Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The basis for international trade is that a nation can import a particular good or service at a lower cost than if it were produced domestically In other words, if you can buy it cheaper than you can make it you buy it This maxim is true for individuals and nations
MERCANTILISM
Mercantilism advocated government intervention to achieve a surplus in the balance of trade. It viewed trade as a zero-sum game, one in which a gain by one country results in a loss by another As an economic philosophy, mercantilism is problematic and not valid, yet many political views today have the goal of boosting exports while limiting imports by seeking only selective liberalization of trade
The ability to produce a good using fewer resources than another country (same output with less input)
The meaning of absolute advantage is that a country is more productive than another country in producing a good (same input with more output).
Absolute Advantage
Absolute advantage deals with the ability of a country to turn inputs into outputs A country is said to have an absolute advantage if it takes less input to turn out a unit of a good than it does for another country. Hence a country should never produce a product that it can buy at a cheaper price from another country It is possible for one country to have an absolute advantage in everything or nothing
Natural Distribution of resources Acquired advantage of technology and skill Regional Division of Labour Inefficiency in production can be avoided Benefit to Customers Industrial and National Development by increase in Global Productivity
The theory is based on 2x2x1 model i.e 2 countries, 2 products and 1 factor of production-labour
Output per one day of labour Product/country Brazil tea coffee 20 kg 80 kg India 65 kg 25kg
Hence India has absolute advantage in production of tea and Brazil in coffee. Both countries are better off in producing only 1 product and trading it with another country for the second product.
Practically no absolute advantage Different Country Size Variety of resources Transport cost Absolute advantage for more than one products.
The Model of Comparative Advantage Trade is still possible and mutually beneficial even if one country has an absolute advantage over another in producing both goods, provided that each country enjoys a comparative advantage in the production of one good.
Comparative Advantage
Comparative advantage means that a country has a lower opportunity cost of producing a good than another country Every country must have a comparative advantage in something Specialization generates potential gains from trade that can make both trading partners better off.
India has an advantage in both cotton and jute. However, cotton : India is 2.5 times better Jute : India is 1.25 times better, Hence, India has comparatively more advantage in cotton .
Continuing with the same example with differential wage rates in the two countries. COST COMPARISON country Product Wage Labour rate/day days 3 rs. 3 rs 10 10 Total wages 30 rs. 30 rs Total Cost per production unit 100 units 100 units 0.30 rs/unit 0.30 rs/unit 0.50 rs./unit 0.25 rs/unit
India
Cotton Jute
2 rs 2rs
10 10
20 rs. 20 rs.
40 units 80 units
Implications
1. 2. 3.
Efficient allocation of global resources Maximisation of global production at least possible cost Product prices become almost equal throught the world Better concept because it applies the principles of Division of labour Specialization Opportunity cost
Limitations
Limitation of 2x2x1 model Transportation cost ignored Factor mobility ignored Exchange rate fluctuations ignored Not applicable to trade in services Economic efficiency is not the sole aim of international trade Gains to both nations may in different ratios.
8 hours 10 hours
20 cameras 10 cameras
*Assuming countries have 200,000 available hours and split their time evenly between cameras and computers.
*Assuming that Germany specializes in cameras, and the U.S. specializes in computers, and they trade 12,500 cameras for 625 computers (Trading price: 20 cameras = 1 computer).
Germany
Computers
1,250 1,000
625
Cameras
10,000 20,000 12,500 25,000
Cameras
Germany
Computers
1,250 1,000
625
Cameras
10,000 20,000 12,500 25,000
Cameras
<
<
Countries export those products which they can produce and sell at lower rates than the other countries. This price is indirectly dependent on factors of production : their availability and factor prices. If labour is available in abundance in relation to land and capital, the price of labour would be low and price of land and capital would be high.
Product price
Product Demand
Product Supply
Consumer wants
Consumers income
Production technology
Factor prices
Factor price
Factor demand
Factor supply
Implications
1. 2. 3.
Generally, abundant factor supply will be supported by low demand creating a favourable condition for international trade. This factor proportions theory implies he following relationships : Land labour relationship Labour capital relationship Technology- labour raltionships
Criticism
The Leontief Paradox In 1953, Wassily Leontief postulated that since the U.S. was relatively abundant in capital compared to other nations, the U.S. would be an exporter of capital intensive goods and an importer of labor-intensive goods. However, he found that U.S. exports were less capital intensive than U.S. imports due to availability of skilled labour Since this result was at variance with the predictions of the theory, it has become known as the Leontief Paradox
Criticism
Ignores the role of product differentiation Based on 2x2x2 model , practically not possible Ignores international factor mobility As per this theory, trade would not occur among nations having similar factor endowments, however fact differs. Ingnores transportations costs and trade barriers
Economies of Scale, First Mover Advantages, and the Pattern of Trade The pattern of trade we observe in the world economy may be the result of first mover advantages and economies of scale
The conditions in the nation governing how companies are created, organized, and managed, and the nature of domestic rivalry impacts firm competitiveness
Being a first mover can have important competitive implications, especially if there are economies of scale and the global industry will only support a few competitors