LTE Benchmark Report

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

LTE CLUSTER_ DURBAN 3 (Jacobs)
Huawei Optimization Team
23rd Oct 2013

Page 2 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Page 2
Overview
18 outdoor sites in Cluster 3, All 18 sites on service
eNodeBID eNodeB Name Site Status
26 L00026-Transwerk Onair
27 L00027-Hadlow_Place Onair
257 L00257-Bluff_W_Tower Onair
1809 L01809-Wentworth_VC Onair
1953 L01953-1_Serowe_Rd Onair
2217 L02217-Akaya_Centre Onair
2723 L02723-Omo_Tower Onair
3945 L03945-Treasure_Beach_CC Onair
5150 L05150-Bluff_Shopping_Centre Onair
5159 L05159-Wentworth_Secondary Onair
5161 L05161-Silver_Service_Station Onair
5166 L05166-Bayhead_VC Onair
5735 L05735-Merebank_East_CC Onair
5737 L05737-Durban_Wanderers_Sports_Club Onair
6594 L06594-Bayhead_North_CC Onair
7263 L07263-NG_Kerk_Montclair Onair
7431 L07431-Ansteys_Beach_Camera_Pole Onair
8204 L08204-Bluff_W_Reservoir Onair
26 L00026-Transwerk Onair
Page 3
Drive Test Plan
LAPTOP_1
UE1(E398 Free mode): Loop start + Dial up + Ping + http + hang up + wait(20s)+ loop end.
LAPTOP_2
UE2(E398 Locked to LTE): Dial up + FTP Upload(50MB unlimited times) +hang up
UE3(Scanner Locked to LTE): Scan the TOPN
LAPTOP_3
UE4(E398 Locked to LTE):Dial up + FTP Download {100MB unlimited times} + hang up
UE5(P1 phone Free mode): Cs Fallback MO
UE6(P1 phone Free mode): Cs Fallback MT

KPI name Description
Target
Threshold
Achieve
Threshold
Device

Signal strength Average RSRP should be better than the threshold. -110 dBm -78.57 dBm Scanner
Signal quality Average RSRQ should be better than the threshold. -13 dB -10.19 dB Scanner
Downlink coverage Percentage of measurements for which both RSRP and RSRQ above threshold. 90 % 97.78 % Scanner
Uplink coverage Average PUCCH transmit power should be less than a threshold. 10 dBm -4.1 dBm UL UE
Time spent in LTE
Percentage of time during which the UE is using the LTE network as opposed to
GSM/WCDMA.
90 % 99.4 % Http & Ping UE
Coverage KPIs
KPI name Description Target Threshold Achieve Threshold
Event
Numbers
Device
RRC block rate Percentage of RRC connection that failed to setup. 3 % 5.8 % 12/208 HTTP+PING UE
RRC setup time Average RRC connection setup time. 60 ms 50 ms 198 HTTP+PING UE
RRC slow setup rate
Percentage of RRC connections with a setup time longer than
a threshold: 60 ms.
10 % 7.6 % 15/198 HTTP+PING UE
RRC drop rate
Percentage of RRC connections not terminated with a RRC
Connection Release message.
5 % 6.1 % 12/196 HTTP+PING UE
RRC re-est. failure rate Percentage of RRC re-establishment procedures that failed. 10 % 58.8 % 10/17 HTTP+PING UE
Intra-LTE handover failure rate Percentage of handover procedures that failed. 3 % 2.7 % 11/407 HTTP+PING UE
Session Continuity (Redirect) failure rate Percentage of failed re-directs from LTE to UMTS/GSM 5 % 2.9 % 4/138 CSFB UE- MO
CSFB Block rate(MO) Percentage of CS Fallback calls that failed to setup. 3 % 0.0 % 0/135 CSFB UE- MO
CSFB setup time(MO) Average CS Fallback call setup time. 8000 ms 12549 ms 135 CSFB UE- MO
CSFB slow setup rate(MO)
Percentage of CS Fallback calls with a setup time longer than
a threshold: 8000 ms.
10 % 100 % 135/135 CSFB UE- MO
CSFB drop rate(MO) Percentage of CS Fallback calls that dropped. 5 % 0.0 % 0/135 CSFB UE- MO
CSFB Block rate(MT) Percentage of CS Fallback calls that failed to setup. 3 % 0.0 % 0/132 CSFB UE- MT
CSFB setup time(MT) Average CS Fallback call setup time. 8000 ms 6992 ms 132 CSFB UE- MT
CSFB slow setup rate(MT)
Percentage of CS Fallback calls with a setup time longer than
a threshold: 8000 ms.
10 % 18.2 % 24/132 CSFB UE- MT
CSFB drop rate(MT) Percentage of CS Fallback calls that dropped. 5 % 0.0 % 0/132 CSFB UE- MT
Radio Performance KPIs

