Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
B N SRINIVAS RAO
By
B N Srinivas Rao
UNIT -1
ESSENTIALS OF A CONTRACT
2
B N SRINIVAS RAO
B N SRINIVAS RAO
1ST SESSION
3
INTRODUCTION
The law of contract is the most important branch of Mercantile Law. Without such a law it would be difficult, if not impossible, to carry on any trade or business in a smooth manner. The law of contract is applicable not only to business but also to all day-to-day personal dealings.
B N SRINIVAS RAO
WHAT IS LAW?
Before learning the meaning of the term 'Law' you must know as to why we need law. No civilized society can exist without law. It is required for the preservation of peace and orderliness in every society. Without law, no person will care for others and their dealings may not materialize. With the growth of society and the concept of welfare state, it became necessary to regulate the conduct of people and protect their property and contractual rights. Hence, each country enacted laws suited to its various needs and the value system it cherished.
B N SRINIVAS RAO
DEFINE LAW
"Law is a rule of civil conduct, prescribed by the supreme power of stale, commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong." ------ Blackstone. 'Law is the body of principles recognised and applied by the state in the administrator of justice."
-
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Salmond.
6
It is a part of civil law which deals with the rights and obligations of mercantile persons arising out of mercantile transactions in respect of mercantile property
SOURCES
Judicial Decisions
Our laws are based primarily on the English laws which developed through customs and usages of Merchants or traders in England, These customs and usages governed these merchants in their dealings with each other.
B N SRINIVAS RAO
As a matter of fact, it is an unwritten law based on customs, usages and precedents. The most important part of mercantile law, namely, the Law of Contracts, is still a part of Common Law in England.
9
B N SRINIVAS RAO
The Negotiable Instruments Act Essentials of a Contract 1881, The Sale of Goods Act 1930, The Indian Partnership Act 1932, The
Companies Act 1956, and so on
10
JUDICIAL DECISIONS:
The past judicial decisions of courts are another important source of law. They are generally followed by the courts while deciding similar cases before them. The past decisions have persuasive and guiding value. Wherever the law is silent on a point, the judge has to decide the case according to the principle of equity, justice and good conscience. The decisions of English courts are also frequently referred to as precedents in deciding various cases and for interpreting the Indian Statutes.
11
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CUSTOMS
AND
USAGES:
The customs and usages of particular trade are yet another important source of Indian mercantile law. They play an important role in regulating the dealings between the merchants of that trade. But it is necessary that such customs or usages must be widely known, reasonable, constant and must not be inconsistent with the law, The Indian Contract Act recognises this fact by providing that "nothing contained therein shall affect any usage or custom of trade.
12
B N SRINIVAS RAO
B N SRINIVAS RAO
2ND SESSION
13
B N SRINIVAS RAO
14
WHAT IS A CONTRACT?
Broadly speaking, a contract is an agreement made between two or more persons to do or to abstain from doing a particular act. A contract invariably creates a legal obligation between the parties by which certain rights are given to one party and a corresponding duty is imposed on the other party. A contract has been defined by different authorities in various ways. Some of the important definitionsare as follows:
A contract is an agreement, creating and defining the obligations between parties. - Salmond
A contract is an agreement enforceable at law made between two or more persons by which rights are acquired by one or more to acts or forbearance on the part of others. - Sir William Anson Every agreement and promise enforceable at law is a contract.
- Sir Fredrick Pollock
B N SRINIVAS RAO
15
B N SRINIVAS RAO
an agreement
16
AGREEMENT
Section 2(e) of the Contract Act defines agreement as every promise and every set of promises forming the consideration for each other.
B N SRINIVAS RAO
In this context a promise refer to a proposal (offer) which has been accepted. For example, Ramesh offers to sell his ,scooter for Rs. 8,000 to Shyam. Shyam accepts this offer. It becomes a promise and treated as an agreement between Ramesh and Shyam. In other words, an agreement consists of an offer by one party and its acceptance by the other.
