Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
\
|
= = q
Q
A V
P
c TE
exp 1 1
A
c
/Q: Specific Collection Area (SCA)
Turbulent flow: uniformly mixing
Perfect Collection
The fraction of the particles removed in
unit time = the ratio of the area traveled
by drift velocity in unit time to the total
cross-section
Q: How to increase the efficiency?
Q: An ESP that treats 10,000 m
3
/min of air is expected to
be 98% efficient. The effective drift velocity of the
particles is 6.0 m/min. (a) What is the total collection
area? (b) Assuming the plates are 6 m high and 3 m
long, what is the number of plates required?
6 m
3 m
Internal Configuration: self-review
Random collisions between ions
and particles
(
(
+ =
kT
t N e c d
e
kT d
n
i i p p
2
1 ln
2
2
2
t
Q: Does q depend on time?
Does q depend on d
p
?
The total number of charges on a particle
(c
i
~ 2.410
4
cm/s)
ne q =
The total charges on a particle
Use esu, not SI units.
Bombardment of ions in the presence of a strong
field
eZ 1
eZ
4 2
3
i
i
2
|
|
.
|
\
|
+
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
+
=
t N
t N
e
Ed
n
i
i
p
t
t
c
c
Total number of charges by field charging
Q: Is the charging rate dependent on
particle size? On field strength? On
time? On material?
Aerosol Technology, Hinds, W. C., John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
+
=
e
Ed
n
p
s
4 2
3
2
c
c
Saturation charge
(Z
i
~ 450 cm
2
/stVs)
Comparison of Diffusion & Field Charging
Q: Does collection efficiency increase
as particle size increase (because of a
higher number of charges)?
dp (um) n
diff
n
field
n
total
Z
diff
Z
Field
Z (stCs/g)
0.01 0.10 0.02 0.12 0.66 0.10 0.76
0.02 0.30 0.06 0.36 0.49 0.11 0.60
0.05 1.1 0.40 1.50 0.31 0.12 0.43
0.1 2.8 1.6 4.38 0.23 0.13 0.36
0.2 7 6.5 13.2 0.18 0.17 0.35
0.5 21 40 61.2 0.15 0.30 0.45
1 48 161 209 0.16 0.52 0.68
2 108 646 754 0.16 0.98 1.14
5 311 4035 4346 0.18 2.34 2.52
10 683 16140 16824 0.20 4.61 4.80
20 1490 64562 66052 0.21 9.16 9.37
50 4134 403510 407644 0.23 22.78 23.0
Number of Charges vs dp
dp (um)
0.01 0.1 1 10
n
10
-2
10
-1
10
0
10
1
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
Diffusion charging
Field Charging
Nit = 10
7
s/cm
3
c= 5.1
E = 5 KV/cm
T = 298 K
ELectrical Mobility vs dp
dp (um)
0.01 0.1 1 10
Z
(
s
t
C
.
s
/
g
)
0.1
1
10
Diffusion charging
Field Charging
Combined Charging
Typical fly ash
size distribution
Q: If the ESP is used to collect the fly ash,
how will the particle size distribution at
ESP outlet look like?
Impact of particles resistivity on ESPs performance:
Factors: temperature, composition
Flue gas conditioning
10
9
- 10
10
ohm-cm is desired
Q: How does resistivity affect an ESPs performance?
Effects of sulfur content and temperature on resistivity
Q: Is S in coal good or bad?
Water spray for cement kiln dust
Flue Gas Conditioning
Effective drift velocity as a function of resistivity by
measurement
Use the same Deutsch-Anderson Equation with new w
e
.
Q: Estimate the total collection area required for a 95% efficient fly-ash
ESP that treats 8000 m
3
/min. The ash resistivity is 1.610
10
ohm-cm.
Good for moderate collection
efficiency (90% ~ 95%)
High Efficiency ESP (>95%)
Matts-Ohnfeldt Equation
(
(
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
k
e
C
w
Q
A
exp 1 q
Use k = 1 for fly ash
k = 0.5 or 0.6 for
industrial category
Rule of Thumb
Below 95%, use Deutsch-Anderson Equation
Above 99%, use Matts-Ohnfeldt Equation
Between them, use an average
Q: In designing a high
efficiency ESP, a smaller
drift velocity is to be
used. Why?
avg C C
V I P =
C
C
e
A
kP
w =
Power density ~ 1-2 W/ft
2
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
Q
kP
C
exp 1 q
Corona power
Drift velocity
Efficiency vs. Corona Power
k = 0.55 for P
c
/Q in W/cfs up to 98.5%
03-03-2014
56
03-03-2014
57
03-03-2014
58
Positive Corona Negative Corona
+
- -
- +
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
electron molecule
particle
Collection Plate Collection Plate Electrode Electrode
Step 1
+
-
+
Step 2
+
-
+
Step 3
+
+
-
Step 4
03-03-2014
59
Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)
Drift velocity of particles between the ESP
plates
03-03-2014
60
Types of ESPs in terms of shape
Cylindrical type
Plate type
Types of ESPs in terms of flow
direction
Vertical gas-flow
Horizontal gas-flow
Types of ESPs in terms
performance
One stage or two stages
Dry or wet
Plate type, horizontal gas-flow, one stage
and dry ESPs are the most common ESP type
in industrial application.
03-03-2014
61
Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)
One-stage ESP Two-stage ESP
Discharge
electrodes
Collecting
electrodes
The observed
minimum is because
of Cunningham
factor in calculation
of drift velocity.
03-03-2014
62
03-03-2014
63
03-03-2014
64
03-03-2014
65
03-03-2014
66
03-03-2014
67