Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ALLAN JULIUS AZCUETA Legal Officer II Legal Services Group Anti-Money Laundering Council Secretariat
OBJECTIVES OF FORFEITURE
- To take the facilitating property that makes the crimes possible - To take the criminals profits
- To break the criminal organizations (criminals commit crime to gain profit) - To prevent reinvestment of proceeds of crime in other criminal activities
Forfeiture:
- a form of incapacitation - a form of deterrence - a means of recovering for the victims - a form of punishment
Kinds of Forfeiture
a) Criminal forfeiture
- Dependent on criminal conviction - Jurisdiction over the person of the accused is necessary (in personam) - Defendant typically must be present
b) Civil forfeiture
- Jurisdiction over the person not required (court must exercise some control over the property) - Criminal conviction not necessary, can forfeit property from dead criminals or fugitives
Criminal Forfeiture
Revised Penal Code
- Under Article 25, forfeiture or confiscation of instruments and proceeds of the offense is classified as an accessory penalty which may be imposed after conviction -Article 45 provides that every penalty imposed for the commission of a felony shall carry with it the forfeiture of the proceeds of the crime and the instruments or tools with which it was committed. Such proceeds and instruments or tools shall be confiscated and forfeited in favor of the Government x x x but those articles which are not subject of lawful commerce shall be destroyed.
confiscation and forfeiture of the proceeds or instruments of the unlawful act, including the properties or proceeds derived from the illegal trafficking of dangerous drugs and/or precursors and essential elements.
Civil Forfeiture
Republic Act No. 1379 Forfeiture of Unexplained Wealth
Republic Act No. 9160 Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001, as amended
R.A. 1379
An Act Declaring Forfeiture in Favor of the State of Any Property Found to Have Been Unlawfully Acquired by Any Public Officer or Employee and Providing for the Proceedings Therefor
Enacted on 18 June 1955 Introduced the first civil forfeiture statute Civil forfeiture of unlawfully acquired wealth of a public officer or employee
R.A. 9160, otherwise known as the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) of 2001
17 October 2001
- effectivity of R.A. 9160
Criminalized money laundering in the Philippines Created the Philippines FIU (AMLC) Introduced civil forfeiture without the necessity of conviction or prosecution in a criminal case
Relevant Terms
Money Laundering
is a crime whereby the proceeds of an unlawful activity as defined in the AMLA are transacted thereby making them appear to have originated from legitimate sources (Sec. 4, AMLA, as amended)
Unlawful Activity--- is any act or omission or a series or combination thereof involving or having direct relation to any of the following offenses:
1. Kidnapping for ransom
Unlawful Activity-2. Sections 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of R.A. No. 9165, otherwise known as the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002;
Importation of prohibited drugs; Sale of prohibited drugs; Administration of prohibited drugs; Delivery of prohibited drugs; Distribution of prohibited drugs; Transportation of prohibited drugs;
Unlawful Activity-Cont.
Maintenance of a Den, Dive or Resort for prohibited users; Manufacture of prohibited drugs; Possession of prohibited drugs; Use of prohibited drugs; Cultivation of plants which are sources of prohibited drugs; and Culture of plants which are sources of prohibited drugs;
Unlawful activity
3. Graft and Corruption under R.A. No. 3019, as amended 4. Plunder (R.A. 7080, as amended) 5. Robbery and Extortion 6. Jueteng and Masiao (P.D. 1602) 7. Piracy (RPC & PD 532) 8. Qualified Theft under Art. 310, RPC
Unlawful activity
9. Swindling under Art. 315, RPC
10. Smuggling under RA 455 & 1937 11. Violations of the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000 12. Hijacking, destructive arson and murder, including those perpetrated by terrorists against non-combatant persons and similar targets
Unlawful activity
13. Fraudulent practices and other violations of the Securities Regulation Code of 2000 (RA 8799)
14. Felonies or offenses of a similar nature that are punishable under the penal laws of other countries
15 November 2005 - the Supreme Court adopted the Rule prescribing the procedure in cases of civil forfeiture. A.M. No. 05-11-04-SC, otherwise known as Rule of Procedure in Cases of Civil Forfeiture, Asset Preservation, and Freezing of Monetary Instrument, Property, or Proceeds Representing, Involving, or Relating to an Unlawful Activity or Money Laundering Offense under R.A. No. 9160, as Amended 15 December 2005 - effectivity of the Rule, following its publication in a newspaper of general circulation.