17
offer
B N SRINIVAS RAO
AGREEMENT
acceptance
18
DIFFERENTIATION
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
:
CONTRACT
Offer and its acceptance constitute an Agreement May not create a legal obligation Every agreement need not be a contract. Agreement is not concluded and binding on concerned parties.
enforceability of an agreement constitute a contract creates a legal obligation All contracts are agreements
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CLASSIFICATION OF CONTRACTS
B N SRINIVAS RAO
contract
A contract may be (i) made in writing or by word of mouth or (ii) inferred from the conduct of the parties or circumstances of the case. The first category of contract is termed as 'express contract' and the second as 'implied contract'
B N SRINIVAS RAO
21
EXPRESS CONTRACT
An express contract is one where the terms are clearly stated in words, spoken or written.
B N SRINIVAS RAO
For example, A wrote a letter to B stating offer to sell my car for Rs. 30,000 to you", B accepts the offer by letter sent to A. This is an express contract. Similarly, when A asks a scooter mechanic to repair his scooter and the mechanic agrees, it is an express contract made orally by spoken words.
22
IMPLIED
CONTRACT
A contract may be created by the conduct or acts of parties (and not by their words spoken or written). It may result from a continuing course of conduct of the parties. For example, where a coolie in uniform carries the luggage of A to be carried out of railway station without being asked by A to do so and A allows it, the law implies that A has agreed to pay for the services of the coolie. This is a case of an implied contract between A and the coolie. Similarly, when A boards a BMTC bus, an implied contract comes into being. A is bound to pay the prescribed fare.
23
B N SRINIVAS RAO
On the basis of the extent to which the contracts have been performed, we may classify them as (i) executed contracts,
B N SRINIVAS RAO
and
EXECUTED CONTRACTS:
It is a contract where both the parties have fulfilled their respective obligations under the contract. For example, A agrees to sell his book to B for Rs. 30. A delivers the book to B and B pays Rs. 30 to A. It is an executed contract.
B N SRINIVAS RAO
25
EXECUTORY CONTRACTS:
It is a contract where both the parties to the contract have still to perform their respective obligations. For example, A agrees to sell a book to B for Rs. 30. If the book has not been delivered by A and B has not paid the price. the contract is executory. A contract may sometimes be partly executed and partly executory. It happens where only one of the parties has performed his obligation. In the example given above, if A has delivered the book to B but B has not paid the price. the contract is executed as to A and executory as to B.
26
B N SRINIVAS RAO
27
B N SRINIVAS RAO
ON
THE
BASIS
OF
ENFORCEABILITY
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CONTRACT
VALID
VOID
contract
Contract
VOIDABLE contract
ILLEGAL
contact
UNENFORCEABLE contract
28
VALID CONTRACT:
B N SRINIVAS RAO
A contract which satisfies all the conditions prescribed by law is a valid contract. If one or more of these elements is/are missing, the contract is either void, voidable, illegal or unenforceable.
29
VOID CONTRACT:
It is a contract without any legal effects and is a nullity. A contract may become void due to impossibility of performance, change of law or some other reasons. Section 2(g) says that an agreement nor
B N SRINIVAS RAO
In the case of void agreement no contract comes into existence. Such an agreement confers no rights on any person and creates no obligations. It is void ab-intio i.e., from the very beginning. A void agreement never matures into a contract, it is void from the very beginning.
30
VOIDABLE CONTRACT:
An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties thereon, but not at the option of the other or others, is a voidable contract.
Thus, a voidable contract is one which can be set aside or repudiated at the option of the aggrieved party. Until it is set aside or avoided by the party entitled to do so, it remains a valid contract.
B N SRINIVAS RAO
31
DISTINCTION BETWEEN:
VOID CONTRACT It is void from the very beginning. A contract is void if any essential element of a valid contract (other than free consent) is missing. It cannot be enforced by any party. Third party does not acquire any rights. Question of damages does not arise VOIDABLE CONTRACT It remains valid till it is repudiated by the aggrieved party. A contract is voidable if the consent of a party is not free. If the aggrieved party so decides, the contract may continue to be valid and enforceable. An innocent party in good faith and for consideration acquires good title before the contract is avoided. If it is not avoided within a reasonable time it may become valid. The aggrieved party can also claim damages.
