Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Rome, Italy
Outline of Presentation
I. II.
Slide No. 1
I. Introduction
From 2000 to 2003, women accounted for the second largest number of poor population (after the children)
Magnitude of poor women Poverty Incidence (%)
2000 2003
32.3 29.0
Slide No. 2
The Philippine Statistical System is a decentralized statistical system Many agencies of government generate statistics NSO Bureau of Agricultural Statistics Bureau of Labor & Employment Statistics BSP DENR, DOT, DepED, CHED, DOH, DOST, etc.
Need for coordinating agency
Slide No. 3 JOEncarnacion Dec. 2007
Executive Order 121 Reorganizing the Philippine Statistical System and for Other Purposes
Issued on January 30, 1987
Created the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) as the highest policy-making and coordinating body on statistical matters in the country
Slide No. 4
I. Introduction
Slide No. 5
Our Services
Coordination services Inter-agency concerns Survey review system Designation of statistics Subnational statistical system Online statistical service Technical services (including data requests and advocacy for statistical awareness) Administers the NATIONAL STATISTICAL INFORMATION CENTER http://www.nscb.gov.ph
Slide No. 6 JOEncarnacion Dec. 2007
Until 2007, official poverty estimates compiled by the NSCB are disaggregated by geographical location
- National - Regional - Provincial Still, one of the demands is poverty statistics at lower levels and sectoral disaggregation
Slide No. 7
Slide No. 8
Farmer-peasant Artisanal fisherfolk Workers in the formal sector and migrant workers Senior citizens Youth and students Children Urban poor Workers in the informal sectors Indigenous peoples and cultural communities Differently-abled persons Victims of calamities and disasters Cooperatives Non-government organizations
4. WOMEN
Slide No. 10
Data sources
2000 and 2003 Family Income and Expenditures Survey (FIES) 4th quarter 2000 and 2003 round of the Labor Force Survey (LFS) undertaken in January 2004 2000 Census of Population and Housing (CPH) 2000 and 2003 Philippine Poverty Statistics
Slide No. 11
Data source FIES was used for classifying households as poor or non-poor LFS was used to assign household members into sectors Estimated total population of the sector based on the FIES and LFS.
However, for years when the conduct of the CPH and FIES coincide, data from the CPH will be used (e.g., 2000) to estimate the total population for four sectors, namely, women, youth, children, and senior citizen. Otherwise, data from FIES will be used.
Slide No. 12
Both FIES and LFS follow the Integrated Survey of Households (ISH) sampling scheme, making the estimation of poverty incidence straightforward. For example, the poverty incidence for women is:
Slide No. 13
Share of sectoral population to the total population, Philippines (2000 and 2003)
60.0 50.0
49.9 48.7
% Distribution
40.0
29.3
30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Women
2000
6.0 6.4 6.8 5.8 1.2 1.2
Youth Children Senior Citizens Urban Poor M igrant and Formal Sector Workers Farmers Fishermen
2003
Sector
Slide No. 14
Women Youth Children Senior Citizens Urban poor Migrant and Formal Sector Workers Farmers Fishermen
Highlights:
The poverty incidence for all sectors decreased from 2000 to 2003. The Senior Citizens, Fishermen and Farmers sectors exhibited the largest decreases. Three sectors were worse off than the countrys poverty incidence among the population of 30.0. These are the Children, Farmers and Fishermen sectors. In terms of magnitude of poor population, the Children, Women and Urban Sectors are the largest. Slide No. 15 JOEncarnacion Dec. 2007
Highlights:
Region VII exhibited the largest decrease in poverty incidence while Region IX showed the largest increase from 2000 to 2003. CAR, ARMM, CARAGA, Regions I, IV-B, V, VI, VIII, IX, X, XI and XII were worse off than the national poverty incidence for the women sector. In terms of magnitude of poor women population, Regions IV-A, V and VI are the largest. Slide No. 16 JOEncarnacion Dec. 2007
