Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
First came the viking cargo ships, the knarr. They were able to sail mostly downwind but required the use of oars. Staying mostly within sight of land, they knew a little about prevailing winds and navigated with the aid of a sundial and a sun stone.
In the early 19th century Clipper ships sailed all over the
world. Not much was required to sail the vessel except a strong back, a loud voice, and a basic knowledge of navigation.
Navigational equipment probably included a compass, a sextant and a telescope. Life expectancy for the vessel was no more than a couple of years.
A cargo ship in the 1950s and 1960s was more fully equipped:
Gyro Compass (maybe) Gyro Steering Stand (Doubtful) Radar (2) (used only approaching land) Loran A (probable) RDF (required) Fathometer (required) Radio Equipment (+ Operator) Telegraphy
In the early part of the 21st century, the face of shipping is quite
different. Shipping has become a heavily regulated industry. Crews have to be increasingly well educated and trained and conform to regulations and procedures designed to protect cargo, crew, investors and environment. No longer as subject to the vagaries of wind and weather, modern cargo vessels are increasingly becoming the transportation mode of choice.
Human error
remains the #1 cause of shipping accidents
The MEGA BORG released 5.1 million gallons of oil as the result of a lightering accident and subsequent fire. The incident occurred 60 nautical miles south-southeast of Galveston, Texas on June 8, 1990.
LNG ships
are more technically advanced and carry a cargo unlike any other
Cargo is carried at extremely cold temperature LNG can only be carried in specially designed ships Loading and discharge process is different from other tankers Cargo immediately starts re-gasification process (boil-off) Highly reduced volume 1/600th Most ships are steam powered Re-liquification & re-gasification plants on board
Return to AIMU Website
LNG ships
Why?
Excellence and continued training of crew Experienced officers with long tenure in the LNG industry Superior quality of ships and equipment Long term contracts with point to point delivery Controlled and sustainable growth (supply continually meeting demand) Quality control instituted by the owner/operators
Return to AIMU Website
The Demand
Time-line
In service as of September 2004 In service as of May 2005 Expected new contracts for 2005 Expected on order at end of 2005 Expected total of LNG fleet by end of 2009
Number of ships
174 ships (including 28 ships delivered since January 2002) 182 ships 50-65 (21 are firm orders) 143-158 339-354
Traditional and new entrant operators, and delivery years of new LNG ships (as of September, 2004)
Operators Traditional Operators Misc Gas de France Golar Exmar Nigeria LNG MOL Pronav NYK Sonatrach Bergessen Lief Hoegh Kawasaki Sub-Total New Entrant Operators Teekay Petronet Angelokousis (Maran) Moller/Maersk BG Group Knutsen TMT Tsakos Dynacom Cosco Sovcomflot OSG Iino Sub-Total Total 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 1 0 2 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 27 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 13 30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 6 13 4 1 4 1 7 1 1 1 3 2 1 4 1 31 94 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 2 1 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 2 1 1 14 2 1 2 1 1 5 0 2 0 1 1 2 18 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 1 2 0 2 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 7 12 3 4 3 5 8 4 8 2 7 2 5 63 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total
RESULT = SHORTAGES
Shortage of adequately trained officers and crew to meet increased manning requirements
3rd Officer
Total 5
Junior Engineer
Total 5
Total 6
Return to AIMU Website
Total 3
17 27
Total
165-180
Officers 2004(4th Qtr) 2 (delivered) 2005 2006 2007 20 27 30 26 260 351 390
2008-2010 Total
86-101 165-180
1,118-1,313 2,145-2,290
671-788 1,287-1,374
Shortage of time to adequately train senior officers from a different segment of the shipping industry to meet the qualifications for commanding LNG ships
Training
Approved tanker familiarization course
Appropriate shore-based fire-fighting course At least 3 months approved seagoing service on tankers Tanker familiarization certificate
Shortage of training billets aboard existing LNG ships to be able to meet the loading and discharge qualification requirements
Consequences?
LNG ships sit idle, cargo doesnt move highly unlikely Poaching of qualified senior LNG officers from one company to another occurs LNG ships sail with minimally trained (qualified) crews Serious accidents occur.
Return to AIMU Website
Solutions:
First, industry must recognize the looming problem International training standards for the LNG industry must be established by IMO and national entities Training programs for converting senior officers from one type of ship to LNG ships must be developed LNG companies must work together in order to provide training billets aboard LNG ships Underwriters and financiers should insist on some level of crew training and certification Worlds maritime academies must start process of providing basic LNG training to their undergraduate students SIGTTO and IAMU are developing model courses
Return to AIMU Website
The Need