32
B N SRINIVAS RAO
ILLEGAL
OR UNLAWFUL CONTRACT:
The word illegal' means contrary to law. You know that contract is an agreement enforceable by law and therefore, it cannot be illegal. It is only the agreement which can be termed as illegal or unlawful. Hence, it is more appropriate to use the term 'illegal agreement' in place of 'illegal contract'. An 'illegal agreement' is one which has been specifically declared to be unlawful under the provisions of the Contract Act or which goes against the provisions of any other law of the land. Such agreement cannot be enforced by law. For example, A agrees to pay Rs.50,000 to B if B kills C. This is an illegal agreement because its object is unlawful. Even if B kills C, he cannot claim the agreed amount from A.
33
B N SRINIVAS RAO
UNENFORCEABLE
CONTRACT:
It is a contract which is actually valid but cannot be enforced because of some technical defect. This may be due to non-registration of the agreement, non-payment of the requisite stamp fee, etc. Sometimes, the law requires a particular agreement to be in writing. If such agreement has not been put in writing, it becomes unenforceable. For example, an oral agreement, for arbitration are unenforceable because the law requires that an arbitration agreement must be in writing. It is important to note that in most cases, such , contracts can be enforced if the technical defect involved is removed.
34
B N SRINIVAS RAO
B N SRINIVAS RAO
2ND SESSION
35
B N SRINIVAS RAO
ESSENTIALS
OF A VALID CONTRACT
36
Proper offer and its proper acceptance Intention to create legal relationship
Free consent
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Lawful consideration
37
Lawful object
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Possibility of performance
Legal formalities
38
PROPER
In order to create a valid contract it is necessary that there must be at least two parties, one making the offer and the other accepting it. For example, the offer must be definite and duly communicated to the other party. Similarly, the acceptance must be unconditional and communicated to the offeror in the prescribe mode, and so on. Unless such conditions with regard to the offer and the acceptance are satisfied the agreement does not become enforceable.
39
B N SRINIVAS RAO
OFFER
OR PROPOSAL
When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.
40
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Offer should not contain a term the non-compliance of which would be acceptance
41
ACCEPTANCE
Section 2(b) of the Indian Contract Act defines the term 'acceptance' as "when the person to
whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposal when accepted becomes a promise. "
42
B N SRINIVAS RAO
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Acceptance must be communicated by a person who has the authority to accept Acceptance must be made within the time prescribed or within a reasonable time Acceptance must be given before the offer lapses or is withdrawn
43
LAPSE OF AN OFFER
By lapse of stipulated or reasonable time By death or insanity of the offerer or the offeree before acceptance B N SRINIVAS RAO By rejection of offer by the offeree If it is not accepted in the prescribed or usual mode By counter offer by the offeree By revocation By subsequent illegality or destruction of subject-matter
44
INTENTION
There must be an intention among the parties to create a legal relationship, If an agreement is not capable of creating a legal obligation it is not a contract. In case of social or domestic agreements, generally there is no intention to create legal relationship. For example, In an invitation to dinner there is no intention to create legal relationship and therefore, is not a contract. Similarly, certain agreements between husband and wife do not become contracts because there is no intention to create legal relationship.
45
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CASE:
This point can well be illustrated by the famous case of Balfour v. Balfour. Mr. Balfour had promised to pay f 30 per month to his wife living in England when she could not accompany him to Caulon where he was employed. Mr. Balfour failed to pay the promised amount. Mrs. Balfour filed a suit against her husband for breach of this agreement, It was held that she could not recover the amount as it was a social agreement and the parties never intended to create any legal relations.
46
B N SRINIVAS RAO
FREE
CONSENT:
For a contract to be valid, it is essential that there must be free and genuine consent of the parties to the contract. They must have made the contract of their own free will and not under any fear or pressure. According to Section 14, consent is said to be
B N SRINIVAS RAO
free when it is not caused by ( i ) coercion, (ii) undue influence, (iii) fraud, (iv) misrepresentation, or ( v ) mistake.
But if the agreement is induced by mutual mistake which is material to the agreement, it would be void.
47
CONSENT:
Section 13 of the Indian Contract Act defines the term 'Consent' as Two or more persons are
said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.
