Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Recommended Reading
Pearce, Stevens and Barr, The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations (5th ed) Ch 7 Hayton and Mitchell: Commentary and Cases on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies (13th ed) Ch 2 Hanbury and Martin, Modern Equity (19th ed) Ch 4 Rickett Completely Constituting an Inter Vivos Trust: Property Rules? *2001+ Conv 515 Halliwell Perfecting Imperfect Gifts and Trusts: Have We Reached the End of The Chancellors Foot? *2003+ Conv 192 Kodilinye, A Fresh Look at the Rule in Strong v Bird [1982] Conv 14
Lecture Objectives
Able to determine if a trust is completely constituted Able to investigate if an effective transfer of trust property to trustees has taken place Able to assess if a settlor has made a sufficient declaration of trust where he wishes to be a trustee of the trust property Able to critically analyse the exceptions to the maxim which states equity will not assist a volunteer
Constitution of a trust
Milroy v Lord (1862) 4 De G F & J 264 at 274 per Turner LJ: I take the law of this court to be well settled, that, in order to render a voluntary settlement valid and effectual, the settlor must have done everything which, according to the nature of the property comprised in the settlement, was necessary to be done in order to transfer the property and render the settlement binding upon him.(cont. next slide)
Constitution of a trust
He may, of course, 1). do this by actually transferring the property to the persons for whom he intends to provide, and the provision will then be effectual, and it will be equally effectual if 2). he transfers the property to a trustee for the purposes of the settlement, or 3). declares that he himself holds it in trust for those purposes;...but, in order to render the settlement binding, one or other of the modes must, as I understand the law of this court, be resorted to, for there is no equity in this court to perfect an imperfect gift.
Constitution of a trust
Hanbury and Martin give a simple example of how a trust is set up. The settlor must make a declaration that A is to hold Blackacre on trust for B. He must transfer Blackacre to A.
Exception? Re Rose [1952] Ch 499 Re Fry [1946] Ch 312- he hadnt done everything he was supposed to do so cant rely on Re Rose. Pennington v Waine [2002] 1 WLR Muddied the waters
Ineffective transfers
Maitlands Lectures on Equity (1932) Richards v Delbridge (1874) LR 18 Eq 11
If there is an ineffective gift to someone, the court will not assume that the settlor intended to be a trustee for the person claiming to be an intended beneficiary
Declaration of trust
Settlor declares himself trustee of his property Jones v Lock (1865) 1 Ch App 25 Paul v Constance [1977] 1 All ER 195 Vandervell v IRC [1967] 2 AC 291
Re Wilson [1933] IR 729 Does not apply to future gifts or testamentary gifts Bai v Wilson (1915) 34 NZLR Specific property
Recap Questions
What are the three requirements to create a valid express trust? What does it mean to say that a trust should be completely constituted? In Milroy v Lord, the court pointed out 3 ways in which a trust can be constituted. What were they? Declare your self as a trustee or transfer the property to a trustee What is the Re Rose exception? If there is an ineffective transfer of property, what assumption does the court not make?
Recap Questions
What is the position of a volunteer where a trust is incompletely constituted? What are the exceptions to this general rule? What is the rule in Strong v Bird? How has it developed over the years? Why is the rule somewhat controversial? Because it is luck that allows you to become the executor of the estate.