Member behaviour L o a d Deflection Linear response until material reaches yield stress Magnitude of deformations depends on E and G Residual stresses cause early yielding BUT steel ductility causes local redistribution. Once yielding starts, member becomes non-linear and behaviour approaches full plasticity. This is due to material and GEOMETRIC NON-LINEARITY Bending moments and torques influenced by deformations as well as applied forces.
Member behaviour L o a d Deflection Linear response until material reaches yield stress Magnitude of deformations depends on E and G Residual stresses cause early yielding BUT steel ductility causes local redistribution. Once yielding starts, member becomes non-linear and behaviour approaches full plasticity. This is due to material and GEOMETRIC NON-LINEARITY Bending moments and torques influenced by deformations as well as applied forces.
Direitos autorais:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato PPTX, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
Member behaviour L o a d Deflection Linear response until material reaches yield stress Magnitude of deformations depends on E and G Residual stresses cause early yielding BUT steel ductility causes local redistribution. Once yielding starts, member becomes non-linear and behaviour approaches full plasticity. This is due to material and GEOMETRIC NON-LINEARITY Bending moments and torques influenced by deformations as well as applied forces.
Direitos autorais:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato PPTX, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
Deflection Linear response until material reaches yield stress
Magnitude of deformations depends on E and G
Residual stresses cause early yielding BUT steel ductility causes local redistribution
May assume linear behaviour until more general yielding occurs Member behaviour L o a d
Deflection Full Plasticity Once yielding starts, member becomes non-linear and behaviour approaches full plasticity
This non-linear behaviour is due to MATERIAL NON-LINEARITY Material non-linearity Member behaviour L o a d
Deflection Full Plasticity GEOMETRIC NON-LINEARITY Bending moments and torques influenced by deformations as well as applied forces Deformations may become very large (depends on E and G) as behaviour approaches elastic buckling limit
Elastic buckling Member behaviour L o a d
Deflection Full Plasticity MATERIAL & GEOMETRIC NON- LINEARITY Curve becomes non-linear after first yield and approaches a maximum load before starting to decrease
Elastic buckling Member behaviour L o a d
Deflection Full Plasticity Brittle Failure Local buckling Material fracture Elastic buckling Local buckling Brittle fracture
Influence of joint stiffness Simple joints No moment transfer Pinned joints Rigid joints No beam-to-column rotation Full moment transfer Semi-rigid Some flexibility Moments transfer < rigid joints Frames with simple joints Simple joints do not develop moments which adversely affect structure as a whole Structure assumed to be pin jointed No moments transmitted Joint must have rotation capacity May analyze and design members individually See NCCI Simple construction
First order elastic analysis 1 st order analysis of rigid frame assumes Material behaves linearly Member behaves linearly no member instability effects (P-o) Frame behaves linearly no frame instability effects (P-A)
1 st order analysis L h N N Hh/2 H/2 H/2 N-Hh/L N+Hh/L H 2 nd order analysis R L H L H R R R H N N A o H R h+R R A M Max R R o First order analysis 2 nd order effects due to sway Second order moments referred to as the "P-A" effect; i.e. an axial load P applied at an eccentricity A Generates second order moments due to eccentrically applied vertical load in the members Sway causes eccentricity of the vertical loading P-A effects arise due: - to horizontal loading - and/or from any effect such as lack of verticality or out of straightness of the column, which could cause the frame to move. P-A effects do not necessarily cause instability. Need to determine whether the P-A effects are significant If so, whether or not they will they cause instability. cf 1 st & 2 nd order braced frame cf 1 st & 2 nd order unbraced frame Elastic buckling of braced frames Elastic buckling analysis used to approximate second-order effects Replace frame loads by a set which produces the same member axial forces without any bending Set of member forces N cr which causes buckling depends on distribution of axial forces in frame: Expressed as a load factor
cr x set of axial forces N i
N cr = o cr N i
Alternatively, expressed by a set of effective length factors k cr = L cr /L defines the member forces at frame buckling by N cr = t 2 EI
/(k cr L) 2 . Computer programs Except for isolated members (and very simple frames), determination of frame buckling factor cr is carried out numerically, using a suitable computer program. 1. Find initial member axial forces {N i } by carrying out a first-order elastic analysis of the frame under the initial loads. 2. Then use a finite element method to determine the elastic buckling load factors cr for which the total frame stiffness vanishes: ie [K]{D} - cr [G]{D} = {0}
[K] is the elastic stiffness matrix [G] is the stability matrix associated with the initial axial forces {N i } {D} is the vector of nodal deformations which define the buckled shape of the frame (e.g. see elastic buckling in braced/unbraced frames)
Alternatively, for rigid rectangular frames effective length factor k cr of each compression member obtained using estimates of member relative end stiffness factors k 1 , k 2 in a braced member chart limited to vertical columns of regular rectangular frames with regular loading patterns in which each horizontal beam has zero axial force and all the columns buckle simultaneously in the same mode.
q = k = E(I c / L c ) E(I c / L c ) + E(| e I b / L b ) | e = factor which varies with restraint conditions at far end of beam = 0.5 if far end is same as that at column, = 0.75 if far end is pinned, = 1.0 if the far end is fixed Effective length ratios non-sway NCCI Effective length ratios - sway Instability Consider an axially loaded vertical slender cantilever strut At low axial loads, P, a small disturbing force, F, cause cantilever to deflect a finite amount. When disturbing force is removed, cantilever returns to original shape As axial load is increased, small disturbing force causes more deflection due to decreasing stiffness of column Eventually resistance will vanish and cantilever will deflect in an uncontrolled manner Load to cause this failure (infinite material strength and no imperfections) is known as the elastic critical load Ratio between this load and the factored load on the strut is known as the elastic critical load factor cr
When cr > 10 frame judged to be stable and the second order effects can be neglected. When cr < 4 frame potentially unstable and requires careful second order analysis.
Imperfections Necessary to allow for imperfections (residual stresses, lack of verticality or straightness, lack of fit, minor eccentricities ) see 5.3 For frames sensitive to sway, global sway imperfection | 0 =1/200 o h is a reduction factor for height o h = 2/\h but 2/3 s o h s 1,0 o m is a reduction factor for number of columns (m) in a row o m = \{ 0, 5[ 1 + 1/m]} For individual members, use e 0 /L See 5.3.4 Classification of frames Braced A frame may be regarded as braced if the bracing system carries the horizontal Unbraced if this loading is carried by bending action in the columns Sway frames are regarded as non-sway if the P-A effects are deemed to be small enough to be ignored Sway sensitive if the P-A effects are significant in the design. Approximate calculation of o crit o cr =F cr /F Ed
F Ed is design load on the structure F cr is the elastic critical buckling load for global instability
H Ed is total design value of horizontal reaction at bottom of storey due to horizontal loads (applied and fictitious) V Ed is the total design vertical load at the bottom of the storey o H,Ed is horizontal displacement of top of storey relative to bottom h is storey height