Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Introduction
Sittler, in 1964, gave a formal description of the multiple-target tracking (MTT) problem [17].
Traditional target tracking systems are based on powerful sensor nodes, capable of detecting and locating targets in a large range. Nowadays, tracking methods use large-scale wireless sensor networks.
Introduction
Multiple-Target Tracking (MTT): Varying number of targets arise in the field at random locations and at random times. The movement of each target follows an arbitrary but continuous path, and it persists for a random amount of time before disappearing in the field. The target locations are sampled at random intervals. The goal of the MTT problem is to find the moving path for each target in the field.
Introduction
Large-scale target tracking wireless multisensor system has several advantages: (1) Better geometric fidelity; (2) Quick deployment (3) Robustness and accuracy
F. Zhao, J. Shin, and J. Reich, Information-driven dynamic sensor collaboration for tracking applications, IEEE Signal Proces. Mag. (March 2002). The participants for collaboration in a sensor network were determined by dynamically optimizing the information utility of data for a given cost of computation and communication. The metrics used to determine the participant nodes (who should sense and whom the information must be passed to) are (1) detection quality (2) track quality (3) scalability (4) survivability (5) resource usage
Information-driven dynamic sensor collaboration Summary: The algorithm described is power-efficient in terms of bandwidth. The selection of sensors is a local decision. Thus, if the first leader is incorrectly elected, it could have a cascading effect and overall accuracy could suffer. It is also computationally heavy on leader nodes. This approach is applied to tracking a single object only.
The paper discuss the sleepawake pattern of each node during the tracking to obtain power efficiency. The network operations have two stages: 1. the surveillance stage during the absence of any event of interest 2. the tracking stage, which is in response to any moving targets.
REFERENCES
1. J. Aslam, Z. Butler, V. Crespi, G. Cybenko, and D. Rus, Tracking a moving object with a binary sensor network, Proc. ACM Int. Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), 2003. 2. Y. Bar-Shalom and X.-R. Li, Multitarget-Multisensor Tarcking: Principles and Techniques, Artech House, 1995. 3. R. R. Brooks, P. Ramanathan, and A. M. Sayeed, Distributed target classi.cation and tracking in sensor network, Proc. IEEE, 91(8) (2003). 4. K. Chakrabarty, S. S. Iyengar, H. Qi, and E. Cho, Grid coverage for surveillance and target location in distributed sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Comput. 51(12) (2002). 5. C. Y. Chong, K. C. Chang, and S. Mori, Distributed tracking in distributed sensor networks, Proc. American Control Conf., 1986. 6. M. Chu, H. Haussecker, and F. Zhao, Scalable information-driven sensor querying and routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl. 16(3) (2002). 7. C. Gui and P. Mohapatra, Power conservation and quality of surveillance in target tracking sensor networks, Proc. ACM MobiCom Conf., 2004. 8. R. Gupta and S. R. Das, Tracking moving targets in a smart sensor network, Proc VTC Symp., 2003.
REFERENCES
9. C. F. Huang and Y. C. Tseng, The coverage problem in a wireless sensor network, Proc. ACM Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA), 2003. 10. M. G. Karpovsky, K. Chakrabaty, and L. B. Levitin, A new class of codes for covering vertices in graphs, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 44 (March 1998). 11. J. Liu, M. Chu, J. Liu, J. Reich, and F. Zhao, Distributed state representation for tracking problems in sensor networks, Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2004. 12. J. Liu, J. Liu, J. Reich, P. Cheung, and F. Zhao, Distributed group management for track initiation and maintenance in target localization applications, Proc. Int. Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2003. 13. K. Mechitov, S. Sundresh, Y. Kwon, and G. Agha, Cooperative Tracing with BinaryDetection Sensor Networks, Technical report UIUCDCS-R-2003-2379, Computer Science Dept., Univ. Illinois at Urbaba Champaign, 2003. 14. L. Y. Pao, Measurement reconstruction approach for distributed multisensor fusion, J. Guid. Control Dynam. (1996). 15. L. Y. Pao and M. K. Kalandros, Algorithms for a class of distributed architecture tracking, Proc. American Control Conf., 1997. 16. N. S. V. Rao, Computational complexity issues in operative diagnosis of graph based systems, IEEE Trans. Comput. 42(4) (April 1993).
REFERENCES
17. R. W. Sittler, An optimal data association problem in surveillance theory, IEEE Trans. Military Electron. (April 1964). 18. Q. X.Wang,W. P. Chen, R. Zheng, K. Lee, and L. Sha, Acoustic target tracking using tiny wireless sensor devices, Proc. Int. Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2003. 19. Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, Geography informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing, Proc. ACM MobiCom Conf., 2001. 20. L. Yuan, C. Gui, C. Chuah, and P. Mohapatra, Applications and design of hierarchical and/or broadband sensor networks, Proc. BASENETS Conf., 2004. 21. W. Zhang and G. Cao, Dctc: Dynamic convoy tree-based collaboration for target tracking in sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 11(5) (Sept. 2004). 22. W. Zhang and G. Cao, Optimizing tree recon.guration for mobile target tracking in sensor networks, Proc. IEEE InfoCom., 2004. 23. W. Zhang, J. Hou, and L. Sha, Dynamic clustering for acoustic target tracking in wireless sensor networks, Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Conf. Network Protocols (ICNP), 2003. 24. F. Zhao, J. Shin, and J. Reich, Information-driven dynamic sensor collaboration for tracking applications, IEEE Signal Proces. Mag. (March 2002). 25. Y. Zhou and K. Chakrabarty, Sensor deployment and target localization in distributed sensor networks, ACM Trans. Embedded Comput. Syst. 3 (Feb. 2004).