Você está na página 1de 82

8-1

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall


Project Management
Chapter 8
8-2
The Elements of Project Management
CPM/PERT Networks
Probabilistic Activity Times
Microsoft Project
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
Formulating the CPM/PERT Network as a Linear
Programming Model
Chapter Topics
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-3
Network representation is useful for project analysis.
Networks show how project activities are organized and are used to
determine time duration of projects.
Network techniques used are:
CPM (Critical Path Method)
PERT (Project Evaluation and Review Technique)
Developed independently during late 1950s.
Overview
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-4
Elements of Project Management
Management is generally perceived as concerned with planning,
organizing, and control of an ongoing process or activity.
Project Management is concerned with control of an activity for a
relatively short period of time after which management effort ends.
Primary elements of Project Management to be discussed:
Project Planning
Project Team
Project Control
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-5
Elements of Project Management
Project Planning
Objectives
Project Scope
Contract Requirements
Schedules
Resources
Personnel
Control
Risk and Problem Analysis


Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-6
Project team typically consists of a group of individuals from various
areas in an organization and often includes outside consultants.
Members of engineering staff often assigned to project work.
Project team may include workers.
Most important member of project team is the project manager.
Project manager is often under great pressure because of uncertainty
inherent in project activities and possibility of failure. Potential
rewards, however, can be substantial.
Project manager must be able to coordinate various skills of team
members into a single focused effort.
Elements of Project Management
The Project Team
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-7
Figure 8.1 The project management process
The Project Management Process
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-8
Elements of Project Management
Scope Statement
Document providing common understanding of project.

Justification describing the factors giving rise to need for project.

Expected results and what constitutes success.

List of necessary documents and planning reports.

Statement of work (SOW) - a planning document for
individuals, team members, groups, departments, subcontractors
and suppliers, describing what are required for successful
completion on time.


Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-9
Elements of Project Management
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) (1 of 2)
WBS breaks down project into major components (modules).

Modules are further broken down into activities and, finally, into
individual tasks.

Identifies activities, tasks, resource requirements and relationships
between modules and activities.

Helps avoid duplication of effort.

Basis for project development, management , schedule, resources and
modifications.

Approaches for WBS development:
1. Top down process 2. Brainstorm entire project
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-10
Figure 8.2 WBS for Computer Order-processing System Project
Elements of Project Management
Work Breakdown Structure (2 of 2)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-11
Elements of Project Management
Responsibility Assignment Matrix (1 of 2)

Project manager assigns work elements to organizational units,
departments, groups, individuals or subcontractors.

Uses an organizational breakdown structure (OBS).

OBS is a table or a chart showing which organizational units are
responsible for work items.

OBS leads to the responsibility assignment matrix (RAM)

RAM shows who is responsible for doing the necessary work in
the project


Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-12
Elements of Project Management
Responsibility Assignment Matrix (2 of 2)

Figure 8.3 A responsibility assignment matrix
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-13
Elements of Project Management
Project Scheduling
Project Schedule evolves from planning documents, with focus on
timely completion.

Critical element in project management source of most conflicts and
problems.

Schedule development steps:
1. Define activities, 2. Sequence activities,
3. Estimate activity times, 4. Construct schedule.

Gantt chart and CPM/PERT techniques can be useful.

Computer software packages available, e.g. Microsoft Project.
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-14
Elements of Project Management
Gantt Chart (1 of 2)

Popular, traditional technique, also known as a bar chart -developed
by Henry Gantt (1914).

Direct precursor of CPM/PERT for monitoring work progress.

A visual display of project schedule showing activity start and finish
times and where extra time is available.

Suitable for projects with few activities and precedence relationships.

Drawback: precedence relationships are not always discernible.
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-15
Elements of Project Management
Gantt Chart (2 of 2)
Figure 8.4 A Gantt chart
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-16
Elements of Project Management
Project Control
Process of ensuring progress toward successful completion.

Monitoring project to minimize deviations from project plan and
schedule.

Corrective actions necessary if deviations occur.

