RIGHT TO INFORMATION IN INDIA Seminar on RTI - IIM Ahmedabad December 7, 2013
Right to Information in India :-
1. Introduction 2. Recent Scenario 3. Practical Aspects 4. Short film on RTI 5. Q & A
Right to Information is a Fundamental Right..
Right to Information has been judicially recognized as part of Article 19(1)(a) of Indian Constitution All Citizens shall have the right to freedom of Speech and Expression
For proper enjoyment of freedom of Speech and Expression, it is imperative that correct information is available to the Citizens.
The Right To Information is a fundamental right in every sense of the word because it is absolutely essential to the healthy functioning of a modern democracy since an uninformed citizen cannot possibly be expected to be a good citizen.
Free flow of information from the Government to the people will not only create an enlightened and informed public opinion but also render those in authority accountable
- Mr. V.P. Singh, Prime Minister of India (1989)
Lack of Transparency was one of the main causes for all pervading corruption and Right to Information would lead to openness, accountability and integrity
- Soli Sorabji, Former Attorney General of India (1998-2004) Why an RTI Act ?
RTI in various countries :-
- Sweden (1766) Freedom of Press Act
- India is the 48 th Country to implement RTI (enacted 15-06- 2005, came into force 12-10-2005)
- USA (1966) Freedom of Information Act
- UK (2000) Freedom of Information Act
- South Africa (2000) Promotion of Access to Info Act.
- New Zealand (1982) Official Information Act
- Finland (1951) Openness to Public documents
- RTI in constitution of the countries like France, Brazil, Mexico, Columbia etc..
- More than 90 countries are having act on RTI..
RTI Act in various states before RTI Act, 2005 :-
1. Tamil Nadu (1997) 2. Goa (1997) 3. Rajasthan (2000) 4. Karnataka (2000) 5. Delhi (2001) 6. Maharshtra (2002) 7. Assam (2002) 8. Madhya Pradesh (2003) 9. Jammu & Kashmir (2004, Amendment In 2008, repealed, New Law made in 2009)
Journey of Right to Information Act in India :-
The movement of RTI started in early 1990s by Majdoor Kisaan Shakti Sanghathan (MKSS) in Devdungri,Rajashthan
Press Council of India drafted a Right to Information Bill, 1996 (Justice P B Sawant, Chairman, PCI)
Institute of Rural Development, Hyderabad also drafted a bill in 1997
In 1997 January 2, DoPT established a working group under the chairmanship of Mr. H.D. Shouri
Freedom of Information Bill 2000 introduced in Parliament on 25 th July 2000.Freedom of Information Act, 2002 (repealed)
Right to Information Act, 2005 (w.e.f. 12 th October 2005)
Objective of Right to Information Act, 2005 :-
An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority,
the constitution of a Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
Whereas the Constitution of India has established democratic Republic;
And whereas democracy requires an informed citizen and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the governed;
Right to Information (Section 2(j)) :-
.. includes the right to:
- Inspection of work, documents, records (Sec 2(i);
- Taking notes, extracts, or certified copies of documents or records;
- Taking certified samples of material;
- Obtaining information in the form diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or any other electronic mode or through print outs where such information is stored in a computer or any other device
Information (Section 2(f)) :-
Information means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and
information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force;
Records (Section 2(i)) :-
Record includes
Any document, manuscript and file;
Any microfilm, microfiche and facsimile copy of a document;
Any reproduction of image or images embodied in such microfilm (whether enlarged or not; and
Any other material produced by a computer or any other device
Public Authority (Section 2(h)) :-
Public Authority means any authority or body or institution of self government established or constituted
- by or under the constitution
- by any other law made by the parliament
- by any other law made by the state legislature
- by notification issued or order made by the appropriate government and includes any - body owned , controlled or substantially financed
- non government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate government.
Authority under RTI Act, 2005 :-
State Information Commission (Section 15)
Appellate Authority
Public Information Officer (PIO) e.g. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation Central Information Commission, New Delhi (Section 12)
Appellate Authority
Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) e.g. Income Tax Dept
Supply of Information to Only Citizen of India :-
The Act gives the right to information only to the citizen of India. It does not make provision for giving information to corporation, associations, companies etc., which are legal entities but not citizen.
However if an application is made by an employee or office bearer of any corporation, association, companies, NGO etc. indicating his name and such employee/office bearer citizen of India, information may be supplied to him/her.
Person living abroad can make an application to Embassy of India in respective countries.
