Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Presented by
Ankush Goyal Harsha Malhotra Satyajeet Suman
According to Edwin Flippo, "Performance Appraisal is the systematic, periodic and impartial rating of an employee's excellence, in matters pertaining to his present job and Performance Appraisal also his potential for a better job. Rating, called as Performance
Employee Assessment, Employee Performance Review, Personnel Appraisal, Performance Evaluation, objective assessment of Employee Evaluation, Merit Rating
Supervision
Dependability
Co-operation
Judgement
Versatility
Health
Performance Measurement
Performance Management refers to the entire process of appraising performances, giving feedback to the employees and offering rewards or punishments to them
4 Performance Appraisal By Ankush, Harsha, Satyajeet
Performance Standards
Translate job reqts. Into levels of acceptance or unacceptable performance
Job Analysis
Performance Appraisal
Improving Performance
Appraisal Process
Feedback
Appraisal Performance
Performance Interview
Performance Management
8
Appropriate Purposes
Objectives of Appraisal
This includes effecting promotions and transfers, assessing training needs, awarding pay increases, and like.
Traditional Guiding value Primary Goal Leadership practices Appraisal frequency Degree of formality Attribution to individual Control, documentation Directional evaluative Occasional High Systems Attribution to system Devt. , Problem solving Facilitative, Coaching Frequent Low Group Orientation
10
Individual? Workgroup? Organization ? Division? Immediate Superiors? Peers? Subordinat es? Committee s? Clients?
When to Evaluate?
Appraisal Design
What to Evaluate?
What Problems?
11
How to Solve?
12
13
objective data to base this on. It helps you to set priorities where there are conflicting demands on your resources. This makes it easy to choose the most important problem to solve, or select the solution that will give you the greatest advantage.
14
simply checks off the employees level of performance. The scales may specify five points, so a factor such as job knowledge might be rated 1 (poorly informed about work duties) to 5 (has complete mastery of all phases of the job)
15
16
employee but in order of forced distribution. For example, the distribution requested with 10 or 20 percent in the top category, 70 or 80 percent in the middle, and 10 percent in the bottom.
17
18
Essay Method
This method ask managers / supervisors to
describe strengths and weaknesses of an employees behavior. Its a non-quantitative technique. This method usually use with the graphic rating scale method.
19
Employees understanding of the companys programs, policies, objectives, etc. Employees relations with co-workers and superiors. The employees general planning, organizing and controlling ability; The attitudes and perceptions of the employee, in general.
20
21
performance behavior of employees throughout the performance period. At the end of the rating period, these recorded critical incidents are used in the evaluation of the workers performance.
22
23
24
MBO Process
Mmanagers set objectives for the employee,
periodically evaluate the performance, and reward according to the result. It focuses attention on what must be accomplished (goals) rather than how it is to be accomplished (methods).
25
performance appraisal that consists of a series of vertical scales, one for each important dimension of job performance.
26
27
assessed based on ideas of many other different people, eg. customers, suppliers, peers and direct reports. Implemented by the manager of HR Dept. so that the subordinate reviewers are made sure that all their assessments on performance are kept anonymous.
28
Main Contributors
Subordinates.
29
planning and goal-setting. 360 degree concentrates on subjective areas, for example efficiencies of teamwork, character, and leadership. 360 degree supplies on the way others think about a specific staff.
30
31
32
33
Challenges to Appraisal
Create a culture of excellence that inspires every employee to improve and lend himself or herself to be assessed. Align organizational objectives to individual aspirations. Clear growth path for talented individuals. Provide new challenges to rejuvenate careers that have reached the plateau stage.
Embed teamwork in all operational processes. Debureaucratise the organisation structure for ease of flow of information
4. Challenges to Appraisal
Errors and 1.a. Errors/Bias Bias
3. Politics c. Politics
Liking
b. Liking d. Legality
37
1. Halo Error
Allowing a few behaviors of employees to influence the perception and rating of other behaviors.
Observation of specific behavior (s) (e.g., volunteers to work overtime) High ratings on other performance dimensions
Performance Appraisal By Ankush, Harsha, Satyajeet 39
2. Recency Effect
Allowing the most recent behavior of an employee to overly influence the overall appraisal.
Performance Appraisal By Ankush, Harsha, Satyajeet 40
3. Primacy Effect
Allowing first impressions of employees to overly influence subsequent perceptions of performance.
41
4. Rating Tendencies
___ X__
Very Poor
42
5. Escalation of Commitment
When supervisors use appraisals to support their views of and intentions toward employees e.g. to promote, dismiss, or punish.
Performance Appraisal By Ankush, Harsha, Satyajeet 43
45
Challenges: Politics
Often, supervisors allow politics to affect their appraisals. For example, a lower than justified rating may be used to punish an employee, or supervisors may avoid a pattern of low ratings to hide poor supervisory practices.
46
Challenges: Legality
How to ensure legal compliance in performance appraisal? Recent study of 295 federal court cases identified factors related to legality of appraisals:
Legally defensible appraisal procedures. Legally defensible appraisal content Legally defensible documentation of appraisal results
47
Supervisors
Peers
Outsiders
Subordinates
Performance Appraisal By Ankush, Harsha, Satyajeet 48
360-degree feedback, also known as 'multi-rater feedback', 'multisource feedback', or 'multisource assessment. is employee development feedback that comes from all around the employee. "360" refers to the 360 degrees in a circle. The feedback would come from subordinates, peers, and managers in the organizational hierarchy, as well as self-assessment, and in some cases external sources such as customers and suppliers or other interested stakeholders. It may be contrasted with upward feedback , where managers are given feedback by their direct reports, or a traditional performance appraisal, where the employees are most often reviewed only by their manager.
Performance Appraisal By Ankush, Harsha, Satyajeet 49
50