Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Introduction
It is the democratic demand, Let there be light in every house in Bangladesh. The Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh has an enthusiastic program and committed to provide electricity to every house by 2020. Generally country has generation of capacity about 5,000 MW, of which about 3,000 MW is produced generally, against peak demand of about 5500 MW. (Ahmed, S, 2006.) The Power System Master Plan has provided 20 year forecast which shows as demand of 4,600 MW in 2005, 6,800 MW in 2010, and about 10,000 MW in 2015.( Rahman, M., 2004). Non-renewable sources of energy are natural gas, oil and coal in Bangladesh. And renewable sources of energy are water, wind, waves, bio gas and solar energy. Presently more than 70% of the energy is produced with Natural gas. Bangladesh is exploring hydrocarbon resources but researchers opine that the country may not have sustainable supply of natural gas resources beyond 2030. Bangladesh has till now five coal fields in the country. It is to mention the proved reserves of coal deposits in Jamalganj Coal Field is 1,053 million metric tons (MMT), in Barapukuria Coal Field of 389 MMT, in Phulbari Coal Field of 572 MMT, Khalaspir Coal Field of 277 MMT and the Dighipara Coal Field by five holes drilled in an area of 3.4 square kilometres may have deposit of about 200 MMT with the expectation of having probable coal deposits of 600 MMT. The estimated coal basin area is about 15 square kilometres. In quality the Dighipara coal is nearly same and in some respect is better. The average thickness is 59 metres next to Jamalganj Coal Basin. The overburden is medium in thickness. The quality of coal in Bangladesh is such that 1(one) million tons of that can produce electricity of 300 MW. As such planners may hope that Coal resources in Bangladesh may provide sustainable energy development in the country.
Some salient aspects of the JAMAGANJ COAL FIELD Table showing the Succession in the Jamalganj Coal Basin: Age Recent Recent to Formation Sub- Alluvium Thickness in metres (feet) 25.91-82.31(85-270) Lithology Clay, silt, coarse, medium and fine sand, coarse, medium and fine gravel.
Pliocene
Coarse to fine gravel and coarse 12.19-71.64 (40-235) sand. ---Unconformity------Upper Miocene to Jamalganj Formation Silt, fine sand, clay, Oligocene (Surma Gv. Undiff.) sand (1) 277.43-411.58 (910- quick medium gravel, 1350) shaly clay sandstone, shaly coal. ---Unconformity------Eocene Kopili Shaly clay and 30.48 (100) sandstone. Eocene Sylhet Limestone Limestone, shaly 15.24-33.53 (50-110) clay. Eocene to Cherra Sandstone, shaly 51.82-106.70(170Paleocene clay, silt, shaly 350) coal. -----Unconformity----Cretaceous Upper Sibgonj Trap wash. 146.34 (480) Gondwana Rajmahal 335.36 (1100) Basalt andesite. and
Dupi Tila
---Unconformity-------
Permian
Pre-Cambrian
Table showing the thickness of coal seams as by M/s Krupp: Seam No. I II III IV V VI VII Thickness in metres 0.71 2.41 32.16 1.98 1.83 3.10 22.86 Thickness in feet 2-4 7-11 105-6 6-6 6-0 10-2 75-1
Table showing the proven coal reserve estimates by M/s Krupp: Seam No. II III IV V VI VII Reserve in million tons 39.5 526.8 32.4 30.0 50.8 374.4
Table showing the seamwise reserve estimates made by Savornin are as follows: No. of Seam III IV V VI VII Total Indicated in million Inferred in million Total in million tons tons tons 352 288 640 115 134 249 63 77 140 38 120 158 148 228 376 716 847 1563
Table showing the average chemical analysis of Jamalganj coal given by different agencies: Constituent M/s Waheeduddin Ahmed and M.A Zaher
22.4% (Range 10%-60%) 30-40% 33-54 average 47% -
M/s Krupp
