Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
December 2003
Agenda
>
>
>
MND/MRA/PCS, 2
Radio interface
Gb interface
Ater interface
MND/MRA/PCS, 3
DL and UL TBF establishment DL and UL TBF release DL and UL TBF progress DL and UL TBF : RLC statistics Sessions and transfers GPRS radio resources = PDCH GPRS radio resources = MPDCH GPRS service and CCCH load
MND/MRA/PCS, 4
Overall description
Radio
TBF end BSS Gb time
MND/MRA/PCS, 5
Ater
GPU
Transfer phase Fast DL TBF re-establishment T3192 Non-DRX mode DRX mode time
DL TBF establishment requests Transfer mode While T3192 running Idle mode + non-DRX mode + MPDCH Idle mode + non-DRX mode + no MPDCH Idle mode + DRX mode + MPDCH Idle mode + DRX mode + no MPDCH Idle mode + with / without MPDCH
UL TBF establishment requests Idle mode + MPDCH Idle mode + no MPDCH Transfer mode Idle mode + with / without MPDCH
GPRS/EGPRS request/success
DL TBF establishment successes Transfer mode While T3192 running Idle mode + non-DRX mode + MPDCH Idle mode + non-DRX mode + no MPDCH Idle mode + DRX mode + MPDCH Idle mode + DRX mode + no MPDCH Idle mode + with / without MPDCH
UL TBF establishment successes Idle mode + MPDCH Idle mode + no MPDCH Transfer mode Idle mode + with / without MPDCH
MND/MRA/PCS, 6
% TBF establishment failures Downlink Congestion rate (radio-Ater- (P14 + P105g + P105c + P105e) / (P91a +P91b+ P91c + Congestion (radio-Ater-GPU) GPU) P91d + P91e + P91f) rate Radio congestion rate P14 / (P91a + P91b + P91c + P91d + P91e + P91f) Radio congestion rate % of time during which (P13 / 10) / GP % of time during which PDCH allocation for DL TBF PDCH allocation for UL TBF is not possible due to is not possible due to congestion congestion ATer congestion rate P105g / (P91a + P91b + P91c + P91d + P91e + P91f) ATer congestion rate DSP congestion rate P105c / (P91a + P91b + P91c + P91d + P91e + P91f) DSP congestion rate CPU congestion rate P105e / (P91a + P91b + P91c + P91d + P91e + P91f) CPU congestion rate Radio problem rate P15 / (P91a + P91b + P91c + P91d + P91e + P91f) Radio problem rate Gb problem rate P65 / (P91a + P91b + P91c + P91d + P91e + P91f) Gb problem rate BSS problem rate (P91a + P91b + P91c + P91d + P91e + P91f - P14 - P15 BSS problem rate - P90a - P90b - P90c- P90d - P90e - P90f - P65 - P105e - P105c - P105g) / (P91a + P91b + P91c + P91d + P91e + P91f)
P105h / (P62a + P62b + P62c) P105d / (P62a + P62b + P62c) P105f / (P62a + P62b + P62c) P28 / (P62a + P62b + P62c) P66 / (P62a + P62b + P62c) ((P62a + P62b + P62c - P27 - P28 - P30a - P30b - P30c - P66 - P105h - P105f - P105d) / (P62a + P62b + P62c)
MND/MRA/PCS, 7
MND/MRA/PCS, 8
RNO reports
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
MND/MRA/PCS, 9
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
MND/MRA/PCS, 10
B7 Thresholds
>
Thresholds :
Significant traffic is reached for 2000 DL TBF requests/cell/day (less when Delayed downlink TBF release is activated) UL/DL TBF establishment success rate is seen as good above 95 % (except if CS2 is used at beginning of DL TBF)
All rights reserved 2003, Alcatel
MND/MRA/PCS, 11
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
Overall description
time
MND/MRA/PCS, 12
P9 / (P90a + P90b + P90c + KPI P90d + P90e + P90f) Acceptable release rate (P146 + P98a + P396a - ( (P434b + P434d) - (P396a))) / (P90a + P90b + P90c + P90d KPI + P90e + P90f) Drop rate (P90a + P90b + P90c + P90d + P90e + P90f - P9 - P146 P98a - ( (P434b + P434d) KPI (P396a))) / (P90a + P90b + P90c + P90d + P90e + P90f) Release rate due to PDCH P146 / (P90a + P90b + P90c fast pre-emption +P90d + P90e) Release rate due to P98a / (P90a + P90b + P90c + suspend procedure P90d + P90e + P90f) Release rate due to Flush P396a / (P90a + P90b + P90c message + P90d + P90e + P90f)