Pro-Active Disclosure (Section 4(1)(b)) :-
Under this section , every public authority to publish 16 category of information e.g.
1. The particular of organization , functions and duties, 2. The powers and duties of its officers and employee, 3. The procedure followed in decision making process, including channels of supervision and accountability, 4. Directory of its officers and employees, 5. The rules, regulations instructions, manuals and records held by it or under its control or used by its employee, 6. The budget allocated to each its agency indicating particular of all plans, proposed expenditure and reports on disbursement made, 7. A statement of the board, council , committee and other bodies consisting of two or more person constituted as its parts or the purpose of its advice. 8. The monthly remuneration received by each its officer and employee including the system of compensation as provided in its regulations, 9. The name designation and other particular of Public Information Officer, Appellate Authority etc.
Information Exclusion (Section 8) :-
1. Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interest of the state, relation with foreign states.
2. Information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court
3. Information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual.
4. Information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property.. etc..
5. Notwithstanding any of the exemption listed above, a public authority may allow to access to information if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interest.
Severability (Section 10) :-
Where a request for access to information is rejected on the ground that it is in relation to information which is exempt from disclosure, then,
notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, access may be provided to that part of the record which does not contain any information which is exempt from disclosure under this Act and which can reasonably be severed from any part that contains exempt information.
Third Party Information (Section 11) :-
CPIO/SPIO after having request from applicant for the information of third party within 5 days of the receipt will inform third party
Third party within 10 days from the receipt of letter will reply (positive/negative) to CPIO/SPIO.
Then CPIO/SPIO will make a decision in 40 days as whether or not to disclose the information or record or part thereof and give writing the notice of his decision to the third party.
Third party is entitled to prefer appeal under Section 19 of the RTI Act.
Exempted Organization (Section 24) :- (Schedule 2 of RTI Act)
1. Intelligence Bureau, MoH 2. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, MoF 3. Border Security Force 4. Central Reserve Police Force 5. Central Industrial Security Force 6. National Security Guards 7. Research & Analysis Wing 8. Defense Research & Development Organization 9. Assam Rifles 10.Border Road Development Organization 11.Central Bureau of Intelligence Total 25..
One can get the information from above org only in the case of allegation of corruption or human rights violation
RTI success story :-
1. Attendance of village school teacher (Banda, UP) 2. Transparency in public distribution system for BPL families (Bahraich, UP) 3. School uniform distributed. (Allahabad) 4. Exposing corruption in medicine procurement at PSU (Koria, Chhatishgarh) 5. Payment of pension dues from railways (Bhavnagar Division) 6. Attendance of staff in the school has helped in checking teachers absenteeism and students drop out. 7. Attendance of doctors and nurses at primary health centres has led to improvement in health care facilities in rural area. 8. The details of supplies and food grains through rations shops has assured the reach of entitlements to the beneficiaries. 9. Muster of roll and beneficiaries of employment guarantee schemes has exposed corruption and ensured effective delivery of service to the poor For delay in RTI - IIT Kharagpur staff made to pay :- (Indian Express, Dt. 14-06-2010)
- Prof Kumar of the IIT Kharagpur sought information on Adjunct, visiting faculty and honorarium they received on 4/10/2009.
- He filed a complaint to Central Information Commission (CIC), New Delhi on 25/12/2012 as he did not get the information from PIO.
- The CIC has penalised two officials of IIT Kharagpur for allegedly delaying information sought under the RTI Act. While ordering that Rs. 15,000 /- each to be deducted from the salaries of PIO.
- Prof also given Rs. 5,000 /- as compensation. Student employ RTI to bring changes :- (The Times of India, Lucknow Dt. 29/05/2011)
- 9 RTI application filed by school children in UP governments health department demanding information why tobacco retaill shops are allowed to operate within the 100 yards of educational institution of ban, who is responsible to enforce tobacco law in Lucknow, what action should be taken against the official for not taking any action,
- A student filed RTI applications with the Lucknow Municipal Corporation demanding information on why garbage is dumped in public places, who is responsible to remove it, what action will be taken, and when garbage will be removed.
- These students were part of the recently held summer training camp in which they were taught by Magsaysay award winner social activist Sandeep Pandey and social activist Bobby Ramakant as how to draft an RTI application and use it as a tool to curb corruption and make state government agencies do their job.