48
B N SRINIVAS RAO
COERCION
( i ) the committing or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code; or (ii) the unlawful detaining or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement
49
B N SRINIVAS RAO
UNDUE
INFLUENCE:
Section 16 (i) of the Contract Act defines undue influence as 'A contract is said to be
induced by undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other
50
B N SRINIVAS RAO
FRAUD
The term 'fraud' is defined by Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act as follows:
Fraud means and includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract or by any one with his connivance or by his agent, .with intent to deceive another party thereto or his agent, or to induce him to enter into the contract: i) the suggestion, as to a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true; ii) the active concealment of a .fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact; iii) a promise made without any intention of performing it; iv) any other act fitted to deceive; v) an9 such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent."
51
B N SRINIVAS RAO
MISREPRESENTATION
52
B N SRINIVAS RAO
MISTAKE
53
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CAPACITY
OF PARTIES:
The parties to an agreement must be competent to contract i.e., they must be capable of entering into a contract. If any party to the contract is not competent to contract, the contract is not valid. Section 11 of the Act which says that every
B N SRINIVAS RAO
person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject and who is of sound mind, and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.
54
1
2
a minor
B N SRINIVAS RAO
55
A MINOR:
According to Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, a person is deemed to have attained Majority (i) when he completes 18 years or (ii) where a guardian of person or property or both. has been appointed by a Court of Law (or where his property has passed under the superintendence of the Court of Wards), he attains Majority on completion of 21 years.
56
B N SRINIVAS RAO
POSITIONS OF MINOR:
Contract with a minor is void ab initio Fraudulent representation by a minor is void Ratification of a contract by n minor on attaining the age of majority is void Minor as a partner A minor cannot be a partner in a partnership firm. However, a minor may, with the consent of all the partners for the time being, be admitted to the benefits of partnership Minor can be an agent Minor as a shareholder A minor cannot be declared insolvent because he is incapable of contracting debts.
57
B N SRINIVAS RAO
EXCEPTIONS
Contract
for the benefit of a minor Contract by Guardian Contract for Supply of Necessaries
58
B N SRINIVAS RAO
WHO
IS A
PERSON
OF
SOUND MIND?
person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract, if at the time when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interests. Thus soundness of mind of a person
B N SRINIVAS RAO
depends on two facts: i) his capacity to understand the terms of the contract, and ii) his ability to form a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interests. If a person is incapable of both, he suffers from unsoundness of mind. Idiots, lunatics and drunken persons are examples of those having an unsound mind
59
Lunatics: A lunatic is a person who is mentally deranged due to some mental strain or other.persona1 experience. Idiots: An idiot is a person who is permanently of unsound mind. Idiocy is a congenital defect. Such a person has no lucid intervals. He cannot make a valid contract.
Drunken Persons: Section 12 of the Indian Contract Act reads: A same man is delirious
B N SRINIVAS RAO
from fever or who is so drunk that he cannot understand the terms of a contract or form a rational judgment as to its effects on his interest cannot contract while such delirium or drunkenness lasts.
60
Convicts
Insolvents
61
HOME
62
LAWFUL
CONSIDERATION:
An agreement must be supported by consideration, Consideration means something in return. It is also defined as the price paid by one party to buy the promise of the other. However, this price need not always be in terms of money. For' example, A agrees to sell his book to B for Rs. 20. Here the consideration for A is Rs. 20, and for B it is the book.
63
B N SRINIVAS RAO
when at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain porn doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.
64
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Consideration may move from the promisee or any other person Consideration may be past, present or future Consideration must be of some value
65
LAWFUL
OBJECT:
The object of an agreement must be lawful. An agreement made for any act which is prohibited by law will not be valid. For example, if A rents out a house for use as a gambling den, the agreement is void because the object of the agreement is unlawful. If the object is unlawful for any of the reasons mentioned in Section 23, the agreement shall be void. Thus, the consideration as well as the object ,of
66
B N SRINIVAS RAO
AGREEMENT
The agreement must not have been expressly declared void under Contract Act. Sections 24 to 30 specify certain types of agreements which have been expressly declared void. They are . agreement in restraint of marriage, agreement in restraint of legal proceedings, agreement in restraint of trade and agreement by way of wager. For example, A agreed to pay Rs. 1,000 to B if he (B) does not marry throughout his life. B promised not to marry at all. This agreement shall not be valid because it is in restraint of marriage which has been expressly declared void under Section 26.
