7 visualizações

Enviado por mm1979

cap budgeting

- NET PRESENT VALUE AND OTHER INVESTMENT CRITERIA _ Chapter 08
- M10_Gitman50803X_14_MF_C10
- 1. Capital Budgeting
- Chapter09.pdf
- PK10 Notes
- Chp10.ppt
- Capital Budgeting Techniques
- The Basics of Capital Budgeting
- Chapter 19
- Capital Budgeting and Cash Flow Projection
- MS 42 UNIT 5 Capital Budgeting Decisions.doc
- Ch 6 Investment Decisions
- CAPITAL BUDGETING.pdf
- 10 - Chaper 10 Capital Budgeting Techniques
- Chapter 9
- Time Value of Money
- Capital Budgeting
- Chapter 8HAN
- Broiler Fs
- Financial Analysis of Projects I - Transcript

Você está na página 1de 26

Chapter 12

Capital budgeting: process by which organization evaluates and selects long-term investment projects

Ex. Investments in capital equipment, purchase or lease of buildings, purchase or lease of vehicles, etc.

Payback

Small businesses use this method because it is simple Requires calculation of number of years required to pay back original investment Payback-based decisions:

Between two mutually exclusive investment projects, choose project with shortest payback period Set a predetermined standard

Ex. Accept all projects with payback of less than 5 years and reject all others

Payback

Poor method on which to rely for allocation of scarce capital resources because:

1. 2. Payback ignores time value of money Payback ignores expected cash flows beyond payback period. PROJECT A

Cost = $100,000 Expected Future Cash Flow: Year 1 $50,000 Year 2 $50,000 Year 3 $110,000 Year 4 and thereafter: None Total = $210,000 Payback = 2 years

Ex.:

PROJECT B

Cost = $100,000 Expected Future Cash Flow: Year 1 $100,000 Year 2 $5,000 Year 3 $5,000 Year 4 and thereafter: None Total = $110,000 Payback = 1 year

-Payback period for Project B is shorter, but Project A provides higher return -Project A is superior to Project B.

Difference between present value of expected future benefits of project to present value of expected cost of project If NPV is positive (if present value of benefits exceeds present value of cost), then project is accepted. If NPV is negative (if present value of costs exceeds present value of benefits), then project is rejected. NPV = PVB PVC Where NPV = net present value PVB = present value of benefits PVC = present value of costs

Between two mutually exclusive projects, choose project with highest net present value. Ex.: Consider Project A and Project B and 12% discount rate

PVBa = ($50,000)(0.893) + ($50,000)(0.797) + ($110,000)(0.712) PVBa = $162,820 PVBb = ($100,000)(0.893) + ($5,000)(0.792) + ($5,000)(0.712) PVBb = $96,820 PVCa = PVCb = $100,000 NPVa = $162,000 $100,000 = $62,800 NPVb = $96,820 $100,000 = ($3,180)

Project A is superior to Project B because PVBa > PVCa and PVBb < PVCb Return on Project B is insufficient to justify investment given firms cost of capital.

Selection of a Discount Rate To find discounted present value of sum of money to be received in future, choose rate at which money in hand may be invested between now and future period in which money is to be received.

This rate represents individuals opportunity cost, or cost of next-best opportunity.

Discount rate that exactly equates present value of expected benefits to cost (drives NPV to zero) Find this discount rate by trial and error Ex.:

Use discount rate of 20% as first estimate of IRR on Project A. NPVa = PVBa PVCa NPVa = $40,040 Since NPV is too high, use higher estimate of 40%. NPVa = $1,240 Use estimate of 41% to get closer to zero.

NPVa = $290

Investment of $100,000 at 41% annual compound rate of return allows withdrawal of that investment as a cash flow of $50,000 at end of 1 year, $50,000 at end of 2nd year, and $110,000 at end of 3rd year.

Project A Cash Flow Schedule Year 1 2 3 Beginning investment $100,000 $91,000 $78,310 Annual earnings at 41% 41,000 37,310 _32,107 Subtotal $141,000 $128,310 $110,417 Annual cash flow (50,000) (50,000) (110,417) Ending investment $91,000 $78,310 $-0-

In general, any project with IRR greater than or equal to cost of capital should be accepted. Any project with IRR less than cost of capital should be rejected. In this case, Project A would be accepted.

Ex. (continued): IRR for Project B is approximately 8.75%. NPVb = $120 8.75% per year is less than cost of capital of 12%. Achieved rate of return on Project B falls short of attainable rate of return on other opportunities.

IRR of an Annuity

Project A and Project B do not provide benefits in form of annuity (constant annual cash flow). If project costing $100,000 and returning $25,000 per year for 5 years is available, calculate appropriate annuity factor:

X represents annuity factor that will cause $25,000, 5-year annuity to have present value of $100,000. Refer to table of annuity factors in Exhibit 11.4 to find discount rate that has present value of annuity factor equal to 4.00 after 5 years.