A. Proximate 1. Ash 2.Volatile matter (Dry basis) 3. Fixed carbon (Dry basis) 4. Moisture B. Ultimate (Dry-ash-free basis) C H N 0 S CL Calorific Value (clean coal) Coal with 20-25% ash content
25.7% (dry ash free 24.5% (Dry basis) basis) 40.6% 36.92% ,, 36.72% 3.58% (air dried)
79% 5.4% 1.81% 12.5% 0.65% 0.04% 12,100 BTU /Ib 11,000 BTU/Ib
80.1% 5.39% 1.83% 12-02% 0.55% 0.005% 11878 BTU/lb (air dried) -
Table showing the stratigraphic succession in the Barapukuria basin, Dinajpur District, Bangladesh:
Age Group Formation Member Lithology Max. thickness in meters
Holocene Alluvium Silty clay 1.83 ------------------------------------------------Unconformity------------------------------------------------------Pleistocene Barind Clay Residum Clay and sandy clay 10.36 ------------------------------------------------Unconformity------------------------------------------------------Pliocene Dupi Tila Upper Sandstone, pebbly sandstone 126.82 and clay/mudstone ---------Local Unconformity---------------------Lower Sandstone, claystone and mudstone with silica and white clay ------------------------------------------------Unconformity------------------------------------------------------Permian Gondwana Feldspathic sandstone, carbona- 457.32 ceous sandstone and shale, ferruginous sandstone, conglomerates, and coal beds. -----------------------------------------------Unconformity-------------------------------------------------------Precambrian Basement Diorite, granodiorite, quartzdiorite, 14.32+ complex granite, and diorite gneiss
Table showing the thickness (in parenthesis) of coal seams in different boreholes of Barapukuria basin (in metres), Dinajpur District, Bangladesh: Bore hole Seam-I SeamII 162.19171.04 (8.84) Nil SeamIII 171.65172.26 (0.61) Nil SeamIV 188.72189.33 (0.61) Nil SeamV 197.87208.23 (10.37) Nil SeamVI SeamSeamVII 371.95372.26 (0.30) 203.66204.27 (0.61) 491.69506.55 (4.65) 324.85326.52 (1.68) Nil Composite Thickness 60.82
GDH-38
GDH-39
GDH-40
GDH-41
GDH-42
GDH-43
Average Thickness
331.71371.34 (39.63) 170.43203.05 (32.62) 193.90- 252.74- 276.52- 306.25- 326.37- 450.30198.47 267.98 283.16 309.37 359.14 491.16 (4.57) (15.24) (2.97) (3.12) (8.08) (40.86) 129.57- 132.00- 141.62- 158.54- 162.50- 285.37130.03 140.70 142.53 158.84 168.90 321.65 (0.46) (8.69) (0.92) (0.30) (6.40) (36.28) Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 190.55216.16 (25.61) Nil Nil Nil Nil 161.58- 286.89171.79 329.26 (10.21) (42.37) 1.83 10.92 1.50 1.34 8.77 36.22
33.23
79.50
54.73
25.61
Table showing seam-wise average results of chemical analysis of the Barapukuria coal, Dinajpur District, Bangladesh:
Seam No.
1 11. 111 IV V VI VII
Sp.Gr.
Ash %
Sulfur %
1.33 0.50 0.62 0.52 0.43 0.65 0.77
Fixed carbon %
45.50 50.60 54.66 48.67 44.93 53.44 53.38
Analysed by: Deen M. Mia, M.Rahman, Meherunnesa and Begum Sakera Table showing seamwise reserves of Barapukuria coal, Dinajpur District, Bangladesh:
Seam Bore hole No. Av. Area covered in km2 No. Thickness in metres Proved
I II III IV V VI VII Total GDH-38,40,41 GDH-38,40,41 GDH-38,40,41 GDH-38,40,41 GDH-38,40,41 ,43 GDH-38,39,40, 41, 42,43 GDH-38,39,40, 41, 43 1.83 10.92 1.50 1.34 8.77 36.22 1.60 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.60 1.49 0.74
Reserves in MMT
Probable Total
1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.35 1.49 1.49
Age
Group/ Formation
Lithology
Probable
12.26 sq.km
Table showing the Result of Analyses of Coal found in Khalaspir coal basins in percentages. Name of Moist Fixed Basin ure Carbon Khalahspir 0.57-4.1 32.09-66.55 Volatile Matters Ash Sulphur BTU/Pound
7388- 13000
Grade Bituminous
Hosaf International is continuing exploration work in this coal field and has a proved deposit of 277 million tons with 18 holes.
