Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
UPES
Coal Gas Diesel Nuclear Hydro RES 20 24.5
Renewable energy accounts for approximately 12.04% of a total 214.86 GW of power generation capacity installed in India. Demand for power in India has been increasing due to the rising population, growing economy, and changing lifestyles.
Despite substantial capacity additions, the power sector is still in shortage of energy.
Peak demand shortage averages around 9%.
CAGR 19%
10.2
14.4
16.8
Renewable energy installed capacity was grown at a healthy CAGR of 19% over FY07-FY12
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
UPES
Grid Interactive Installed capacity (In MW) Wind 0.35% 5.30% Small Hydro power Biomass Power 13.01% 68.27% Bagasse Cogeneration Waste to power Solar PV
the
power generation
Target of Renewable energy mix of 15 % upto2017 Total installed capacity of Solar PV was 10 MW
UPES
Decentralized System
Suitable for where grid connectivity is poor or grid is not viable Best option for Rural Electrification
UPES
Cr/MWp
Land according to technology used (Crystalline & Thin film) Highest cost sharing by PV module is
13% 43% 13% 10%
Module
PCU
around 43%
Land Cost
12%
Mounting Structure
2% 7%
Evacuation cost up to Inter connection point IDC & Contingency cost
Source: CERC
% Sharing of Cost/MW
Responsible of energy generation through solar PV Primary requirement for design of power plant Data me be instant(Irradiance) or integrated(irradiation ) Comparable result found the inaccuracy of 20-25%
Losses in PV system
Which cause the power actually delivered to the grid to be lower than the power produced from PV module Cable loss Power Inverter Dust on the Module surface Ambient temperature Varying insolation level
Reflection loss
data show that the module faced toward the equator with tilt angle of latitude ,yearly reflection losses is 1 % relative to STC
Soiling Loss
Occur due to dust and dirt particles Losses are generally 1% Reduce the power capability
Mismatch Effect
Losses due to series and parallel connection of Module Module dont have identical property
MPPT Loss
Extract the max power from Solar PV
Inverter Efficiency
Stand alone ,Grid tied Efficiency measure how well it convert the dc voltage into AC voltage Efficiency of 95-98 % Less efficiency at low power
Micro Inverter Is micro inverter best option to optimize the performance ? UPES
Micro inverter operate similarly to central inverter System Connected on each individually module Handle much less power than central inverter
Cost effective
Cost is 10-12% high comparable to Central or String Inverter Energy production 18-20% high , so cost effectiveness is justified
Limitless scalability
Include main panel board of PV load center that feeds multiple micro inverter sub panel distributed across the system
Reliable
System availability greater than 99.8%
Safe
Low voltage DC Reduce fire risk
UPES
UPES
LCOE takes account of 1. Capital Cost- module cost , cost of power conversion electronics, Installation 2. Power harvesting the total power harvested from the system ,through its life
time and monetary value of each harvested kWh ,determine the financial return
Power optimizer are also used for extracting the max power from Module ,but cost is
increase $200 per module and need of central inverter same
Installation Cost
No high voltage DC switch and wire No need to allocate area for inverter in building
According to market survey installation cost for String inverter is $16,500 and for Micro
inverter is $12,500 for 7kWp plant Offer saving of 24% in installation cost
Shade impact On Power Generation Through Solar PV Experimental Case study - String & Micro inverter
PV Evaluation Lab (PVEL), in association with NREL ,recently performed a series of field test to measure the shade impact on solar array output.
Solar Micro inverter shows the higher output than a string inverter in certain cases Perform in Light ,Medium and Highly shade 4%,8%,12% increased energy harvested by Micro Inverter
Solar power electronics ,Inverter ,Micro Inverter ,Power converter have a range of obtaining Max power curve
NREL developed different type of standard test procedure for simulating PV performance under shade Source: NREL , PVEL, Enphase energy
Adopted Methodology
Performance tested on two identical 8kWp Array
One connected with String inverter and another is with Micro Inverter
Tested under different 78 shaded test condition
Mesh with transparency of 36% Shade configuration time is around 20 Minutes Performance is measured with the RGM (Revenue grade meter )
Result
Micro Inverter perform better in shading
String inverter stuck in the a local MPP causing current limited operation of the system NRELs result show that the approximately 50% of the energy lost due to shading by
Thank You.