Normal release rate
P22 / (P30a + P30b + P30c) (P147 + P98b +P396b (P434a + P434c) - (P396b))) / (P30a + P30b + P30c) (P30a + P30b + P30c - P22 P147 - P98b - (P434a + P434c) - (P396b))) / (P30a + P30b + P30c) P147 / (P30a + P30b + P30c) P98b / (P30a + P30b + P30c) P396b / (P30a + P30b + P30c)
Drop rate
Release rate due to PDCH fast pre-emption Release rate due to suspend procedure Release rate due to Flush message
MND/MRA/PCS, 13
Gb drop Blocking drop Stagnat drop Radio pb % Acc Release % Norm Release
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
MND/MRA/PCS, 14
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
(P408a + P408b + P408c + radio resource realloc P408d) / (P30a + P30b + P30c) execution Gb problem P24 / ( P30a + P30b + P30c)
N_StagnatingWindow Blocking situation BSS problem
P385b / (P30a + P30b + P30c) P303b / (P30a + P30b + P30c) (P30a + P30b + P30c - P22 P147 - P98b - P396b - P24 P385b - P303b - P408a - P408b P408c - P302c) / ( P30a + P30b + P30c)
MND/MRA/PCS, 15
B7 Thresholds
Thresholds :
When Delayed DL TBF release is not activated and CS2 is not used at the beginning of TBF : UL/DL TBF normal release rate is seen as good above 98 % When Delayed DL TBF release is activated or CS2 is used at beginning of TBF (without optimisation of the coding scheme adaptation) : Threshold of DL TBF normal release rate should be lower.
MND/MRA/PCS, 16
Overall presentation
TBF statistics : duration, number, throughput DL TBF : delayed DL TBF release TBF resources re-allocation
TBF follow-up B7
TBF statistics Downlink Average TBF duration (P16 / 10) / (P90a + P90b + P90c Average TBF duration + P90d + P90e + P90f) Maximum number of TBF p35 Maximum number of TBF simultaneously established simultaneously established Average number of TBF p36 / 10 Average number of TBF simultaneously established simultaneously established Average useful throughput (P55a * N1 + P55b * N2) / Average useful throughput in kbit/s at RLC level per ((P16a/10) * 1000) in kbit/s at RLC level per TBF TBF
MND/MRA/PCS, 18
Average GPRS TBF duration in ack mode Average EGPRS TBF duration in ack mode
Maximum number of TBF simultaneously established Average number of TBF simultaneously established Average useful throughput in kbit/s at RLC level per GPRS TBF Average useful throughput in kbit/s at RLC level per EGPRS TBF
Maximum number of TBF simultaneously established p36 / 10 Average number of TBF simultaneously established (P55a * N1 + P55b * N2 + P55c Average useful throughput * N3 + P55d * N4) / ((P16a/10) * in kbit/s at RLC level per 1000) GPRS TBF (P55e*176 + P55f*224 + Average useful throughput P55g*296 + P55h*352 + in kbit/s at RLC level per P55i*448 + P55j*592 + EGPRS TBF (P55k*896 + P55l*1088 + P55m*1184)/2) / (P38c*1000)
MND/MRA/PCS, 19
MND/MRA/PCS, 20
MND/MRA/PCS, 21
10 12 0 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2 4 6 8
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03 14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
RNO reports
RNO reports
>
On RNO graphs :
% Efficiency = Rate of DL TBF resumptions per DL TBF establishments % Active = Percentage of time during which the DL TBF connections are in the active state
MND/MRA/PCS, 22
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
Failures causes
Success rate
Trigger T1 B7 / B8
