Lee and Marlene Canters Assertive Discipline

Assertive Discipline The Theory

Focuses on creating a classroom based on the rights and needs of both the students and the teacher in the classroom The climate of the classroom needs to be calm and caring Behavior must be humanely managed What are the rights and needs of both students and teachers, according to the Assertive Discipline model?

Rights and Needs

Students 1. Warm, supportive classroom/teacher 2. Learning 3. Safety 4. Limits Teachers 1. Support from administration/parents 2. Teaching 3. Respect and trust 4. Enforce limits

Primary Teachings
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. In order for teachers to teach and students to learn, the rights and needs of all must be met. Teachers rights include a classroom free of disruption and support from administration and parents to establish this. Teachers must remember that their mission is to teach students and being in control of the classroom is key to accomplish this. Teachers must model the behavior that they want to see in their students. Teachers need to directly teach students appropriate behavior.

6.
7. 8.

Teachers need a discipline plan based on mutual respect and trust.

The plan must include both positive and negative consequences Directives to students must be worded in a positive manner.

9.

Teachers can be successful with all students, even difficult ones.

Teachers and Assertive Discipline

According to the Canters, how do teachers interact with their students?
Hostile teachers see their students as adversaries. They see their relationship as a power struggle, needing to lay down the law and use harsh, loud commands to do this. With hostile teachers students will: Feel that they are not liked Feel unjustly controlled

The opposite behavior by a teacher is also possible

Teachers and Assertive Discipline

Nonassertive teachers behave passively towards students. They are inconsistent in their discipline plan and apply rules and procedures in an arbitrary manner.
With nonassertive teachers, students will:
Feel that the teacher is wishy-washy and will not take the teachers directives seriously! Act confused about what is expected of them

The ideal teacher, according to the Assertive Discipline Model, is

Teachers and Assertive Discipline

Assertive!
Assertive teachers are clear, consistent and confident. They are consistent in with discipline and apply rules and procedures in a manner that encourages students to behave in an acceptable manner.
With assertive teachers, students will: Have their needs meet. Know that they have rights and that they will be respected. Have trust in their teacher and their teachers words and actions.

Good Discipline:
A Step-by-Step Approach
According to the Canters, good discipline is learned! Good discipline is the fruit of creating a classroom environment of mutual respect and trust.
How to begin?
1. Listen to students. Get to know them as individuals. Take an interest in them as people. This includes communication with their parents, guardians or caregivers. 2. Teach them how to behave. Teachers must model the behavior that they expect their students to exhibit. Establish clear routines and procedures in the classroom. Make sure that students understand what is expected. This may need to be reinforced and reevaluated often through positive repetition of rules and/or procedures.

A Step-by Step Approach

3. Have a Plan! This plan needs to include rules that are stated clearly and positively. For example, say keep your hands to yourself rather than show respect to others. It is very important that consequences are used consistently.
Should include both negative and positive consequences

Positive consequences are used when the teacher catches a student

being good

Negative consequences should be used when students misbehave or interfere with the rights of others to learn. Students should be aware of consequences. (step 2)

They should never include physical or psychologically harmful forms of punishment!

A Step-by-Step Approach
4. The Plan should have: A discipline hierarchy that establishes clear consequences that get increasingly harsher if infractions of rules or directions are repeated. The only effective way to make this work is to keep track of student behavior. There are a variety of ways that this can be accomplished. Clearly post rules and consequences!

Difficult Students
According to the Canters, most students will respond well by using their techniques. However, there will be some who may not, for a variety of reasons. These difficult students need more attention and guidance.

How can these students be included?

Reach out to them. Respond to them, dont just react. Build a trusting relationship with them. Get to know them.

Students may have special needs, such as extra attention, firmer limits, motivation.
The teacher should determine which need is the primary need and fill that need first.

Difficult Students
Some suggestions for working with difficult students: Write reminders to praise students with positive remarks that are genuine! Be aware of nondisruptivemisbehaviors, such as withdrawing, daydreaming, doodling etc. Use positive ways of redirecting such as eye contact, physical proximity or calling on students. Reactive confrontations may worsen relationships. The Canters suggest the following:
1. Stay calm

2. Depersonalize the situation

3. Is it an covert or overt confrontation? Covert is when the student mumbles or sneers but doesnt verbally confront. Overt is when the student draws other students into the situation while defying the teacher. 4. Back-off hostile students! Deal with the whole class first. Talk with the student privately at a later time.

Strengths of Assertive Discipline

It Works
McCormack (1989)

Assertive Discipline can be a basis on which to build a more comprehensive model of discipline, can raise and clarify teacher expectations for behavior.
McDaniel (1989)

Perhaps the most telling evidence of the strength of Assertive Discipline is its continued widespread popularity, which suggests that it provides educators skills that work well for their students and themselves.
Charles (2002)

Criticism of Assertive Discipline

criticized for being unnecessarily harsh and too focused on suppressing unwanted behavior rather than on helping students learn to control their own behavior.
Charles (2002)

we find no evidence that Assertive Discipline is an effective approach deserving schoolwide or districtwide adoption.
Render, Padilla, & Krank (1989)

Some final thoughts

I could site other studies that support the effectiveness of Assertive Discipline, but the real test of any educational approach is its use by teachers, in classrooms, with students. Assertive Discipline undergoes that testing in tens of thousands of classrooms every day.
Canter (1988)

The Canters continually modify their approach to ensure that it remains effective as social realities change. Earlier they focused on teachers being strong leaders in the classroom, while now they emphasized the building of trusting, helpful relationships between teachers and students.
Charles (2002)