Definition
Civil forfeiture may be defined as
the seizure and confiscation of any monetary instrument or property, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, involved in or related to an unlawful activity under Section 3(i) or a money laundering offense under Section 4, Republic Act No. 9160, as amended.
Action in the name of the Republic of the Philippines (RP) Represented by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) Through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG)
be filed:
Direct Filing
Sec. 5. Direct Filing; Action on the
petition
- The petition shall be filed directly with the Executive Judge of the RTC, or, in his absence, the viceexecutive judge, or, in their absence, any judge of the same station; - The judge shall act on the petition within 24 hours after its filing.
Prohibited Pleading
- Respondent shall file verified Comment or Opposition; - NOT a Motion to Dismiss.
Provisional Remedies
Sec. 11. Ex-parte issuance of Provisional
-PAPO
is issued upon determination of probable cause that the monetary instrument or property is related to an unlawful activity; - based on the allegations of the verified petition; - effective immediately for 20 days (from date of service to respondents)
Service of APO
- Personal service;
- in any manner deemed expedient by the court, if personal service not practicable; - When authorized by the court, through facsimile (fax) or electronic mail (e-mail) - APO is enforceable anywhere in the Philippines
Order of Trial
Pre-Trial (Mandatory)
Trial Judgment (Order of Forfeiture) (Appeal)
Prohibited Procedures
Not allowed:
- amicable settlement - mediation - other alternative mode of dispute resolution (Sec. 26)
Important!
No prior criminal charge, pendency of, or conviction for an unlawful activity or money laundering offense is necessary for the commencement or the resolution of a petition for civil forfeiture. (Sec. 27)
Judgment
Sec. 32. The court shall render
judgment within thirty (30) days from submission of the case for resolution.
- Preponderance of evidence
Appeal
- Notice of appeal within 15 days - Memoranda, in lieu of briefs, within a non-extendible period of 30 days from notice that all evidence are attached to the record.
SC Ruling
Bedayo, et al vs. Sps. Vicente, et al. G.R. No. 169031-32; 26 Sept. 2005
An order of forfeiture is a condition sine qua non before a petition for segregation of funds (third party claim) may be filed.
- Ex parte
with the Presiding Justice in Manila, or the Executive Justices in Cebu City or Cagayan de Oro City
Docketed in a separate logbook Strictly confidential Raffled on the same day; among members of first three (3) Div. only
Action by the CA
- Within 24 hours after filing; - Issue freeze order upon determination of probable cause, based on allegations of the petition, that M/I, property or proceeds are in any way related to an unlawful activity.
Freeze order
Effective immediately for 20 days On motion by petitioner, may be extended for a period not exceeding 6 months
SC Ruling
M/Gen. Carlos Garcia vs. CA, G.R. No. 165800; 27 Nov. 2007
Nothing in RA 9160 requires that a case for violation of anti-money laundering laws must be filed before the issuance of a freeze order. X x x. There are only two requisites under the law for the issuance of the freeze order: (1) the application ex parte by the AMLC; and (2) the determination of probable cause by the CA.
SC Ruling
Republic vs. Glasgow Credit & Collection Services, Inc., et al. G.R. No. 170281; 18 Jan. 2008
Forfeiture proceedings are actions in rem. x x x. As an action in rem, it is a proceeding against the thing itself instead of against the person. In actions in rem or quasi in rem, jurisdiction over the person of the defendant is not a prerequisite to conferring jurisdiction on the court, provided that the court acquires jurisdiction over the res. x x x.
Thank you!