During the 1950's the Standard Vacuum Oil Company (SVOC) carried out seismic survey in the northern part of the country and in 1963, the Oil and Gas Development Corporation (OGDC) also carried out seismic survey. In addition to those, the SVOC and OGDC carried out aeromagnetic survey in the region. The surveys identified several basins and Dighipara basin is one of such basins. The Geological Survey of Bangladesh carried out regional Gravity and Magnetic Surveys to delineate the basin boundary and in 1995 the Geological Survey of Bangladesh discovered this coal field. The quality of this coal is similar to other coal. The Geological Survey of Bangladesh has continued the exploration activity in the Basin and drilled four holes and found coal in all the holes. The composite thickness of the coal seams is about 64 metres. It has been estimated that in an area of 1.2 square kilometres there is more than 100 metric tons of coal is proved deposits and the probable deposit is 600 million tons. Recently the Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh has granted an exploration licence to the Petrobangla. The Delta Pacific Mining PLC has expressed their willingness to have joint venture with the Petrobangla. The probable basin area is about 15 square kilometres.
Structurally the Dighipara basin is within the southern slope of the Rangpur Platform. Dighipara basin Is a north-south elongated oval shaped and may be fault bounded basin. This basin is separated from the Khalaspir basin by the Bhaduria high. Eastern side of the basin may be fault bounded (evidenced from the gravity bouger anomaly map). Dighipara, Dangapara.and Daudpur may be the sub-basins of one big basin and these sub-basins may be separated from each other by secondary faults. The northeast-southwest trending fault may be the northern limit of these basins. These basins may be formed by faulting in the crystalline basement during Permo-carboniferous time (Banerjee, 1981). Later on these basins were reshaped and basin marginal adjustments took place from time to time due to the Himalayan upheavals (Uddin 1996).
Table showing the stratigraphic succession of the basin as established from the borehole: Age Holocene Pleistocene Formation / Group Alluvium Barind Clay Lithologic description Silty clay: light brown, soft, root lets Red lay: brown, variegated, sticky & plastic when wet, hard on drying. Ferruginous nodules present. Thickness (Max.) 0.9m (3 ft)
------------------------------------Unconformity---------------------------------------------Pliopleistocene Dupi Tila Formation Sandstone, pebbly sandstone and occasional clay stone: Sandstone: light yellow to brown, white at places, fine to coarse, loose. Pebbly sandstone: Grey with various shades of colour, sub-angular, mostly quartzite embedded in a sand matrix; poorly consolidated. Clay: grey to bluish grey with reddish tints, sticky and plastic when wet, hard on drying, at places lignitic material present. Bottom part is white. Soft. Reworked Kopili sandstone, shale with fossils Tura sandstone? Mainly silica sand and occasional clay beds Feldspathic sandstone, carbonaceous sandstone, carbonaceous shale, conglomerate and coal beds, Diorite Gneiss, granite gneiss, granite: Highly fractured Base not seen 320.00 m (1050 ft)
? ? Permian
60.95m (200 ft) 60.95 m (200 ft) 167.33 m (549 ft) 41.15m (135 ft)
PreCambrian
Table showing formations with depth and thickness: Formation GOH-49/1995 GDH-58/2001 Thicknes s (m) Thicknes s (m) Depth (m) Depth (m) GOH-60/2003 Thicknes s (m) Depth (m) GDH-61/2004 Thicknes s (m) 0.91 5.18 183.48 60.96 61.26 167.33 8.84 (+)
Calorific value BTU/Ib.