KPI name Description Target Threshold Achieve Threshold
Device

Avg. FTP download throughput Average FTP downlink throughput. 10 Mbps 14.296 Mbps DL UE
Low FTP download throughput session
Percentage of FTP DL sessions with throughput lower than 1
Mbps.
10 % 1 % DL UE
FTP download failure rate Percentage of failed FTP download sessions. 5 % 1.8 % DL UE
Avg. FTP upload throughput Average FTP uplink throughput. 5 Mbps 9.617 Mbps UL UE
Low FTP upload throughput session
Percentage of FTP UL sessions with throughput lower than
500 kbps.
10 % 1 % UL UE
FTP upload failure rate Percentage of failed FTP upload sessions 5 % 0 % UL UE
Service Performance KPIs_ FTP
Service Performance KPIs Ping & HTTP

Metric Value
Number of HTTP downloads
256
HTTP downloads OK
86.7% (222)
HTTP downloads interrupted EOF
0% (0)
HTTP downloads cancelled by user
0% (0)
HTTP downloads failures
13.3% (34)
HTTP download Drop Rate* 13.3%
Metric Value
Number of PING
1067
PING OK
84.1% (897)
PING failures
15.9% (170)
Mean RTT (ms)
38
RTT above threshold
6.7% (71)
* HTTP download drop rate excludes cancelled and interrupted tasks.
RSRP- Map (Scanner)
Assistant Map
RSRP- Histogram (Scanner)
Assistant Histogram
RSRQ- Map (Scanner)
Assistant Map
RSRQ- Histogram (Scanner)
Assistant Histogram
SINR Map (Scanner)
Assistant Map
SINR Histogram (Scanner)
Assistant Histogram
Number of cells within 5dB of best cell (Scanner)
Best Server TX Branch 1 Map (UE1)
Assistant Map
Best Server TX Branch 2 Map (UE1)
Assistant Map
PCI-Map (UE1)
Assistant Map
PUSCH Power Distribution (UE4)
0.000%
10.000%
20.000%
30.000%
40.000%
50.000%
60.000%
70.000%
80.000%
90.000%
100.000%
0.000%
5.000%
10.000%
15.000%
20.000%
25.000%
30.000%
35.000%
40.000%
45.000%
-
6
0
-
5
6
-
5
2
-
4
8
-
4
4
-
4
0
-
3
6
-
3
2
-
2
8
-
2
4
-
2
0
-
1
6
-
1
2
-
8
-
4048
1
2
1
6
2
0
2
4
2
8
PUSCH Power distribution all
EARFCNs
PUSCH PDF PUSCH CDF
PUCCH Power Distribution (UE4)
0.000%
10.000%
20.000%
30.000%
40.000%
50.000%
60.000%
70.000%
80.000%
90.000%
100.000%
0.000%
1.000%
2.000%
3.000%
4.000%
5.000%
6.000%
-
6
0
-
5
6
-
5
2
-
4
8
-
4
4
-
4
0
-
3
6
-
3
2
-
2
8
-
2
4
-
2
0
-
1
6
-
1
2
-
8
-
4048
1
2
1
6
2
0
2
4
2
8
PUCCH Power distribution all
EARFCNs
PUCCH PDF PUCCH CDF
L1 Payload Rate DL Distribution (UE1)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
3%
4%
4%
5%
5%
0
3
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
1
8
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
2
7
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
3
6
0
0
0
3
9
0
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
4
5
0
0
0
4
8
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
5
4
0
0
0
5
7
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
3
0
0
0
6
6
0
0
0
6
9
0
0
0
7
2
0
0
0
7
5
0
0
0
7
8
0
0
0
L1 Payloadrate DL distribution all
EARFCNs
PDF Tput DL CDF Tput DL
CQI Distribution (UE1)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
CQI distribution all EARFCNs
CQI PDF CQI CDF
MCS DL Distribution (UE1)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
0