67
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CERTAINTY
OF MEANING:
Section 29 of the Contract Act provides that Agreements, the meaning of which is not
absolutely essential that its terms must be clear and not vague or uncertain. For a example, A agreed to sell 100 tonnes of oil to B. Here it is not clear what kind of oil is intended to be sold. Therefore, this agreement is not valid on the ground of uncertainty.
certain or capable of being made certain, are void. Thus to make a valid contract it is
68
B N SRINIVAS RAO
POSSIBILITY
OF PERFORMANCE:
The terms of the agreement must also be such as are capable of performance. An agreement to do an act impossible in itself is void (Section 56.) If the act is impossible of performance, physically or legally, the agreement cannot be enforced by law. For example, A promises to B that he will enclose some area between two parallel lines or that he will run at a speed of 200 kms. per hour or that he will bring gold from the sun. All these acts are such which are impossible of performance and therefore the agreement is not treated as valid.
69
B N SRINIVAS RAO
LEGAL
FORMALITIES:
The Contract Act does not require that a contract must be in writing to be valid. But, in some cases the Act has specified that the agreement must be made in writing. For example, a promise to pay a time barred debt must be in writing and an agreement for a sale of immovable property must be in writing and registered under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. In such a situation, the agreement must comply with the necessary formalities as to writing, registration, etc. If these legal formalities are not carried out, then the contract is not enforceable by law.
70
B N SRINIVAS RAO
WAGERING AGREEMENTS
A wager is an agreement by which one promises to pay money or moneys worth on the happening of some uncertain event in consideration of the other partys promise to pay if the event does not happen. It is essential that each party may either win or loose If either of the parties may win but cannot loose or may loose but cannot win is not wagering.
71
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CHARACTERISTICS AGREEMENT
OF A
WAGERING
B N SRINIVAS RAO
72
73
B N SRINIVAS RAO
EFFECT
OF
WAGERING AGREEMENTS
Wagering Agreements have been declared void in India. Such agreements are illegal in Maharashtra and Gujarat. No suit can be maintained for recovery or enforcing the result of any game or uncertain event. Money deposited with stakeholder cannot be recovered. An agent cannot recover any money from the principal. The principal cannot sue the agent for not carrying out his instruction. Agent is bound to hand over the winnings to principal. Collateral transactions are not affected except in Maharashtra and Gujarat.
74
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CONTINGENT CONTRACTS
A Contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral to such contract, does or does not happen. [Sec 31]
B N SRINIVAS RAO
75
RULES
Cannot be enforced until the event has happened. If the event becomes impossible such contract becomes void. (Sec 32) Where the contract is to be performed if a particular event does not happen, performance can be enforced on the event becoming impossible. (Sec 33) Contract contingent upon how a person will act at an unspecified time, the event shall be considered to become impossible when the person does anything rendering it impossible. (Sec 34)
76
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Contract to do or not to do anything if a specified uncertain event happens within a fixed time, becomes void if the event does not happen or its happening becomes impossible before the expiry of that time, and vice versa. (Sec 35) Contingent agreement to do or not to do anything, if an impossible event happens are void whether or not the fact is known to the parties. (Sec 36)
B N SRINIVAS RAO
77
DISCHARGE
OF
CONTRACT
A contract is said to be discharged when it ceases to operate. The rights and obligations created by it comes to an end. A contract may be discharged By Performance Actual performance doing what the parties intended to do when they entered in to the contract. Attempted performance or tender It is the legitimate attempt on the part of the promisor to perform his obligations
78
B N SRINIVAS RAO
BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT
OR
CONSENT
Novation
Rescission
Alteration Remission Waiver Merger
79
B N SRINIVAS RAO
BY
OPERATION OF
LAW
By death.
By merger.
By insolvency. By unauthorized alteration of terms of a written contract. By rights and liabilities becoming vested in the
B N SRINIVAS RAO
same person.
80
BY IMPOSSIBILITY
OF
PERFORMANCE
B N SRINIVAS RAO
ab initio.