TBF resources re-allocation : trigger T1 Downlink Uplink Nb of TBF candidate for resource realloc P403a Nb of TBF candidate for resource realloc Resource realloc ratio due to trigger T1 P403a / (P403a + P403b + Resource realloc ratio due to trigger T1 P403c + P403d) Nb of resource realloc successes P405a Nb of resource realloc successes Resource realloc success rate P405a / P403a Resource realloc success rate Nb of resource realloc exec fail due to P407a Nb of resource realloc exec fail due to radio problems radio problems Resource realloc exec fail rate due to radio P407a / P403a Resource realloc exec fail rate due to radio problems problems Nb of resource realloc preparation failures P423a Nb of resource realloc preparation failures because no PDCH could be found because no PDCH could be found Resource realloc preparation fail rate due P423a / P403a Resource realloc preparation fail rate due to lack of radio resources to lack of radio resources Resource realloc prep efficiency rate (P403a - P423a) / P403a Resource realloc prep efficiency rate Nb of resource realloc failures due external P425a Nb of resource realloc failures due external request (suspension request or Flush request (suspension request or Flush message) during exec of the realloc message) during exec of the realloc procedure procedure Nb of resource realloc failures due to BSS P403a - P423a - P425a Nb of resource realloc failures due to BSS pb during exec of the realloc procedure P407a - P405a pb during exec of the realloc procedure Exec fail rate due to BSS pb (P403a - P423a - P425a Exec fail rate due to BSS pb P407a - P405a) / P403a Resource realloc exec efficiency rate P405a / (P403a - P423a) Resource realloc exec efficiency rate
P404a - P424a - P426a P408a - P406a (P404a - P424a - P426a P408a - P406a) / P404a P406a / (P404a - P424a)
MND/MRA/PCS, 24
Trigger T2 B7 / B8
Downlink Nb of TBF candidate for resource realloc P403b Resource realloc ratio due to trigger T1 P403b/ (P403a + P403b + P403c + P403d) Nb of resource realloc successes P405b Resource realloc success rate P405b / P403b Nb of resource realloc exec fail due to P407b radio problems Resource realloc exec fail rate due to radio P407b / P403b problems Nb of resource realloc preparation failures P423b because no PDCH could be found Resource realloc preparation fail rate due P423b / P403b to lack of radio resources Resource realloc prep efficiency rate (P403b - P423b) / P403b Nb of resource realloc failures due external P425b request (suspension request or Flush message) during exec of the realloc procedure Nb of resource realloc failures due to BSS P403b - P423b - P425b pb during exec of the realloc procedure P407b - P405b Exec fail rate due to BSS pb (P403b - P423b - P425b P407b - P405b) / P403b Resource realloc exec efficiency rate P405b / (P403b - P423b)
P404b - P424b - P426b P408b - P406b (P404b - P424b - P426b P408b - P406b) / P404b P406b / (P404b - P424b)
MND/MRA/PCS, 25
Trigger T3 B7 / B8
TBF resources re-allocation : trigger T3 Downlink Uplink Nb of TBF candidate for resource realloc P403c Nb of TBF candidate for resource realloc Resource realloc ratio due to trigger T1 P403c / (P403a + P403b + Resource realloc ratio due to trigger T1 P403c + P403d) Nb of resource realloc successes P405c Nb of resource realloc successes Resource realloc success rate P405c / P403c Resource realloc success rate Nb of resource realloc exec fail due to P407c Nb of resource realloc exec fail due to radio problems radio problems Resource realloc exec fail rate due to radio P407c / P403c Resource realloc exec fail rate due to radio problems problems Nb of resource realloc preparation failures P423c Nb of resource realloc preparation failures because no PDCH could be found because no PDCH could be found Resource realloc preparation fail rate due