Personal Computer Applications Most basic business-oriented electronic calculators, personal computers, businessoriented spreadsheet applications, specialpurpose capital budgeting software packages can do actual calculations or be programmed to solve capital budgeting problems.

Profitability Index

Also benefit/cost ratio Calculated as ratio of present value of benefits of investment to cost of investment

PI = NPV(benefits)/NPV(costs)

General rule: All projects with PI > 1.0 should be accepted. Between two or more mutually exclusive projects having different costs, choose project with highest profitability index.

Profitability Index

Investment decisions based on profitability index will be same as decisions made using net present value. All projects having positive net present value have profitability index larger than 1.0 and therefore are acceptable.

Selection of Method

All 3 methods (net present value, internal rate of return, profitability index) result in same accept-reject decision for given investment opportunity. There are three important circumstances under which methods may yield conflicting decisions.

Selection of Method

1. Choosing from among mutually exclusive investment projects with similar costs, but radically differing time patterns of cash inflows. Ex. One project provides large cash flows in early years and small cash flows in later years compared with another project providing small cash flows in early years but large cash flows in later years.

Project having highest net present value and profitability may have lowest internal rate of return.

Selection of Method

1. (continued)

Choice of method depends on which assumption is closest to reality. Choice should be based on which reinvestment rate is closest to rate that firm will be able to earn on cash flows generated by project.

If cash flows can be reinvested at cost of capital, select project with higher net present value. If cash inflows can be reinvested at IRR of project, select project with higher IRR.

Selection of Method

1. (continued)

General rule: NPV method should be preferred if conflict arises because projects with very high IRRs relative to firms cost of capital are rare. In most cases, reinvestment rate will be closer to cost of capital than to IRR and thus, NPV method is normally preferred to IRR method.

Selection of Method

2. Choosing from among mutually exclusive projects with widely differing costs.

If project with highest NPV has lowest PI and IRR, in general, give preference to project with highest NPV since this will maximize value of firm. If project with highest PI and IRR is substantially less expensive than competing project, former is selected because lower-cost project may be perceived as less risky than higher-cost project.

Selection of Method

3. Capital rationing where insufficient capital is available to accept all projects having positive NPVs.

Rank-order projects from highest IRR to lowest and select projects that firm has sufficient capital to accept.

In practice, uncertainty is often dealt with through simple mechanism of assigning higher discount rate to riskier projects.

How much higher depends on managements perception of degree of risk and additional compensation required because of that risk

Case Study

Droppitt Parcel Company is considering purchasing new equipment to replace existing equipment that has book value of zero and market value of $15,000. New equipment costs $90,000 and is expected to provide production savings and increased profits of $20,000 per year for the next 10 years. New equipment has expected useful life of 10 years, after which its estimated salvage value would be $10,000. Straight-line depreciation

Effective tax rate: 34% Cost of capital: 12%

Case Study

See Exhibit 12.4 1. Effective cost of new equipment: $80,100

Droppits trades its old equipment in for new equipment by selling it and applying sale proceeds to new equipment.

Case Study

2. Calculate present value of expected benefits of new equipment.

All benefits have been converted to after-tax basis before present values are calculated. Profit increase is multiplied by 0.66 (1.00 tax rate) to determine increased profit remaining after tax. Calculate tax benefit resulting from effect of depreciation by multiplying annual depreciation deduction by effective tax rate. Reflects salvage value of new equipment at end of its expected useful life. No tax effect here because there is no profit or loss involved.

Case Study

3. NPV: $13,068 4. IRR (solved by trial and error using electronic calculator): 15.7% New machine should be purchased to replace old machine since NPV is positive and IRR exceeds cost of capital.

- NET PRESENT VALUE AND OTHER INVESTMENT CRITERIA _ Chapter 08Enviado porzordan
- M10_Gitman50803X_14_MF_C10Enviado pordhfbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbh
- 1. Capital BudgetingEnviado porlunalovegood23
- Chapter09.pdfEnviado porBabuM ACC FIN ECO
- PK10 NotesEnviado porMutevu Steve
- Chp10.pptEnviado porKhaled A. M. El-sherif
- Capital Budgeting TechniquesEnviado porNagarajan Cheyur
- The Basics of Capital BudgetingEnviado porRanin, Manilac Melissa S
- Chapter 19Enviado porSilparaja
- Capital Budgeting and Cash Flow ProjectionEnviado pornira_110
- MS 42 UNIT 5 Capital Budgeting Decisions.docEnviado porsudhir.kochhar3530
- Ch 6 Investment DecisionsEnviado porAnkur Aggarwal
- CAPITAL BUDGETING.pdfEnviado porSanNy Basumatary
- 10 - Chaper 10 Capital Budgeting TechniquesEnviado porhunkie
- Chapter 9Enviado porMorerp
- Time Value of MoneyEnviado porRishab Kapur
- Capital BudgetingEnviado porjayson
- Chapter 8HANEnviado porNo Names
- Broiler FsEnviado porAlfredo Jr Beltran
- Financial Analysis of Projects I - TranscriptEnviado porzahbir123
- Sugar Mill in Bolivia - Financial Feasibility 2010Enviado pormarianove
- Capital BudgetingEnviado porDuc
- Technic of Cap BudEnviado porAmar Nath
- capital budgeting.pptEnviado porremon4hr
- Capital Budgeting TechinquesEnviado porcindytantriani
- Investing in Pasture ImprovementEnviado porNaomi Hender
- Cost Analysis for Decision Making (Acct - What the Numbers Mean)Enviado porNguyen Dac Thich
- Class3-Valuation2Enviado porKaheendaRwiiko
- Topic 5. The Basics of Capital Budgeting.docxEnviado porCerf Vint
- 157_37315_EA312_2013_1__2_1_Chap008Enviado porMuhammad Safdar