Key elements of project control
Time management
Cost management
Performance management
Earned value analysis.
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-17
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
A branch reflects an activity of a project.
A node represents the beginning and end of activities, referred to as
events.
Branches in the network indicate precedence relationships.
When an activity is completed at a node, it has been realized.
The Project Network
CPM/PERT
Figure 8.5 Nodes and Branches
Activity-on-Arc (AOA) Network
8-18
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Network aids in planning and scheduling.
Time duration of activities shown on branches.
Activities can occur at the same time (concurrently).
A dummy activity shows a precedence relationship but reflects
no passage of time.
Two or more activities cannot share the same start and end nodes.
The Project Network
Concurrent Activities
Figure 8. 7 A Dummy Activity
8-19
The Project Network
House Building Project Data
No. Activity Activity Predecessor Duration (Months)

1. Design house and - 3
obtain financing

2. Lay foundation 1 2

3. Order Materials 1 1

4. Build house 2, 3 3

5. Select paint 2, 3 1

6. Select carpet 5 1

7. Finish work 4, 6 1
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-20
The Project Network
AOA Network for House Building Project
Figure 8.6
Expanded Network for Building a
House Showing Concurrent Activities
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-21
The Project Network
AON Network for House Building Project
Activity-on-Node (AON) Network

A node represents an activity, with its label and time shown on the node
The branches show the precedence relationships
Convention used in Microsoft Project software
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 8.8
8-22


The Project Network
Paths Through a Network
Table 8.1
Paths Through the House-Building Network
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Path Events
A 1247
B 12567
C 1347
D 13567
8-23
The critical path is the longest path through the network; the
minimum time the network can be completed. From Figure 8.8:
Path A: 1 2 4 7 3 + 2 + 3 + 1 = 9 months
Path B: 1 2 5 6 7 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1= 8 months
Path C: 1 3 4 7 3 + 1 + 3 + 1 = 8 months
Path D: 1 3 5 6 7 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 7 months
The Project Network
The Critical Path
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-24
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Project Network
Activity Start Times
Figure 8.9 Activity start time
8-25
The Project Network
Activity-on-Node Configuration
Figure 8.10 Activity-on-Node Configuration
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-26
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
ES is the earliest time an activity can start: ES = Maximum (EF)
EF is the earliest start time plus the activity time: EF = ES + t

The Project Network
Activity Scheduling : Earliest Times
Figure 8.11 Earliest activity start and finish times
8-27
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
LS is the latest time an activity can start without delaying critical path time:
LS = LF - t
LF is the latest finish time. LF = Minimum (LS)
The Project Network
Activity Scheduling : Latest Times
Figure 8.12 Latest activity start and finish times
8-28
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Slack is the amount of time an activity can be delayed without
delaying the project: S = LS ES = LF - EF
Slack Time exists for those activities not on the critical path for
which the earliest and latest start times are not equal.
Shared Slack is slack available for a sequence of activities.
The Project Network
Activity Slack Time (1 of 2)
Table 8.2
*Critical path
Activity LS ES LF EF Slack, S
*1 0 0 3 3 0
*2 3 3 5 5 0
3 4 3 5 4 1
*4 5 5 8 8 0
5 6 5 7 6 1
6 7 6 8 7 1
*7 8 8 9 9 0
8-29
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The Project Network
Activity Slack Time (2 of 2)
Figure 8.13 Activity slack
8-30
Activity time estimates usually cannot be made with
certainty.
PERT used for probabilistic activity times.
In PERT, three time estimates are used: most likely time
(m), the optimistic time (a), and the pessimistic time (b).
These provide an estimate of the mean and variance of
a beta distribution:
variance:

mean (expected time):

6
b 4m a
t
+ +
=
2
6
a - b
|
|
|
.
|

\
|
= v
Probabilistic Activity Times
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-31
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Probabilistic Activity Times
Example (1 of 3)
Figure 8.14 Network for Installation Order Processing System
8-32
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Probabilistic Activity Times
Example (2 of 3)
Table 8.3 Activity Time Estimates for Figure 8.14
8-33
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Probabilistic Activity Times
Example (3 of 3)
Figure 8.15 Earliest and Latest Activity Times
8-34
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Expected project time is the sum of the expected times of the
critical path activities.
Project variance is the sum of the critical path activities variances
The expected project time is assumed to be normally distributed
(based on central limit theorem).
In example, expected project time (t
p
) and variance (v
p
) interpreted as
the mean () and variance (o
2
) of a normal distribution:
= 25 weeks
o
2
= 62/9
= 6.9 (weeks)
2
Probabilistic Activity Times
Expected Project Time and Variance
8-35
Using the normal distribution, probabilities are determined
by computing the number of standard deviations (Z) a
value is from the mean.