P423c / P403c Resource realloc preparation fail rate due to lack of radio resources to lack of radio resources Resource realloc prep efficiency rate (P403c - P423c) / P403c Resource realloc prep efficiency rate Nb of resource realloc failures due external P425c Nb of resource realloc failures due external request (suspension request or Flush request (suspension request or Flush message) during exec of the realloc message) during exec of the realloc procedure procedure Nb of resource realloc failures due to BSS P403c - P423c - P425c Nb of resource realloc failures due to BSS pb during exec of the realloc procedure P407c - P405c pb during exec of the realloc procedure Exec fail rate due to BSS pb (P403c - P423c - P425c Exec fail rate due to BSS pb P407c - P405c) / P403c Resource realloc exec efficiency rate P405c / (P403c - P423c) Resource realloc exec efficiency rate
P404c - P424c - P426c P408c - P406c (P404c - P424c - P426c P408c - P406c) / P404c P406c / (P404c - P424c)
MND/MRA/PCS, 26
Trigger T4 B8
TBF resources re-allocation : trigger T4 Downlink Uplink Nb of TBF candidate for resource realloc P403d Nb of TBF candidate for resource realloc Resource realloc ratio due to trigger T4 P403d / (P403a + P403b + Resource realloc ratio due to trigger T4 P403c + P403d) Nb of resource realloc successes P405d Nb of resource realloc successes Resource realloc success rate P405d / P403d Resource realloc success rate Nb of resource realloc exec fail due to P407d Nb of resource realloc exec fail due to radio problems radio problems Resource realloc exec fail rate due to radio P407d / P403d Resource realloc exec fail rate due to radio problems problems Nb of resource realloc preparation failures P423d Nb of resource realloc preparation failures because no PDCH could be found because no PDCH could be found Resource realloc preparation fail rate due P423d / P403d Resource realloc preparation fail rate due to lack of radio resources to lack of radio resources Resource realloc prep efficiency rate (P403d - P423d) / P403d Resource realloc prep efficiency rate Nb of resource realloc failures due external P425d Nb of resource realloc failures due external request (suspension request or Flush request (suspension request or Flush message) during exec of the realloc message) during exec of the realloc procedure procedure Nb of resource realloc failures due to BSS P403d - P423d - P425d Nb of resource realloc failures due to BSS pb during exec of the realloc procedure P407d - P405d pb during exec of the realloc procedure Exec fail rate due to BSS pb (P403d - P423d - P425d Exec fail rate due to BSS pb P407d - P405d) / P403d Resource realloc exec efficiency rate P405d / (P403d - P423d) Resource realloc exec efficiency rate
P404d - P424d - P426d P408d - P406d (P404d - P424d - P426d P408d - P406d) / P404d P406d / (P404d - P424d)
MND/MRA/PCS, 27
RNO V3 reports
MND/MRA/PCS, 28
RNO V3 reports
External stop Fail radio Fail BSS Prep fail Success % Success
DL ressource realloc T2
70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 01/09/2003 02/09/2003 03/09/2003 04/09/2003 05/09/2003 06/09/2003 07/09/2003 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0
External stop Radio fail BSS fail Prep fail Success % Success
DL ressource realloc T3
100000 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 01/09/2003 02/09/2003 03/09/2003 04/09/2003 05/09/2003 06/09/2003 07/09/2003 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
External stop Radio fail BSS fail Prep fail Success % Success
MND/MRA/PCS, 29
Overall description B7 / B8
LT ST
Throughput per cell, per PDCH, per TBF PACCH RLC blocks PDTCH occupancy PACCH occupancy