13500 13600 13400 13400 13400 13500 13400 13800 12000 12500 13500 13450 12200 12350 13200
Alluvium 0-0.61 0.61 0-0.61 0.61 0-0.76 0.76 0-0.91 Barind Clay 0.61- 7.62 0.61-6.10 5.49 0.76- 3.66 2.90 0.91-6.10 Residuum 8.23 Dupi Tila 8.23- 319.72 6.10243.83 3.666.10327.95 249.92 260.59 256.93 189.58 249.92287.41 Tura (?) 287.41335.87 Gondwana 327.95- 141.42 335.87469.37 501.98 Basement 469.37- 41.15 501.98510.52 (+) 526.06 Kopili (?) 37.49 48.46 166.11 24.08 (+) 189.58250.53 260.59- 67.97 250.53328.56 311.80 328.56- 166.72 311.80495.28 479.12 495.28- 9.75 479.12505.03 (+) 487.96 -
Table showing Coal seams with depth and thickness (in metres):
Seam no. I II III IV v VI VII Total thickness GDH-49/1995 327.96-345.03= 17.07 348.39-382.22=33.83 384.66-391.67=7.01 395.94-398.37=2.44 400.43-402.03=1.60 406.45-406.76=0.30 ----62.25 metres GDH-58/2001 GDH-60/2003 GDH-61/2004 323.09-342.90=19.81 348.08-384.66 =36.58 388.32-395.02 = 6.71 397.31-400.66 =3.35 407.97-408.89 = 0.91 411.99-412.80= 0.81 414.83-417.73=2.90 71.07 metres
383.53-400.5 I = 16.98 355.09-365.00=9.91 403.62-438.91=35.30 368.81-402.71=33.99 441.135-442.57=1.22 407.52-408.04=0.52 444.79-455.07=10.27 416.36-419.25=2.90 -------------------------------63.76 metres 47.32 metres
Table showing the results of the Chemical Analyses of Coal Samples (GDH-61/04) :
Seam No. I Depth in feet
1065'7" 1085' 1102'2" 1123'18" 1156' 1172' 1188'6" 1215' 1231'8' ' 1252'8" 1276'6" 1285'8" 1314' 1339' 1369'8"
Moisture %
4.06 3.30 4.73 3.35 2.82 3.01 2.20 2.65 2.22 2.24 3.57 2.36 1.97 2.10 3.15
Volatile Matter %
29.94 33.65 30.50 33.90 33.92 33.65 33.19 29.40 28.23 32.58 28.08 26.90 29.65 29.97 27.57
Ash %
4.05 6.30 3.57 4.85 4.83 3.50 6.70 3.80 17.54 9.88 5.80 7.89 12.33 11.85 9.66
Fixed Carbon %
61.95 56.75 61.20 57.90 58.43 59.84 57.91 64.15 52.01 55.40 62.55 62.85 56.05 56.08 59.62
Total Sulfur %
0..33 0.41 0.91 0.54 0.89 0.65 0.64 0.86 0.52 0.65 0.38 0.86 0.49 0.44 0.50
Depth (m)
Specific Gravity
1.30 1.34 1.61 1.30 1.29 1.29 1.31 1.23 1.25 1.37 1.32 1.28 1.30 1.29 1.32
II
III
IV V
VII Analyzed by: Ferdowsi Begum, Chemist, Analytical Chemistry Branch, GSB, Assisted by, Begurn Sakera, Chemist, Analytical Chemistry Branch, GSB.
Table showing the maximum, minimum and average results of the seam-wise chemical analyses of coal at Dighipara basin, Dinajpur.
