Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Introduction
Steel concrete composite systems popular because of advantages Combines better of steel and concrete Objective: compare steel and concrete with composite construction Parameters: deflection, size, material consumption, behaviour under seismic forces, foundation requirements and total cost of building
Project details
Particular Details
Foundation depth
Foundation type No. of stories Walls Tie at bottom level Lift Water tank
No basement provided
Columns fixed at raft is considered 3 m storey height All the walls At 3 levels Machine room at top
Parking story
Two stories
X direction 0.0431
Y direction 0.00 X direction 0.00
Y direction 0.0429
248397.0
14061.1
6970.7
886.2
545.3
RCC Ground floor to 10th 1126.6 floor 10th floor to 20th floor 20th floor to 30th floor 1121.5 913.9
Conclusion
1. As the results show the Steel option is better than R.C.C. But the Composite option for high rise building is best suited among all three options. 2. In all the options the values of story displacements are within the permissible limits as per code limits. 3. Steel and composite structure gives more ductility to the structure as compared to the R.C.C. which is best suited under the effect of lateral forces. 4. Total saving in the composite option as compared to the R.C.C. results in 10 % so as with Steel it will be 6-7%.