MND/MRA/PCS, 30 All rights reserved 2003, Alcatel
KPI KPI
(P20a + P20b + P20c + P20d) / (P55a + P55b + P55c + P55d + P20a + P20b + P20c + P20d)
(P20b + P55b + P72b) / PDTCH RLC block (P20a + P55a + P72a + CS2 / (CS1 + CS2) P20b + P55b + P72b) ratio
MND/MRA/PCS, 31
Average TX_EFFICIENCY
MND/MRA/PCS, 32
MND/MRA/PCS, 33
RNO V3 reports
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
MND/MRA/PCS, 34
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
RNO V3 reports
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
MND/MRA/PCS, 35
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
In RLC ack mode, rate of RLC retransmitted data bytes sent on PDTCH and encoded in MCSx
7b*240+P57c*288+P 57d*400)
In RLC ack mode, rate of RLC retransmitted data bytes sent on PDTCH and encoded in MCSx (p21e) / ((p21e)+( ( (P57e)*176+(P57f)*22 4+(P57g)*296+(P57h)* 352) / 8))
MND/MRA/PCS, 36
MND/MRA/PCS, 37
Overall description B7 / B8
Transfer
% of time DL/UL TBF are granted the max nb of PDCH they suppor and the corresponding MS are engaged in DL/UL biased transfers
MND/MRA/PCS, 38
Session : a session corresponds to a mobile station and the BSS exchanging packet data using downlink TBFs, uplink TBFs or both
Bias : For each MS, the MFS counts the number of bytes exchanged in each direction and then determines the main direction of the application
MND/MRA/PCS, 39 All rights reserved 2003, Alcatel
MND/MRA/PCS, 40
RNO Reports
Time Opt alloc DL Time bias Time bias %Time Opt Alloc
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
UL session
6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Time Opt alloc UL Time bias Time bias %Time Opt Alloc
MND/MRA/PCS, 41
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
Overall description B7 / B8
MND/MRA/PCS, 42
PDCH usage B7 / B8
Soft pre-emption Number of PDCH released after having been P417 marked by the soft pre-emption procedure Number of times the soft pre-emption procedure P418 is called Average number of UL+DL TBF candidates to a (P403a + P404a) / P417 T1 reallocation per PDCH released after having been marked
MND/MRA/PCS, 43 All rights reserved 2003, Alcatel
MAX_PDCH_Dyn follow-up B7 / B8
MND/MRA/PCS, 44
MND/MRA/PCS, 45
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
10
15
20
25
30
35
Alloc max
T1 Success
MPDCH establishment requests (primary) MPDCH alloc and de-alloc requests (secondary)
Time during which a MPDCH cannot be established (prim + sec) MPDCH signalling traffic PPCH
PRACH
PAGCH PACCH
MND/MRA/PCS, 46 All rights reserved 2003, Alcatel
MPDCH allocation Average number of established MPDCH (primary and secondary) Maximum number of established MPDCH (primary and secondary) Cumulative time during which primary MPDCH is established Primary MPDCH time occupancy Number of primary MPDCH establishment requests Number of secondary MPDCH dynamic allocation and deallocation requests Time during which a primary MPDCH cannot be established % of time during which a primary MPDCH cannot be established Time during which a secondary MPDCH cannot be established % of time during which a secondary MPDCH cannot be established
P93 / 10 P94 P37 / 10 ((P37 / 10)* 60) / GP P51a P51b P395a / 10 (P395a / 10) / GP P395b / 10 (P395b / 10) / GP
MND/MRA/PCS, 47
PRACH signalling load due to NC2 feature P438d Dedicated PAGCH signalling load on all the existing MPDCH P400 UL PACCH signalling load on all the existing MPDCH P401
MND/MRA/PCS, 48
MND/MRA/PCS, 49
OMC-R QoS indicators - Radio interface GPRS service and CCCH load
>
MND/MRA/PCS, 50
OMC-R QoS indicators - Radio interface GPRS service and CCCH load
