Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
This session will consider a new creative approach for gathering employer feedback about business and management programs. It capitalizes on technology and, in a recent pilot study, generated outstanding results. This new approach solves many of the problems with historic employer mail surveys by delivering the survey to the person within the company in the best position to evaluate the quality of your program. Less costly and more effective than a mail methodology, this approach shows real promise.
Session Objectives
Employer Program Assessments: Validating mission and improving the quality of academic programs
Why employer studies have historically been difficult and compromised.
Exploring a new methodology for conquering past shortcomings and capturing valuable stakeholder feedback.
commonly include within their mission providing an education experience that prepares candidate to succeed in a business career.
Underlying Premise
In principle the degree to which the academic program has prepared candidates for a successful business career is best determined by: Current Students Faculty Alumni Employers
Underlying Premise
Focus on the program, not individuals: Protect alumni and employer anonymity Focus on performance as it relates to preparedness
Underlying Premise
The Alumni: Having been in the work place they are now prepared to evaluate the degree to which their education prepared to succeed
Underlying Premise
The Employer: Who is in the best position to evaluate preparedness and performance?
Recruiter HR representative Supervisor
Underlying Premise
The Supervisor: Know strengths Knows weaknesses Know performance Can compare with others educated at different institutions
Who to Survey:
Alumni: Employer: Contact Info: Cost: Challenging Easy email lower Difficult mail higher
Confidentiality:
Response Rates: Assessment Durations Time:
high
higher short
low
lower long
Contact:
Difficult to identify who should be surveyed Supervisors change quickly over time
Contact:
Cost:
Paper Administration:
Printing & Materials Costs: Surveys, letters, envelopes Postage: Send initial request, follow-up request (possible return postage) Handling: Stuffing initial mailing, opening responses, (potential for loss of damage) Processing: Cost to scan surveys
Contact:
Cost:
Web Administration:
Dependant on acquiring valid alumni email
Contact:
Cost:
Confidenti ality:
Mail Administration
Follow-Up Reminders: Surveys must be tagged with identifier to determine upon receipt who has responded
Surveys received must identified and be logged, compromising confidentiality Survey returned to academic program staff who can identify participants
Contact:
Cost:
Confidenti ality:
Web Administration
Follow-Up Reminders: While identifies exist, reminders can be sent without access to responses (if third party involved)
While employer representative evaluates individual, responses used only to evaluate program, not individuals Alumni evaluation can remain confidential (if third party involved)
Contact Info:
Confidenti ality: Response Rate:
Mail Administration: Mail surveys traditionally have a very low response rate driven by: Bad addresses
Potential to lose survey
Contact Info:
Confidenti ality: Response Rate:
Web Administration:
Easy to complete Email addresses change less often Survey always available Easy to send multiple reminders
Contact Info:
Confidenti ality: Response Rate: Results TurnAround Time:
Mail Administration:
Long time from initial mailing to review of results Web Administration
Combining Assessments
New Methodology for Combining Alumni and Employer Assessments:
Send academic program assessment to alumni that captures their perceptions of their preparation and their supervisors name and email address Assure alumni of their anonymity, and the purpose of sending their supervisor a survey is to capture their perceptions of the academic program (vale of third party) Once the alumni completes the survey an employer survey is automatically sent to their supervisor
Combining Assessments
Benefits:
More Information: Gather feedback from two stakeholder populations simultaneously Accuracy Identifying Employer: Solve the problem of identifying the employer representative by having alumni provide the name of their supervisor
Combining Assessments
Benefits:
Higher Response Rates: (our experience is response rates are higher for email surveys than mail surveys) Results Timing: Immediate real-time results reporting Stakeholder Comparisons: Dual comparative analysis of both surveys Results Distribution: Fast, easy distribution of results
Principles
Personal
Assure Confidentiality
Secure Link
Link Surveys
Immediacy Accuracy
Examples
Alumni Invitation Example
Examples
Alumni Survey Example
Examples
Employer Invitation Example
Examples
Employer Survey Example