BY SUPERVENING IMPOSSIBILITY
Non-existence or non-occurrence of a
particular state or things Death or incapacity for personal services Change of law or stepping in of a person with statutory authority Out break of war
B N SRINIVAS RAO
82
In the following cases a contract is not discharged on the ground of supervening impossibility: Difficulty of performance, Commercial impossibility, Impossibility due to failure of a third person, Strikes, lock-outs and civil disturbances, and Partial Impossibility.
83
BY
BREACH OF CONTRACT
On the due date of performance.
Actual Breach
a)
B N SRINIVAS RAO
i)
ii)
Express Repudiation.
Implied Repudiation.
Anticipatory Breach
a)
By express renunciation.
84
REMEDIES
FOR
BREACH
OF
CONTRACT
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Rescission of the contract. Suit for damages. Suit upon quantum meruit. Suit for specific performance.
RESCISSION
OF THE CONTRACT
Rescission means a right not to perform an obligation. In case of breach of contract the promisee need not perform his obligation,
B N SRINIVAS RAO
he is not only discharged from his liabilities but also he is entitled to claim compensation for damages which he might have sustained due to non performance of the contract. [Section 39]
86
SUIT
FOR DAMAGES
B N SRINIVAS RAO
The object of awarding damages is not to punish the party at fault but to make good the financial loss suffered by the injured party due to breach of contract.
87
RULES
RELATING TO DAMAGES
Ordinary damages arising in the usual course of things. special damages such damages which the parties knew to be likely to result from the breach. Compensation is not given for any remote or indirect loss or damages, and
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Such compensation for damages arising from breach of quasi contract shall be same as in any other contract.
88
Exemplary or Vindictive damages essentially in the nature of punishment for wrong inflicted. Nominal Damages the injured party has not in fact suffered any loss due to the breach of contract. Damages for loss of reputation the smaller the amount of cheque dishonoured, higher the amount of damages. Damages for inconvenience and discomfort generally not recoverable.
B N SRINIVAS RAO
89
Liquidated damages represent a sum, fixed or ascertained by the parties in the contract, which is a fair and genuine pre-estimate of the probable loss that might ensue as a result of the breach if it takes place. Penalty is a sum named in the contract which is disproportionate to the damages likely to accrue as a result of the breach. In India no such distinction is made and the court allow only reasonable compensation.
90
B N SRINIVAS RAO
QUANTUM MERUIT
When an agreement is discovered to be void. [Sec 65] When something is done without any intention to do gratuitously. [Sec 70] When there is an express or implied contract to render service but no agreement as to remuneration. When the completion of the contract has been prevented by the act of the other party to the contract. When a contract is divisible. When an indivisible contract is completely performed but badly.
91
B N SRINIVAS RAO
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The remedy of Specific Performance is in the nature of equitable remedies based on the principles of equities. Among the remedies are specific performance, injunction, rectification and cancellation of instruments and rescission of contract. In the discretion of the court, specific performance may be enforced: where there is no standard for ascertaining the actual damage caused by the nonperformance; or where compensation in money for the nonperformance would not afford adequate relief.
92
B N SRINIVAS RAO
SUIT
FOR INJUNCTION
It is a judicial process whereby a party to the contract is ordered to refrain from doing a particular act or thing, or to do a particular act or thing. It a discretionary remedy and it acts only in personam. Injunction means a prohibitory order of the court to a person to not to do a particular act he has promised not to do under a contract, or to do an act which he has promised, under a contract, to do.
93
B N SRINIVAS RAO
QUASI CONTRACTS
Sometime a person may receive a benefit which the law regards another person as better entitled, or for which the law considers he should pay to the other person, even though there is no contract between the parties. Such relationships are called quasi contracts because although there is no contract or agreement between the parties, they are put on the same pedestal as though there was a contract between them. This is based on the principles of equity.
94
B N SRINIVAS RAO
KINDS
OF QUASI CONTRACTS
B N SRINIVAS RAO
Payment by an interested person. [Sec 69] Right to recover for non-gratuitous Act. [Sec 70] Responsibility of the finder of Goods. [Sec 71] When money is paid or things are delivered by mistake or under coercion. [Sec 72]
95
B N SRINIVAS RAO
CONTRACTS OF INDEMNITY
In
a contract of indemnity one party promises to compensate the other party against loss suffered by the latter. 125 confines itself to losses occasioned due to an act of promisor or due to act of any other persons.