GPRS/GSM AGCH breakdown
450000 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0
CS AGCH
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
MND/MRA/PCS, 51
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
MND/MRA/PCS, 52
MND/MRA/PCS, 53
Ater interface - GCH DSP congestion duration (in seconds) (not B8). P100 Cumulative time (in seconds) during which a P100a GCH (16k channel) is busy in the GPU Maximum number of busy GCH (16k channel) in P100b the GPU Cumulative time (in seconds) during which a P101 GCH resource (16k channel) is available in the GPU Atermux congestion duration (in seconds) due to P383a a lack of GCH transmission resources on the Atermux interface Time (cumulated over a granularity period) P383b during which the GPU remains in "high" Ater usage
MND/MRA/PCS, 54
Gb interface indicators :
BVC
MND/MRA/PCS, 55
BVC : introduction
BVC Number of DL LLC bytes Received from SGSN Discarded due to congestion Not rerouted Well received from SGSN
Received from MS
MND/MRA/PCS, 56
MND/MRA/PCS, 57
Blocked bytes Discarded bytes Not rerouted Rerouted bytes Received bytes %Well receiv
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
UL sent bytes
MND/MRA/PCS, 58
14 /0 8/ 20 03 16 /0 8/ 20 03 18 /0 8/ 20 03 20 /0 8/ 20 03 22 /0 8/ 20 03 24 /0 8/ 20 03 26 /0 8/ 20 03 28 /0 8/ 20 03 30 /0 8/ 20 03 01 /0 9/ 20 03 03 /0 9/ 20 03 05 /0 9/ 20 03 07 /0 9/ 20 03 09 /0 9/ 20 03 11 /0 9/ 20 03 13 /0 9/ 20 03
For the first EDGE experimentation some RNO reports are available :
DL/UL TBF establishments DL/UL data transfers Qos DL/UL sessions
EDGE_trial_GPRS_Telecom
DL/UL GPRS throughput : cell,PDCH,TBF DL/UL EGPRS throughput : PDCH, TBF DL/UL RLC traffic : CSx/MCSx usage... DL/UL CS transitions (only for GPRS)
Agenda
>
>
>
MND/MRA/PCS, 60
Different data applications are multiplexed over the GPRS radio layers : FTP, WEB/HTTP, WAP, MMS, Data applications have very different traffic characteristics (amount of data, duration between LLC PDU) leading to different ways of triggering of the radio layers algorithms This has a direct impact on the follow-up of some OMC-R QoS indicators :
>
>
number of DL/UL TBF establishment requests DL/UL TBF duration coding scheme distribution
MND/MRA/PCS, 61
Data applications use TCP/IP protocol layers which have a great impact on the end user QoS
FTP above TCP/IP layers
FTP TCP IP PPP PPP relay SNDCP P LLC RLC MAC RF RLC MAC RF SNDCP P LLC BSSGP NS L1 BSSGP NS L1 relay GTP UDP IP-Gn L2 L1 IP GTP UDP First IP router IP-Gn L2 L1 Last IP router relay IP IP relay IP IP relay IP
relay
(*)
GGSN Gi
TCP data segment Possible repartition on the end to end path of the TCP flight size TCP acknowledgement
MND/MRA/PCS, 62
(*) this graphical representation is used to express the fact that many data segments are currently waiting to be transmitted on the represented link and are stored in buffers of the device handling the link . It doesnt mean that simultaneous segments are being transmitted.
Several upper layers parameters and algorithms have a great impact on the end user QoS :
MTU size at sender side TCP window size at receiver side TCP slow start algorithm at sender side TCP algorithms to handle congestion situations
MND/MRA/PCS, 63
FTP download of a 1 MB file considering different MTU and TCP window size values MS used : Sagem OT190 (3+1)
Max. throughput obtained for a TCP window size ~ 8*1460 bytes
MND/MRA/PCS, 64
Contrary to the CS service, the follow-up of radio layers QoS indicators (from drive tests or OMC-R) is not sufficient to have a complete status of the end user QoS Good QoS at radio layers level does not necessarily mean good end user QoS.