(
Q
P
S
K
)
1

(
Q
P
S
K
)
2

(
Q
P
S
K
)
3

(
Q
P
S
K
)
4

(
Q
P
S
K
)
5

(
Q
P
S
K
)
6

(
Q
P
S
K
)
7

(
Q
P
S
K
)
8

(
Q
P
S
K
)
9

(
Q
P
S
K
)
1
0

(
1
6
Q
A
M
)
1
1

(
1
6
Q
A
M
)
1
2

(
1
6
Q
A
M
)
1
3

(
1
6
Q
A
M
)
1
4

(
1
6
Q
A
M
)
1
5

(
1
6
Q
A
M
)
1
6

(
1
6
Q
A
M
)
1
7

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
1
8

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
1
9

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
0

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
1

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
2

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
3

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
4

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
5

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
6

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
7

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
2
8

(
6
4
Q
A
M
)
MCS DL distribution all EARFCNs
MCS DL PDF MCS DL CDF
RBs DL Distribution (UE1)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
048
1
2
1
6
2
0
2
4
2
8
3
2
3
6
4
0
4
4
4
8
5
2
5
6
6
0
6
4
6
8
7
2
7
6
8
0
8
4
8
8
9
2
9
6
1
0
0
RBs DL distribution all EARFCNs
RBs DL PDF RBs DL CDF
Frame Usage DL Distribution (UE1)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
048
1
2
1
6
2
0
2
4
2
8
3
2
3
6
4
0
4
4
4
8
5
2
5
6
6
0
6
4
6
8
7
2
7
6
8
0
8
4
8
8
9
2
9
6
1
0
0
FU DL distribution all EARFCNs
FU DL PDF FU DL CDF
L1 Payload Rate UL Distribution (UE4)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
0
1
5
0
0
3
0
0
0
4
5
0
0
6
0
0
0
7
5
0
0
9
0
0
0
1
0
5
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
3
5
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
1
6
5
0
0
1
8
0
0
0
1
9
5
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
2
2
5
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
2
5
5
0
0
2
7
0
0
0
2
8
5
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
1
5
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
3
4
5
0
0
3
6
0
0
0
3
7
5
0
0
3
9
0
0
0
L1 Payloadrate UL distribution all
EARFCNs
Tput UL PDF Tput UL CDF
MCS UL Distribution (UE4)
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
m
c
s
0
m
c
s
1
m
c
s
2
m
c
s
3
m
c
s
4
m
c
s
5
m
c
s
6
m
c
s
7
m
c
s
8
m
c
s
9
m
c
s
1
0
m
c
s
1
1
m
c
s
1
2
m
c
s
1
3
m
c
s
1
4
m
c
s
1
5
m
c
s
1
6
m
c
s
1
7
m
c
s
1
8
m
c
s
1
9
m
c
s
2
0
m
c
s
2
1
m
c
s
2
2
m
c
s
2
3
m
c
s
2
4
m
c
s
2
5
m
c
s
2
6
m
c
s
2
7
m
c
s
2
8
MCS UL PDF MCS UL CDF
RBs UL Distribution (UE4)
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
159
1
3
1
7
2
1
2
5
2
9
3
3
3
7
4
1
4
5
4
9
5
3
5
7
6
1
6
5
6
9
7
3
7
7
8
1
8
5
8
9
9
3
9
7
RB UL PDF RB UL CDF
Frame Usage UL Distribution (UE4)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
048
1
2
1
6
2
0
2
4
2
8
3
2
3
6
4
0
4
4
4
8
5
2
5
6
6
0
6
4
6
8
7
2
7
6
8
0
8
4
8
8
9
2
9
6
1
0
0
FU UL distribution all EARFCNs
FU UL PDF FU UL CDF
Thank you

LTE Benchmark Report

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

LTE Benchmark Report

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

Você também pode gostar