- Most of the children who have filed applications are students of Class 9 to 12 AISHWARYA 9 YEARS OLD FILED RTI IN NOV.2009 Bihar Shows the way in RTI Helpline will empower people, bring accountability (The Times of India, Dt. 29/01/2007, Sections Times Nations) Now, instead of writing an application for seeking information under the RTI Act and submitting it to concerned departments, all one has to do is dial a number where an attendant processes the request and sends an application to the concerned official. A duplicate copy is forwarded to the district magistrate through email followed by a fax message. A copy of the application will be delivered at the callers address within three days. Plus, the caller will be given a special number for follow-up action, says A Subhani, secretary, personnel, Bihar. A Rs 10 RTI application fee will be added to the telephone call charge. This helpline will be launched in coordination with an NGO, Parivartan.
Now RTI on wheels to answer your RTI queries :- (Express India, Ahmedabad 23/02/2008)
- For the first time in India, a vehicle is being exclusively designed to create awareness as well as help the people of Gujarat to use their RTI effectively.
- This initiative taken by Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pehal (MAGP), Ahmedabad this vehicle will be equipped by LCD computer, internet, printer, scanner, copier. Manned by two volunteer, the vehicle will screen films on RTI, distribute pamphlets, hold peoples discussion on the act and assist people to file application seeking information Chitkara Institutions covered under RTI Act :- (Indian Express, Chandigarh, Dt. 1/06/2011)
- Sardavinder Goyal filed an RTI application in September 2010 seeking some information from MD of Chitkara Instituitions, Patiala. - Management denied the information under RTI saying that they are self financed institution that received no grant from Govt. agency. - Getting no response he filed a complaint with the State Information Commission. - In December 2010 Chitkara Education Trust granted permission to run Chitkara University. - Consequently being a university Chitkara covered under RTI Act.
Reliance Infra comes under RTI:- (DNA,Mumbai Dt. 21/7/2011)
- RTI Activist Anil Galgali filed an RTI application to Reliance Infra regarding meter connection details.
- He was denied information saying that they are not the public authority.
- Anil filed a complaint to Maharashtra State Information Commission against the denial of Reliance Infra.
- Justifying the order, the commission said though Rinfra is a private company, Reliance Energy provides essential public service and hence should come under the Act.
- Commission also stated that since the company was formed and given work under the Electricity Act, 2003 and supplying power is a public service under this Act.
RTI Act not applicable to Reliance Infra :- (The Times of India,Mumbai, Dt. 14/10/2011)
Reliance infrastructure moved to Bombay HC against the order of Maharashtra Information Commission.
- Division of bench of HC said that Reliance does not fall in the category of Public Authority as it is a private company.
- Judges also added that merely by providing essential services of power distribution, they can not be termed as Public Authority.
- HC granted the stay on the decision of Maharashtra SIC.
Torrent Power refuses to give information under RTI :- (Indian Express, Ahmedabad, Dt. 19-03-2010)
Applicant had sought information on power failures, shutdowns, interruptions at Rajnagar complex, Narayan Nagar and Paldi areas of Ahmedabad.
The applicant had sought information regarding the types of power failures, power outages, shutdowns, interruptions at Rajnagar complex, Narayan Nagar road and Paldi areas in Ahmedabad between January 1, 2009 and November 2009.
In its reply sent on January 16, 2010, the company said the information cannot be shared as they are not a public authority as mentioned in Section 2 (h) of the Act.
Reacting to this, the Chief Information Commissioner, Government of India, Wajahat Habibullah, told The Indian Express: As far as I am concerned, yes, they (Torrent Power) have to be under the ambit of RTI Act. But it depends on a lot of things, including investment by the government, whether the government has any stake or not.
The Supreme Court said examinees have a right to inspect answer-sheets under the transparency law. The evaluated answer-sheets are covered under the definition of the information under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, a Bench comprising Justices R V Raveendran and A K Patnaik said.
It upheld the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which had said rejection for inspection of answer-sheets cannot be sustained.
The apex court dismissed the appeals of CBSE, West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, West Bengal Council for Higher Education, University of Calcutta, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and West Bengal Central School Service Commission which had challenged the February 5, 2009 judgment.
The apex court agreed with the findings of the High Court that the examination conducting bodies do not retain the evaluated answer- sheets under any fiduciary capacity.