Seam Moisture % No. Max Min. Av. I 4.73 0.49 3.2 II 4.71 0.32 2.67 III 3.59 2.11 2.71 IV 2.68 0.41 1.88 V 2.1 1.38 1.74 VI 1.58 1.58 1.58 VII 3.15 3.15 3.15 Volatile Matter % Max. 38.23 39.56 33.59 29.65 29.97 32.94 27.57 Min. 14.74 13.42 20.36 22.85 26.24 32.94 27.57 Av. 30.89 32.08 28.46 25.42 27.64 32. 94 27.57 Max. 38.57 37.56 30.2 34.9 32.23 14.71 9.66 Ash % Min. 2.53 1.34 4.6 12.33 11.85 14.71 9.66 Av. 9.18 8.17 12.50 20.62 22.47 14.71 9.66 Fixed Carbon % Max. 73.15 79.9 62.85 56.57 56.08 50.77 59.62 Min. 35.04 37.69 45.32 41.44 40.12 50.77 59.62 Av. 56.29 57.13 56.33 52.38 50.08 50.77 59.62 Total Sulfur % Max. Min. Av. 1.29 0.33 0.65 0.91 0.4 0.67 0.86 0.37 0.58 1.01 0.4 0.56 1.03 0.44 0.86 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.50 0.50 0.50 Calorific value BTU/lb. Max. Min. Av. 14981 9110 12836 14250 9200 12983 14600 9250 12497 12200 9100 10650 12350 9100 10480 12170 12170 12170 13200 13200 13200
Phulbari Coal field Geological Survey of Bangladesh expected to get more coal at Barapukuria. In 1997 one foreign company named BHP (Broken Hill Proprietary International) discovered bituminous coal at the depth150m at Phulbari and thickness is 38.41. The deposit of this coal field is thought to be considerable thickness. The prospecting licence was then transferred to during 2002 to Asia Energy PLC for exploration of coal in the Phulbari Basin. The company in their exploration activities has found 572 million tons of coal. AEC has strongly recommended for development the coal by through open pit mining. But there was resentment over the mining methods. It is understood that there many pros and cons on the mining methods. Now it will be Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh to decide what is to. The government is contemplating to promulgate the Coal Policy of Bangladesh. The estimated 2.6 billion tons of coal=65 TCF of gas-more than four times the known reserves. Government Revenue US $ 200 million per year. 3 million tons of import coal from India for brick kilns. 1 mmt of coal=0.025 TCF of gas. 65 TCF= 2600 million tons 1 ,, = 2600/65=40 million metric tons. It is expected additional coal tonnage mine life will be found through exploring area Grounwater can be controlled upper Dupi .Tila aquifer. Total number of boreholes=108 Total cumulative depth all boreholes=23,893 meters Phulbari Basin is defined by the sub-crop of the Permian half-graben structure beneath the overlain Tertiary sediments.
The basin and coal strata deepers from west to east and depth of coal appear to be maximum in the central part of the Phulbari basin. There are two major coal seams I Seam -11.9-19.8 metres thick II Main 13.9-20.8 metres thick There are three seams.
Table: Stratigraphy of the Phulbari basin Period Quaternary Tertiary Formation Undifferentiated Madhupur Clay Upper Dupi Tila Lower Dupi Tila Lower Dupi Tila Permian Gondwana Group Lithology Alluvials associated with streams. Clays, red-brown. Interbedded sands and gravels,generally micaceous. Mudstone and clays, weathered Intercalated quartz sands and silty clays. Mudstones and sandstones, weathered. Coal seams: Upper, main, Lower 1 and Lower 2. Mudstones and sandstones, weathered. Basement granite/granodiorite
Archean Hydrogeology
Modhupur Clay: Permeability 0.0001 to 0.008 m/day Upper Dupitila Transmissivity- 650 to 1500 m2/d Hydraulic conductivity 6 to 15 m/d Storativity for 0.001 to 0.0001 Specific yield 0.15to 25 Ground water depth range 2 to 9 meters. Lower Dupitila regional aquiclude Barapukuria suggest coal seam have higher permeability. Continuous groundwater extraction rates upto 7000 l/s will be required to manage over the life of the mine.
Coal Quality High volatile A bituminous High volatile B bituminous Predominantly dull banded dull Occasional higher concentration of bright coal Vitrinite content is relatively low. Raw coal has very low coking properties.