The Z value is used to find corresponding probability in
Table A.1, Appendix A.
Probability Analysis of a Project Network (1 of 2)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-36
Probability Analysis of a Project Network (2 of 2)
Figure 8.16 Normal Distribution of Network Duration
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-37
What is the probability that the new order processing system will be
ready by 30 weeks?
= 25 weeks
o
2
= 6.9 o = 2.63 weeks
Z = (x-)/ o = (30 -25)/2.63 = 1.90


Z value of 1.90 corresponds to probability of .4713 in Table A.1,
Appendix A. Probability of completing project in 30 weeks or less:
(.5000 + .4713) = .9713.



Probability Analysis of a Project Network
Example 1 (1 of 2)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-38
Probability Analysis of a Project Network
Example 1 (2 of 2)
Figure 8.17 Probability the Network Will Be Completed in 30 Weeks or Less
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-39
A customer will trade elsewhere if the new ordering system is not
working within 22 weeks. What is the probability that she will be
retained?
Z = (22 - 25)/2.63 = -1.14

Z value of 1.14 (ignore negative) corresponds to probability of
.3729 in Table A.1, appendix A.
Probability that customer will be retained is .1271
Probability Analysis of a Project Network
Example 2 (1 of 2)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-40
Probability Analysis of a Project Network
Example 2 (2 of 2)
Figure 8.18 Probability the Network Will Be Completed in 22 Weeks or Less
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-41
CPM/PERT Analysis with
QM for Windows & Excel QM (1 of 2)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-42
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 8.2
CPM/PERT Analysis with
QM for Windows & Excel QM (2 of 2)
8-43
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Microsoft Project handles only AON networks.


Analysis with Microsoft Project (1 of 13)
Exhibit 8.3
8-44
Analysis with Microsoft Project (2 of 13)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 8.4
8-45
Analysis with Microsoft Project (3 of 13)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 8.5
8-46
Exhibit 8.6
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (4 of 13)
8-47
Figure 8.7
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (5 of 13)
8-48
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (6 of 13)
Figure 8.8
8-49
Exhibit 8.9
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (7 of 13)
8-50
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (8 of 13)
Exhibit 8.10
8-51
Exhibit 8.11
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (9 of 13)
8-52
Figure 8.12
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (10 of 13)
8-53
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (11 of 13)
Figure 8.13
8-54
Exhibit 8.14
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (12 of 13)
8-55
Exhibit 8.15
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Analysis with Microsoft Project (13 of 13)
8-56
Project duration can be reduced by assigning more resources to
project activities.

However, doing this increases project cost.

Decision is based on analysis of trade-off between time and
cost.

Project crashing is a method for shortening project duration by
reducing one or more critical activities to a time less than normal
activity time.
Project Crashing and
Time-Cost Trade-Off Overview
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-57
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
Example Problem (1 of 5)
Figure 8.19 The Project Network for Building a House
8-58
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
Example Problem (2 of 5)
Figure 8.20
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Crash cost & crash time have a linear relationship:
$2000
5
$400 /
Total Crash Cost
Total Crash Time weeks
wk
=
=
8-59
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Table 8.4
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
Example Problem (3 of 5)
8-60
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 8.21 Network with Normal Activity Times and Weekly Crashing Costs
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
Example Problem (4 of 5)
8-61
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 8.22
Revised Network with
Activity 1 Crashed
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
Example Problem (5 of 5)
As activities are crashed, the critical path may change and
several paths may become critical.
8-62
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 8.16
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
Project Crashing with QM for Windows
8-63
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
General Relationship of Time and Cost (1 of 2)
Project crashing costs and indirect costs have an inverse
relationship.
Crashing costs are highest when the project is shortened.
Indirect costs increase as the project duration increases.
Optimal project time is at minimum point on the total
cost curve.
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-64
Project Crashing and Time-Cost Trade-Off
General Relationship of Time and Cost (2 of 2)
Figure 8.23
The Time-Cost Trade-Off
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-65
General linear programming model with AOA convention:
Minimize Z = Ex
i