SC : STUDENTS HAVE RIGHT TO EXAMINE ANSWER SHEETS CBSE & Anthr v/s.Aditya Bandopadhyay & Athrs. (Dt. 9/08/2011) Retired judges to be appointed as Information Commission
..the necessary qualification required for appointment as Chief Information Commissioner or Information Commissioner is that the person should have wide knowledge and experience in law and other specified fields.
it must be termed as a judicial Tribunal which requires to be manned by a person of judicial mind,
Two member, one Judicial member and One Expert member
SC : Retired Judges to be appointed as Information Commisioner Namit Sharma v/s.Union of India (Dt. of Judgement. 13/09/ 2012) Cont
The Supreme Court's order mandating the appointment of a judicial member and an expert to hear RTI-related cases, has crippled functioning of one-fourth of the country's 28 information commissions.
.Intervention petition filed in SC by Aruna Roy & Shailesh Gandhi, SC granted stay on judgement thereafter disputed part was removed from the judgement
Supreme Court order leads to RTI logjam across states (Times of India, 30/09/2012) Cont Cont The Hon'ble Supreme Court had held in the Namit Sharma case that the cases coming up before the Information Commission should be in benches of two members and one of which should be from a judicial background. Further, the SC had directed for appointing the retired High Court judges as the Chief Information Commissioner.
Hearing a review petition, a bench of the Hon'ble Justice A.K. Patnaik and Hon'ble Justice Arjan Kumar Sikri of the SC has stayed its order in the Namit Sharma case thus partially paving way for filling of the vacancies of the Information Commissioner in the country.
Cont Source :- http://www.rtifoundationofindia.com/originalcontent.php?oid=3629 BCCI not Public Authority Om Prakash Kashiram v/s. BCCI* CIC Judgment Dt. 11 th July, 2011 BCCI under RTI ? (Times of India, Dt. 30/08/2011) National Sports (Development), Bill 2011 BCCI, IOA & Other sports body opposed WADA is of the opinion that BCCI should be covered under RTI Bill rejected by Cabinet on 30 th
August) After the enactment of the BCCI will be covered under RTI * Source :- http://rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_LS_A_2011_001382_M_63301.pdf NSE should disclose information under RTI Act: Delhi High Court :-
The court has upheld the decision of the Central Information Commission which had declared that the stock exchange is a public authority The Delhi High Court today said that the National Stock Exchange (NSE) is a public authority and is bound to reveal information under the Right to Information (RTI) Act,
The CIC had in 2007 held that stock exchanges are quasi- governmental bodies which are bound to disclose information to the public under the RTI Act.
A stock exchange being a quasi-governmental body working under the statute and exercising statutory powers has to be held to be a public authority under the Act Source :- http://www.moneylife.in/article/nse-should-disclose-information-under-rti-act-delhi-high-court/4796.html April 15, 2010 MCX ready to come under RTI Act; other exchanges still reluctant :-
MCX is in favour of bringing exchanges under the Right to Information (RTI). The exchange will work with policymakers to develop a framework for exchanges RTI policy. This is in stark contrast with other exchanges like the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), which so far have resisted any attempt to bring them under ambit of the RTI Act. Source :- http://www.moneylife.in/article/mcx-ready-to-come-under-rti-act-other-exchanges-still-reluctant/23905.html Dt. February 25, 2012 1. Congress Rs. 1385.36 Crore 2. BJP Rs. 682 Crore 3. NCP Rs. 141.34 Crore 4. BSP Rs. 147.18 Crore 5. RJD Rs. 2.85 Crore etc.
The information came through a petition filed by Hisar based RTI activist Ramesh Verma before the Income Tax department.
Political parties are exempted from tax on their income through Section 13 A of IT Act 1961. They have to, however, maintain a book of account for donations or income above Rs 20,000.
Rs 2,490 Crore tax-exemption given to political parties in 5 years (Obtained through RTI Application) :- Source :- http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/rs-2-490-cr-tax-exemption-given-to-political- parties-in-5-years_814239.html, December 2, 2012 MISUSE OF RTI :- Man files 550 RTIs for missing wife (The Times of India, Mumbai 25/07/2011)
Ramshankar Saroj, 10 TH Class pass, autorickshaw driver has filed around 550 RTIs in a little over three years. That works out to around one RTI every two days.
While Saroj may be on his way to finding himself a place in the record books, the Dharavi police, who have had to reply to the queries, are not amused. They say Saroj is making their lives "miserable" and they have closed the case for which he is repeatedly filing queries.
The case in which Saroj has filed around 550 RTIs in 1,133 days began with a missing person's complaint he filed for his wife, Shilpa, 35, on May 21, 2008.
