Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
9/4/2012
Earnings to be Distributed High Vs. Low Payout. Objective Maximize Shareholders Return. Effects Taxes, Investment and Financing Decision.
9/4/2012
Walters Model
9/4/2012
Assumptions
Internal Financing Constant Return and Cost of Capital 100% Payout or Retention Constant EPS and DIV Infinite Time
9/4/2012
Valuation
Market price per share is the sum of the present value of the infinite stream of constant dividends and present value of the infinite stream of capital gains.
P (DIV / k ) (r / k ) (EPS DIV) k
9/4/2012
Example
r 0.15, 0.10, 0.08 k 0.10 EPS Rs 10 DPS 40% (0.15 / 0.1) P (4 / 0.1) (10 4) Rs 130 0.1 (0.10 / 0.1) P (4 / 0.1) (10 4) Rs 100 0.1 (0.08 / 0.1) P (4 / 0.1) (10 4) Rs 88 0.1
6
Growth Firms Retain all earnings Normal Firms No effect Declining Firms Distribute all earnings
9/4/2012
Criticism
9/4/2012
Gordon's Model
9/4/2012
Assumptions
All Equity Firm No External Financing Constant Return and Cost of Capital Perpetual Earnings No Taxes Constant Retention Cost of Capital greater than Growth Rate
10
9/4/2012
Valuation
Market value of a share is equal to the present value of an infinite stream of dividends to be received by shareholders
P EPS(1 b) /(k br )
9/4/2012
11
Example
r 0.15, 0.10, 0.08 k 0.10 EPS Rs 10 b 60% P (1 0.6) / 0.10 (0.15 * 0.6) = Rs 400 P 10(1 6) / 0.10 (0.10 * 0.6) = Rs 100 P 10(1 0.6) / 0.10 (0.08 * 0.6) = Rs 77
12
Growth Firms Retain all earnings Normal Firms No effect Declining Firms Distribute all earnings
9/4/2012
13
Traditional Position
Graham and Dodd .the stock market is overwhelming in favour of liberal dividends as against niggardly dividends
No advantage or disadvantage of tax associated with dividends Investment and Dividend decisions are independent No floatation or transaction cost
9/4/2012
15
According to M-M, under a perfect market situation, the dividend policy of a firm is irrelevant as it does not affect the value of the firm. They argue that the value of the firm depends on firm earnings which results from its investment policy. Thus when investment decision of the firm is given, dividend decision is of no significance.
16
Dividend Policy
9/4/2012 18
Question
What should be the payout ratio? How stable should be the dividends over time?
Funds requirement Liquidity Access to external sources of financing Shareholders preference Differences in cost of External and internal equity Control Taxes
19
9/4/2012
Stable dividend payout ratio Stable dividend Vs. steadily changing dividends
9/4/2012
20
Many individual investors depend on dividend income It has information content Steady dividend highly desirable feature by institutional investors
9/4/2012
21
Pure residual dividend approach Fixed payout ratio approach Smoothed residual approach
9/4/2012
22
Most firms think primarily in terms the proportion of earnings that should be paid out as dividends rather than in terms the proportion of earnings that should be ploughed back in the firm Firm try to reach the target pay out over a period of time because stockholders prefer a steady progression of dividends
23
9/4/2012
Lintners Model
9/4/2012
24
Legal Aspect
Rate of dividend 10-12.5% reserves 2.5% Rate of dividend 12.5-15% reserves 5% Rate of dividend 15-20% reserves 7.5% Rate of dividend >20% reserves 10%
Average of 5 years or 10% of paid up capital Maximum reserve equal to 10% of paid up capital and free reserves can be drawn. First it should be utilised to set off losses Reserve should not fall below 15 % of its paid up capital
9/4/2012
25
Procedural Aspect
9/4/2012
26