Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
If this business were split up, I would give you the land and bricks and mortar, and I would take the brands and trade marks, and I would fare better than you. John Stuart, Chairman of Quaker (ca. 1900)
Situation today?
Major part of business value is derived from intangibles
They are durable, sometimes living beyond the life of the company itself
Then, to begin with, some companies started putting the value of brands they had acquired on the balance sheet. This prompted them to also put the value of internally generated brands on the balance sheet as well In 1988, Rank Hovis McDougall (RHM), a leading UK food conglomerate, played heavily on the power of its brands to successfully defend a hostile takeover bid by Goodman Fielder Wattie (GFW).
They did this by putting the value of internal as well as external brands on the balance sheet The LSE endorsed this method in 1989 and most companies latched on to the opportunity Today, most companies include brand performance as a financial indicator.
Pros
Increased competition Improved product performance Pressure on brand owners to behave in socially responsible ways
the potential costs of behaving unethically far outweigh any benefits, and outweigh the monitoring costs associated with an ethical business.
Perceptive measures
Awareness levels
Aided, unaided, top of mind
Knowledge, familiarity, relevance, Specific image attributes, purchase consideration Preference, satisfaction, recommendation
Why it fails
No direct correlation made between financial investment and value added If financial investment is not made in the right direction, it is practically useless
Got it?
The future
Managers could end up managing the brand entirely by the value method.
Bad for creative communication and the underlying freshness necessary for brand communication The quaker takeover of Snapple
end