Ramashakar has also filed 800 RTIs to BruhadMumbai in connection with illegal Slum Rehabilitation Authority (TOI, Mumbai, Dt. 27 th July, 2011) MISUSE OF RTI :- HC fines man Rs 50,000 for seeking private information RTI (DNA, Mumbai, 7 th March 2012)
- A man pursued the litigation to Delhi High Court against his father, regarding Sales Tax Return under RTI.
- He was denied information by PIO, Appellate Authority and CIC.
- He approached the Delhi High Court against the order of CIC.
- The information asked is confidential and private in nature. The present appeal is abuse of the process of law and thus fine is invited.
- The HC said the purpose of the RTI was not to enable a person take undue advantage of the law to settle personal scores.
MISUSE OF RTI :- Abstract from the judgment delivered on August 9 th , 2011 CBSE Anrs. v/s. Aditya Bandopadhyays Anrs. (Civil Appeal 6454/2011 Supreme Court) - ..Indiscriminate & Impractical demands or directions under RTI Act for disclosure of all and sundry information (unrelated to transparency & accountability in the functioning of public authorities & eradication of corruption) would be counter- productive as it will adversely affect the efficiency of the administration and result in the executive getting bogged down with the non-productive work of collecting and furnishing information.
- The RTI Act should not be allowed to be misused or abused , to become a tool to obstruct the national development and integration or to destroy the peace, harmony among its citizen. Nor it should be converted into a tool of oppression and intimidation of honest official striving to do their duty.
- .The nation does not want a scenario where 75% staff of public authorities spends 75% of their time in collecting and furnishing information to applicant instead of discharging their regular duties.
Parents use RTI to access answer papers of kid's classmates :- (Times of India, 25/09/2010)
- Competitive parenting has reached a new level, with parents taking the RTI route to lay their hands on the Secondary School Leaving Certificate (Class 10th) answer scripts of their kid's classmates.
- Karnataka Secondary Education Board has written to the Karnataka government seeking its permission to exempt processing of answer sheets under RTI.
- "We're getting a lot of RTI queries for other students' papers. We cannot encourage that. We cannot keep giving somebody's answer sheets to others," said KSEEB director
- Students can seek a photocopy of the answer sheet for a fee of Rs 300 per paper. Revaluation costs Rs 700 and retotalling Rs 150. An RTI request costs a mere Rs 10.
6 YEARS ON VACANCIES MAKING RTI INEFFECTIVE IN GUJARAT (The Times of India, Ahmedabad, 13/10/2011)
- Several vacancies in the state information commission and slow disposal rate of application casting a shadow
- Even after six years of implementation of RTI, the information commission does not have adequate infrastructure and staff.
- There are more than 8000 cases pending with the commission. Today, if one complaint or appeal is filed, the applicant has to wait for at least two years for first hearing because of the vacant posts.
- There are 10 vacant posts including those of Chief Information Commissioner and information commissioner.
- In Gujarat RTI applicant are mostly from rural and semi urban areas seeking information on issue like MNREGA payments and housing
Sandesh, Surat Dt. September 18, 2012 CIC FINES BABUS IN LESS THAN 1 % CASES (The Times of India, Mumbai Dt. 15/10/2011)
- CIC is handling babus with kid-gloves for not providing information within the prescribed time frame of RTI. Under the act, the chief information commissioner can impose a penalty and order compensation and disciplinary action against erring public information officer.
- Since 2006-07, the CIC has imposed penalties in only 648 cases (less than 1%) under the act, even though it has disposed of 75,284 appeals/complaints out of 94,209 since 2006-2007.The CIC sanctioned compensation in only 134 cases in six years. In 22 cases, disciplinary action against the chief information officer.
- RTI activists feel this emboldens CPIOs, allows them to grimace at information-seekers and does not deter other CPIOs from refusing to give information on flimsy grounds. Anil Galgali, a RTI activist, said, "This also demoralizes information-seekers who are denied information on one pretext or the other, are driven away and involves waste of time, money and energy of the information-seekers."
RTI ACT NEEDS A CRITICAL REVIEW : MANMOHAN SINGH (6 th Annual Convention of Information Commissioners, New Delhi) (The Times of India, Ahmedabad, 14/10/2011)
- Law should not adversely affect the deliberative processes in the government
- RTI Act had been effective but there were concerns that it could end up discouraging honest, well meaning public servants from giving full expression to their views.