- Bill AmazonEnviado pormm1979
- brm jay4Enviado porrakshaksinghai
- xEnviado pormm1979
- 1o institution.docxEnviado pormm1979
- BSNL BILLEnviado pormm1979
- mc15Enviado porSialhai
- Time TableEnviado pormm1979
- t Pig and AgricultureEnviado pormm1979
- Seat Matrix 2015Enviado pormm1979
- 1o institution.docxEnviado pormm1979
- AboutEnviado pormm1979
- 3. B.B.A. SyllabusEnviado porcoolaadi69
- B. Tech.Enviado pormm1979
- Protege FigureEnviado pormm1979
- amazon.pdfEnviado pormm1979
- SunEnviado porJeshi
- nola13-guillermo.ppsxEnviado pormm1979
- Pricing FormulaesEnviado porravi_uppalamurthy
- Economic Survey Statistical Appendix 2014-15Enviado porNaman N Shah
- cs-accumEnviado pormm1979
- MBA MAT February 2013 Reasoning Question PaperEnviado porbaju7728
- Daily Call Money RatesEnviado pormm1979
- Business Research Methods MCQEnviado porApurvaa Patil
- Deployment of Bank CreditEnviado pormm1979
- New Wordpad DocumentEnviado pormm1979
- AmazonEnviado pormm1979
- M Mall FeedbackEnviado pormm1979
- Market Entry StrategiesEnviado pormm1979
- FNPostdoc Reference Report FormEnviado pormm1979
- Reference 1 9Enviado pormm1979

- supply chin management of automobilesEnviado porDipankar Pathak
- 2016 Mexico Salary GuideEnviado porAv Raham B. Arias
- Emotional Branding.pptEnviado porAakash Pareek
- Con RailEnviado porkenc_519
- 7 P's of Marketing for ICICI BANKEnviado porPradeeps Srithar
- Social Media Marketing Proposal TemplateEnviado porPrashant Kumar Dey
- Exercise 1 FullEnviado porDoanxuan Hoi
- Financial Statements as a Management ToolEnviado pordavidimola
- Introduction to Cost Accounting and Cost Concepts.gnluEnviado porSunil beniwal
- Pwc Report EnEnviado porjapuncic
- PM0012-MQP-Keys.pdfEnviado porJoshi Dhvanit
- Cap. 7 Managerial Economics - D. Salvatore (7th E.)Enviado porLuz Santivanez
- SSF Print Ad_The Star_7 AprilEnviado porSSF
- ecnimicsEnviado porMuhammad Ramiz
- Solutions to End of Mankiw 4 solProblemsEnviado porNatasha Vania
- Utf8''Lec3 NotesEnviado porudbhav
- ConceptsEnviado porJavier Almeida
- Apply Size Premium MetricsEnviado pormarianove
- Fin.411.Final.studentEnviado porArianna Talley
- Operation ManagementEnviado porjfdj_898jgkgf
- SSRN-id2298565Enviado porsoumensahil
- ACC2001 Aug 2011 Practice Exam QuestionsEnviado porShin Tan
- FIN 515 MART Expect Success Fin515martdotcomEnviado porisabella45
- Chapter 7 – Global Segmentation and Positioning 1Enviado porpeixuan
- SAKHI_Rachel_Merrill Edge - Account Status as of December 18th_Year of 2017_Holdings_Shares_Sales of Personal Finance StatementEnviado porRachel Sakhi
- marketingprocessoverview-120204103817-phpapp02Enviado porAnonymous 4UMGyEjTP
- Prathi Project CapexEnviado porJennifer Joseph
- Babcock & Brown Limited - The difference between Infrsatructure Assets and Infrastructure Funds.pdfEnviado poryingmeitan
- Housing Markets-financial Crisis 2007Enviado porGuillermo Olivera
- RELATIONSHIP MARKETINGEnviado porSharifah Md Ibrahim