Section
contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any other person is called a contract of indemnity. [Sec 124]
97
If
a person who is interested in the payment of money which another is bound to pay and pays it, he is entitled to be indemnified. [Sec 69] surety has a rights to claim indemnity from the principal debtor for sums he has rightfully paid towards the guarantee. [Sec 145] principal is liable to indemnify the agent for all amount paid by him during the exercise of his authority. [Sec 222]
98
The
The
cost that he may be compelled to pay in sums which he may have paid under the
CONTRACT
A
OF
GUARANTEE
to
discharge in
The
is
to
Debtor.
be vitiated by incapacity, flaw in consent, and unlawful character of the agreement. May be oral and it may either be expressed or implied. Concurrence of parties. Existence of Principal debt. Essential of a valid contract like Consideration and Free consent.
101
EXTENT
The
OF SURETY'S LIABILITY
liability of surety is coextensive with that of the principal debtor. [Sec 128] The Surety may limit his liability by an express agreement. The liability of the surety arises immediately when a default is made by the principal debtor. The creditor can sue the surety without suing the principal debtor. If the guarantee is conditional upon another person joining it as co-surety, the guarantee is not valid if that person does not join. [Sec 144]
102
KINDS
Specific
OF
GUARANTEES
guarantee extends to a specific transaction or a single debt. The liability of surety comes to an end when the guaranteed debt is duly discharged. Continuing guarantee extends to a series of transaction. This kind of guarantee is intended to cover a number of transactions over a period of time. Whether the guarantee is continuing guarantee or not is a question of intention, subject matter & circumstance.
103
104
RIGHTS
OF
SURETY
Against Creditor Right of Security Right of set-off. Right of subrogation. Against principal debtor Right to be relieved of liability. Right to indemnity. Against co-sureties Right of contribution Co-sureties liable to contribute equally. Liability of co-sureties bound in different sums. Release of co-surety. 105
DISCHARGE
By Discharge Variance Release
OF
SURETY
Revocation of Guarantee
by conduct of creditor
Compounding
debtor
Creditor Creditor Creditor
By
impairing surety's remedy Loss of security by the creditor Discharge of surety by invalidation of contract Guarantee obtained by misrepresentation Guarantee obtained by concealment Guarantee on contract that creditor shall not act on it until a co-surety joins Failure of consideration
107
bailment is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the direction of the person delivering them. The person delivering the goods is called the bailor and the person to whom the goods are delivered is called the bailee."
108
ESSENTIAL
There There The
REQUISITE OF BAILMENT
delivery be of goods.
Delivery
bailor.
Delivery
Delivery Delivery
KINDS OF BAILMENT
On the basis of reward
Gratuitous
Bailment Bailment
Non-Gratuitous
mutual benefit.
110
DUTIES
To To To
OF A
BAILOR
disclose known faults [Sec 150] bear extraordinary expenses [Sec 158] indemnify bailee for loss in case of
DUTIES
To
Not Not Not To To
OF A
BAILEE
112
RIGHTS OF BAILOR
Right
to claim damages in case of negligence. Right to terminate the contract in case of unauthorized use. Right to claim compensation in case of unauthorized use. Right to claim separation of goods in case of unauthorized mixture. Right to claim separation of goods in case of unauthorized mixture of goods which cannot be separated. Right to demand return of the goods. Right to claim compensation in case of unauthorized retention of goods. Right to demand accretion to the goods.
113
RIGHTS
Delivery
OF
BAILEE
bailors of goods.
Delivery Right Right
Bailee's
TERMINATION
On On
OF
BAILMENT
bailment.
of bailor or bailee.
115
FINDER
A
is
OF
GOODS
person who finds goods belonging to another and takes them into his custody,
subject to the same responsibilities as a bailee. [Sec 71] must take reasonable care. must not use the goods for his own purpose. must not mix goods with his own. must try to find out the owner of the goods.
116
He He He He
RIGHTS
Right Right
OF
FINDER
OF
GOODS
Right
of sale.