- even as we recognise and celebrate the efficacy and the effectiveness of the RTI, we must take a critical look at it. There are concerns that need to be discussed and addressed honestly
- It was not desirable to have a situation in which an authority was flooded with request for information having no bearing on public interest ARUNA ROY BLAST PM FOR REMARK (The Times of India, Ahmedabad, Dt. 16/10/2011)
- Trasperancy advocate Aruna Roy slammed PM Manmohan Singhs statement saying that the RTI was adversely affecting deliberation in the government and deterring honest official from expressing their views on file.
- Roy said We reject the suggestions that transparency makes bureaucrats inefficient. The government has always been inefficient. Papers accessed by us through RTI have proved this
- In the last six years, information received by the people has created upheaval in governance. What has upset the system in the scam. Instead of welcoming transparency, the persistence for amendments is wrong she added
BRING CORPORATES UNDER RTI : NITISH KUMAR (6th Annual Convention of Information Commissioners, New Delhi) (The Times of India, Ahmedabad, Dt. 16/10/2011)
- Nitish Kumar made a strong push for expanding the scope of RTI, demanding that corporates sector and public private partnership (PPP) projects be brought under it.
- He urged that authority not to fight shy of parting with information, governments would gradually get used to transparency.
- Prevailing culture of secrecy leads authorities to resist even sharing even innocuous information with people, he said dissemination of information could actually help governments do a course correction. NO PROPOSAL TO REVIEW RTI SALMAN KHURSID (The Times of India, Ahmedabad, 16/10/2011)
- Salman Khursid clarified that there was no proposal for a relook at the RTI Act
- He also said We are proud of RTI. We are pleased that we gave RTI to this country. Even if it causes inconvenience to this country to an extent, we will bear that inconvenience. But we must ensure that in totality, the efficiency and functioning of government is strengthened
Effectiveness: More than 90% Arunachal Pradesh
Effectiveness: 70 to 80% Nagaland
Effectiveness: 60 to 70% Tripura Manipur
Effectiveness: 50 to 60% Karnataka
Effectiveness: 40 to 50% Assam Kerela Gujarat Punjab Orissa Bihar
Effectiveness: 20 to 30% Andhra Pradesh Central Information Commission Rajasthan West Bengal
Inadequate Data Meghalaya Mizoram * Sources :- http://www.rtiawards.org/images/final_report.pdf (Public Cause Research Foundation a Trust (www.pcrf.in), New Delhi is the secretariat of RTI Awards Effectiveness of Information Commissioner * :-
- The National Council of Educational Research & Training (NCERT) has decided to print an RTI message in textbook for classes from VI to VIII, stating that the law combats corruptions and promotes transparency and accountability in the government machinery.
- The message to be displayed on the inner side of the textbook back cover is expected to reach nearly one crore students in 2012 Govt to go textbook on RTI,extol its virtue in school :- Hindustan Times, New Delhi Dt. 20/08/2012
RTI ACTIVISTS KILLED :-
1. Satish Shetty from Pune. He exposed many land scam (Jan 2010) 2. Lalitkumar Mehta from Jharkhand. He exposed corruption in MGNRGA (May 2008) 3. Vishram Dodiya of Ahmedabad filed a RTI application to get details about the illegal electricity connection by a private firm. (February 2010) 4. Dattatray Patil of Kolhapur. He exposed fake registration of handloom (May 2010) 5. Vitthal Gite - He exposed scam in local school (April 2010) 6. Satyendra Dubey , IIT Kanpur graduate, a project director of NHAI murdered in Gaya Bihar after fighting corruption in the highway construction project. (Nov 2003) 7. Manjunath IIM- L graduate was killed trying to expose corruption in petroleum marketing. (Nov. 2005) 8. Amit Jethwa from Ahmedabad shot dead near Gujarat High Court. He filed PIL in Gujarat HC about illegal mining in Gir Forest.. (July 2010) 9. Shela Masood shot dead at Bhopal (August, 2011) SATYENDRA DUBEY (IEC) B. Tech (IIT Kanpur), M. Tech (BHU) Civil Engi Project Dir. of NHAI - Died on 24/11/2003 MANJUNATH SHANMUGAM IIM Lucknow (2003) Marketing Manager of IOCL Died Nov 2005 www.manjunathshanmugamtrust.org Regi. on 23/02/2006, Manjunath Birth Anniversary Amit Jethwa, an Environmentalist & RTI Activist shot dead opp. Gujarat High Court in July 2010 Anna Supporter and RTI Activist Shehla Masood shot dead in Bhopal on 16 th August , 2011
SUGGESTION ON RTI ACTIVIST KILLINGS :-
According to RTI activist Vivek Deveshwar from Bangaluru,
My personal advice is that if there is an issue, then only one person should not be involved in exposing it. Let hundreds of people come forward and seek the same information. This will deter the culprit in question since he cannot go around killing so many people."