Number of regions worse off than the general population 2000 12 13 12 11 13 12 2003 12 12 12 12 12 12
Number of regions worse off than the regional situation 2000 4 0 17 3 0 0 2003 2 0 17 0 0 0
26.4 24.2
64.2 66.6
6.7 17.9
65.7 72.9
9 8
8 7
13 14
13 14
1 / Excludes NCR in 2000 due to high CV (with CV > 50 percent) 2/ Excludes CAR in 2000 due to high CV (with CV > 50 percent) JOEncarnacion Dec. 2007
Slide No. 17
Observed gender inequality in economic participation Hence, men have greater economic visibility and higher contribution to the economy, more participation in making economic decisions, and more access to credit Economic undercount of women thus puts them in a situation that can perpetuate, if not outright worsen the inequity between men and women Need for information on womens and mens contribution to the economy
Slide No. 18
Efforts on the generation of satellite accounts: a. Measuring The Contribution of Women To The Philippine Economy by Romulo A. Virola and Sylvia M. de Perio (1998) b. Womens Contribution To The Economy by Romulo A. Virola (1999) c. Do Women Contribute Less Than Men to Nation Building by Romulo A. Virola, Jessamyn O. Encarnacion, Armyl G. Zaguirre, Raymond S. Perez (2007)
Slide No. 19
Taking off from the methodology used by Virola and de Perio in 1998 Using updated parameters from the results of the 2000 TUS.
Total Unpaid Hours per Day (from various studies) Total Unpaid Hours / Day Women NEDA (1984), IPC / ILLO (19851990) a/ Employed 4.271 Unemployed 6.575 Outside the Labor Force 6.575 Employment Status TUS / NSO (2000) Original 7.155 8.704 8.704
b/
Men NEDA (1984), IPC / ILLO (19851990) a/ 1.218 1.875 1.875 TUS / NSO (2000) b/ Original 5.455 5.171 5.171 Adjusted c/ 5.054 4.906 4.906
a/ b/ c/
Used in the 1998 study of Virola and de Perio Used in this study Details of the original were: 1) rescaled to add up to 24 hours (1 day); and 2) weighted using urban (for Quezon City) and rural (for Batangas) population as weights.
Slide No. 20
Table 1. Percentage Distribution of Value of Unpaid Hours (Housew ork Services) to GDP, At Current Prices % to GDP Women Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2000-2006 OC/MP 46.69 47.45 47.23 44.82 43.55 45.29 44.89 45.52 MP 40.73 40.90 40.84 38.83 37.90 39.19 38.93 39.46 OC/MP 48.60 48.48 49.27 47.69 48.16 47.84 48.56 48.34 Men MP 27.42 27.73 27.80 26.17 25.63 26.63 26.40 26.73 OC/MP 95.28 95.93 96.51 92.50 91.70 93.13 93.45 93.86 Total MP 68.15 68.63 68.64 65.00 63.54 65.83 65.33 66.19
Slide No. 21
Table 2. Percentage Share to GDP and Adjusted GDP by Sex, 2000-2006 Conventional GDP Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2000-2006 Men 61.80 60.42 60.49 61.62 62.10 61.12 61.07 61.23 Women 38.20 39.58 39.51 38.38 37.90 38.88 38.93 38.77 Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Men 53.06 52.27 52.35 53.21 53.65 52.92 52.91 52.93 Adjusted GDP Women 46.94 47.73 47.65 46.79 46.35 47.08 47.09 47.07 Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Slide No. 22
Women account for 59.6 percent of the total hours of unpaid work!
Table 3. Pe r ce ntage Dis tr ibution of Total Unpaid Hour s of Wor k (Hous e w or k Se r vice s ) by Se x, E ploye d, Une m ploye d and Not in the Labor For ce m 2000-2006 Women E mployed A griculture, Fishery and Forestry Mining and Quarrying Manuf acturing E lectricity, Gas and Water Construction Wholesale and Retail Trade Transportation, Communication and Storage Financing, Insurance, Real E state and Business Services Government Services P rivate Services Unemployed Not in the Labor Force TOTA L 44.68 11.07 0.03 5.09 0.08 0.11 12.99 0.44 1.49 8.04 5.34 50.95 81.25 59.62 Men 55.32 24.84 0.29 4.62 0.28 4.53 6.31 6.30 1.60 5.17 1.38 49.05 18.75 40.38
Slide No. 23
Women not in the labor force account for more than half of the total value of unpaid work of women!