117
PLEDGE
The
bailment of goods as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise. [Sec 172] A pledge can be created only in respect of a chattel (movable possession) capable of delivery. The general property in the goods remains in the owner, but a special property in them passes to the pawnee who may sell the goods. The person delivering goods is Pledger or Pawnor. The person to whom goods are delivered is Pledgee or Pawnee.
118
174] Right to extraordinary expenses Right against true owner, when the Pawnor's title is defective Pawnee's right where Pawnor makes default Under Section 176 the Pawnee has the following three rights: may file a suit against the Pawnor; or he may sell the goods after giving reasonable notice; or can recover any deficiency arising on the sale. 119
RIGHTS
Right
OF
PAWNOR / PLEDGER
to get back goods. Right to redeem debt. Preservation and maintenance of goods. Rights of an ordinary debtor.
120
PLEDGE
Pledge Pledge
BY NON-OWNERS
by Mercantile Agent. by a person in possession under a where pawnor has limited interest.
voidable contract.
Pledge
Pledge
Pledge
121
CONTRACT
An
OF
AGENCY
agent is a person employed to do any act for another, or to represent another, in dealings with third persons. The person for whom such act is done or who is so represented, is called the principal." Whatever the principal can do himself, he may get the same done through an agent,; and What the principal does by another, he does it himself. The acts of the agents are the acts of the principal.
122
CREATION
By
OF
AGENCY
Agreement - Express Agreement. - Implied Agreement. Implied agency includes the following Agency by Estoppel. Agency by holding out. Agency by necessity Agent acceding his authority in an emergency. A person entrusted with another's property. Husband and Wife. Agency by ratification. 123
agent must act for an identifiable principal. The principal must be in existence. The principal must have contractual capacity. Ratification must be with full knowledge of facts. Ratification must be done within a reasonable time. The act to be ratified must not be void, illegal or ultra vires. The whole transaction must be ratified. Ratification can be of the acts the principal had power to do. Ratification should not put a third party to damages. Ratification relates back to the date of the act.
124
DUTIES
To To To To
OF
AGENTS
Not To
To
Not
to delegate authority.
126
RIGHTS
Right Right
OF
AGENTS
Right
Right Right Right
of lien.
of indemnification.
of compensation.
of stoppage in transit.
127
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
Delegatus A
Sub-agent is a person employed by and acting under the control of the original agent and the business of the agency. [Section 191] A agent may appoint a sub-agent if There is a custom of trade. The nature of work is such that sub-agent is necessary. Where the principal is aware of the intention of the agent to appoint a sub-agent. Where unforeseen emergencies arise rendering. Where the act to be done is purely ministerial. Where the principal permits appointment of subagent.
128
a sub-agent is properly appointed, the following effect follows : principal is bound by the acts of the sub-agent; agent is responsible to the principal for the acts of the sub-agent; sub-agent is responsible for his acts to the agent, but not to the principal, except in case of fraud or willful wrong.
129
Where
the the
the
POSITION
OF
PRINCIPAL
AND
AGENT
IN
Named principal
Acts
When
Notice
Principal
inducing belief that agent's unauthorized acts were authorized. or fraud of agent.
131
Misrepresentation
Undisclosed principal
The
position of Principal contracting party may sue either the principal or the agent or both. principal may also require the performance of contract. position of agent as between the principal and agent, the agent has all the rights of an agent as against the principal; as regards the third party, he is personally liable on the contract.
132
The The
but
The the If
third party may elect to sue either the principal or the agent or both.
the principal discloses himself before the contract is completed, the other party may refuse to fulfill the contract on the ground of mistake of identity of party.
third party can also claim a right of setoff against the agent.
133
The
the contract expressly provides. When the agent acts for a foreign principal. When he acts for an undisclosed principal. When he acts for a principal who cannot be sued. Where he signs a contract in his own name. Where he acts for a principal not in existence. Where he is liable for breach of warranty of authority. Where he receives or pays money by mistake or fraud. Where his authority is coupled with interest. Where trade usage or customs makes him personally liable.
134
IRREVOCABLE AGENCY
a)
c)
liability.
136
END OF DECK
137
B N SRINIVAS RAO