This issue should not just be limited to activists. Even the common man should come forward and file such applications. The government ought to take a lead in such matters and create more awareness
THE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE & PROTECTION TO PERSON MAKING THE DISCLOSURE BILL, 2010 :-
A bill to establish a mechanism to receive complaint to disclosure on any allegation of corruption or willful misuse of power or willful misuse of discretion against any public servant and to inquire and cause any inquiry into such disclosure and to provide adequate safeguards against victimization of the person making such complaint.. Whistle Blowers Act
Format of Application :-
- There is no prescribed format for application for seeking information at central level. The application can be made on simple paper. The application should however have the name and complete postal address of the applicant. Even in the case where the information is sought electronically, the application should contain name and postal address of the applicant.
- States are given power under section 27 of RTI Act, 2005 to make Rules, prescribing various forms, fees for RTI application, appeal etc.
-The information seeker is not required to give reason for seeking information. (Sec 6)
Fees for seeking Information :- -Fees of Rs. 10 with application (Cash / DD / IPO /,)* (may vary state to state, Kerala Rs. 10, Guj. Rs. 20, Delhi Rs. 25, Haryana Rs. 50)
Further Fees towards the cost of providing the information, details of which shall be intimated to the applicant by the PIO as prescribed by Right to Information (Regulation of Fee & Cost) Rules 2005. Rates of Fees as prescribed in the rules are given below.
- Rs. 2 for each page (A4/A3) created or copied - Actual charge or cost price of a copy in a larger size copy. - Actual cost or price for model or samples. - For information provided in diskette/floppy etc. Rs. 50 per diskette/floppy
As already pointed out , a citizen has right to inspect the records of the public authority. For inspection of records, the public authority shall charge no fees for first hour. But a fee of Rs. 5 for subsequent hour (or fraction thereof ) shall be charged
* States are given power under Sec. 27 of RTI Act to make rules prescribing forms, fees for RTI application, appeal etc.
Time limit for Providing Information :-
Information to be provided as expeditiously as possible and not later than 30 days,
48 hours where life or liberty is involved,
35 days where request is given to Assistant PIO,
40 days where third party is involved and
45 days for information about human rights violation from listed security/ intelligence agencies. APPELLATE AUTHORITY Appellate officer Under RTI Act, 2005 Vice Chancellor Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat 2 STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER Registrar Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat 1 STATE INFORMATION COMISSIONER Bureau of Economics & Statistics Building Sector 18 Gandhinagar 3 (Illustration State Level) Flow of Appeal :- When you file an application for information under RTI Act to VNSGU 30 days 1 st Appl. 90 days 2 nd Appeal APPEAL TO BE DISPOSED IN 30 DAYS EXTENDED TO 45 DAYS No time limit for disposal INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN IN 30 DAYS APPELLATE AUTHORITY Appellate officer Under RTI Act, 2005 Aaykar Bhavan Ahmedabad 2 CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER Aaykar Bhavan Ahmedabad 1 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONER August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place New Delhi 110 066 3 (Illustration - Central Level) Flow of Appeal :- When you file an application for information under RTI Act to Income Tax Dept. 30 days 1 st Appl. 90 days 2 nd Appeal APPEAL TO BE DISPOSED IN 30 DAYS EXTENDED TO 45 DAYS No time limit for disposal INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN IN 30 DAYS
Govt. puts 500 word limit on RTI pleas :-
An application shall be accompanied by a fee of Rs 10 and shall ordinarily not contain more than 500 words, excluding annexures, containing address of the Central Public Information Officer and that of the applicant
The rules, however, said no application shall be rejected on the ground that it contains more than 500 words. Source :- http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271230/govt-puts-500-word-limit.html
Specific Question to be asked in RTI Application :-
(1) How many number of students got GPAT-2011 stipend from Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Science (Manipal University, Karnataka), for academic year 2012-2013?
(2) Even though our college has applied and I am GPAT qualified, I didnt get stipend yet I want justification. - Do not ask question starting from Why - Ask question preferably starting from What, When etc.
