutted in the end stand as truth and matters to which the judgment of the law is applied.

7. IN COMMERCE FOR ANY MATTER TO BE RESOLVED MUST BE EXPRESSED. (Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21). No one is a mind reader. You have to put your position out there, you have to state what the issue is, to have someone to talk about and resolve. Legal Maxim: "He who fails to assert his rights has none.) 8. The primary users of commercial law and those who best understand and codified it in Western Civilization are the Jews. This is Mosaic Law they have had for more than 3500 years past which is based upon Babylonian commerce. This one is: HE WHO LEAVES THE BATTLEFIELD FIRST LOSES BY DEFAULT. (Book of Job; Mat. 10:22; this means that an affidavit which is unrebutted point for point stands as "truth in commerce" because it hasn't been rebutted and has left the battlefield. Governments allegedly exist to resolve disputes, conflicts and truth. Governments allegedly exist to be substitutes for the dueling field and the battlefield for so disputes; conflicts of affidavits of truth are resolved peaceably, reasonably instead of by violence. So people can take their disputes into court and have them all opened up and resolved, instead of going out and marching ten paces and turning to kill or injure. Legal Maxim: "He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it". 9. SACRIFICE IS THE MEASURE OF CREDIBILITY (NO WILLINGNESS TO SACRIFICE = NO LIABILITY, RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY OR MEASURE OF CONVICTION). Nothing ventured nothing gained. A person must put himself on the line assume a position; take a stand, as regards the matter at hand. And one cannot realize the potential gain without also exposing himself to the potential of loss. (One who is not damaged, put at risk, or willing to swear an oath on his commercial liability to claim authority) (Acts 7, life/death of Stephen). For the truth of his statements and legitimacy of his actions has no basis to assert claims or charges and forfeits all credibility and right Legal Maxim: "He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit". 10. SATISFACTION OF A LIEN. In commerce a lien or claim can be satisfied in any one of three ways. (Gen. 2-3; Mat. 4; Revelation.). #1 #2 #3

Which way will it be that I extract from you what is rightfully and lawfully mine YO The jig is up my man Sincerely, Patrik-Bernard:Kapuscinsky

Você também pode gostar