>
>
Inversely, trying to improve QoS at end user side can have side effect on QoS at radio layers.
Starting TBF in CS2 allows better throughput during FTP transfer but QoS at radio layers shows that it can degrade the DL TBF establishment success rate. Enabling delayed downlink TBF release allows better response time from mobiles but it leads to more risks to drop DL TBF.
Radio
MND/MRA/PCS, 65
End user performances are obtained through different end user services :
>
These performances must be interpreted with a maximum of information concerning the context of the measurements.
MND/MRA/PCS, 66
First network : with Sagem OT190, local server, T3192 = 1 s. Test results come from series of 300 pings with first ping not taken into account Second network : with Siemens S45, server not local, T3192 = 500 ms. Test results come from series of 100 pings with first ping taken into account For both : Ericsson core network
Ping size First network 32 32 1400 1400 32 32 1400 1400 bytes bytes bytes bytes bytes bytes bytes bytes Ping separation 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 second second second second second second second second Average Ping duration B7 iso B6 B7 full 1045.44 1271.73 3944.14 3211.71 2113.34 1245.39 698.62 1240.53 3102.37 3030.93 756.31 956.16 3523.45 3102.86
B7 iso B6 : w/o Non DRX mode with Delayed emission of final PUAN B7 Full : with Non-DRX mode with Delayed DL TBF release with Delayed emission of final PUAN
Second network
MND/MRA/PCS, 67
Performed with Siemens S45 and Samsung Q100 and a local server Motorola core network PC with Windows 98 (MTU = 1500 bytes, TCP window size = 16384 bytes) and with Windows 2000 (default TCP parameter values)
DL FTP with (4+ 1) MS UL FTP (1 TS on UL) In B6 (with Non-DRX mode) In B7 full 5.3 Kbytes/s 5.4 Kbytes/s 1.3 Kbytes/s 1.3 Kbytes/s
>
Performed with Motorola T280 / Ericsson core network WAP access time reduced in B7 release from 10 seconds to less than 6 seconds with activation of Non-DRX mode and Downlink delayed TBF release However, these tests are not statistically reliable
All rights reserved 2003, Alcatel
MND/MRA/PCS, 68
First network : Web server on intranet. Total page size : 185 kbytes with 46 images of average size = 2.87 kbytes Second network : Web server on internet. Total page size : 60 kbytes with 45 images of average size = 0.99 kbytes and with Java scripts For both : Ericsson core network, Siemens S45 and PC with Windows 2000 (MTU = 1500 bytes, TCP window size : First network = 14600 bytes, Second network = 11680 bytes)
Average Page download duration (s) B6 B7 iso B6 B7 full 82 61 123.45 69.3 56 First network Second network Average WEB Throughput (kbit/ s) B6 B7 iso B6 B7 full 18.05 24.26 3.89 6.93 8.57
B6 : w/o Non DRX mode B7 iso B6 : w/o Non DRX mode, with Delayed emission of final PUAN, new coding scheme adaptation, ... B7 Full : with Non DRX mode, Delayed DL TBF release, Delayed emission of final PUAN, new coding scheme adaptation, ...
MND/MRA/PCS, 69
Agenda
>
>
>
MND/MRA/PCS, 70
Despite the OMC-R QoS follow-up is not sufficient to have a complete status of the end user QoS, following domains must be followed :
To ensure that enough PDCH are available for GPRS and that there is no impact on the GSM To ensure that GPRS radio layers are working properly
DL/UL TBF establishment success rate DL/UL TBF normal and acceptable release rate DL/UL RLC re-transmission rate CS2/(CS1 +CS2) ratio
MND/MRA/PCS, 71
MND/MRA/PCS, 72
Other OMC-R QoS indicators are interesting to follow the efficiency of some features :
MND/MRA/PCS, 73