COMPLAINTS (Sec. 18) :-
If a person is unable to submit a PIO either by reason that such an officer has not been appointed by the concerned public authority or Asst PIO has refused to accept his or her application or appeal for forwarding the same to the PIO or Appellate Authority as the case may be or he has been refused to access to any information requested by him under RTI Act or he has not been given any response to a request for information within time limit specified under the act or he has been required to pay an amount of fees which he considers unreasonable or he believes that he has been given incomplete, misleading or false information
He can make a complaint to Information Commission Central / State Information Commission as the case may be Section 20 of RTI Act, 2005 PENALTIES:- - Refused to receive an application or has not furnished any information Rs. 250 per day till application is received or information furnished maximum to Rs. 25,000 /- - Malafidely denied the request for information or destroyed information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete, misleading information then disciplinary action can be taken the information officer Section 19 (8) (b) of RTI Act, 2005 - COMPENSATION:-
Under Section 19(8)(b) of the RTI Act, the CIC or the SIC, can require the Public Authority to compensate the complainant / appellant for any loss or detriment suffered. The complainant / appellant should be able to justify the claim for compensation as well as the amount of compensation sought.
Section 19 (8) (b) of RTI Act, 2005 - COMPENSATION:-
HC orders compensation for not providing info under RTI Act PTI | 10:10 PM, Oct 01,2010
New Delhi, Oct 1 (PTI): The Delhi High Court has asked the Public Information Officer of Directorate of Delhi Health Service(DHS) to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation to a poor man for not providing information pertaining to his treatment in a hospital within the stipulated time under RTI Act.
Justice S Muralidhar upheld Central Information Commission's(CIC) August 20 order and dismissed an appeal filed by DHS challenging the compensation awarded by the CIC. "....Any delay in providing timely information can result in a person belonging to the Economic Weaker Section (EWS) having to needlessly spend valuable resources for medical treatment which should otherwise be available to such person free of cost.
SECTION 26 of RTI ACT, 2005 GOVT TO PREPARE PROGRAMME.:-
The appropriate government may, to the extent of availability of financial and other resources - develop and organize educational programmes to advance the understanding of the public, in particular of disadvantaged communities as to how to exercise the rights contemplated under this Act RTI Application Annexure 1 RTI 1 st Appeal RTI 2 nd Appeal RTI Application RTI 1 st Appeal RTI 2 nd Appeal Order of 2 nd
Appeal Small Survey on awareness on RTI * :- (Informal)
1. 14% people do not know about the RTI Act, 2005 2. 63% people do not know how to make an RTI Application 3. 80% people are of the opinion that Govt. is not taking much initiative for dissemination of RTI Act. 4. 49% people are of the opinion that media is not playing active role for dissemination of RTI Act. * Total respondent 100 (Most of having PG degrees.)
(C) K L GUPTA (C) K L GUPTA spc.ahmedabad@indiapost.gov.in spc.ahmedabad@indiapost.gov.in spc.ahmedabad@indiapost.gov.in spc.ahmedabad@indiapost.gov.in (C) K L GUPTA SOME IMPORTANT WEBSITES :-
1. www.rti.gov.in (Govt. of Indias most imp website on RTI) 2. www.cic.gov.in (Central Information Commissioner, New Delhi 3. www.rti.india.gov.in 4. www.rti.org.in 5. www.gic.guj.nic.in (Gujarat Information Commissioner) 6. www.sic.maharashtra.gov.in (Maharashtra Information Commissioner) 7. www.ric.rajasthan.gov.in (Rajasthan Information Commissioner) 8. www.rtiawards.org
Note :- Please visit website of other State Information Commissioner for more information.
Exercise on RTI Application
Form at least 3 questions to be asked in RTI Application regarding Drainage complaint redressal in Municipal Corporation
1. What is the role & duty of Pandesara Ward Office? 2. Which are the area covered by Pandesara Ward Office? 3. What is the sanctioned strength of the staff what is present situation of staff strength in the said ward. Give details of last 5 years? 4. How many complaints received regarding drainage cleaning in last 4 months, date of complaint, date of redressal of the complaint ? 5. How many complaints received by House No. C/387 to 398, Hariomanagar, Pandesara 394221 ? 6. Who are the responsible officers for the redressal of the complaint ? 7. Which are the action can be taken against the officers in failing duties i.e. drainage cleaning ?
Kalpeshkumar L Gupta Academic Associate IIM Ahmedabad advocatekgupta@gmail.com klgupta@iimahd.ernet.in Mob 99248 97691 (c) K L Gupta
Job Demand, Family Supportive Organizational Culture and Positive Spillover From Work-To-Family Among Employees in The Information Technology Enabled Services in India