Table 4. Pe r ce ntage Dis tr ibution of Total V alue of Unpaid Hour s of Wor k (Hous e w or k Se r vice s ) by Se x for All (M ar k e t Pr ice ), In At Cur r e nt Pr ice s
2000-2006 Wo m en M en
Em plo yed
40.62
74.23
5.1 2
7.28
N o t in the Labo r F o rc e
54.26
1 8.49
T OT A L
1 00.00
1 00.00
Slide No. 24
Other findings of the study: Women accounted for only 27.4 percent of the total Net Factor Income from Abroad (NFIA) Women contributed 46.2 percent of the adjusted Gross National Product (GNP) from 38.0 percent when unpaid work was not included
Slide No. 25
Slide No. 26
the 20 core GAD indicators cover the PFA areas of concern: (1) education and training; (2) economy; (3) health; (4) poverty; (5) institutional mechanism; (6) media; (7) power and decision-making; (8) environment; (9) violence against women; (10)girl child; (11)armed conflict; and (12)human rights
Slide No. 27 JOEncarnacion Dec. 2007
Slide No. 28
Coordination mechanisms
creation of the Interagency Committee (IAC) on Gender Statistics to serve as a strategic mechanism to sustain the efforts and initiatives in the generation and improvement of gender statistics and institutionalize the implementation of the GAD
Slide No. 29
Slide No. 30
Slide No. 31
Distribution of women by person who has the final say in making specific decisions, according to current marital status and type of decision
JOEncarnacion Dec. 2007
Slide No. 32
Slide No. 33
Slide No. 34
Slide No. 35
Digression
Global Forum on Gender Statistics 10-12 December 2007
Measuring Progress of Philippine Society: Gross National Product or Gross National Happiness
by Romulo A. Virola and Jessamyn O. Encarnacion
Presented during the 10th National Convention on Statistics EDSA Shangri-la Plaza Hotel, Mandaluyong City, Philippines 1-2 October 2007
Slide No. 36
Digression
Global Forum on Gender Statistics 10-12 December 2007
Slide No. 37
Digression
Slide No. 38
Global Forum on Gender Statistics 10-12 December 2007 Community participation & volunteer work Cultural activities
Digression
1. Conceptual Framework
HI1
Work
Friends
Economy
Health
Environment
Income and financial security HI n Leisure and sports Love life
Government
Politics Others
Digression
Private company employees Government office employees Participants in the National Convention on Statistics Students in a private university Participants in the 48th ASP Convention
Slide No. 40
Digression
No. of respondents Source/Domain Family Health Religion and/or spiritual work Friends Income and financial security Education Love life Work Environment Economy Technological know-how Leisure and sports Government Sex life Community and volunteer work Cultural activities Politics
Slide No. 41
Digression
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Slide No. 42
Digression
Average importance Source/Domain Family Friends Religion and/or spiritual work Love life Health Education Sex life Work Leisure and sports Community and volunteer work Technological know-how Income and financial security Cultural activities Environment Economy Government Politics JOEncarnacion Dec. 2007 9.45 8.57 8.59 8.20 8.95 8.25 6.39 7.94 6.98 6.24 7.17 8.30 5.88 7.88 7.84 6.53 5.84
Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Slide No. 43
Digression
Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Slide No. 44
Digression
Slide No. 45
Digression
Slide No. 46
Digression
Slide No. 47
Digression
Slide No. 48
Thank you!
visit: www. nscb.gov.ph email: jo.encarnacion@nscb.gov.ph info@nscb.gov.ph
Slide No. 49