subject to:
x
j
- x
i
> t
ij
for all activities i j
x
i
, x
j
> 0

Where:
x
i
= earliest event time of node i
x
j
= earliest event time of node j
t
ij
= time of activity i j
The objective is to minimize the project duration (critical path time).
The CPM/PERT Network
Formulating as a Linear Programming Model
i
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-66
The CPM/PERT Network
Example Problem Formulation and Data (1 of 2)
Figure 8.24
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-67
Minimize Z = x
1
+ x
2
+ x
3
+ x
4
+ x
5
+ x
6
+ x
7

subject to:
x
2
- x
1
> 12
x
3
- x
2
> 8
x
4
- x
2
> 4
x
4
- x
3
> 0
x
5
- x
4
> 4
x
6
- x
4
> 12
x
6
- x
5
> 4
x
7
- x
6
> 4
x
i
, x
j
> 0
The CPM/PERT Network
Example Problem Formulation and Data (2 of 2)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-68
Exhibit 8.17
The CPM/PERT Network
Example Problem Solution with Excel (1 of 4)
B6:B12
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-69
Exhibit 8.18
The CPM/PERT Network
Example Problem Solution with Excel (2 of 4)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-70
Exhibit 8.19
The CPM/PERT Network
Example Problem Solution with Excel (3 of 4)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-71
Exhibit 8.20
The CPM/PERT Network
Example Problem Solution with Excel (4 of 4)
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-72
Minimize Z = $400y
12
+ 500y
23
+ 3000y
24
+ 200y
45
+ 7000y
46

+ 200y
56
+ 7000y
67

subject to:
y
12
s 5 y
12
+ x
2
- x
1
> 12 x
7
s 30
y
23
s 3 y
23
+ x
3
- x
2
> 8 x
i
, y
ij
0
y
24
s 1 y
24
+ x
4
- x
2
> 4
y
34
s 0 y
34
+ x
4
- x
3
> 0
y
45
s 3 y
45
+ x
5
- x
4
> 4
y
46
s 3 y
46
+ x
6
- x
4
> 12
y
56
s 3 y
56
+ x
6
- x
5
> 4
y
67
s 1 x
67
+ x
7
- x
6
> 4
x
i
= earliest event time of node I
x
j
= earliest event time of node j
y
ij
= amount of time by which activity i j is crashed
Project Crashing with Linear Programming
Example Problem Model Formulation
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Objective is to
minimize the
cost of crashing
8-73
Project Crashing with Linear Programming
Excel Solution (1 of 3)
Exhibit 8.21
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-74
Project Crashing with Linear Programming
Excel Solution (2 of 3)
Exhibit 8.22
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-75
Project Crashing with Linear Programming
Excel Solution (3 of 3)
Exhibit 8.23
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-76
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Given this network and the data on the following slide, determine the
expected project completion time and variance, and the probability
that the project will be completed in 28 days or less.
Example Problem
Problem Statement and Data (1 of 2)
8-77
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Example Problem
Problem Statement and Data (2 of 2)
8-78
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6
b 4m a
t
+ +
=
2
6
a - b
|
|
|
.
|

\
|
= v
Example Problem Solution (1 of 4)
Step 1: Compute the expected activity times and variances.
8-79
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Example Problem Solution (2 of 4)
Step 2: Determine the earliest and latest activity times & slacks
8-80
Example Problem Solution (3 of 4)
Step 3: Identify the critical path and compute expected
completion time and variance.

Critical path (activities with no slack): 1 3 5 7
Expected project completion time: t
p
= 9+5+6+4 = 24 days
Variance: v
p
= 4 + 4/9 + 4/9 + 1/9 = 5 (days)
2
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-81
Example Problem Solution (4 of 4)
Step 4: Determine the Probability That the Project Will be
Completed in 28 days or less ( = 24, o = \5)
Z = (x - )/o = (28 -24)/\5 = 1.79
Corresponding probability from Table A.1, Appendix A, is .4633 and
P(x s 28) = .4633 + .5 = .9633.
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8-82
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Você também pode gostar