Ash content 15% to 19% Through processing-7% to 13% possible for export market 20 to 35% for local industrial and thermal power stations Volatile matter varies from 37.5% to less than 36%. Sulphur usually less than 1%. Ash- 14.1% to 27.4% Fixed carbon -44.7% to 53%. Density- 1.39-1.51 Specific energy- M.J/kg-24.8 to 28.3
Tertiary Coal About 3(three) million tons of lignite coal of tertiary rock has been found at LalghatTakerghat area of Sunamgonj district. Coal has been found in 5(five) of 11(eleven) identified basins of Bangladesh. Geological drill hole will be done in 7(seven) basins. It is expected that the reserve of coal deposit must be hopeful. Today it is not a dream that the future of the country will be enlightened by the light of black coal of Bangladesh Table1 Showing some aspects of the coal basins of Bangladesh. Name of Coal Basin Jamalganj Dighipara Phulbari Barapukuria Khalaspir Total thickness in metres 64 50-64 14-77 25.61-79.67 29 Basin area in sq. km 37 15 6 6.58 15.0 Explored area in sq. km 11.8 3.4 5.0 5.0 2.54
Depth of coal in metres Proved Probable Reserve in reserves in million million metric tons metric tons
? 600 ? ? 685
Table 2 Showing the Result of Analyses of Coal found in different coal basins in percentages. Name of Basin Jamalgonj Dighipara Phulbari Barapukuria Khalahspir Moist ure
2.9-3.06 2.7 0.57-4.1
Fixed Carbon
Volatile Matters
Ash
Sulphur BTU/Pound
11,780 11,500-13,000 8000kcal/kg 10,500-13,591 7388- 13000
34-54 30-42 22.4 0.6 49.76-52.76 30.01-39.27 8-14.9 0.54-0.65 51.0 30.5 12.15 <1 44.93-54.86 28-65 11.79 0.43 32.09-66.55 6.02-28.83 7.6-50.51 Trace
There was a great hope of Mining of Coal Deposits in Jamalgonj and the Government endeavoured to mine the coal for the benefit of the nation but the hope was ended by the comment in the report of the Robertson Research International Limited, Financially and economically the establishment of a Coal mine at Jamalgonj is doubtfully viable because a
zero interest loan would enable to operate or a break even slightly profitable basis.The capital cost conditions, as at present forseen(at present day price) of the project is extended to be 83.048 million Sterling Pound which will be studying two shafts.It is ,therefore,concluded from these facts that the development of a Coal mine at Jamalgonj is not commercially viable project. Further, it is to mention that the BHP-UTAH International Inc. made a proposed for extraction of Coal Bed Methane Gas from the Jamalgonj Coal Field but study had not produced bright prospect. There are many conditions prevailing in the Jamalgonj Coal Field which tempt to proceed to have a study of extracting Coal Bed Methane but the fate of the proposed ended with their comment in Production Forcast Of all variables,the Geological unknowns still have the most potential to change the feasivility unless continuity of thick seams is proved;unless there is a sufficient gas absorbed, and unless sufficient permeability can be developed by fracturing A Review on the Report of the Underground Gasification of Coal depicts some salient features which may give some light of hope of possibility of use of Jamalgonj Coal Deposits. The report mentioned, In the USA some successful result had been obtained by electro Carbonization of coal in the seam at an experimental establishment in Gorgas, Alabama. This work had been seen by a British delegation in 1952. When it was considered that the result was sufficiently promising to justify the initiation of similar tests in Britain should the need arise. Further it is to note that the national Coal Board sent a group of experts to USSR to observe the processes of Gasification of Coal. During the study of Underground Gasification of Coal, there were more than 62 trials and in one trial it was observed: A trial gave usable gas for a period of 118 days during which time it was estimated that 9,000 tons of Coal consumed out of 10800 tons of Coal which was available. The calorific value of the gas produced varied from 40 to 90 B.th. U/Cu.Ft with an average value of 57 B.th U/Cu.In conclusion it was said In fact, the trial was a while complete success. Further it was mentioned that the actual heat balance may also be affected by gas loss. For a number of reasons, the overburden may be permeable or may develop fissures through subsidence. Leakage of air and gas can result. This is an adverse effect in the processes of underground gasification of coal. Now let us mention some salient features of the Jamalganj Coal field as it was observed in Shaft Sinking Site Drill Hole (SSDH-14). Process parameters - such as operating pressure, outlet temperature and flow are governed by the coal and rock properties that vary with time and location. Information on the process conditions must be constantly monitored and updated as the underground gasifier develops. Process parameters need to be adjusted accordingly to accommodate the ever-varying conditions of gasification. The WCG technology uses a variety of modern drilling methods; including highprecision directional holes, as well as conventional vertical and inclined (or angled) holes. In its arsenal are various methods of well-linking, the capability to inject different oxidants (air, enriched air, 02/1-120, C02/02 and so on), and a great variety of designs of underground
gasifiers. It can be applied to coal in a wide range of geological cond'itions, with the following preferred parameters: Coal seam thickness from 0.5 to 30 m. Dip from 00 to 70'. Depth from 30 to 800 m. Calorific value (LHV) from 8.0 to 30.0 MJ/kg (which includes low-quality lignite and bituminous coal).
Geological Succession with some particular aspects ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Formation Lithology Probable permeability conditions -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Alluvium Sand, silt and clay Permeable ---------------------------------Unconformity---------------------------------------------------------------------Barind Clay Clay and silt Poorly permeable ---------------------------------Unconformity---------------------------------------------------------------------Dupi Tila Formation Pebbly sandstone forming Permeable deep aquifer ---------------------------------Unconformity---------------------------------------------------------------------Surma Group Alteration of sandstone, siltstone Nearly impervious and claystones ---------------------------------Unconformity---------------------------------------------------------------------Kopili Formation Marly in character Nearly impervious ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sylhet Limestone Fine grained limestone forming the May be slightly roof rock over the Tura Sandstone permeable ---------------------------------Unconformity---------------------------------------------------------------------Tura Sandstone Clayey sandstone May be slightly Permeable ---------------------------------Unconformity---------------------------------------------------------------------Gondwana Top of the formation is of thick white Top of the formation clay bed and alteration of arkosic nearly impervious sandstone and Coal Beds. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table: Projected Demand for Commercial Energy and Electricity (Low Economic Growth Scenario) 1990 113 4.5% 1995 125 5.4% 2000 137 6.4% 2005 149 7.2% 2010 161 7.7% 2015 174 8.0% 2020 186 8.0%
Population (million) GNP Growth Rate Per capita GNP ($) Energy Growth Rate Per Capita Kg OE Total Fuel (MTOE) MJ/$ GNP Electricity Percentage in fuel Total GWH Per capita KWh Load Factor Peak Load
Table: Projected Demand for Commercial Energy and Electricity (High Economic Growth Scenario) 1990 113 4.5% 190 7.3% 56 6 13 35% 8271 73 55% 1717 1995 125 5.4% 217 7.4% 72 9 14 37% 12377 99 56% 2523 2000 137 7.2% 265 9.9% 97 13 16 39% 19417 142 56% 3858 2005 149 8.7% 353 11.9% 148 22 18 37% 30542 205 57% 6117 2010 161 9.3% 504 10.3% 229 37 19 33% 45491 282 58% 8953 2015 174 9.6% 736 10.3% 346 60 20 31% 69641 400 59% 13474 2020 186 10.0% 1081 10.3% 526 98 21 30% 109828 589 60% 20896
Population (million) GNP Growth Rate Per capita GNP ($) Energy Growth Rate Per Capita Kg OE Total Fuel (MTOE) MJ/$ GNP Electricity Percentage in fuel Total GWH Per capita KWh Load Factor Peak Load
In conclusion, it may be said that considering the permeability factors of overlying formations there will be less possibility of gas or air loss but it should be the subject of study. Further, it is to say that all types studies are to be made to identify the best way or better ways to implement to use the coal deposits in the Jamalganj Coal Field towards the development of the area and the development of the country as a whole.